Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 284-892-9 | CAS number: 84989-04-8 The fraction of tar acid rich in 3- and 4-methylphenol, recovered by distillation of low-temperature coal tar crude tar acids.
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
In several tests performed according to OECD TG 471 in the presence and in the absence of a metabolic activation system and tested up to cytotoxicity the componens o-, m- and p-cresol revealed no genotoxic activity when tested from concentrations of 5 to 5000 µg/plate (Pepper, Hamilton & Scheetz 1981, Pool and Lin 1982, Pool 1992, Haworth 1993, JETOC 1998 and MHLW 2001). All cresols had been tested with the Salmonella typhimurium strains recommended in the guideline TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and TA1538. Additionally m-cresol was tested with the recommended Escherichia coli WP2uvrA and WP2uvrA/pKM101strains to cover the detection of certain oxidising mutagens, cross-linking agents and hydrazines as well (JETOC 1998).
The results from the tests are confirmed by the negative results in the mouse lymphoma assays performed according to the respective guideline with and without a metabolic activation system on all three components (Pepper, Hamilton & Scheetz 1981, CMA 1988).
In contrast to that the tests for chromosome aberration in mammalian cell systems in the presence and in the absence of a metabolic activation revealed clastogenic activity for cresols when tested up to cytotoxicity. (CMA 1988, MLHW 2001).
An in-vivo chromosomal aberration assay with m-cresol in mice bone marrow following oral dosing of 96-960 mg/kg bw yielded a negative result. The doses were chosen from dose-range finding study with 400-2000 mg/kg bw resulting in mortality (0/6-6/6) and difficulty in breathing and lethargy (CMA 1989). However, the reliability of the test result is questionable because of experimental deficiencies (only 50 instead of 100 metaphases were scored). Thus, this assay cannot fully compensate the result from the in-vitro assays.
Additionally performed reliable in-vivo studies generally showed negative results for cresols. The Dominant Lethal Assay (DLA) with o-cresol in the mouse was negative (CMA 1989). When tested according to OECD TG 478 /Rodent Dominant Lethal Assay) p-cresol did also not induce dominant lethal mutations in male germ cells of mice (CMA 1989). Following repeated dosing of mice with 0 and 1250-20000 ppm for 13 weeks a MNT with peripheral erythrocytes in mice that were dosed with 0, 5000, 10000 and 20000 ppm was carried out. The NOAEL for general toxicity is 1250 ppm based on increased relative kidney and liver weights at higher doses. In the erythrocytes of the chosen mice o-cresol did not induce a significant elevation in the frequency of micronucleated erythrocytes. (US Department of Health and Human Services 1991).
Thus, cresols reveal no gene mutation activity and the clastogenic activity in vitro was not confirmed by respective in vivo studies.
Short description of key information:
In vitro:
Bacterial reverse mutation assay (Ames): negative (o-, m-, p-cresol)
Mammalian cell gene mutation: negative (o-, m-, p-cresol)
Chromosome aberration test: positive (o-, m-, p-cresol)
In vivo:
Dominant Lethal Assay (DLA) in mice: negative (o-cresol)
Chromosome aberration in mice bone marrow: negative (m-cresol)
Rodent Dominant Lethal Assay in male mice germ cells: negative (p-cresol)
Endpoint Conclusion: No adverse effect observed (negative)
Justification for classification or non-classification
The in vivo tests disproved the positive result from the in vitro chromosome aberration assays. Therefore cresols have not to be classified for mutagenic potential.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.