Cauzele în care ECHA este pârâtă sau intervenientă

Acest tabel conține toate cauzele închise pentru care instanța a adoptat o hotărâre și în care ECHA a fost parte. Părțile interesate pot consulta cu ușurință deciziile care pot fi relevante pentru acestea și care se încadrează în sfera activităților principale ale ECHA (REACH, CLP, printre altele). Pentru unele dintre cauze, poate să existe un recurs pendinte sau o retrimitere, de asemenea menționate în tabel. Tabelul nu cuprinde cauze care au ca obiect personalul sau achizițiile.

Cauzele închise de instanță sunt clasificate în opt categorii:

REACH Lista substanțelor candidate: cauze referitoare la identificarea unei substanțe ca prezentând motive de îngrijorare deosebită;
Înregistrare REACH: cauze cu privire la obligația de transmitere în comun a datelor;
REACH Autorizare: cauze referitoare la includerea unei substanțe pe lista de autorizare (anexa XIV) și cererile de autorizare;
REACH Evaluare: cauze în care ECHA a solicitat informații din partea unui solicitant al înregistrării în cadrul procedurii de evaluare (articolele 40, 41 sau 46 din REACH);
CLH: cauze privind armonizarea clasificării unei substanțe;
Biocide: cauze referitoare la biocide;
ATD: cauze legate de solicitările de acces la documente;
Mărimea întreprinderii: cauze legate de verificarea mărimii întreprinderii și taxele aferente.

Case number	Parties	Keywords	Main Legal Provisions	Procedurally linked cases	Date of the ruling
T-669/15 R	Lysoform Dr. Hans Rosemann and Others v ECHA	Application for interim measures — REACH — Making available on the market and use of biocidal products — Inclusion of a company as a supplier of an active substance on the list referred to in Article 95 of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 — Application for suspension of operation — Lack of urgency	Art. 278, 279, 256(1) of TFEU; Art. 95 of BPR; Art. 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights	Initial Case: T-669/15 Appeal on the Initial Case: C-663/16 P	17/12/2015
T-543/15R	Lysoform Dr. Hans Rosemann and Others v ECHA	Application for interim measures — REACH — Making available on the market and use of biocidal products — Inclusion of a company as a supplier of an active substance on the list referred to in Article 95 of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 — Application for suspension of operation — Lack of urgency	Art. 278, 279, 256(1) of TFEU; Art. 95 of BPR; Art. 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights	Initial Case: T-543/15 Appeal on the Initial Case: C-666/16 P	17/12/2015
T-669/15	Lysoform Dr. Hans Rosemann and Others v ECHA	Actions for annulment — Inclusion as supplier of an active substance on the list provided for in Article 95 of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 — Lack of direct concern — Inadmissibility	Art. 95 of BPR; Art. 263 of TFEU	Proceedings for interim measures T-669/15 R Appeal C-663/16 P	12/10/2016
T-543/15	Lysoform Dr. Hans Rosemann and Others v ECHA	Actions for annulment — Inclusion as supplier of an active substance on the list provided for in Article 95 of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 — Lack of direct concern — Inadmissibility	Art. 95 of BPR; Art. 263 of TFEU	Proceedings for interim measures T-543/15 R Appeal C-666/16 P	12/10/2016
C-663/16 P	Lysoform Dr. Hans Rosemann and Ecolab Deutschland v ECHA	Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice –– Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 — Making available on the market and use of biocidal products — Article 95 — European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) — Publication of a list of active substances — Inclusion of a company as a supplier of an active substance	Art. 130(1), 130(7) and 181 of the Rules of Procedure	Initial Case: T-669/15 Proceedings for interim measures: T-669/15 R	19/07/2017
C-666/16 P	Lysoform Dr. Hans Rosemann and Ecolab Deutschland v ECHA	Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice –– Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 — Making available on the market and use of biocidal products — Article 95 — European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) — Publication of a list of active substances — Inclusion of a company as a supplier of an active substance	Art. 130(1) and 130(7) of the Rules of Procedure	Initial Case: T-543/15 Proceedings for Interim Measures: T-543/15 R	19/07/2017
T-243/17	Ecolab Deutschland and Lysoform Dr. Hans Rosemann v ECHA	Removal from the register	Art. 263 of TFEU		18/10/2017
T-347/18	Laboratoire Pareva and Biotech3D v Commission	Biocidal products – Active substance PHMB (1415; 4.7) – Refusal of approval for product-types 1, 5 and 6 – Conditional approval for product-types 2 and 4 – Risks to human health and the environment – Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 – Article 6(7)(a) and (b) of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1062/2014 – Harmonised classification of the active substance under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 – Prior consultation of the ECHA – Manifest error of assessment – Read-across – Right to be heard	Regulation (EU) 528/2012, Article 6(7)(a) and (b) of the Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1062/2014, Regulation (EC) 1272/2008		15/09/2021
T-734/18	Sumitomo Chemical and Tenka Best v Commission	Removal from the registrer			18/12/2019
T-337/18	Laboratoire Pareva v Commission	Biocidal products – Active substance PHMB (1415; 4.7) – Refusal of approval for product-types 1, 5 and 6 – Conditional approval for product-types 2 and 4 – Risks to human health and the environment – Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 – Article 6(7)(a) and (b) of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1062/2014 – Harmonised classification of the active substance under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 – Prior consultation of the ECHA – Manifest error of assessment – Read-across – Right to be heard	Regulation (EU) 528/2012, Article 6(7)(a) and (b) of the Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1062/2014, Regulation (EC) 1272/2008		15/09/2021
T-199/21	EurO3zon v ECHA	Suspension of evaluation active substance - BPR Regulation			08/04/2023
C-702/21 P	Laboratoire PAREVA S.A.S. v Commission	Appeal – Biocidal products – Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 – Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1062/2014 – Active substance PHMB (1415; 4.7) – Refusal of approval as an existing active substance for use in biocidal products of product-types 1, 5 and 6 – Approval as an existing active substance for use in biocidal products of product-types 2 and 4 – Teratogenic effect – Human health risk assessment	Appeal – Biocidal products – Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 – Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1062/2014 – Active substance PHMB (1415; 4.7) – Refusal of approval as an existing active substance for use in biocidal products of product-types 1, 5 and 6 – Approval as an existing active substance for use in biocidal products of product-types 2 and 4 – Teratogenic effect – Human health risk assessment	Appeal of the Cases T-337/18 and T-347/18	10/11/2022
T-123/20	Sciessent LLC v Commission	Biocidal products – Active substances – Silver zeolite and silver copper zeolite – Refusal of approval for product-types 2 and 7 – Article 4 and Article 19(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 – Efficacy – Active substances for use in treated articles – Assessment of the efficacy of the treated articles themselves – Competence of the Commission – Principle of non-discrimination – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations	Articles 3(1)(I), 4(1), 19(1), 19(2), Annex II, Annex VI of Regulation (No 528/2012)	COM Decision 2019/1973	16/11/2022
T-122/20	Sciessent LLC v Commission	Biocidal products – Active substances – Silver zeolite and silver copper zeolite – Refusal of approval for product-types 2 and 7 – Article 4 and Article 19(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 – Efficacy – Active substances for use in treated articles – Assessment of the efficacy of the treated articles themselves – Competence of the Commission – Principle of non-discrimination – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations	Articles 3(1)(I), 4(1), 19(1), 19(2), Annex II, Annex VI of Regulation (No 528/2012)	COM Decision 2019/1960	16/11/2022