- ECHA
- Over ons
- Onze werkwijze
- Procedures en beleid
- Transparantie
- Zaken waarbij ECHA partij is
- Company size
Zaken waarbij ECHA verweerder of interveniënt is.
Zaken waarbij ECHA verweerder of interveniënt is.
Zaken waarbij ECHA verweerder of interveniënt is.
Deze tabel bevat alle rechtszaken waarbij ECHA partij was en die door middel van een vonnis zijn afgehandeld. Geïnteresseerden kunnen eenvoudig verwijzen naar beslissingen die voor hen relevant zijn binnen het bereik van de kernactiviteiten van ECHA (zoals REACH en CLP). Voor sommige zaken kan er sprake zijn van een nog aanhangig beroep of een terugverwijzing. Deze zaken zijn ook in de tabel opgenomen. De tabel betreft geen personeels- of aanbestedingsprocedures.
De afgehandelde rechtszaken zijn ingedeeld in acht categorieën:
- REACH-kandidaatslijst: zaken met betrekking tot de identificatie van een zeer zorgwekkende stof;
- REACH-register: zaken in verband met de verplichting tot gezamenlijke indiening van gegevens;
- REACH-autorisatie: zaken met betrekking tot de opname van een stof op de autorisatielijst (bijlage XIV) en autorisatie-aanvragen;
- REACH-beoordeling: zaken waarbij ECHA informatie van een registrant heeft gevraagd op grond van de beoordelingsprocedure (artikelen 40, 41 of 46 van REACH)
- CLH: zaken betreffende de harmonisatie van de indeling van een stof;
- Biociden: zaken betreffende biociden;
- ATD: zaken betreffende verzoeken om toegang tot documenten;
- Omvang van de onderneming: zaken betreffende de verificatie van de ondernemingsomvang en daarmee samenhangende kosten.
Case number | Parties | Keywords | Main Legal Provisions | Procedurally linked cases | Date of the ruling |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Crosfield Italia v ECHA | REACH — Fee for registration of a substance — Reduction granted to micro-, small-and medium-sized enterprises — Error in declaration relating to the size of the enterprise — Recommendation 2003/361/EC — Decision imposing an administrative charge — Obligation to state reasons |
Art. 296 of TFEU, Article 20, 91(1) and 94(1) of REACH, Art. 48(2) of the Rules of Procedure of General Court, Art. 6(2) of the Annex to Recommendation 2003/361 |
15/09/2016 | ||
Spraylat v ECHA | REACH — Fee for registration of a substance — Reduction granted to micro-, small and medium-sized enterprises — Error in declaration relating to the size of the enterprise — Decision imposing an administrative charge — Proportionality |
Art. 277 of TFEU; Art. 2 and Table 1 of Decision MB/D/29/2010 |
02/10/2014 | ||
T-656/16 | PM v ECHA | REACH — Fee due for the registration of a substance — Reduction granted to SMEs — Determination of the size of the undertaking — ECHA’s verification of the undertaking’s declaration — Request for evidence demonstrating the status of a SME — Decision imposing an administrative charge | Art. 1(1) and 74(3) of REACH | 03/10/2017 | |
T-758/15 | EDF Toruń v ECHA | REACH — Fee for registration of a substance — Reduction granted to SMEs — Error in the declaration relating to the size of the enterprise — Decision imposing an administrative charge — Recommendation 2003/361/EC — Legitimate expectations — Proportionality — Calculation criteria of the amount of the administrative charge |
Art. 3(36) of REACH; Art. 13 of Regulation No 340/2008 |
18/07/2017 | |
T-675/13 | K Chimica v ECHA | REACH — Fee for registration of a substance — Reduction granted to micro, small and medium-sized enterprises — Error in declaration relating to the size of the enterprise — Recommendation 2003/361/EC — Decision imposing an administrative charge — Determination of an enterprise’s size — Power of the ECHA | Art. 63 of TFEU; Art. 3 of REACH; Art. 6(3) of the Annex to Recommendation 2003/361 | 15/09/2016 | |
T-620/13 | Marchi Industriale v ECHA | REACH — Fee for registration of a substance — Reduction granted to micro-, small and medium-sized enterprises — Error in declaration relating to the size of the enterprise — Recommendation 2003/361/EC — Decision imposing an administrative charge — Determination of the size of the undertaking — Power of the ECHA — Obligation to state reasons | Art. 20 and 91(1) of REACH; Art. 3(2) and 6(2) of the Annex to Recommendation 2003/361 | 15/09/2016 | |
T-392/13 | La Ferla v Commission and ECHA | REACH — Fee for registration of a substance — Reduction granted to micro, small and medium-sized enterprises — Error in declaration relating to the size of the enterprise — Recommendation 2003/361/EC — Decision imposing an administrative charge — Request for information — Power of the ECHA — Proportionality | Art. 263 of TFEU; Art. 3 and 20 of REACH | T-392/13 DEP | 15/09/2016 |
T-540/13 | Société européenne des chaux et liants v ECHA | Action for annulment — REACH — Imposition of an administrative charge for an error in declaration relating to the size of the undertaking — Rules on languages — Period allowed for commencing proceedings — Inadmissibility | Art. 104 of REACH; Art. 134(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court | 02/10/2015 | |
T-89/13 | Calestep v ECHA | REACH — Fee for registration of a substance — Reduction granted to micro, small and medium-sized enterprises — Error in declaration relating to the size of the enterprise — Decision imposing an administrative charge — Recommendation 2003/361/EC — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law | Art. 20, 91 and 94 of REACH; Art. 2(2) of the Annex to Recommendation 2003/361/EC | T-89/13 R | 16/09/2015 |
T-89/13 R | Calestep v ECHA | Reference – Fees and charges payable to ECHA - Reduced fees awarded to small businesses - Verification by ECHA of the declaration on the size of the undertaking - Decision ordering the recovery of the unpaid balance of the full fee due - Application for suspension of operation - Failure to comply with formal requirements - Inadmissibility | Art. 44(1) (c) and 104 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court; Art. 256(1), 278 and 279 of TFEU | T-89/13 | 11/03/2013 |
T-392/13 DEP | La Ferla v Commission and ECHA | Procedure - Taxation of costs |
Art. 140 and 170 of the Rules of Procedure; |
Initial case: T-392/13 |
14/12/2017 |
T-630/16 | Dehtochema Bitumat v ECHA | REACH — Fee payable for registration of a substance — Reduction granted to SMEs — Recommendation 2003/361/EC — Notion of linked undertaking — Submission of a ‘Declaration of Wrong Enterprise Size’ — 50% reduction of the amount of the applicable administrative charge — Authority of the ECHA — Cessation of production of the substance | Art. 134(1) of the Rules of Procedure; Art. 3 and 6 of the Annex to the Recommendation 2003/361/EC | 16/01/2018 | |
T-625/16 R | Przedsiębiorstwo Energetyki Cieplnej v ECHA | REACH — Fee payable for registration of a substance — Reduction granted to SMEs — Error in the declaration relating to the size of the undertaking — Decision imposing an administrative charge — Cessation of production of the substance — Criteria for calculation of the administrative charge — Recommendation 2003/361/EC — Legal certainty — Legitimate expectations — Proportionality — Equal treatment |
Art. 256, 278 and 279 of TFEU; |
Initial case: |
10/03/2017 |
T-855/16 R | Fertisac v ECHA | Interim proceedings — REACH — Fee due for registration of a substance — Reduction granted to micro, small and medium-sized undertakings — Decision imposing an administrative charge and a supplementary fee — Application for suspension of operation — No urgency |
Art. 256, 278 and 279 of TFEU; Art. 156 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court |
Initial case:
|
10/03/2017 |
T-625/16 |
Przedsiebiorstwo Energetyki Cieplnei Sp. z. o.o. v ECHA |
REACH — Fee payable for registration of a substance — Reduction granted to SMEs — Error in the declaration relating to the size of the undertaking — Decision imposing an administrative charge — Cessation of production of the substance — Criteria for calculation of the administrative charge — Recommendation 2003/361/EC — Legal certainty — Legitimate expectations — Proportionality — Equal treatment | Article 6(4), 3(36) and 74(3) of REACH |
Proceedings for interim measures: T-625/16 R |
30/01/2018 |
T-855/16 | Fertisac v ECHA | REACH — Fee payable for registration of a substance — Reduction granted to SMEs — Verification by the ECHA of the declaration relating to the size of the enterprise — Decision imposing an administrative charge — Recommendation 2003/361/EC — Exceeding of financial ceilings — Concept of ‘linked enterprise’ | Art 2(1), 3(2) and 6(2) of the Annex to the Recommendation 2003/361/EC |
Proceedings for interim measures: |
07/03/2018 |
Electroquimica Onubense v ECHA | REACH — Representation by a lawyer who is not a third party — Manifest inadmissibility |
Regulation (EC) No 340/2008 |
08/04/2019 | ||
ECHA v Miejskie Przedsiębiorstwo Energetyki Cieplnej sp. z o.o. | Radiation of the case |
Article 267 TFEU |
04/06/2021 | ||
Novasol S.A. v. ECHA | REACH - Fee for the registration of a substance - Reduction granted to SMEs - Verification by ECHA of the declaration relating to the size of the undertaking - Request for evidence demonstrating SME status - Refusal to provide certain information - Decision ordering recovery of the uncollected amount of the fee due and imposing an administrative charge - Concept of 'related undertaking' - Recommendation 2003/361/EC - Obligation to state motivation |
Article 74(3) of the REACH Regulation (No 1907/2006); Article 13(3) & 13(4) of Regulation 340/2008 |
SME D (2021)8531-DC |
08/03/2023 |