Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 201-944-8 | CAS number: 89-83-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Toxicity to reproduction
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- screening for reproductive / developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Cross-reference
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
Reference
- Endpoint:
- short-term repeated dose toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 422 (Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction / Developmental Toxicity Screening Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 22 MAR 1996
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Details on species / strain selection:
- Crj:CD, SPF
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Age at study initiation: (8 wks
- Weight at study initiation: Males: 333-371 g; Females: 193-221 g
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20 - 25
- Humidity (%): 40 - 70
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12 - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- other: 3% gum arabic solution
- Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- not specified
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- males: 43 days
females: from 14 days before mating to day 3 of lactation - Frequency of treatment:
- daily
- Dose / conc.:
- 0 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Dose / conc.:
- 8 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Dose / conc.:
- 40 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Dose / conc.:
- 200 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 10 males + 10 females/group
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: Doses were selected based on the results of a pre-test performed at doses of 30, 100 and 300 mg/kg bw/d.
- Positive control:
- none
- Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: every week and at termination of study
- Sacrifice and pathology:
- SACRIFICE
- Male animals: All surviving animals 42 d after commencement of treatment
- Maternal animals: All surviving animals at PND 4
GROSS NECROPSY
- Gross necropsy consisted of external and internal examinations including the cervical, thoracic, and abdominal viscera.
HISTOPATHOLOGY / ORGAN WEIGHTS
The tissues indicated in Table 3 were prepared for microscopic examination and weighed, respectively. - Statistics:
- Bartlett, Kruskal-Wallis, Dunnett, Scheffé
- Clinical signs:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Decreased locomotor activity and an ataxic gait in females were observed in the 200 mg/kg group.
- Mortality:
- mortality observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence):
- One male rat died in the 200 mg/kg group.
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- A tendency for suppression of body weight gain in males was observed in the 200 mg/kg group.
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- not examined
- Description (incidence and severity):
- gavage administration
- Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Description (incidence and severity):
- gavage administration
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- no effects observed
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- no effects observed
- Endocrine findings:
- no effects observed
- Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Decreased locomotor activity and an ataxic gait in females were observed in the 200 mg/kg group.
- Immunological findings:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Organ weights were not influeced by test item (please refer to table 1).
- Gross pathological findings:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Thickening of the wall in the forestomach was observed in all male rats in the dose group of 200 mg/kg bw/day (table 2).
- Neuropathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Histopathological examination revealed mucosal hyperplasia, inflammatory cell infiltration and edema in the forestomach of both sexes, involution of the thymus of females and an increase of fatty droplets in the fascicular zone of the adrenals of females in the 200 mg/kg group. In the 40 mg/kg group, similar histopathological changes were observed in the forestomach of both sexes and in the thymus of females (table 3).
- Other effects:
- no effects observed
- Details on results:
- In the 200 mg/kg/group, one animal died and body weight gain tend to be suppressed in male rats. Femals rats showed a decrease in locomotor activity an an ataxic gait. Histopathological examination revealed mucosal hyperplasia, inflammatory cell infiltration and edema in the forestomach in both males and females. Involution of the thymus and an increase of fatty droplets in the fascicular zone of the adrenals were also observed in female rats. In the 40 mg/kg group, similar histopathological changes were observed in the forestomach in both sexes and in the thymus in female rats. There were no significant differences in food consumption or organ weights among the groups. No effects ascribable to the compound were found on hematological or blood chemical examination in male rats. The NOEL for repeat dose toxicity is considered to be 8 mg/kg/day for both sexes based on local irritation effects on the forestomach.
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEL
- Remarks:
- local effects
- Effect level:
- 8 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- act. ingr.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- histopathology: non-neoplastic
- Critical effects observed:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- The NOEL for repeat dose toxicity is 8 mg/kg bw/day for both sexes based on local irritation effects on the forestomach.
- Executive summary:
Thymol was studied for oral toxicity in rats in an OECD combined repeat dose and reproductive/developmental toxicity screening test according to OECD TG 422 at doses of 0 (vehicle), 8, 40, 200 mg/kg day. Clinical signs, behaviour, weight was recorded and hematological and biochemical parameters were determined. After termination of the study a pathological and histopathological examination was conducted. The NOEL for repeat dose toxicity is 8 mg/kg bw/day for both sexes based on local irritation effects on the forestomach.
Table 1: Absolute and relative organ weights in rats treated orally with thymol m the combined repeat dose and reproductive/developmental toxicity screening test |
|||||
|
|||||
Dose (mg/kg/day) |
0 |
8 |
40 |
200 |
|
Male |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of animals |
10 |
9 |
10 |
9 |
|
Body weight (g) |
528 ± 23.5 |
510±24.7 |
519 ± 46.4 |
506±27.7 |
|
Absolute organ weight |
|
||||
Pituitary (mg) |
14.3 ± 1.36 |
14.4±1.30 |
14.2±0.99 |
14.7 ± 1.45 |
|
Thymus (mg) |
356 ± 54.4 |
353 ± 82.8 |
361±108.4 |
391±67.6 |
|
Liver (g) |
14.48 ± 1.277 |
13.37 ± 0.817 |
14.55 ± 2.130 |
14.12 ± 1.455 |
|
Kidney (g) |
3.14±0.186 |
3.07 ± 0.330 |
3.34±0.437 |
3.20 ± 0.211 |
|
Adrenal (mg) |
70.2 ± 9.05 |
63.5 ± 11.04 |
64.9 ± 8.16 |
65.7±10.00 |
|
Testis (g) |
3.54 ± 0.210 |
3.45 ± 0.229 |
3.48 ± 0.398 |
3.55 ± 0.175 |
|
Prostate (g) |
0.71 ±0.209 |
0.63 ± 0.132 |
0.65±0.109 |
0.73±0.251 |
|
Epididymis (g) |
1.28 ± 0.069 |
1.28 ± 0.091 |
1.29 ± 0.129 |
1.27 ± 0.058 |
|
Relative organ weight |
|
||||
Pituitary (mg%) |
2.7 ± 0.28 |
2.8 ± 0.23 |
2.8 ± 0.19 |
2.9 ± 0.26 |
|
Thymus (mg%) |
67±9.9 |
69 ± 16.2 |
69 ± 17.0 |
78 ± 16.3 |
|
Liver (g%) |
2.74 ± 0.185 |
2.62±0.174 |
2.79 ± 0.203 |
2.79 ± 0.186 |
|
Kidney (g%) |
0.59±0.032 |
0.60 ± 0.061 |
0.64 ± 0.058 |
0.64 ± 0,060 |
|
Adrenal (mg%) |
13.3±2.07 |
12.4 ± 1.88 |
12.6 ± 2.12 |
13.0±1.S4 |
|
Testis (g%) |
0.67±0.052 |
0.68 ±0.070 |
0.67 ± 0.095 |
0.70 ± 0.037 |
|
Prostate (g%) |
0.13 ± 0.039 |
0.12 ± 0.028 |
0.13±0.031 |
0.14 ± 0.047 |
|
Epididymis (g%) |
0.24 ± 0.018 |
0.25 ± 0.022 |
0.25±0.030 |
0.25 ± 0.009 |
|
Female |
|
||||
Number of animals |
10 |
10 |
10 |
8 |
|
Body weight (g) |
313 ± 12.2 |
320±13.8 |
324 ± 11.5. |
314±23.3 |
|
Absolute organ weight. |
|
||||
Pituitary (mg) |
21.3±2.95 |
21.3±2.90 |
21.9±1.29 |
20.3±3.26 |
|
Thymus (mg.) |
212 ± 56.5 |
232 ± 39.5 |
216±67.9 |
210 ± 79.7 |
|
Liver (g) |
13.78±0.612 |
13.50 ± 1.493 |
15.09 ± 1.021 |
14.91 ± 1.189 |
|
Kidney (g) |
1.98 ± 0.163 |
1.98 ± 0.134 |
2.02 ± 0.157 |
2.05 ± 0.180 |
|
Adrenal (mg) |
71.7±11.83 |
71.9±9.19 |
77.7 ± 9.04 |
70.1 ± 9.05 |
|
Relative organ weight |
|
||||
Pituitary (mg%) |
6.8 ± 0.94 |
6.7±0.80 |
6.8 ± 0.31 |
6.5±0.75 |
|
Thymus (mg%) |
68 ± 18.3 |
73±12.4 |
67 ±22.6 |
65±22.8 |
|
Liver (g%) |
4.41±0.172 |
4.22 ± 0.422 |
4.66 ± 0.259 |
4.75 ± 0.240 |
|
Kidney (g%) |
0.63 ± 0.034 |
0.62±0.039 |
0.63 ± 0.038 |
0.65±0.073 |
|
Adrenal (mg%) |
22.9 ± 3.33 |
22.5 ± 2.93 |
24.0 ± 2.60 |
22.3 ± 2.14 |
|
Values are expressed as Mean±S.D. |
|
Table 2:Summary of necropsy findings in rats treated orally with thymol in the combined repeat dose and reproductive/developmental toxicity screening test |
||||||||||
|
Sex |
Male |
Female |
|||||||
Organ Findings |
Fate |
Scheduled sacrifice |
Dead |
Scheduled sacrifice |
||||||
Dose (mg/kg/day) |
0 |
8 |
40 |
200 |
200 |
0 |
8 |
40 |
200 |
|
Number of animals |
10 |
9 |
10 |
9 |
1# |
10 |
10 |
10 |
9 |
|
Thymus |
||||||||||
Small |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
Stomach |
||||||||||
Thickening of wall in forestomach |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Heart |
||||||||||
Dilatation of atrium |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Lung |
||||||||||
Congestion |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Liver |
||||||||||
Congestion |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Adrenal |
||||||||||
Whitish |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
|
Brain |
||||||||||
Dilatation of cerebral ventricle |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
#, One animal died at43days after commencement of treatment. |
Table 5: Summary of histopathological findings in rats treated orally with thymol in the combined repeat dose and reproductive/developmental toxicity screening test | |||||||||||
Sex | Male | Female | |||||||||
Organ Findings | Fate | Scheduled sacrifice | Dead | Scheduled sacrifice | |||||||
Dose (mg/kg/day) | 0 | 8 | 40 | 200 | 200 | 0 | 8 | 40 | 200 | ||
Number of animals | 10 | 9 | 10 | 9 | 1* | 10 | 10 | 10 | 9 | ||
Thymus |
|||||||||||
Involution | + | * | * | * | * | * | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
Stomach | |||||||||||
Edema, forestomach | + | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0/2& | 0/5& | 0/5& | 0/5& | |
Erosion, forestomach | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0/2 | 0/5 | 1/5 | 0/5 | |
Hyperplasia, mucosa, forestomach | + | 0 | 0 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 0/2 | 0/5 | 2/5 | 3/5 | |
++ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0/2 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 1/5 | ||
Inflammatory cell infiltration, forestomach | + | 0 | 0 | 6 | 9 | 0 | 0/2 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 2/5 | |
Heart | |||||||||||
Inflammatory cell infiltration, focal | + | 6 | * | * | 1 | 0 | 0 | * | * | 1 | |
Spleen | |||||||||||
Extramedullar hematopoiesis | + | 0 | * | * | 0 | 0 | 0 | * | * | 1 | |
Lung | |||||||||||
Congestive edema | ++ | * | * | * | * | 1 | * | * | * | * | |
Inflammatory cell infiltration | + | * | * | * | * | 1 | * | * | * | * | |
Liver | |||||||||||
Congestion | + | 0 | * | * | 0 | 1 | 0 | * | * | 0 | |
Extramedullar hematopoiesis | + | 0 | * | * | 0 | 0 | 0 | * | * | 1 | |
Hemorrhage, focal | + | 2 | * | * | 0 | 0 | 0 | * | * | 0 | |
Microgranuloma | + | 9 | * | * | 6 | 0 | 1 | * | * | 0 | |
Kidney | |||||||||||
Basophilic change, tubular epithelium | + | 1 | * | * | 0 | 0 | 3 | * | * | 2 | |
Calcification, corticomedullar junction | + | 2 | * | * | 1 | 0 | 1 | * | * | 1 | |
Cyst | + | 1 | * | * | 0 | 0 | 1 | * | * | 0 | |
Fibrosis, focal | + | 0 | * | * | 0 | 0 | 1 | * | * | 1 | |
Hyaline droplet, tubular elithelium | + | 2 | * | * | 1 | 0 | 0 | * | * | 0 | |
Testis | |||||||||||
Atrophy, seminiferous tubule | + | 1 | * | * | 0 | 0 | |||||
Epididymis | |||||||||||
Inflammatory cell infiltration | + | 1 | * | * | 1 | 0 | |||||
Prostate | |||||||||||
Inflammatory cell infiltration | + | 10 | * | * | 4 | 0 | |||||
Pituitary | |||||||||||
Cyst | + | 0 | * | * | 0 | 0 | 0 | * | * | 1 | |
Hyperplasia, rathke's pouch | + | 1 | * | * | 0 | 0 | 0 | * | * | 0 | |
Adrenal | |||||||||||
Increase of fatty droplet, fascicular zone | + | 0 | * | * | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
Brain | |||||||||||
Dilatation of cerebral ventricle | + | 0 | * | * | 1 | 0 | 0 | * | * | 0 | |
+, Slight; ++, Moderate; *, Not examined. | |||||||||||
&, Number of animals showing lesion / number of animals examined. | |||||||||||
#, One animal died at 43 days after commencement of treatment. |
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 996
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 422 (Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction / Developmental Toxicity Screening Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 22 MAR 1996
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Thymol
- EC Number:
- 201-944-8
- EC Name:
- Thymol
- Cas Number:
- 89-83-8
- Molecular formula:
- C10H14O
- IUPAC Name:
- 5-methyl-2-(propan-2-yl)phenol
- Test material form:
- solid
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Details on species / strain selection:
- Crj:CD, SPF
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Age at study initiation: (P) 8 wks
- Weight at study initiation: (P) Males: 333-371 g; Females: 193-221 g
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20 - 25
- Humidity (%): 40 - 70
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- other: 3% gum arabic solution
- Details on mating procedure:
- no data
- Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- not specified
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- males: 43 days
females: from 14 days before mating to day 3 of lactation - Frequency of treatment:
- daily
- Details on study schedule:
- terminal kill:
males: 44 days
females: day 4 of lactation
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Dose / conc.:
- 0 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Dose / conc.:
- 8 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Dose / conc.:
- 40 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Dose / conc.:
- 200 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 10 males + 10 females/group
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: Doses were selected based on the results of a pre-test performed at doses of 30, 100 and 300 mg/kg bw/d.
- Positive control:
- none
Examinations
- Parental animals: Observations and examinations:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: every week and at termination of study
- Oestrous cyclicity (parental animals):
- estrous cycle in days was monitored
- Sperm parameters (parental animals):
- Parameters examined in P male parental generations: testis weight, epididymis weight
- Litter observations:
- PARAMETERS EXAMINED
The following parameters were examined in F1 offspring: number and sex of pups, stillbirths, live births, postnatal mortality, presence of gross anomalies, weight gain, physical or behavioural abnormalities - Postmortem examinations (parental animals):
- SACRIFICE
- Male animals: All surviving animals 42 d after commencement of treatment
- Maternal animals: All surviving animals at PND 4
GROSS NECROPSY
- Gross necropsy consisted of external and internal examinations including the cervical, thoracic, and abdominal viscera.
HISTOPATHOLOGY / ORGAN WEIGHTS
The tissues indicated in Table 3 were prepared for microscopic examination and weighed, respectively. - Statistics:
- Bartlett, Kruskal-Wallis, Dunnett, Scheffé
- Reproductive indices:
- Mating index (%) = (Number of pairs with successful mating/number of pairs examined) x 100
Fertility index (%) = (Number of pregnant animals/number of pairs with successful mating) x 100
Gestation index (%) = (Number of females with live pups/number of pregnant females) x 100
Implantation index (%) = (Number of implantation sites/number of corpora lutea) x 100 - Offspring viability indices:
- Delivery index (%) = (Number of pups delivered/number of implantation sites) x 100
Live birth index (%) = (Number of live pups on day 0/number of pups delivered) x 100
Viability index (%) = (Number of live pups on day 4/number of live pups on day 0) x 100
Results and discussion
Results: P0 (first parental generation)
General toxicity (P0)
- Clinical signs:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Decreased locomotor activity and an ataxic gait in females were observed in the 200 mg/kg group.
- Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
- not examined
- Mortality:
- mortality observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence):
- One male rat died in the 200 mg/kg group.
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- A tendency for suppression of body weight gain in males was observed in the 200 mg/kg group.
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- not examined
- Description (incidence and severity):
- gavage administration
- Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Description (incidence and severity):
- gavage administration
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- no effects observed
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- no effects observed
- Endocrine findings:
- no effects observed
- Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Decreased locomotor activity and an ataxic gait in females were observed in the 200 mg/kg group.
- Immunological findings:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Histopathological examination revealed mucosal hyperplasia, inflammatory cell infiltration and edema in the forestomach of both sexes, involution of the thymus of females and an increase of fatty droplets in the fascicular zone of the adrenals of females in the 200 mg/kg group. In the 40 mg/kg group, similar histopathological changes were observed in the forestomach of both sexes and in the thymus of females (table 3).
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Other effects:
- not examined
Reproductive function / performance (P0)
- Reproductive function: oestrous cycle:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The duration of the oestrous cycle was unchanged by treatment (table 4).
- Reproductive function: sperm measures:
- not examined
- Reproductive performance:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The compound exerted no effects on reproductive parameters such as the estrous cycle, mating index, fertility index, gestation length, number of corpora lutea or implatations, the implantation index, gestation index, delivery index, parturition or maternal behaviour. Birth weight and body weight gain tended to be low in the 200 mg/kg group neonates. This is considered to be caused by the higher litter size. There were no significant differences in numbers of offspring or live offspring at birth, the sex ratio, live birth index or viability index. No abnormal findings ascribable to the compound were found on external examination, or in terms of clinical signs or necropsy finding for the neonates (please refer to table 4 and 5).
Effect levels (P0)
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEL
- Effect level:
- 200 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- reproductive performance
- Remarks on result:
- not determinable due to absence of adverse toxic effects
Target system / organ toxicity (P0)
- Critical effects observed:
- no
Results: P1 (second parental generation)
Effect levels (P1)
- Remarks on result:
- not measured/tested
Results: F1 generation
General toxicity (F1)
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
- not examined
- Mortality / viability:
- mortality observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The slightly reduced viability index in the 200 mg/kg bw dose group on PND 4 (table 5) is considered to be caused by the higher litter size.
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The slightly reduced body weight of the pups on PND 0 and PND 4 in the 200 mg/kg bw dose group (table 5) is considered to be caused by the higher litter size.
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- not examined
- Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- not specified
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not specified
- Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Sexual maturation:
- not examined
- Anogenital distance (AGD):
- not examined
- Nipple retention in male pups:
- not specified
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not specified
- Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings:
- not specified
- Other effects:
- not specified
Developmental neurotoxicity (F1)
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not specified
Developmental immunotoxicity (F1)
- Developmental immunotoxicity:
- not examined
Effect levels (F1)
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEL
- Generation:
- F1
- Effect level:
- 200 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: Marginally reduced birth weight at 200 mg/kg bw is considered to be related to higher litter size.
- Remarks on result:
- not determinable due to absence of adverse toxic effects
Target system / organ toxicity (F1)
- Critical effects observed:
- no
Results: F2 generation
Effect levels (F2)
- Remarks on result:
- not measured/tested
Target system / organ toxicity (F2)
- Critical effects observed:
- not specified
Overall reproductive toxicity
- Reproductive effects observed:
- no
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1: Absolute and relative organ weights in rats treated orally with thymol m the combined repeat dose and reproductive/developmental toxicity screening test |
|||||
|
|||||
Dose (mg/kg/day) |
0 |
8 |
40 |
200 |
|
Male |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of animals |
10 |
9 |
10 |
9 |
|
Body weight (g) |
528 ± 23.5 |
510±24.7 |
519 ± 46.4 |
506±27.7 |
|
Absolute organ weight |
|
||||
Pituitary (mg) |
14.3 ± 1.36 |
14.4±1.30 |
14.2±0.99 |
14.7 ± 1.45 |
|
Thymus (mg) |
356 ± 54.4 |
353 ± 82.8 |
361±108.4 |
391±67.6 |
|
Liver (g) |
14.48 ± 1.277 |
13.37 ± 0.817 |
14.55 ± 2.130 |
14.12 ± 1.455 |
|
Kidney (g) |
3.14±0.186 |
3.07 ± 0.330 |
3.34±0.437 |
3.20 ± 0.211 |
|
Adrenal (mg) |
70.2 ± 9.05 |
63.5 ± 11.04 |
64.9 ± 8.16 |
65.7±10.00 |
|
Testis (g) |
3.54 ± 0.210 |
3.45 ± 0.229 |
3.48 ± 0.398 |
3.55 ± 0.175 |
|
Prostate (g) |
0.71 ±0.209 |
0.63 ± 0.132 |
0.65±0.109 |
0.73±0.251 |
|
Epididymis (g) |
1.28 ± 0.069 |
1.28 ± 0.091 |
1.29 ± 0.129 |
1.27 ± 0.058 |
|
Relative organ weight |
|
||||
Pituitary (mg%) |
2.7 ± 0.28 |
2.8 ± 0.23 |
2.8 ± 0.19 |
2.9 ± 0.26 |
|
Thymus (mg%) |
67±9.9 |
69 ± 16.2 |
69 ± 17.0 |
78 ± 16.3 |
|
Liver (g%) |
2.74 ± 0.185 |
2.62±0.174 |
2.79 ± 0.203 |
2.79 ± 0.186 |
|
Kidney (g%) |
0.59±0.032 |
0.60 ± 0.061 |
0.64 ± 0.058 |
0.64 ± 0,060 |
|
Adrenal (mg%) |
13.3±2.07 |
12.4 ± 1.88 |
12.6 ± 2.12 |
13.0±1.S4 |
|
Testis (g%) |
0.67±0.052 |
0.68 ±0.070 |
0.67 ± 0.095 |
0.70 ± 0.037 |
|
Prostate (g%) |
0.13 ± 0.039 |
0.12 ± 0.028 |
0.13±0.031 |
0.14 ± 0.047 |
|
Epididymis (g%) |
0.24 ± 0.018 |
0.25 ± 0.022 |
0.25±0.030 |
0.25 ± 0.009 |
|
Female |
|
||||
Number of animals |
10 |
10 |
10 |
8 |
|
Body weight (g) |
313 ± 12.2 |
320±13.8 |
324 ± 11.5. |
314±23.3 |
|
Absolute organ weight. |
|
||||
Pituitary (mg) |
21.3±2.95 |
21.3±2.90 |
21.9±1.29 |
20.3±3.26 |
|
Thymus (mg.) |
212 ± 56.5 |
232 ± 39.5 |
216±67.9 |
210 ± 79.7 |
|
Liver (g) |
13.78±0.612 |
13.50 ± 1.493 |
15.09 ± 1.021 |
14.91 ± 1.189 |
|
Kidney (g) |
1.98 ± 0.163 |
1.98 ± 0.134 |
2.02 ± 0.157 |
2.05 ± 0.180 |
|
Adrenal (mg) |
71.7±11.83 |
71.9±9.19 |
77.7 ± 9.04 |
70.1 ± 9.05 |
|
Relative organ weight |
|
||||
Pituitary (mg%) |
6.8 ± 0.94 |
6.7±0.80 |
6.8 ± 0.31 |
6.5±0.75 |
|
Thymus (mg%) |
68 ± 18.3 |
73±12.4 |
67 ±22.6 |
65±22.8 |
|
Liver (g%) |
4.41±0.172 |
4.22 ± 0.422 |
4.66 ± 0.259 |
4.75 ± 0.240 |
|
Kidney (g%) |
0.63 ± 0.034 |
0.62±0.039 |
0.63 ± 0.038 |
0.65±0.073 |
|
Adrenal (mg%) |
22.9 ± 3.33 |
22.5 ± 2.93 |
24.0 ± 2.60 |
22.3 ± 2.14 |
|
Values are expressed as Mean±S.D. |
|
Table 2: Summary of necropsy findings in rats treated orally with thymol in the combined repeat dose and reproductive/developmental toxicity screening test |
||||||||||
|
Sex |
Male |
Female |
|||||||
Organ Findings |
Fate |
Scheduled sacrifice |
Dead |
Scheduled sacrifice |
||||||
Dose (mg/kg/day) |
0 |
8 |
40 |
200 |
200 |
0 |
8 |
40 |
200 |
|
Number of animals |
10 |
9 |
10 |
9 |
1# |
10 |
10 |
10 |
9 |
|
Thymus |
||||||||||
Small |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
Stomach |
||||||||||
Thickening of wall in forestomach |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Heart |
||||||||||
Dilatation of atrium |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Lung |
||||||||||
Congestion |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Liver |
||||||||||
Congestion |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Adrenal |
||||||||||
Whitish |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
|
Brain |
||||||||||
Dilatation of cerebral ventricle |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
#, One animal died at43days after commencement of treatment. |
Table 3: Summary of histopathological findings in rats treated orally with thymol in the combined repeat dose and reproductive/developmental toxicity screening test | |||||||||||
Sex | Male | Female | |||||||||
Organ Findings | Fate | Scheduled sacrifice | Dead | Scheduled sacrifice | |||||||
Dose (mg/kg/day) | 0 | 8 | 40 | 200 | 200 | 0 | 8 | 40 | 200 | ||
Number of animals | 10 | 9 | 10 | 9 | 1* | 10 | 10 | 10 | 9 | ||
Thymus |
|||||||||||
Involution | + | * | * | * | * | * | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
Stomach | |||||||||||
Edema, forestomach | + | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0/2& | 0/5& | 0/5& | 0/5& | |
Erosion, forestomach | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0/2 | 0/5 | 1/5 | 0/5 | |
Hyperplasia, mucosa, forestomach | + | 0 | 0 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 0/2 | 0/5 | 2/5 | 3/5 | |
++ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0/2 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 1/5 | ||
Inflammatory cell infiltration, forestomach | + | 0 | 0 | 6 | 9 | 0 | 0/2 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 2/5 | |
Heart | |||||||||||
Inflammatory cell infiltration, focal | + | 6 | * | * | 1 | 0 | 0 | * | * | 1 | |
Spleen | |||||||||||
Extramedullar hematopoiesis | + | 0 | * | * | 0 | 0 | 0 | * | * | 1 | |
Lung | |||||||||||
Congestive edema | ++ | * | * | * | * | 1 | * | * | * | * | |
Inflammatory cell infiltration | + | * | * | * | * | 1 | * | * | * | * | |
Liver | |||||||||||
Congestion | + | 0 | * | * | 0 | 1 | 0 | * | * | 0 | |
Extramedullar hematopoiesis | + | 0 | * | * | 0 | 0 | 0 | * | * | 1 | |
Hemorrhage, focal | + | 2 | * | * | 0 | 0 | 0 | * | * | 0 | |
Microgranuloma | + | 9 | * | * | 6 | 0 | 1 | * | * | 0 | |
Kidney | |||||||||||
Basophilic change, tubular epithelium | + | 1 | * | * | 0 | 0 | 3 | * | * | 2 | |
Calcification, corticomedullar junction | + | 2 | * | * | 1 | 0 | 1 | * | * | 1 | |
Cyst | + | 1 | * | * | 0 | 0 | 1 | * | * | 0 | |
Fibrosis, focal | + | 0 | * | * | 0 | 0 | 1 | * | * | 1 | |
Hyaline droplet, tubular elithelium | + | 2 | * | * | 1 | 0 | 0 | * | * | 0 | |
Testis | |||||||||||
Atrophy, seminiferous tubule | + | 1 | * | * | 0 | 0 | |||||
Epididymis | |||||||||||
Inflammatory cell infiltration | + | 1 | * | * | 1 | 0 | |||||
Prostate | |||||||||||
Inflammatory cell infiltration | + | 10 | * | * | 4 | 0 | |||||
Pituitary | |||||||||||
Cyst | + | 0 | * | * | 0 | 0 | 0 | * | * | 1 | |
Hyperplasia, rathke's pouch | + | 1 | * | * | 0 | 0 | 0 | * | * | 0 | |
Adrenal | |||||||||||
Increase of fatty droplet, fascicular zone | + | 0 | * | * | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
Brain | |||||||||||
Dilatation of cerebral ventricle | + | 0 | * | * | 1 | 0 | 0 | * | * | 0 | |
+, Slight; ++, Moderate; *, Not examined. | |||||||||||
&, Number of animals showing lesion / number of animals examined. | |||||||||||
#, One animal died at 43 days after commencement of treatment. |
Table 4: Fertility and pregnancy data in rats treated orally with thymol in the combined repeat dose and reproductive/developmental toxicity screening test |
||||
Dose (mg/kg/day) |
0 |
8 |
40 |
200 |
Estrous cycle (days) |
4.3±0.41c) |
4.3 ± 0.35 |
4.6 ± 0.60 |
4.3 ± 0.42 |
Number of pairs examined |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
Number of pairs with successful mating |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
Mating index (%)a) |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Number of pregnant females |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
Fertility index (%)b) |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Pairing days until mating |
2.3 ± 1.06 |
2.7 ± 1.16 |
3.0 ± 0.94 |
3.6 ± 3.89 |
Number of estrous stages without mating |
0.0 ± 0.00 |
0.0 ± 0.00 |
0.0 ± 0.00 |
0.0 ± 0.00 |
a) Mating index (%) = (Number of pairs with successful mating/number of pairs examined) x 100 b) Fertility index (%) = (Number of pregnant animals/number of pairs with successful mating) x 100 c) Values are expressed as Mean±S.D. |
Table 5: Delivery and litter data in rats treated orally with thymol in the combined repeat dose and reproductive/developmental toxicity screening test |
||||
Dose (mg/kg/day) |
0 |
8 |
40 |
200 |
Number of females examined |
10 |
10 |
10 |
9 |
Number of females with live pups |
10 |
10 |
10 |
8 |
Gestation index (%)a) |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
88.9 |
Gestation length (days) |
22.3 ± 0.48f) |
22.5 ± 0.53 |
22.4 ± 0.52 |
22.4 ± 0.52 |
Number of corpora lutea |
17.2 ± 1.81 |
17.5±1.72 |
18.3 ± 2.26 |
17.9 ± 1.97 |
Number of implantation sites |
15.9 ± 1.37 |
16.5 ± 1.95 |
17.2 ± 2.57 |
15.6 ± 4.58 |
Implantation index (%)b) |
92.9 |
94.4 |
93.9 |
86.9 |
Delivery index (%)c) |
96.7 |
90.7 |
93.5 |
84.9 |
Number of pups delivered |
15.4 ± 1.78 |
15.0 ± 2.16 |
16.0 + 2.05 |
16.4 ± 1.77 |
Number of live pups on day 0 |
15.3 ± 1.70 |
14.8 ± 2.10 |
15.8 ± 1.81 |
16.1 ±1.73 |
Live birth index (%)d) |
99.4 |
98.7 |
99.0 |
98.5 |
Sex ratio (male/female) |
0.83 (70/84) |
0.74 (64/86) |
1.05 (82/78) |
0.87 (61/70) |
Number of live pups on day 4 |
15.3 ± 1.70 |
14.6 ± 2.46 |
15.6 ± 1.90 |
15.3±1.98 |
Viability index on day 4 (%)e) |
100.0 |
98.3 |
98.7 |
94.9 |
Body weight of pups (g) |
|
|
|
|
on day 0 male |
6.8 ± 0.66 |
6.7 ± 0.53 |
6.5 ± 0.85 |
6.1 ± 0.56 |
female |
6.4 ± 0.62 |
6.3 ± 0.52 |
6.1 ± 0.78 |
5.8 ± 0.46 |
on day 4 male |
10.8 ±1.06 |
10.7 ± 1.07 |
10.5 ±1.09 |
9.7±1.29 |
female |
10.2 ± 1.06 |
10.2 ±1.06 |
10.2 ± 1.11 |
9.3 ± 1.16 |
Body weight gain of pups (g) |
|
|
|
|
day 0 to 4 male |
4.1 ± 0.61 |
4.0 ± 0.59 |
4.0 ± 0.48 |
3.5 ± 0.79 |
female |
3.8 ± 0.63 |
3.9 ± 0.57 |
4.1 ± 0.53 |
3.4 ± 0.78 |
a) Gestation index (%) = (Number of females with live pups/number of pregnant females) x 100 b) Implantation index (%) = (Number of implantation sites/number of corpora lutea) x 100 c) Delivery index (%) = (Number of pups delivered/number of implantation sites) x 100 d) Live birth index (%) = (Number of live pups on day0/number of pups delivered) x 100 e) Viability index (%) = (Number of live pups on day4/number of live pups on day0) x 100 f) Values are expressed as Mean + S.D. |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- The NOELs for reproductive and developmental toxicity are considered to be 200 mg/kg/day for parental males and females, and 200 mg/kg/day for offspring. The marginally reduced birth weight at 200 mg/kg bw was related to higher litter size.
- Executive summary:
Thymol was studied for oral toxicity in rats in an OECD combined repeated dose and reproductive/developmental toxicity screening test according to OECD TG 422 at doses of 0 (vehicle), 8, 40, 200 mg/kg day.
The compound exerted no effects on reproductive parameters such as the estrous cycle, mating index, fertility index, gestation length, number of corpora lutea or implantations, the implantation index, gestation index, delivery index, parturition or maternal behaviour. Birth weight and body weight gain tended to be low in the 200 mg/kg group neonates. This is considered to be related to the higher litter size. There were no significant differences in numbers of offspring or live offspring at birth, the sex ratio, live birth index or viability index. No abnormal findings ascribable to the compound were found on external examination, or in terms of clinical signs or necropsy finding for the neonates.
The NOELs for reproductive and developmental toxicity are considered to be 200 mg/kg/day for parental males and females, and 200 mg/kg/day for offspring (marginaly reduced birth weight at 200 mg/kg bw was related to higher litter size).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.