Sager med ECHA som sagsøgt eller intervenient

Denne tabel indeholder samtlige afsluttede retssager, hvori ECHA har været part. Interesserede parter kan let henvise til afgørelser, der har relevans for dem inden for rammerne af ECHA's hovedaktiviteter (bl.a. REACH og CLP). Nogle af sagerne kan omfatte en endnu ikke færdigbehandlet klage eller tilbagesendelse. Disse fremgår også af tabellen. Tabellen viser ikke personale- eller indkøbssager.

De afsluttede retssager er opdelt i otte kategorier:

Reach-kandidatliste: sager vedrørende identifikation af et stof som et særligt problematisk stof
REACH-registrering: sager vedrørende forpligtelsen til fælles indsendelse af data
Reach-godkendelse: sager vedrørende opførelse af et stof på godkendelseslisten (bilag XIV) og ansøgninger om godkendelse
Reach-evaluering: sager, hvor ECHA har anmodet om oplysninger fra en registrant i forbindelse med vurderingsproceduren (artikel 40, 41 eller 46 i REACH)
CLH: sager vedrørende harmoniseret klassificering af stoffer
Biocider: sager vedrørende biocider
ATD: sager vedrørende anmodninger om aktindsigt i dokumenter
Virksomhedsstørrelse: sager vedrørende verificering af virksomhedsstørrelse og tilhørende gebyrer.

Case number	Parties	Keywords	Main Legal Provisions	Procedurally linked cases	Date of the ruling
T-669/15 R	Lysoform Dr. Hans Rosemann and Others v ECHA	Application for interim measures — REACH — Making available on the market and use of biocidal products — Inclusion of a company as a supplier of an active substance on the list referred to in Article 95 of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 — Application for suspension of operation — Lack of urgency	Art. 278, 279, 256(1) of TFEU; Art. 95 of BPR; Art. 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights	Initial Case: T-669/15 Appeal on the Initial Case: C-663/16 P	17/12/2015
T-543/15R	Lysoform Dr. Hans Rosemann and Others v ECHA	Application for interim measures — REACH — Making available on the market and use of biocidal products — Inclusion of a company as a supplier of an active substance on the list referred to in Article 95 of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 — Application for suspension of operation — Lack of urgency	Art. 278, 279, 256(1) of TFEU; Art. 95 of BPR; Art. 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights	Initial Case: T-543/15 Appeal on the Initial Case: C-666/16 P	17/12/2015
T-669/15	Lysoform Dr. Hans Rosemann and Others v ECHA	Actions for annulment — Inclusion as supplier of an active substance on the list provided for in Article 95 of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 — Lack of direct concern — Inadmissibility	Art. 95 of BPR; Art. 263 of TFEU	Proceedings for interim measures T-669/15 R Appeal C-663/16 P	12/10/2016
T-543/15	Lysoform Dr. Hans Rosemann and Others v ECHA	Actions for annulment — Inclusion as supplier of an active substance on the list provided for in Article 95 of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 — Lack of direct concern — Inadmissibility	Art. 95 of BPR; Art. 263 of TFEU	Proceedings for interim measures T-543/15 R Appeal C-666/16 P	12/10/2016
C-663/16 P	Lysoform Dr. Hans Rosemann and Ecolab Deutschland v ECHA	Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice –– Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 — Making available on the market and use of biocidal products — Article 95 — European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) — Publication of a list of active substances — Inclusion of a company as a supplier of an active substance	Art. 130(1), 130(7) and 181 of the Rules of Procedure	Initial Case: T-669/15 Proceedings for interim measures: T-669/15 R	19/07/2017
C-666/16 P	Lysoform Dr. Hans Rosemann and Ecolab Deutschland v ECHA	Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice –– Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 — Making available on the market and use of biocidal products — Article 95 — European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) — Publication of a list of active substances — Inclusion of a company as a supplier of an active substance	Art. 130(1) and 130(7) of the Rules of Procedure	Initial Case: T-543/15 Proceedings for Interim Measures: T-543/15 R	19/07/2017
T-243/17	Ecolab Deutschland and Lysoform Dr. Hans Rosemann v ECHA	Removal from the register	Art. 263 of TFEU		18/10/2017
T-347/18	Laboratoire Pareva and Biotech3D v Commission	Biocidal products – Active substance PHMB (1415; 4.7) – Refusal of approval for product-types 1, 5 and 6 – Conditional approval for product-types 2 and 4 – Risks to human health and the environment – Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 – Article 6(7)(a) and (b) of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1062/2014 – Harmonised classification of the active substance under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 – Prior consultation of the ECHA – Manifest error of assessment – Read-across – Right to be heard	Regulation (EU) 528/2012, Article 6(7)(a) and (b) of the Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1062/2014, Regulation (EC) 1272/2008		15/09/2021
T-734/18	Sumitomo Chemical and Tenka Best v Commission	Removal from the registrer			18/12/2019
T-337/18	Laboratoire Pareva v Commission	Biocidal products – Active substance PHMB (1415; 4.7) – Refusal of approval for product-types 1, 5 and 6 – Conditional approval for product-types 2 and 4 – Risks to human health and the environment – Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 – Article 6(7)(a) and (b) of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1062/2014 – Harmonised classification of the active substance under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 – Prior consultation of the ECHA – Manifest error of assessment – Read-across – Right to be heard	Regulation (EU) 528/2012, Article 6(7)(a) and (b) of the Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1062/2014, Regulation (EC) 1272/2008		15/09/2021
T-199/21	EurO3zon v ECHA	Suspension of evaluation active substance - BPR Regulation			08/04/2023
C-702/21 P	Laboratoire PAREVA S.A.S. v Commission	Appeal – Biocidal products – Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 – Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1062/2014 – Active substance PHMB (1415; 4.7) – Refusal of approval as an existing active substance for use in biocidal products of product-types 1, 5 and 6 – Approval as an existing active substance for use in biocidal products of product-types 2 and 4 – Teratogenic effect – Human health risk assessment	Appeal – Biocidal products – Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 – Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1062/2014 – Active substance PHMB (1415; 4.7) – Refusal of approval as an existing active substance for use in biocidal products of product-types 1, 5 and 6 – Approval as an existing active substance for use in biocidal products of product-types 2 and 4 – Teratogenic effect – Human health risk assessment	Appeal of the Cases T-337/18 and T-347/18	10/11/2022
T-123/20	Sciessent LLC v Commission	Biocidal products – Active substances – Silver zeolite and silver copper zeolite – Refusal of approval for product-types 2 and 7 – Article 4 and Article 19(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 – Efficacy – Active substances for use in treated articles – Assessment of the efficacy of the treated articles themselves – Competence of the Commission – Principle of non-discrimination – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations	Articles 3(1)(I), 4(1), 19(1), 19(2), Annex II, Annex VI of Regulation (No 528/2012)	COM Decision 2019/1973	16/11/2022
T-122/20	Sciessent LLC v Commission	Biocidal products – Active substances – Silver zeolite and silver copper zeolite – Refusal of approval for product-types 2 and 7 – Article 4 and Article 19(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 – Efficacy – Active substances for use in treated articles – Assessment of the efficacy of the treated articles themselves – Competence of the Commission – Principle of non-discrimination – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations	Articles 3(1)(I), 4(1), 19(1), 19(2), Annex II, Annex VI of Regulation (No 528/2012)	COM Decision 2019/1960	16/11/2022