- ECHA
- O nama
- Način rada
- Postupci i politike
- Transparentnost
- Predmeti u kojima ECHA nastupa kao stranka u postupku
- Authorisation
Predmeti u kojima je ECHA tužena strana ili intervenijent
Predmeti u kojima je ECHA tužena strana ili intervenijent
Predmeti u kojima je ECHA tužena strana ili intervenijent
Sljedeća tablica sadrži sve sudske predmete okončane presudom u kojima je ECHA bila stranka u postupku. Zainteresirane strane jednostavno se mogu pozvati na odluke koje su za njih relevantne u sklopu osnovnih aktivnosti ECHA-e (uredbe REACH, CLP, i druge). Za neke je predmete u postupku žalba ili daljnje upućivanje odnosno uzvrat, što je također navedeno u tablici. U tablici nisu navedeni predmeti koji se bave osobljem ili javnom nabavom.
Riješeni sudski predmeti razvrstani su u osam kategorija:
- Popis predloženih tvari prema REACH-u: predmeti vezani uz identifikaciju posebno zabrinjavajućih tvari;
- Registracija u skladu s Uredbom REACH: predmeti povezani s obvezom zajedničkog podnošenja podataka;
- Autorizacija prema REACH-u: predmeti vezani uz uvrštavanje tvari u popis tvari koje podliježu autorizaciji (prilog XIV.) i uz zahtjeve za davanje autorizacije;
- Evaluacija prema REACH-u: predmeti u kojima je ECHA u okviru postupka evaluacije zatražila informacije od podnositelja registracije (članci 40., 41. ili 46. Uredbe REACH);
- CLH: predmeti koji se bave usklađivanjem razvrstavanja tvari;
- Biocidi: predmeti koji se odnose na biocide;
- ATD: predmeti vezani uz pristup dokumentima;
- Veličina poduzeća: predmeti vezani uz potvrđivanje veličine poduzeća i povezane naknade.
Case number | Parties | Keywords | Main Legal Provisions | Procedurally linked cases | Date of the ruling |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
T-360/13 | VECCO and Others v Commission (ECHA as intervener) | REACH — Inclusion of chromium trioxide in the list of substances subject to authorisation — Uses or categories of uses exempted from the authorisation requirement — Concept of ‘existing specific Community legislation imposing minimum requirements relating to the protection of human health or the environment for the use of the substance’ — Manifest error of assessment — Proportionality — Rights of the defence — Principle of sound administration | Art. 58(2) of REACH, Art. 1 of Directive 98/24, Art. 40 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union |
Appeal: C-651/15 P |
25/09/2015 |
C-651/15 P | VECCO and others v Commission (ECHA as intervener) | Appeal — Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH) — Article 58(2) — Authorisation — Substances of very high concern — Exemption — Regulation amending Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 — Inclusion of chromium trioxide in the list of substances subject to authorisation | Art. 58(2) REACH |
Initial case: T-360/13 |
13/07/2017 |
T‑837/16 | Sweden v Commission (ECHA as intervener) | Commission Decision on the authorisation for the use of yellow and red chromate, molybdate and lead sulfate - Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH) - Articles 60(4) and (5) - Examination of unavailable resolutions as substitutes - Error of law | Articles 60(4) and (5) of REACH |
Appeal: C-389/19 P-R |
07/03/2019 |
T‑108/17 | ClientEarth v Commission (ECHA as intervener) | REACH — Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 — Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) — Request for internal review of a decision on marketing authorisation rejected as unfounded — Error of law — Manifest error of assessment — Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 | Articles 57(c), 62, 60(7), 62(4), 60(4), 60(5), and 60(2) of REACH | 04/04/2019 | |
T‑610/17 | ICL-IP Terneuzen, BV, and ICL Europe Coöperatief UA v European Commission (ECHA as intervener) | REACH — Substances subject to authorisation — Inclusion of 1-bromoproprane (nPB) in Annex XIV to Regulation No 1907/2006 — Volumes — Registration dossier — Data — Substance grouping — Principle of sound administration — Right to conduct business and pursue a trade freely — Obligation to state reasons — Legitimate expectations — Proportionality — Equal treatment | Art 57 (c), 58 (3), 59 (8) and Annex XIV of REACH | 20/09/2019 | |
C-389/19 P-R | European Commission v. Kingdom of Sweden (ECHA as intervener) | Reference – Appeal – Articles 278 and 279 TFEU – Application for a stay execution – Request for interim measures – Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 – Chemical substances – Classification, labelling and packaging of certain substances and mixtures – Commission Decision on the authorisation for the use of yellow and red chromate, molybdate and lead sulfate | Articles 278 and 279 TFEU |
Initial case: |
21/11/19 |
Commission v Sweden | Appeal – Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 – Registration, evaluation, authorisation and restriction of chemicals – European Commission decision authorising certain uses of lead sulfochromate yellow and lead chromate molybdate sulfate red, substances listed in Annex XIV of that regulation – Substances of very high concern – Conditions of authorisation – Assessment of the lack of suitable alternatives |
Article 60(4) of the REACH Regulation No 1907/2006 |
25/02/2021 |