- ECHA
- Despre noi
- Modul nostru de lucru
- Proceduri şi politici
- Transparența
- Cauze în care ECHA este parte
- Company size
Cauzele în care ECHA este pârâtă sau intervenientă
Cauzele în care ECHA este pârâtă sau intervenientă
Cauzele în care ECHA este pârâtă sau intervenientă
Acest tabel conține toate cauzele închise pentru care instanța a adoptat o hotărâre și în care ECHA a fost parte. Părțile interesate pot consulta cu ușurință deciziile care pot fi relevante pentru acestea și care se încadrează în sfera activităților principale ale ECHA (REACH, CLP, printre altele). Pentru unele dintre cauze, poate să existe un recurs pendinte sau o retrimitere, de asemenea menționate în tabel. Tabelul nu cuprinde cauze care au ca obiect personalul sau achizițiile.
Cauzele închise de instanță sunt clasificate în opt categorii:
- REACH Lista substanțelor candidate: cauze referitoare la identificarea unei substanțe ca prezentând motive de îngrijorare deosebită;
- Înregistrare REACH: cauze cu privire la obligația de transmitere în comun a datelor;
- REACH Autorizare: cauze referitoare la includerea unei substanțe pe lista de autorizare (anexa XIV) și cererile de autorizare;
- REACH Evaluare: cauze în care ECHA a solicitat informații din partea unui solicitant al înregistrării în cadrul procedurii de evaluare (articolele 40, 41 sau 46 din REACH);
- CLH: cauze privind armonizarea clasificării unei substanțe;
- Biocide: cauze referitoare la biocide;
- ATD: cauze legate de solicitările de acces la documente;
- Mărimea întreprinderii: cauze legate de verificarea mărimii întreprinderii și taxele aferente.
Case number | Parties | Keywords | Main Legal Provisions | Procedurally linked cases | Date of the ruling |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Crosfield Italia v ECHA | REACH — Fee for registration of a substance — Reduction granted to micro-, small-and medium-sized enterprises — Error in declaration relating to the size of the enterprise — Recommendation 2003/361/EC — Decision imposing an administrative charge — Obligation to state reasons |
Art. 296 of TFEU, Article 20, 91(1) and 94(1) of REACH, Art. 48(2) of the Rules of Procedure of General Court, Art. 6(2) of the Annex to Recommendation 2003/361 |
15/09/2016 | ||
Spraylat v ECHA | REACH — Fee for registration of a substance — Reduction granted to micro-, small and medium-sized enterprises — Error in declaration relating to the size of the enterprise — Decision imposing an administrative charge — Proportionality |
Art. 277 of TFEU; Art. 2 and Table 1 of Decision MB/D/29/2010 |
02/10/2014 | ||
T-656/16 | PM v ECHA | REACH — Fee due for the registration of a substance — Reduction granted to SMEs — Determination of the size of the undertaking — ECHA’s verification of the undertaking’s declaration — Request for evidence demonstrating the status of a SME — Decision imposing an administrative charge | Art. 1(1) and 74(3) of REACH | 03/10/2017 | |
T-758/15 | EDF Toruń v ECHA | REACH — Fee for registration of a substance — Reduction granted to SMEs — Error in the declaration relating to the size of the enterprise — Decision imposing an administrative charge — Recommendation 2003/361/EC — Legitimate expectations — Proportionality — Calculation criteria of the amount of the administrative charge |
Art. 3(36) of REACH; Art. 13 of Regulation No 340/2008 |
18/07/2017 | |
T-675/13 | K Chimica v ECHA | REACH — Fee for registration of a substance — Reduction granted to micro, small and medium-sized enterprises — Error in declaration relating to the size of the enterprise — Recommendation 2003/361/EC — Decision imposing an administrative charge — Determination of an enterprise’s size — Power of the ECHA | Art. 63 of TFEU; Art. 3 of REACH; Art. 6(3) of the Annex to Recommendation 2003/361 | 15/09/2016 | |
T-620/13 | Marchi Industriale v ECHA | REACH — Fee for registration of a substance — Reduction granted to micro-, small and medium-sized enterprises — Error in declaration relating to the size of the enterprise — Recommendation 2003/361/EC — Decision imposing an administrative charge — Determination of the size of the undertaking — Power of the ECHA — Obligation to state reasons | Art. 20 and 91(1) of REACH; Art. 3(2) and 6(2) of the Annex to Recommendation 2003/361 | 15/09/2016 | |
T-392/13 | La Ferla v Commission and ECHA | REACH — Fee for registration of a substance — Reduction granted to micro, small and medium-sized enterprises — Error in declaration relating to the size of the enterprise — Recommendation 2003/361/EC — Decision imposing an administrative charge — Request for information — Power of the ECHA — Proportionality | Art. 263 of TFEU; Art. 3 and 20 of REACH | T-392/13 DEP | 15/09/2016 |
T-540/13 | Société européenne des chaux et liants v ECHA | Action for annulment — REACH — Imposition of an administrative charge for an error in declaration relating to the size of the undertaking — Rules on languages — Period allowed for commencing proceedings — Inadmissibility | Art. 104 of REACH; Art. 134(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court | 02/10/2015 | |
T-89/13 | Calestep v ECHA | REACH — Fee for registration of a substance — Reduction granted to micro, small and medium-sized enterprises — Error in declaration relating to the size of the enterprise — Decision imposing an administrative charge — Recommendation 2003/361/EC — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law | Art. 20, 91 and 94 of REACH; Art. 2(2) of the Annex to Recommendation 2003/361/EC | T-89/13 R | 16/09/2015 |
T-89/13 R | Calestep v ECHA | Reference – Fees and charges payable to ECHA - Reduced fees awarded to small businesses - Verification by ECHA of the declaration on the size of the undertaking - Decision ordering the recovery of the unpaid balance of the full fee due - Application for suspension of operation - Failure to comply with formal requirements - Inadmissibility | Art. 44(1) (c) and 104 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court; Art. 256(1), 278 and 279 of TFEU | T-89/13 | 11/03/2013 |
T-392/13 DEP | La Ferla v Commission and ECHA | Procedure - Taxation of costs |
Art. 140 and 170 of the Rules of Procedure; |
Initial case: T-392/13 |
14/12/2017 |
T-630/16 | Dehtochema Bitumat v ECHA | REACH — Fee payable for registration of a substance — Reduction granted to SMEs — Recommendation 2003/361/EC — Notion of linked undertaking — Submission of a ‘Declaration of Wrong Enterprise Size’ — 50% reduction of the amount of the applicable administrative charge — Authority of the ECHA — Cessation of production of the substance | Art. 134(1) of the Rules of Procedure; Art. 3 and 6 of the Annex to the Recommendation 2003/361/EC | 16/01/2018 | |
T-625/16 R | Przedsiębiorstwo Energetyki Cieplnej v ECHA | REACH — Fee payable for registration of a substance — Reduction granted to SMEs — Error in the declaration relating to the size of the undertaking — Decision imposing an administrative charge — Cessation of production of the substance — Criteria for calculation of the administrative charge — Recommendation 2003/361/EC — Legal certainty — Legitimate expectations — Proportionality — Equal treatment |
Art. 256, 278 and 279 of TFEU; |
Initial case: |
10/03/2017 |
T-855/16 R | Fertisac v ECHA | Interim proceedings — REACH — Fee due for registration of a substance — Reduction granted to micro, small and medium-sized undertakings — Decision imposing an administrative charge and a supplementary fee — Application for suspension of operation — No urgency |
Art. 256, 278 and 279 of TFEU; Art. 156 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court |
Initial case:
|
10/03/2017 |
T-625/16 |
Przedsiebiorstwo Energetyki Cieplnei Sp. z. o.o. v ECHA |
REACH — Fee payable for registration of a substance — Reduction granted to SMEs — Error in the declaration relating to the size of the undertaking — Decision imposing an administrative charge — Cessation of production of the substance — Criteria for calculation of the administrative charge — Recommendation 2003/361/EC — Legal certainty — Legitimate expectations — Proportionality — Equal treatment | Article 6(4), 3(36) and 74(3) of REACH |
Proceedings for interim measures: T-625/16 R |
30/01/2018 |
T-855/16 | Fertisac v ECHA | REACH — Fee payable for registration of a substance — Reduction granted to SMEs — Verification by the ECHA of the declaration relating to the size of the enterprise — Decision imposing an administrative charge — Recommendation 2003/361/EC — Exceeding of financial ceilings — Concept of ‘linked enterprise’ | Art 2(1), 3(2) and 6(2) of the Annex to the Recommendation 2003/361/EC |
Proceedings for interim measures: |
07/03/2018 |
Electroquimica Onubense v ECHA | REACH — Representation by a lawyer who is not a third party — Manifest inadmissibility |
Regulation (EC) No 340/2008 |
08/04/2019 | ||
ECHA v Miejskie Przedsiębiorstwo Energetyki Cieplnej sp. z o.o. | Radiation of the case |
Article 267 TFEU |
04/06/2021 | ||
Novasol S.A. v. ECHA | REACH - Fee for the registration of a substance - Reduction granted to SMEs - Verification by ECHA of the declaration relating to the size of the undertaking - Request for evidence demonstrating SME status - Refusal to provide certain information - Decision ordering recovery of the uncollected amount of the fee due and imposing an administrative charge - Concept of 'related undertaking' - Recommendation 2003/361/EC - Obligation to state motivation |
Article 74(3) of the REACH Regulation (No 1907/2006); Article 13(3) & 13(4) of Regulation 340/2008 |
SME D (2021)8531-DC |
08/03/2023 |