Working with Groups
To speed up the identification of chemicals that need regulatory action, authorities address groups of structurally related substances rather than single substances. This grouping approach:
- Brings consistency and improves the coherence of regulatory work.
- Makes it faster to identify substances that need regulatory action as well as those for which no further action is needed at this stage.
- Supports informed substitution by industry. Substances registered for intermediate uses only, or those not currently registered but which could be potential substitutes for known substances of concern, are also identified early on.
Grouping structurally related substances
The groups of substances are primarily formed based on:
- structural similarity, using the substance identity information in registration dossiers and C&L notifications; and
- read-across and categories, using information received in registration dossiers from industry and external sources.
Structurally similar substances are identified from all the registered substances (the chemical universe). Certain substances are pre-selected to act as ‘seeds’. ECHA’s IT tools are then used to identify other substances that are structurally similar to the seeds.
This provides a starting point for grouping substances that may eventually require regulatory action.
Grouping and the chemical universe
Grouping aims to speed up the work authorities do to address all registered substances in the chemical universe.
ECHA, the Member States and the European Commission have developed an approach to assess the groups. Furthermore, where needed this approach is complemented with group specific work. Examples of such groups of substances requiring further work are production residues, slags and ashes. For some groups of substances, cooperation with industry sectors has also been initiated. Two examples of this collaboration are the Petroleum and Coal stream substances working group (PetCo) and the Metals and Inorganics Sectoral Approach (MISA).
Once the grouping is done, substances belonging to the groups can be assessed. As a result, substances are allocated to appropriate pools within the chemical universe and later to different REACH and CLP processes.
Assessing the groups and identifying further regulatory actions
The screening of registered substances started after the first registration deadline in 2010. It focused on substances that had enough hazard information to conclude on the need for, and to initiate, the required regulatory risk management. This systematic screening work has over time enabled the identification of the vast majority of such substances that could go directly to regulatory risk management. As a result, most of the remaining substances are those requiring generation of further hazard information. Screening and assessing substances in groups rather than individually, speeds up the identification of such cases, in particular, compliance checks.
For each group of substances, authorities consider whether there is a need to initiate further regulatory risk management activities for the whole group, for a subgroup or for individual substances within the group.
The early assessment and identification of potential further regulatory risk management needs, including where further hazard information needs to be generated before the hazard can be sufficiently clarified, aims to speed up the work by supporting authorities to promptly proceed with processes such as harmonised classification and labelling or identification as a substance of very high concern (SVHCs) and restrictions. As most screening is being performed by ECHA, Member States can primarily focus on these regulatory risk management actions.