Gadījumi, kad ECHA uzstājas kā atbildētājs vai starpnieks

Šajā tabulā ir norādītas visas pabeigtās lietas ar spriedumu, kurās ECHA piedalījusies kā iesaistītā puse. Interesenti var viegli atrast lēmumus, kuri var attiekties uz viņu jautājumu saistībā ar ECHA pamataktivitātēm (tostarp REACH, CPL). Attiecībā uz dažām lietām var būt iesniegta apelācija vai norāde uz atkārtotu apelācijas izskatīšanu. Šī papildu informācija arī ir norādīta tabulā. Tabulā nav iekļauta informācija par personāla vai iepirkumu lietām.

Tiesas slēgtās lietas ir sadalītas astoņās kategorijās:

REACH kandidātu saraksts: lietas saistībā ar vielu, kuru identificē kā vielu, kas rada lielas bažas;
REACH reģistrācija: lietas, kas attiecas uz datu vienotas iesniegšanas pienākumu;
REACH licencēšana: lietas saistībā ar vielas iekļaušanu licencēšanas sarakstā (XIV pielikums) un licencēšanas pieteikumos;
REACH novērtēšana: lietas, kurās ECHA ir pieprasījusi reģistrētājam iesniegt papildu informāciju saskaņā ar novērtēšanas procedūru (REACH regulas 40., 41. vai 46. pants);
CLH: lietas saistībā ar vielas klasifikācijas saskaņošanu;
Biocīdi: lietas saistībā ar biocīdiem
Piekļuve dokumentiem: lietas saistībā ar pieprasījumiem pēc piekļuves dokumentiem;
Uzņēmuma lielums: lietas saistībā ar uzņēmuma lieluma pārbaudi un ar to saistītie maksājumi.

Case number	Parties	Keywords	Main Legal Provisions	Procedurally linked cases	Date of the ruling
T-360/13	VECCO and Others v Commission (ECHA as intervener)	REACH — Inclusion of chromium trioxide in the list of substances subject to authorisation — Uses or categories of uses exempted from the authorisation requirement — Concept of ‘existing specific Community legislation imposing minimum requirements relating to the protection of human health or the environment for the use of the substance’ — Manifest error of assessment — Proportionality — Rights of the defence — Principle of sound administration	Art. 58(2) of REACH, Art. 1 of Directive 98/24, Art. 40 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union	Appeal: C-651/15 P	25/09/2015
C-651/15 P	VECCO and others v Commission (ECHA as intervener)	Appeal — Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH) — Article 58(2) — Authorisation — Substances of very high concern — Exemption — Regulation amending Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 — Inclusion of chromium trioxide in the list of substances subject to authorisation	Art. 58(2) REACH	Initial case: T-360/13	13/07/2017
T‑837/16	Sweden v Commission (ECHA as intervener)	Commission Decision on the authorisation for the use of yellow and red chromate, molybdate and lead sulfate - Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH) - Articles 60(4) and (5) - Examination of unavailable resolutions as substitutes - Error of law	Articles 60(4) and (5) of REACH	Appeal: C-389/19 P-R	07/03/2019
T‑108/17	ClientEarth v Commission (ECHA as intervener)	REACH — Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 — Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) — Request for internal review of a decision on marketing authorisation rejected as unfounded — Error of law — Manifest error of assessment — Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006	Articles 57(c), 62, 60(7), 62(4), 60(4), 60(5), and 60(2) of REACH		04/04/2019
T‑610/17	ICL-IP Terneuzen, BV, and ICL Europe Coöperatief UA v European Commission (ECHA as intervener)	REACH — Substances subject to authorisation — Inclusion of 1-bromoproprane (nPB) in Annex XIV to Regulation No 1907/2006 — Volumes — Registration dossier — Data — Substance grouping — Principle of sound administration — Right to conduct business and pursue a trade freely — Obligation to state reasons — Legitimate expectations — Proportionality — Equal treatment	Art 57 (c), 58 (3), 59 (8) and Annex XIV of REACH		20/09/2019
C-389/19 P-R	European Commission v. Kingdom of Sweden (ECHA as intervener)	Reference – Appeal – Articles 278 and 279 TFEU – Application for a stay execution – Request for interim measures – Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 – Chemical substances – Classification, labelling and packaging of certain substances and mixtures – Commission Decision on the authorisation for the use of yellow and red chromate, molybdate and lead sulfate	Articles 278 and 279 TFEU	Initial case: T-837/16	21/11/19
C-389/19 P	Commission v Sweden	Appeal – Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 – Registration, evaluation, authorisation and restriction of chemicals – European Commission decision authorising certain uses of lead sulfochromate yellow and lead chromate molybdate sulfate red, substances listed in Annex XIV of that regulation – Substances of very high concern – Conditions of authorisation – Assessment of the lack of suitable alternatives	Article 60(4) of the REACH Regulation No 1907/2006	Appeal of the Case T-837/16	25/02/2021