Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 201-944-8 | CAS number: 89-83-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 27 JAN 1989 to 19 OCT 1989
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 989
- Report date:
- 1989
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- according Ames et al. Mut Res 31, 347-364 (1975), thymol was investigated in the Salmonella/microsome test in doses up to 5000 µg per plate on four Salmonella typhimurium LT2 mutants
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Thymol
- EC Number:
- 201-944-8
- EC Name:
- Thymol
- Cas Number:
- 89-83-8
- Molecular formula:
- C10H14O
- IUPAC Name:
- 5-methyl-2-(propan-2-yl)phenol
- Test material form:
- solid
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- histidine
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- other: partly deficient in lipopolysaccharide side chains in their cell walls and reduced UV repairability
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Type and composition of metabolic activation system:
- source of S9 : Livers of at least six adult male Sprague Dawley rats, of approximately 200 to 300 g in weight. For enzyme induction, the animals received a single intraperitoneal injection of Aroclor 1254, dissolved in corn oil, at a dose of 500 mg/kg body weight, five days before sacrifice. Livers were removed under sterile conditions immediately after sacrifice and kept at 4°C until all animals had been prepared. All the remaining steps were carried out under sterile conditions at 4°C. The livers were washed with cold (4°C), 0.15 M KCl solution (approximately 1 mL KCl per 1 g liver) , and then homogenized in fresh, cold (4°C), 0.15 M KCl (approximately 3 mL KCl per 1 g liver). The homogenate was then centrifuged in a cooling centrifuge at 4°C and 9000 g for 10 minutes. The supernatant (the S9 fraction) was stored at -80°C in small portions.
- method of preparation of S9 mix: The S9 portions were slowly thawed before using. The S9 mix was freshly prepared (Ames et al., 1973a) and used only on the same day. It was placed in a vessel with a double glass wall until used. The hollow wall was filled with ice to keep the S9 mix permanently cold. 70 mL of cofactor solution are composed as follows:
MgCl2 x 6 H2O: 162.6 mg
KCl: 246.0 mg
glucose-6-phosphate, disodium salt: 179.1 mg
NADP, disodium salt: 315.0 mg
phosphate buffer: 100.0 mM
S9 mix consists of this cofactor solution and the corresponding volume of S9 fraction. In all tests, the S9 mix comprised 30% (v/v) S9 fraction.
- concentration or volume of S9 mix and S9 in the final culture medium: 0.5 mL S9 mix in final culture medium
- quality controls of S9 (e.g., enzymatic activity, sterility, metabolic capability): Prior to first use, each batch was checked for its metabolizing capacity by using 2-aminoanthracene; appropriate activity was demonstrated. - Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- first test: 0, 8, 40, 200, 1000, 5000 µg per plate
repeat test 1: 0, 6, 12, 24, 48, 96, 192 µg per plate (highest dose selected based on the substance's toxicity in the first test, which showed thymol to produce bacteriotoxic effects at 40 µg per plate and above) - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: ethanol
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The used solvent was chosen out of the following solvents, in the order given: water, ethanol, acetone, DMSO, DMF, and Ethylene glycol dimethylether (EGDE) according to information given by the internal sponsor in a questionnaire.
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Remarks:
- No untreated control was set up for ethanol, since sufficient evidence was available in literature and from our own experience indicating that this solvent had no influence on the spontaneous mutant counts of the bacterial strains used.
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- sodium azide
- other: -S9: nitrofurantoin (TA 100), 4-nitro-1,2-phenylene diamine (TA 98, TA 1537), +S9: 2-aminoanthracene (all strains)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS:
- Number of cultures per concentration (single, duplicate, triplicate) : 4 plates/concentration
- Number of independent experiments : 2
METHOD OF TREATMENT/ EXPOSURE:
- Test substance added in agar (plate incorporation)
TREATMENT AND HARVEST SCHEDULE:
- Exposure duration/duration of treatment: 48 h
METHODS FOR MEASUREMENT OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: background growth inhibition; other: marked and dose-dependent reduction in the mutant count per plate compared to the negative controls, titer (titers were determined under the same conditions as mutations, except that the histidine concentration in the soft agar was increased from 0.5 mM to 2.5 mM to permit the complete growth of bacteria)
METHODS FOR MEASUREMENTS OF GENOTOXICIY
-count of mutant colonies
- Rationale for test conditions:
- The Salmonella/microsome test is a screening method which detects point mutation caused by chemical agents in vitro. Auxotrophic mutants of Salmonella typhimurium are used to demonstrate this effect. For this purpose, the rate of reversion to prototrophy is evaluated in negative control and treated groups. A mutagenic effect is assumed if this rate increases sufficiently in the treated groups.
- Evaluation criteria:
- A reproducible and dose-related increase in mutant count of at least one strain is considered to be a positive result. For TA 1535, TA 100 and TA 98 this increase should be about twice the amount of the negative controls, whereas for TA 1537 at least a threefold increase should be reached. Otherwise the result is evaluated as negative.
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- not determined
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not determined
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not examined
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- not examined
- Additional information on results:
- RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES (if applicable):
A pre-test was performed at the doses of 0, 8, 40, 200, 1000, 5000 µg per plate. No genotoxicity was observed. Due to the substance's toxicity in the 40 and 200 µg/plate dose groups, doses ranging from 6 µg to 192 µg per plate were chosen for the repeat tests.
STUDY RESULTS
- Concurrent vehicle negative and positive control data : The concurrent vehicle controls are in the range of the historical control data. The positive controls sodium azide, nitrofurantoin, 4-nitro-1,2-phenylene diamine and 2-aminoanthracene, with one exception, increased mutant counts to well over those of the negative controls, and thus demonstrated the system's sensitivity and the activity of the S9 mix. The exception was given in Table 3. No effect was noted for 2-aminoanthracene on TA 1537. However, this lack could not be accounted for to a lack of sensitivity of the tester strains, since the strain-specific positive control 4-nitro-1,2-phenylene diamine demonstrated this sensitivity. But there was also no insufficient activating capacity of S9 mix, since the parallel experiments with TA 1535, TA 100 and TA 98 demonstrated the metabolizing capacity of S9 mix. Therefore the lack of activity of 2-aminoanthracene was accounted for to a technical failure, probably to a lack of compound.
Ames test:
- Signs of toxicity : The substance showed bacteriotoxicity at doses above 24 µg/plate as determined by titer.
- Individual plate counts : Please refer to attachment
- Mean number of revertant colonies per plate and standard deviation : please refer to table 1 and 2 under 'Any other information on results'
HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA (with ranges, means and standard deviation, and 95% control limits for the distribution as well as the number of data)
- Positive historical control data: please refer to table 3 under 'Any other information on results'
- Negative (solvent/vehicle) historical control data: please refer to table 3 under 'Any other information on results'
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1: Summary of Mean Values Without S9 Mix (Mix From Tables 1 - 8) |
||||
Results table and dose group [µg/plate] |
Strain |
|||
TA 1535 |
TA 100 |
TA 1537 |
TA 98 |
|
1-4 |
|
|
|
|
0 |
15 |
80 |
6 |
17 |
8 |
13 |
72 |
9 |
21 |
40 |
14 |
87 |
7 |
22 |
200 |
20 |
95 |
7 |
21 |
1000 |
0 |
-- |
- |
-- |
5000 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Na-azid |
1089 |
|
|
|
NF |
|
515 |
|
|
4-NPDA |
|
|
99 |
151 |
5-8 |
|
|
|
|
0 |
8 |
89 |
9 |
22 |
6 |
8 |
97 |
6 |
20 |
12 |
7 |
115 |
6 |
20 |
24 |
5 |
97 |
10 |
22 |
48 |
8 |
69 |
6 |
20 |
96 |
10 |
76 |
7 |
21 |
192 |
5 |
67 |
6 |
21 |
Na-azid |
896 |
|
|
|
NF |
|
532 |
|
|
4-NPDA |
|
|
115 |
197 |
Table 2: Summary of Mean Values With S9 (Mix From Tables 1-8) |
||||
Results table and dose group [µg/plate] |
Strain |
|||
TA 1535 |
TA100 |
TA 1537 |
TA 98 |
|
1-4 |
|
|
|
|
30%S9 |
|
|
|
|
0 |
20 |
119 |
15 |
37 |
8 |
14 |
108 |
10 |
27 |
40 |
13 |
103 |
11 |
34 |
200 |
18 |
99 |
7 |
23 |
1000 |
-- |
--- |
-- |
-- |
5000 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2-AA |
149 |
480 |
25 |
244 |
5-8 |
|
|
|
|
30% S9 |
|
|
|
|
0 |
17 |
103 |
8 |
39 |
6 |
13 |
117 |
9 |
34 |
12 |
11 |
88 |
7 |
39 |
24 |
11 |
102 |
8 |
31 |
48 |
10 |
97 |
10 |
31 |
96 |
11 |
87 |
12 |
30 |
192 |
16 |
95 |
9 |
29 |
2-AA |
153 |
764 |
102 |
475 |
Table 3: Summary of historical negative and positive controls of experiments performed from July to December 1986 using mean values presented as medians (Z) and semi-Q range (QR) |
|||||||||
Compound and S9 Mix |
Strain |
||||||||
|
TA 1535 |
TA 100 |
TA 1537 |
TA 98 |
|||||
|
Z |
QR |
Z |
QR |
Z |
QR |
Z |
QR |
|
water |
- |
17 |
4 |
102 |
20 |
7 |
1 |
17 |
3 |
DMSO |
- |
15 |
3 |
91 |
10 |
7 |
1 |
16 |
2 |
DMF |
- |
18 |
1 |
68 |
|
7 |
1 |
19 |
|
Na-azid |
- |
1062 |
312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NF |
- |
|
|
354 |
42 |
|
|
|
|
4-NPDA |
- |
|
|
|
|
37 |
22 |
97 |
17 |
30% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
water |
+ |
13 |
2 |
129 |
47 |
9 |
1 |
27 |
3 |
DMSO |
+ |
14 |
1 |
129 |
13 |
9 |
3 |
28 |
3 |
DMF |
+ |
13 |
2 |
100 |
|
10 |
1 |
29 |
|
2-AA |
+ |
314 |
105 |
1309 |
328 |
59 |
9 |
549 |
215 |
10% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DMSO |
+ |
12 |
2 |
124 |
9 |
6 |
2 |
32 |
6 |
2-AA |
+ |
338 |
94 |
2045 |
515 |
175 |
51 |
1426 |
406 |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- In this Ames test none of the four strains used showed a dose-related and biologically relevant increase in mutant counts over those of the negative controls. This applied to both, the tests with and without S-9 mix and was confirmed by the results of the repeat tests.
- Executive summary:
In a bacterial reverse mutation assay similar to OECD TG 471 according Ames et al. Mut Res 31, 347-364 (1975), thymol was investigated in test doses up to 5000 µg per plate on four Salmonella typhimurium LT2 mutants ( S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100). Doses up to and including 24 µg per plate did not cause any bacteriotoxic effects: Total bacteria counts remained unchanged and no inhibition of growth was observed. At higher doses, the substance had a strain-specific bacteriotoxic effect, so that this range could only be used up to 200 µg per plate for assessment purposes. Evidence of mutagenic activity of thymol was not seen. No biologically relevant increase in the mutant count, in comparison with the negative controls, was observed. The positive controls sodium azide, nitrofurantoin, 4-nitro-1,2-phenylene diamine and 2-aminoanthracene had a marked mutagenic effect, as was seen by a biologically relevant increase in mutant colonies compared to the corresponding negative controls.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.