ECHA decisions on data sharing disputes under REACH

ECHA decisions on data sharing disputes under REACH TABS

ECHA Decisions on data sharing disputes table 2014-2016

 

Issue date Decision Legal basis Outcome
for the claimant		 Keywords
24/11/2016 [PDF] 30(3) unfavourable SIEF,
The legitimacy of the lead registrant
Opt-out, the purity profile
SIEF members
Studies
13/10/2016 [PDF] 30(3) favourable SIEF
Lack of transparency regarding administrative cost
Token and opt-out
13/10/2016 [PDF] 30(3) unfavourable SIEF
02/09/2016 [PDF] 30(3) favourable SIEF
Lack of transparency regarding cost breakdown
Unjustified increase of LoA price
Lack of reimbursement mechanism
29/06/2016 [PDF] 30(3) favourable SIEF
Lack of transparency regarding cost breakdown
Delays in providing SIEF agreement and cost calculation
13/04/2016 [PDF] 30(3) favourable SIEF
Lack of transparency regarding cost breakdown
Administrative cost shared equally by all co-registrants regardless of tonnage band
12/04/2016 [PDF] 30(3) unfavourable SIEF
25/11/2015 [PDF] 30(3) favourable
SIEF
Delays in providing SIEF agreement and cost calculation,
Responsibility of the Only Representative for data sharing
07/09/2015 [PDF] 30(3) favourable
SIEF
Lack of discount for REACH-only use of data
Lack of justification for application of risk premium
22/07/2015 [PDF] 30(3) unfavourable SIEF
30/01/2015 [PDF] 30(3) unfavourable
SIEF
26/08/2014 [PDF] 27(6) favourables
Inquiry
Group claim
Lack of transparency regarding cost breakdown
Lack of transparency regarding cost sharing mechanism
26/08/2014 [PDF] 27(6) favourables
Inquiry
Group claim
Lack of transparency regarding cost breakdown
Lack of transparency regarding cost sharing mechanism
11/04/2014 [PDF] 30(3) unfavourable SIEF
03/04/2014 [PDF] 30(3) favourables SIEF
Group claim
Lack of transparency regarding cost breakdown
Lack of transparency regarding cost sharing mechanism
25/02/2014 [PDF] 30(3) unfavourable SIEF

 

*) Note that decisions marked with an asterisk were closed without a final decision granting permission to refer being issued, as the claimant did not provide to ECHA a proof of the payment to the other party of a share of the costs incurred or the dispute was otherwise withdrawn.