Fälle mit ECHA als Beklagte oder Streithelferin

In dieser Übersicht sind alle abgeschlossenen Rechtssachen aufgeführt, an denen die ECHA beteiligt war. Interessierte Parteien können leicht auf Entscheidungen zugreifen, die für sie im Rahmen der Kerntätigkeiten der ECHA (u. a. REACH und CLP) von Belang sein können. In einigen Fällen kann ein Rechtsmittel oder eine Zurückverweisung anhängig sein, was in der Übersicht ebenfalls aufgeführt ist. Nicht in der Übersicht enthalten sind Verfahren in Zusammenhang mit dem Personal sowie Beschaffungsverfahren.

Die abgeschlossenen Rechtssachen wurden in acht Kategorien unterteilt:

REACH-Kandidatenliste: Rechtssachen in Verbindung mit der Identifizierung eines Stoffes als besonders besorgniserregend;
Registrierung nach REACH: Fälle im Zusammenhang mit der Verpflichtung zur gemeinsamen Einreichung von Daten;
REACH-Zulassung: Rechtssachen in Verbindung mit der Aufnahme eines Stoffs in das Zulassungsverzeichnis (Anhang XIV) und Zulassungsanträgen;
REACH-Bewertung: Rechtssachen, bei denen die ECHA während des Bewertungsverfahrens (Artikel 40, 41 oder 46 nach REACH) Informationen vom Registranten angefordert hat;
CLH: Rechtssachen betreffend die harmonisierte Einstufung eines Stoffes;
Biozide: Rechtssachen betreffend Biozide;
ATD: Rechtssachen in Verbindung mit Anträgen auf Zugang zu Dokumenten;
Unternehmensgröße: Rechtssachen in Verbindung mit der Überprüfung der Unternehmensgröße und diesbezüglicher Gebühren.

Case number	Parties	Keywords	Main Legal Provisions	Procedurally linked cases	Date of the ruling
T-669/15 R	Lysoform Dr. Hans Rosemann and Others v ECHA	Application for interim measures — REACH — Making available on the market and use of biocidal products — Inclusion of a company as a supplier of an active substance on the list referred to in Article 95 of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 — Application for suspension of operation — Lack of urgency	Art. 278, 279, 256(1) of TFEU; Art. 95 of BPR; Art. 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights	Initial Case: T-669/15 Appeal on the Initial Case: C-663/16 P	17/12/2015
T-543/15R	Lysoform Dr. Hans Rosemann and Others v ECHA	Application for interim measures — REACH — Making available on the market and use of biocidal products — Inclusion of a company as a supplier of an active substance on the list referred to in Article 95 of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 — Application for suspension of operation — Lack of urgency	Art. 278, 279, 256(1) of TFEU; Art. 95 of BPR; Art. 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights	Initial Case: T-543/15 Appeal on the Initial Case: C-666/16 P	17/12/2015
T-669/15	Lysoform Dr. Hans Rosemann and Others v ECHA	Actions for annulment — Inclusion as supplier of an active substance on the list provided for in Article 95 of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 — Lack of direct concern — Inadmissibility	Art. 95 of BPR; Art. 263 of TFEU	Proceedings for interim measures T-669/15 R Appeal C-663/16 P	12/10/2016
T-543/15	Lysoform Dr. Hans Rosemann and Others v ECHA	Actions for annulment — Inclusion as supplier of an active substance on the list provided for in Article 95 of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 — Lack of direct concern — Inadmissibility	Art. 95 of BPR; Art. 263 of TFEU	Proceedings for interim measures T-543/15 R Appeal C-666/16 P	12/10/2016
C-663/16 P	Lysoform Dr. Hans Rosemann and Ecolab Deutschland v ECHA	Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice –– Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 — Making available on the market and use of biocidal products — Article 95 — European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) — Publication of a list of active substances — Inclusion of a company as a supplier of an active substance	Art. 130(1), 130(7) and 181 of the Rules of Procedure	Initial Case: T-669/15 Proceedings for interim measures: T-669/15 R	19/07/2017
C-666/16 P	Lysoform Dr. Hans Rosemann and Ecolab Deutschland v ECHA	Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice –– Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 — Making available on the market and use of biocidal products — Article 95 — European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) — Publication of a list of active substances — Inclusion of a company as a supplier of an active substance	Art. 130(1) and 130(7) of the Rules of Procedure	Initial Case: T-543/15 Proceedings for Interim Measures: T-543/15 R	19/07/2017
T-243/17	Ecolab Deutschland and Lysoform Dr. Hans Rosemann v ECHA	Removal from the register	Art. 263 of TFEU		18/10/2017
T-347/18	Laboratoire Pareva and Biotech3D v Commission	Biocidal products – Active substance PHMB (1415; 4.7) – Refusal of approval for product-types 1, 5 and 6 – Conditional approval for product-types 2 and 4 – Risks to human health and the environment – Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 – Article 6(7)(a) and (b) of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1062/2014 – Harmonised classification of the active substance under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 – Prior consultation of the ECHA – Manifest error of assessment – Read-across – Right to be heard	Regulation (EU) 528/2012, Article 6(7)(a) and (b) of the Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1062/2014, Regulation (EC) 1272/2008		15/09/2021
T-734/18	Sumitomo Chemical and Tenka Best v Commission	Removal from the registrer			18/12/2019
T-337/18	Laboratoire Pareva v Commission	Biocidal products – Active substance PHMB (1415; 4.7) – Refusal of approval for product-types 1, 5 and 6 – Conditional approval for product-types 2 and 4 – Risks to human health and the environment – Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 – Article 6(7)(a) and (b) of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1062/2014 – Harmonised classification of the active substance under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 – Prior consultation of the ECHA – Manifest error of assessment – Read-across – Right to be heard	Regulation (EU) 528/2012, Article 6(7)(a) and (b) of the Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1062/2014, Regulation (EC) 1272/2008		15/09/2021
T-199/21	EurO3zon v ECHA	Suspension of evaluation active substance - BPR Regulation			08/04/2023
C-702/21 P	Laboratoire PAREVA S.A.S. v Commission	Appeal – Biocidal products – Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 – Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1062/2014 – Active substance PHMB (1415; 4.7) – Refusal of approval as an existing active substance for use in biocidal products of product-types 1, 5 and 6 – Approval as an existing active substance for use in biocidal products of product-types 2 and 4 – Teratogenic effect – Human health risk assessment	Appeal – Biocidal products – Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 – Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1062/2014 – Active substance PHMB (1415; 4.7) – Refusal of approval as an existing active substance for use in biocidal products of product-types 1, 5 and 6 – Approval as an existing active substance for use in biocidal products of product-types 2 and 4 – Teratogenic effect – Human health risk assessment	Appeal of the Cases T-337/18 and T-347/18	10/11/2022
T-123/20	Sciessent LLC v Commission	Biocidal products – Active substances – Silver zeolite and silver copper zeolite – Refusal of approval for product-types 2 and 7 – Article 4 and Article 19(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 – Efficacy – Active substances for use in treated articles – Assessment of the efficacy of the treated articles themselves – Competence of the Commission – Principle of non-discrimination – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations	Articles 3(1)(I), 4(1), 19(1), 19(2), Annex II, Annex VI of Regulation (No 528/2012)	COM Decision 2019/1973	16/11/2022
T-122/20	Sciessent LLC v Commission	Biocidal products – Active substances – Silver zeolite and silver copper zeolite – Refusal of approval for product-types 2 and 7 – Article 4 and Article 19(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 – Efficacy – Active substances for use in treated articles – Assessment of the efficacy of the treated articles themselves – Competence of the Commission – Principle of non-discrimination – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations	Articles 3(1)(I), 4(1), 19(1), 19(2), Annex II, Annex VI of Regulation (No 528/2012)	COM Decision 2019/1960	16/11/2022