|
T-360/13
|
VECCO and Others v Commission (ECHA as intervener)
|
REACH — Inclusion of chromium trioxide in the list of substances subject to authorisation — Uses or categories of uses exempted from the authorisation requirement — Concept of ‘existing specific Community legislation imposing minimum requirements relating to the protection of human health or the environment for the use of the substance’ — Manifest error of assessment — Proportionality — Rights of the defence — Principle of sound administration
|
Art. 58(2) of REACH, Art. 1 of Directive 98/24, Art. 40 of the Statute
of the Court of Justice of the European Union
|
Appeal:
C-651/15 P
|
25/09/2015
|
|
C-651/15 P
|
VECCO and others v Commission (ECHA as intervener)
|
Appeal — Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH) — Article 58(2) — Authorisation — Substances of very high concern — Exemption — Regulation amending Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 — Inclusion of chromium trioxide in the list of substances subject to authorisation
|
Art. 58(2) REACH
|
Initial case:
T-360/13
|
13/07/2017
|
|
T‑837/16
|
Sweden v Commission (ECHA as intervener)
|
Commission Decision on the authorisation for the use of yellow and red chromate, molybdate and lead sulfate - Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH) - Articles 60(4) and (5) - Examination of unavailable resolutions as substitutes - Error of law
|
Articles 60(4) and (5) of REACH
|
Appeal:
C-389/19 P-R
|
07/03/2019
|
|
T‑108/17
|
ClientEarth v Commission (ECHA as intervener)
|
REACH — Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 — Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) — Request for internal review of a decision on marketing authorisation rejected as unfounded — Error of law — Manifest error of assessment — Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006
|
Articles 57(c), 62, 60(7), 62(4), 60(4), 60(5), and 60(2) of REACH
|
|
04/04/2019
|
|
T‑610/17
|
ICL-IP Terneuzen, BV, and ICL Europe Coöperatief UA v European Commission (ECHA as intervener)
|
REACH — Substances subject to authorisation — Inclusion of 1-bromoproprane (nPB) in Annex XIV to Regulation No 1907/2006 — Volumes — Registration dossier — Data — Substance grouping — Principle of sound administration — Right to conduct business and pursue a trade freely — Obligation to state reasons — Legitimate expectations — Proportionality — Equal treatment
|
Art 57 (c), 58 (3), 59 (8) and Annex XIV of REACH
|
|
20/09/2019
|
|
C-389/19 P-R
|
European Commission v. Kingdom of Sweden (ECHA as intervener)
|
Reference – Appeal – Articles 278 and 279 TFEU – Application for a stay execution – Request for interim measures – Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 – Chemical substances – Classification, labelling and packaging of certain substances and mixtures – Commission Decision on the authorisation for the use of yellow and red chromate, molybdate and lead sulfate
|
Articles 278 and 279 TFEU
|
Initial case:
T-837/16
|
21/11/19
|
|
C-389/19 P
|
Commission v Sweden
|
Appeal – Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 – Registration, evaluation, authorisation and restriction of chemicals – European Commission decision authorising certain uses of lead sulfochromate yellow and lead chromate molybdate sulfate red, substances listed in Annex XIV of that regulation – Substances of very high concern – Conditions of authorisation – Assessment of the lack of suitable alternatives
|
Article 60(4) of the REACH Regulation No 1907/2006
|
Appeal of the Case T-837/16
|
25/02/2021
|
