Gadījumi, kad ECHA uzstājas kā atbildētājs vai starpnieks

Šajā tabulā ir norādītas visas pabeigtās lietas ar spriedumu, kurās ECHA piedalījusies kā iesaistītā puse. Interesenti var viegli atrast lēmumus, kuri var attiekties uz viņu jautājumu saistībā ar ECHA pamataktivitātēm (tostarp REACH, CPL). Attiecībā uz dažām lietām var būt iesniegta apelācija vai norāde uz atkārtotu apelācijas izskatīšanu. Šī papildu informācija arī ir norādīta tabulā. Tabulā nav iekļauta informācija par personāla vai iepirkumu lietām.

Tiesas slēgtās lietas ir sadalītas astoņās kategorijās:

REACH kandidātu saraksts: lietas saistībā ar vielu, kuru identificē kā vielu, kas rada lielas bažas;
REACH reģistrācija: lietas, kas attiecas uz datu vienotas iesniegšanas pienākumu;
REACH licencēšana: lietas saistībā ar vielas iekļaušanu licencēšanas sarakstā (XIV pielikums) un licencēšanas pieteikumos;
REACH novērtēšana: lietas, kurās ECHA ir pieprasījusi reģistrētājam iesniegt papildu informāciju saskaņā ar novērtēšanas procedūru (REACH regulas 40., 41. vai 46. pants);
CLH: lietas saistībā ar vielas klasifikācijas saskaņošanu;
Biocīdi: lietas saistībā ar biocīdiem
Piekļuve dokumentiem: lietas saistībā ar pieprasījumiem pēc piekļuves dokumentiem;
Uzņēmuma lielums: lietas saistībā ar uzņēmuma lieluma pārbaudi un ar to saistītie maksājumi.

Case number	Parties	Keywords	Main Legal Provisions	Procedurally linked cases	Date of the ruling
T-669/15 R	Lysoform Dr. Hans Rosemann and Others v ECHA	Application for interim measures — REACH — Making available on the market and use of biocidal products — Inclusion of a company as a supplier of an active substance on the list referred to in Article 95 of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 — Application for suspension of operation — Lack of urgency	Art. 278, 279, 256(1) of TFEU; Art. 95 of BPR; Art. 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights	Initial Case: T-669/15 Appeal on the Initial Case: C-663/16 P	17/12/2015
T-543/15R	Lysoform Dr. Hans Rosemann and Others v ECHA	Application for interim measures — REACH — Making available on the market and use of biocidal products — Inclusion of a company as a supplier of an active substance on the list referred to in Article 95 of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 — Application for suspension of operation — Lack of urgency	Art. 278, 279, 256(1) of TFEU; Art. 95 of BPR; Art. 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights	Initial Case: T-543/15 Appeal on the Initial Case: C-666/16 P	17/12/2015
T-669/15	Lysoform Dr. Hans Rosemann and Others v ECHA	Actions for annulment — Inclusion as supplier of an active substance on the list provided for in Article 95 of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 — Lack of direct concern — Inadmissibility	Art. 95 of BPR; Art. 263 of TFEU	Proceedings for interim measures T-669/15 R Appeal C-663/16 P	12/10/2016
T-543/15	Lysoform Dr. Hans Rosemann and Others v ECHA	Actions for annulment — Inclusion as supplier of an active substance on the list provided for in Article 95 of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 — Lack of direct concern — Inadmissibility	Art. 95 of BPR; Art. 263 of TFEU	Proceedings for interim measures T-543/15 R Appeal C-666/16 P	12/10/2016
C-663/16 P	Lysoform Dr. Hans Rosemann and Ecolab Deutschland v ECHA	Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice –– Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 — Making available on the market and use of biocidal products — Article 95 — European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) — Publication of a list of active substances — Inclusion of a company as a supplier of an active substance	Art. 130(1), 130(7) and 181 of the Rules of Procedure	Initial Case: T-669/15 Proceedings for interim measures: T-669/15 R	19/07/2017
C-666/16 P	Lysoform Dr. Hans Rosemann and Ecolab Deutschland v ECHA	Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice –– Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 — Making available on the market and use of biocidal products — Article 95 — European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) — Publication of a list of active substances — Inclusion of a company as a supplier of an active substance	Art. 130(1) and 130(7) of the Rules of Procedure	Initial Case: T-543/15 Proceedings for Interim Measures: T-543/15 R	19/07/2017
T-243/17	Ecolab Deutschland and Lysoform Dr. Hans Rosemann v ECHA	Removal from the register	Art. 263 of TFEU		18/10/2017
T-347/18	Laboratoire Pareva and Biotech3D v Commission	Biocidal products – Active substance PHMB (1415; 4.7) – Refusal of approval for product-types 1, 5 and 6 – Conditional approval for product-types 2 and 4 – Risks to human health and the environment – Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 – Article 6(7)(a) and (b) of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1062/2014 – Harmonised classification of the active substance under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 – Prior consultation of the ECHA – Manifest error of assessment – Read-across – Right to be heard	Regulation (EU) 528/2012, Article 6(7)(a) and (b) of the Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1062/2014, Regulation (EC) 1272/2008		15/09/2021
T-734/18	Sumitomo Chemical and Tenka Best v Commission	Removal from the registrer			18/12/2019
T-337/18	Laboratoire Pareva v Commission	Biocidal products – Active substance PHMB (1415; 4.7) – Refusal of approval for product-types 1, 5 and 6 – Conditional approval for product-types 2 and 4 – Risks to human health and the environment – Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 – Article 6(7)(a) and (b) of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1062/2014 – Harmonised classification of the active substance under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 – Prior consultation of the ECHA – Manifest error of assessment – Read-across – Right to be heard	Regulation (EU) 528/2012, Article 6(7)(a) and (b) of the Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1062/2014, Regulation (EC) 1272/2008		15/09/2021
T-199/21	EurO3zon v ECHA	Suspension of evaluation active substance - BPR Regulation			08/04/2023
C-702/21 P	Laboratoire PAREVA S.A.S. v Commission	Appeal – Biocidal products – Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 – Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1062/2014 – Active substance PHMB (1415; 4.7) – Refusal of approval as an existing active substance for use in biocidal products of product-types 1, 5 and 6 – Approval as an existing active substance for use in biocidal products of product-types 2 and 4 – Teratogenic effect – Human health risk assessment	Appeal – Biocidal products – Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 – Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1062/2014 – Active substance PHMB (1415; 4.7) – Refusal of approval as an existing active substance for use in biocidal products of product-types 1, 5 and 6 – Approval as an existing active substance for use in biocidal products of product-types 2 and 4 – Teratogenic effect – Human health risk assessment	Appeal of the Cases T-337/18 and T-347/18	10/11/2022
T-123/20	Sciessent LLC v Commission	Biocidal products – Active substances – Silver zeolite and silver copper zeolite – Refusal of approval for product-types 2 and 7 – Article 4 and Article 19(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 – Efficacy – Active substances for use in treated articles – Assessment of the efficacy of the treated articles themselves – Competence of the Commission – Principle of non-discrimination – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations	Articles 3(1)(I), 4(1), 19(1), 19(2), Annex II, Annex VI of Regulation (No 528/2012)	COM Decision 2019/1973	16/11/2022
T-122/20	Sciessent LLC v Commission	Biocidal products – Active substances – Silver zeolite and silver copper zeolite – Refusal of approval for product-types 2 and 7 – Article 4 and Article 19(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 – Efficacy – Active substances for use in treated articles – Assessment of the efficacy of the treated articles themselves – Competence of the Commission – Principle of non-discrimination – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations	Articles 3(1)(I), 4(1), 19(1), 19(2), Annex II, Annex VI of Regulation (No 528/2012)	COM Decision 2019/1960	16/11/2022