- ECHA
- O nas
- Jak pracujemy
- Procedury i polityka
- Przejrzystość
- Sprawy, w których ECHA jest stroną
- Company size
Sprawy, w których ECHA jest oskarżonym lub interwenientem.
Sprawy, w których ECHA jest oskarżonym lub interwenientem.
Sprawy, w których ECHA jest oskarżonym lub interwenientem.
Tabela zawiera wszystkie sprawy sądowe zakończone wydaniem orzeczenia, w których ECHA była stroną. Zainteresowane strony mogą łatwo znaleźć decyzje, które mogą być dla nich istotne odnośnie do głównej działalności ECHA (m.in. REACH, CLP). W niektórych sprawach może nadal trwać postępowanie odwoławcze lub procedura odesłania (renvoi), co również jest wymienione w tabeli. W tabeli nie pokazano spraw związanych z personelem lub zamówieniami publicznymi.
Zamknięte sprawy sądowe sklasyfikowano w ośmiu kategoriach:
- lista kandydacka REACH: sprawy związane z określeniem substancji jako substancji stanowiącej bardzo duże zagrożenie;
- rejestracja REACH: sprawy dotyczące obowiązku wspólnego przedkładania danych;
- udzielanie zezwoleń zgodnie z REACH : sprawy związane z umieszczeniem substancji na liście kandydackiej (załącznik XIV) i wnioskami o udzielenie zezwolenia;
- ocena zgodnie z REACH: sprawy, w których ECHA zażądała informacji od rejestrującego w ramach procedury oceny (art. 40, 41 lub 46 REACH);
- CLH: sprawy związane z harmonizacją klasyfikacji substancji;
- produkty biobójcze: sprawy dotyczące produktów biobójczych;
- dostęp do dokumentów: sprawy związane z wnioskami o dostęp do dokumentów;
- wielkość przedsiębiorstwa: sprawy związane z weryfikacją wielkości przedsiębiorstwa i powiązanymi opłatami.
Case number | Parties | Keywords | Main Legal Provisions | Procedurally linked cases | Date of the ruling |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Crosfield Italia v ECHA | REACH — Fee for registration of a substance — Reduction granted to micro-, small-and medium-sized enterprises — Error in declaration relating to the size of the enterprise — Recommendation 2003/361/EC — Decision imposing an administrative charge — Obligation to state reasons |
Art. 296 of TFEU, Article 20, 91(1) and 94(1) of REACH, Art. 48(2) of the Rules of Procedure of General Court, Art. 6(2) of the Annex to Recommendation 2003/361 |
15/09/2016 | ||
Spraylat v ECHA | REACH — Fee for registration of a substance — Reduction granted to micro-, small and medium-sized enterprises — Error in declaration relating to the size of the enterprise — Decision imposing an administrative charge — Proportionality |
Art. 277 of TFEU; Art. 2 and Table 1 of Decision MB/D/29/2010 |
02/10/2014 | ||
T-656/16 | PM v ECHA | REACH — Fee due for the registration of a substance — Reduction granted to SMEs — Determination of the size of the undertaking — ECHA’s verification of the undertaking’s declaration — Request for evidence demonstrating the status of a SME — Decision imposing an administrative charge | Art. 1(1) and 74(3) of REACH | 03/10/2017 | |
T-758/15 | EDF Toruń v ECHA | REACH — Fee for registration of a substance — Reduction granted to SMEs — Error in the declaration relating to the size of the enterprise — Decision imposing an administrative charge — Recommendation 2003/361/EC — Legitimate expectations — Proportionality — Calculation criteria of the amount of the administrative charge |
Art. 3(36) of REACH; Art. 13 of Regulation No 340/2008 |
18/07/2017 | |
T-675/13 | K Chimica v ECHA | REACH — Fee for registration of a substance — Reduction granted to micro, small and medium-sized enterprises — Error in declaration relating to the size of the enterprise — Recommendation 2003/361/EC — Decision imposing an administrative charge — Determination of an enterprise’s size — Power of the ECHA | Art. 63 of TFEU; Art. 3 of REACH; Art. 6(3) of the Annex to Recommendation 2003/361 | 15/09/2016 | |
T-620/13 | Marchi Industriale v ECHA | REACH — Fee for registration of a substance — Reduction granted to micro-, small and medium-sized enterprises — Error in declaration relating to the size of the enterprise — Recommendation 2003/361/EC — Decision imposing an administrative charge — Determination of the size of the undertaking — Power of the ECHA — Obligation to state reasons | Art. 20 and 91(1) of REACH; Art. 3(2) and 6(2) of the Annex to Recommendation 2003/361 | 15/09/2016 | |
T-392/13 | La Ferla v Commission and ECHA | REACH — Fee for registration of a substance — Reduction granted to micro, small and medium-sized enterprises — Error in declaration relating to the size of the enterprise — Recommendation 2003/361/EC — Decision imposing an administrative charge — Request for information — Power of the ECHA — Proportionality | Art. 263 of TFEU; Art. 3 and 20 of REACH | T-392/13 DEP | 15/09/2016 |
T-540/13 | Société européenne des chaux et liants v ECHA | Action for annulment — REACH — Imposition of an administrative charge for an error in declaration relating to the size of the undertaking — Rules on languages — Period allowed for commencing proceedings — Inadmissibility | Art. 104 of REACH; Art. 134(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court | 02/10/2015 | |
T-89/13 | Calestep v ECHA | REACH — Fee for registration of a substance — Reduction granted to micro, small and medium-sized enterprises — Error in declaration relating to the size of the enterprise — Decision imposing an administrative charge — Recommendation 2003/361/EC — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law | Art. 20, 91 and 94 of REACH; Art. 2(2) of the Annex to Recommendation 2003/361/EC | T-89/13 R | 16/09/2015 |
T-89/13 R | Calestep v ECHA | Reference – Fees and charges payable to ECHA - Reduced fees awarded to small businesses - Verification by ECHA of the declaration on the size of the undertaking - Decision ordering the recovery of the unpaid balance of the full fee due - Application for suspension of operation - Failure to comply with formal requirements - Inadmissibility | Art. 44(1) (c) and 104 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court; Art. 256(1), 278 and 279 of TFEU | T-89/13 | 11/03/2013 |
T-392/13 DEP | La Ferla v Commission and ECHA | Procedure - Taxation of costs |
Art. 140 and 170 of the Rules of Procedure; |
Initial case: T-392/13 |
14/12/2017 |
T-630/16 | Dehtochema Bitumat v ECHA | REACH — Fee payable for registration of a substance — Reduction granted to SMEs — Recommendation 2003/361/EC — Notion of linked undertaking — Submission of a ‘Declaration of Wrong Enterprise Size’ — 50% reduction of the amount of the applicable administrative charge — Authority of the ECHA — Cessation of production of the substance | Art. 134(1) of the Rules of Procedure; Art. 3 and 6 of the Annex to the Recommendation 2003/361/EC | 16/01/2018 | |
T-625/16 R | Przedsiębiorstwo Energetyki Cieplnej v ECHA | REACH — Fee payable for registration of a substance — Reduction granted to SMEs — Error in the declaration relating to the size of the undertaking — Decision imposing an administrative charge — Cessation of production of the substance — Criteria for calculation of the administrative charge — Recommendation 2003/361/EC — Legal certainty — Legitimate expectations — Proportionality — Equal treatment |
Art. 256, 278 and 279 of TFEU; |
Initial case: |
10/03/2017 |
T-855/16 R | Fertisac v ECHA | Interim proceedings — REACH — Fee due for registration of a substance — Reduction granted to micro, small and medium-sized undertakings — Decision imposing an administrative charge and a supplementary fee — Application for suspension of operation — No urgency |
Art. 256, 278 and 279 of TFEU; Art. 156 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court |
Initial case:
|
10/03/2017 |
T-625/16 |
Przedsiebiorstwo Energetyki Cieplnei Sp. z. o.o. v ECHA |
REACH — Fee payable for registration of a substance — Reduction granted to SMEs — Error in the declaration relating to the size of the undertaking — Decision imposing an administrative charge — Cessation of production of the substance — Criteria for calculation of the administrative charge — Recommendation 2003/361/EC — Legal certainty — Legitimate expectations — Proportionality — Equal treatment | Article 6(4), 3(36) and 74(3) of REACH |
Proceedings for interim measures: T-625/16 R |
30/01/2018 |
T-855/16 | Fertisac v ECHA | REACH — Fee payable for registration of a substance — Reduction granted to SMEs — Verification by the ECHA of the declaration relating to the size of the enterprise — Decision imposing an administrative charge — Recommendation 2003/361/EC — Exceeding of financial ceilings — Concept of ‘linked enterprise’ | Art 2(1), 3(2) and 6(2) of the Annex to the Recommendation 2003/361/EC |
Proceedings for interim measures: |
07/03/2018 |
Electroquimica Onubense v ECHA | REACH — Representation by a lawyer who is not a third party — Manifest inadmissibility |
Regulation (EC) No 340/2008 |
08/04/2019 | ||
ECHA v Miejskie Przedsiębiorstwo Energetyki Cieplnej sp. z o.o. | Radiation of the case |
Article 267 TFEU |
04/06/2021 | ||
Novasol S.A. v. ECHA | REACH - Fee for the registration of a substance - Reduction granted to SMEs - Verification by ECHA of the declaration relating to the size of the undertaking - Request for evidence demonstrating SME status - Refusal to provide certain information - Decision ordering recovery of the uncollected amount of the fee due and imposing an administrative charge - Concept of 'related undertaking' - Recommendation 2003/361/EC - Obligation to state motivation |
Article 74(3) of the REACH Regulation (No 1907/2006); Article 13(3) & 13(4) of Regulation 340/2008 |
SME D (2021)8531-DC |
08/03/2023 |