Cauzele în care ECHA este pârâtă sau intervenientă

Acest tabel conține toate cauzele închise pentru care instanța a adoptat o hotărâre și în care ECHA a fost parte. Părțile interesate pot consulta cu ușurință deciziile care pot fi relevante pentru acestea și care se încadrează în sfera activităților principale ale ECHA (REACH, CLP, printre altele). Pentru unele dintre cauze, poate să existe un recurs pendinte sau o retrimitere, de asemenea menționate în tabel. Tabelul nu cuprinde cauze care au ca obiect personalul sau achizițiile.

Cauzele închise de instanță sunt clasificate în opt categorii:

REACH Lista substanțelor candidate: cauze referitoare la identificarea unei substanțe ca prezentând motive de îngrijorare deosebită;
Înregistrare REACH: cauze cu privire la obligația de transmitere în comun a datelor;
REACH Autorizare: cauze referitoare la includerea unei substanțe pe lista de autorizare (anexa XIV) și cererile de autorizare;
REACH Evaluare: cauze în care ECHA a solicitat informații din partea unui solicitant al înregistrării în cadrul procedurii de evaluare (articolele 40, 41 sau 46 din REACH);
CLH: cauze privind armonizarea clasificării unei substanțe;
Biocide: cauze referitoare la biocide;
ATD: cauze legate de solicitările de acces la documente;
Mărimea întreprinderii: cauze legate de verificarea mărimii întreprinderii și taxele aferente.

Case number	Parties	Keywords	Main Legal Provisions	Procedurally linked cases	Date of the ruling
T-360/13	VECCO and Others v Commission (ECHA as intervener)	REACH — Inclusion of chromium trioxide in the list of substances subject to authorisation — Uses or categories of uses exempted from the authorisation requirement — Concept of ‘existing specific Community legislation imposing minimum requirements relating to the protection of human health or the environment for the use of the substance’ — Manifest error of assessment — Proportionality — Rights of the defence — Principle of sound administration	Art. 58(2) of REACH, Art. 1 of Directive 98/24, Art. 40 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union	Appeal: C-651/15 P	25/09/2015
C-651/15 P	VECCO and others v Commission (ECHA as intervener)	Appeal — Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH) — Article 58(2) — Authorisation — Substances of very high concern — Exemption — Regulation amending Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 — Inclusion of chromium trioxide in the list of substances subject to authorisation	Art. 58(2) REACH	Initial case: T-360/13	13/07/2017
T‑837/16	Sweden v Commission (ECHA as intervener)	Commission Decision on the authorisation for the use of yellow and red chromate, molybdate and lead sulfate - Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH) - Articles 60(4) and (5) - Examination of unavailable resolutions as substitutes - Error of law	Articles 60(4) and (5) of REACH	Appeal: C-389/19 P-R	07/03/2019
T‑108/17	ClientEarth v Commission (ECHA as intervener)	REACH — Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 — Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) — Request for internal review of a decision on marketing authorisation rejected as unfounded — Error of law — Manifest error of assessment — Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006	Articles 57(c), 62, 60(7), 62(4), 60(4), 60(5), and 60(2) of REACH		04/04/2019
T‑610/17	ICL-IP Terneuzen, BV, and ICL Europe Coöperatief UA v European Commission (ECHA as intervener)	REACH — Substances subject to authorisation — Inclusion of 1-bromoproprane (nPB) in Annex XIV to Regulation No 1907/2006 — Volumes — Registration dossier — Data — Substance grouping — Principle of sound administration — Right to conduct business and pursue a trade freely — Obligation to state reasons — Legitimate expectations — Proportionality — Equal treatment	Art 57 (c), 58 (3), 59 (8) and Annex XIV of REACH		20/09/2019
C-389/19 P-R	European Commission v. Kingdom of Sweden (ECHA as intervener)	Reference – Appeal – Articles 278 and 279 TFEU – Application for a stay execution – Request for interim measures – Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 – Chemical substances – Classification, labelling and packaging of certain substances and mixtures – Commission Decision on the authorisation for the use of yellow and red chromate, molybdate and lead sulfate	Articles 278 and 279 TFEU	Initial case: T-837/16	21/11/19
C-389/19 P	Commission v Sweden	Appeal – Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 – Registration, evaluation, authorisation and restriction of chemicals – European Commission decision authorising certain uses of lead sulfochromate yellow and lead chromate molybdate sulfate red, substances listed in Annex XIV of that regulation – Substances of very high concern – Conditions of authorisation – Assessment of the lack of suitable alternatives	Article 60(4) of the REACH Regulation No 1907/2006	Appeal of the Case T-837/16	25/02/2021