Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 201-944-8 | CAS number: 89-83-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Biodegradation in soil
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in soil, other
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 4 (not assignable)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Data is from peer reviewed journal and secondary source
- Justification for type of information:
- Data is from peer reviewed journal and secondary source
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: as mentioned below
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Biodegradation study in soil was conducted for 30 days for determining the dissipation half-life (DT50) of the chemical 2-Isopropyl-5-methylphenol.
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Test type:
- laboratory
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Name of test material (IUPAC Name): 2-Isopropyl-5-methylphenol- Common name: Thymol- Molecular formula: C10H14O- Molecular weight: 150.2196 g/mol- Smiles notation: c1(c(cc(C)cc1)O)C(C)C- InChI: 1S/C10H14O/c1-7(2)9-5-4-8(3)6-10(9)11/h4-7,11H,1-3H3- Substance type: Organic- Physical state: Solid- Locations of the label (if radiolabelling): Radiolabeling was done at the 3rd position of hydrogen i.e 3H-Thymol was synthesized. - Other: 3H-Thymol was synthesized by PerkinElmer Life Sciences and Analytical Sciences (Boston, MA). The specific activities of thymol was 27.7 mCi/mmol, respectively. Analytical standards of thymol was purchased from Lancaster Synthesis, Inc. (Pelham, NH)
- Radiolabelling:
- yes
- Oxygen conditions:
- aerobic
- Soil classification:
- not specified
- Soil no.:
- #1
- Soil type:
- sandy loam
- % Clay:
- 18
- % Silt:
- 22
- % Sand:
- 60
- % Org. C:
- 1.6
- pH:
- 7
- Details on soil characteristics:
- SOIL COLLECTION AND STORAGE- Geographic location: Soil was collected at the Iowa State University Agronomy and Agricultural Engineering Research Farm near Ames, Iowa (field 55).PROPERTIES OF THE SOILS (in addition to defined fields)- Moisture at 1/3 atm (%): Soil moisture content was adjusted to 75% of −33 J/ kg moisture.
- Soil No.:
- #1
- Duration:
- 30 d
- Soil No.:
- #1
- Initial conc.:
- 10 other: mg/g
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Parameter followed for biodegradation estimation:
- test mat. analysis
- Soil No.:
- #1
- Temp.:
- 25± 2°C
- Humidity:
- No data available
- Microbial biomass:
- No data available
- Details on experimental conditions:
- EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN- Soil (g/replicate): 50 g/4 replicates for each group.- No. of replication treatments: 4 replicates - Test apparatus (Type/material/volume): French square bottles of 250 ml volume were used as a test vessel for the study.- Details of traps for CO2 and organic volatile, if any: Polyurethane foam was suspended above the treated soils inside each bottle to capture volatile compounds. Polyurethane foam was changed biweekly. Anhydrous calcium sulfate (Drierite; 1.5g) was used to trap 3H2O in the air in the container. Drierite was changed when it turned pink.SAMPLING DETAILS- Sampling intervals: Soil samples were taken at pretreatment and 1, 3, 7, 14 and 30 days post-treatment. > Sample storage before analysis: Soil samples were stored in the −20 ◦C freezer prior to analysis.
- Soil No.:
- #1
- % Recovery:
- 90
- Remarks on result:
- other: %Recovery is >90%.
- Key result
- Soil No.:
- #1
- % Degr.:
- 50
- Parameter:
- test mat. analysis
- Remarks:
- (% degradation)
- Sampling time:
- 5.35 d
- Remarks on result:
- other: Other details not known
- Key result
- Soil No.:
- #1
- DT50:
- 5.35 d
- Temp.:
- 25 °C
- Remarks on result:
- other: Other details not known
- Transformation products:
- not specified
- Evaporation of parent compound:
- not specified
- Volatile metabolites:
- yes
- Residues:
- yes
- Details on results:
- Test chemical thymol was quantified by a HPLC method coupled with LSC. The retention times for thymol was 12.5 on the HPLC chromatogram. Recoveries of 3H-thymol was more than 90% from soil, as determined by spike-recovery experiments at the initial time point.In soil, the cumulative volatilization of test chemical in 1 month reached 26%. The lower volatilization from soil compared with that from water is probably due to adsorption to soil colloids. The evolved 3H2O remained consistently less than 1% throughout the study period, indicating that little mineralization occurred. The average radioactivity as bound residues remained below 3% in 1month.
- Conclusions:
- The percentage degradation of test chemical 2-Isopropyl-5-methylphenol in soil was determined to be 50% in 5.35 days (128.4 hrs).
- Executive summary:
Biodegradation study in soil was conducted under aerobic conditions for 30 days for determining the dissipation half-life (DT50) of the chemical 2-Isopropyl-5-methylphenol (Thymol) (CAS no. 89-83-8).3H-Thymol was synthesized by PerkinElmer Life Sciences and Analytical Sciences (Boston, MA).The specific activities of thymol was 27.7 mCi/mmol,respectively.Analytical standards of thymol was purchased from Lancaster Synthesis, Inc. (Pelham, NH).Initial test substance conc. used in the study was 10 mg/g. Sandy loam soilcollected at the Iowa State University Agronomy and Agricultural Engineering Research Farm near Ames, Iowa (field 55) was used as a test inoculum for the study. The soil was classified as a sandy loam, a Nicollet–Webster complex with 1.6% organic matter, 60% sand, 22% silt and 18% clay, and pH 7.0.Soil (50 g) was kept in a 250mL French square bottle, and soil moisture content was adjusted to 75% of−33 J/ kg moisture. The temperature was maintained at 25±2◦C. Soil samples were treated with 3H-thymol in 300μL of acetone carrier at 10μg/g. Thymol had a total radioactivity of 1.8μCi applied in this study. There were four replications for each group. Bottles were sealed with perforated caps to maintain an aerobic condition.Polyurethane foam was suspended above the treated soils inside each bottle to capture volatile compounds.Polyurethane foam was changed biweekly. Anhydrous calcium sulfate (Drierite; 1.5g) was used to trap 3H2O in the air in the container. Drierite was changed when it turned pink.Soil sampleswere taken at pretreatment and 1, 3, 7, 14 and 30 days post-treatment. These soil sampleswere then stored in the−20◦C freezer prior to analysis. Quantitative analysis of thymol was performed using a Hewlett-Packard (Palo Alto, CA) series 1100 HPLC system with a quaternary pump, an autosampler, a thermostatted column compartment and a Spectroflow 757 absorbance detector (ABI Analytical, Kratos Division, Ramsey, NJ). Data were collected and analyzed using HP Chemstation system software (REV. A.04.01). An Alltech Adsorbosphere(Deerfield, IL) C18 column (4.6×250mm, 5μm particle size) was used. Detection was conducted at 270nm with a flowrate of 1.0mL min−1 at room temperature. The mobile phase was methanol+distilled water (70+30 by volume).Soil samples (50 g) were extracted with methanol + distilled water (95 + 5 by volume) 3 times, and the resulting extracts were pooled. Filtered samples were directly injected for HPLC analysis. HPLC fractions were collected for liquid scintillation counting (LSC). Drierite and polyurethane foam were extracted with methanol 4 times, and the resulting extracts were subjected to LSC to measure trapped radioactivity. Non-extractable radioactive residues in soil were measured by soil combustion using a Packard sample oxidizer.14 Briefly, a 0.5 g soil sample was incorporated into a cellulose pellet, and they were combusted for capture of 3H2O, and three replications were performed for each treatment.The dissipation half-lives(DT50)were calculated using a first-order dissipation model.A Student’st-test was used to compare dissipation rates of thymol in light and in dark from the water dissipation studies. The criterion for statistical significance was set at theP<0.05 level.Test chemical thymol was quantified by a HPLC method coupled with LSC. The retention times for thymol was 12.5 on the HPLC chromatogram. Recoveries of 3H-thymol was more than 90% from soil, as determined by spike-recovery experiments at the initial time point. In soil, the cumulative volatilization of test chemical in 1 month reached 26%. The lower volatilization from soil compared with that from water is probably due to adsorption to soil colloids. The evolved 3H2O remained consistently less than 1% throughout the study period, indicating that little mineralization occurred. The average radioactivity as bound residues remained below 3% in 1month.The percentage degradation of test chemical 2-Isopropyl-5-methylphenol in soil was determined to be 50% in 5.35 days (128.4 hrs). Thus, based on percentage degradation, it is concluded that the chemical 2-Isopropyl-5-methylphenol is not persistent in the soil environment and the exposure risk to soil dwelling animals is moderate to low.
Reference
Table: Dissipation half-lives(DT50)of thymol in water.
Incubation conditions | DT50 (days) (± S. D.) | R2a | Replications (n) |
Thymol in soil | 5.35 (± 0.13) | 0.79 | 4 |
a =R2 is the correlation coefficient for the first-order dissipation model.
In soil, the DT50 of thymol was 5 days.
Description of key information
Biodegradation study in soil was conducted under aerobic conditions for 30 days for determining the dissipation half-life (DT50) of the chemical 2-Isopropyl-5-methylphenol (Thymol) (CAS no. 89-83-8) (Dingfei Hu et. al.; 2008). 3H-Thymol was synthesized by PerkinElmer Life Sciences and Analytical Sciences (Boston, MA).The specific activities of thymol was 27.7 mCi/mmol,respectively.Analytical standards of thymol was purchased from Lancaster Synthesis, Inc. (Pelham, NH).Initial test substance conc. used in the study was 10 mg/g. Sandy loam soilcollected at the Iowa State University Agronomy and Agricultural Engineering Research Farm near Ames, Iowa (field 55) was used as a test inoculum for the study. The soil was classified as a sandy loam, a Nicollet–Webster complex with 1.6% organic matter, 60% sand, 22% silt and 18% clay, and pH 7.0.Soil (50 g) was kept in a 250mL French square bottle, and soil moisture content was adjusted to 75% of−33 J/ kg moisture. The temperature was maintained at 25±2◦C. Soil samples were treated with 3H-thymol in 300μL of acetone carrier at 10μg/g. Thymol had a total radioactivity of 1.8μCi applied in this study. There were four replications for each group. Bottles were sealed with perforated caps to maintain an aerobic condition.Polyurethane foam was suspended above the treated soils inside each bottle to capture volatile compounds.Polyurethane foam was changed biweekly. Anhydrous calcium sulfate (Drierite; 1.5g) was used to trap 3H2O in the air in the container. Drierite was changed when it turned pink.Soil sampleswere taken at pretreatment and 1, 3, 7, 14 and 30 days post-treatment. These soil sampleswere then stored in the−20◦C freezer prior to analysis. Quantitative analysis of thymol was performed using a Hewlett-Packard (Palo Alto, CA) series 1100 HPLC system with a quaternary pump, an autosampler, a thermostatted column compartment and a Spectroflow 757 absorbance detector (ABI Analytical, Kratos Division, Ramsey, NJ). Data were collected and analyzed using HP Chemstation system software (REV. A.04.01). An Alltech Adsorbosphere(Deerfield, IL) C18 column (4.6×250mm, 5μm particle size) was used. Detection was conducted at 270nm with a flowrate of 1.0mL min−1 at room temperature. The mobile phase was methanol+distilled water (70+30 by volume).Soil samples (50 g) were extracted with methanol + distilled water (95 + 5 by volume) 3 times, and the resulting extracts were pooled. Filtered samples were directly injected for HPLC analysis. HPLC fractions were collected for liquid scintillation counting (LSC). Drierite and polyurethane foam were extracted with methanol 4 times, and the resulting extracts were subjected to LSC to measure trapped radioactivity. Non-extractable radioactive residues in soil were measured by soil combustion using a Packard sample oxidizer.14 Briefly, a 0.5 g soil sample was incorporated into a cellulose pellet, and they were combusted for capture of 3H2O, and three replications were performed for each treatment.The dissipation half-lives(DT50)were calculated using a first-order dissipation model.A Student’st-test was used to compare dissipation rates of thymol in light and in dark from the water dissipation studies. The criterion for statistical significance was set at theP<0.05 level.Test chemical thymol was quantified by a HPLC method coupled with LSC. The retention times for thymol was 12.5 on the HPLC chromatogram. Recoveries of 3H-thymol was more than 90% from soil, as determined by spike-recovery experiments at the initial time point. In soil, the cumulative volatilization of test chemical in 1 month reached 26%. The lower volatilization from soil compared with that from water is probably due to adsorption to soil colloids. The evolved 3H2O remained consistently less than 1% throughout the study period, indicating that little mineralization occurred. The average radioactivity as bound residues remained below 3% in 1month.The percentage degradation of test chemical 2-Isopropyl-5-methylphenol in soil was determined to be 50% in 5.35 days (128.4 hrs). Thus, based on percentage degradation, it is concluded that the chemical 2-Isopropyl-5-methylphenol is not persistent in the soil environment and the exposure risk to soil dwelling animals is moderate to low.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Half-life in soil:
- 5.35 d
- at the temperature of:
- 25 °C
Additional information
Various experimental studies and predicted data for the target chemical 2-Isopropyl-5-methylphenol (CAS No. 89-83-8) were reviewed for the biodegradation in soil end point which are summarized as below:
In an experimental key study from peer reviewed journal (Dingfei Hu et. al.; 2008),biodegradation study in soil was conducted under aerobic conditions for 30 days for determining the dissipation half-life (DT50) of the chemical 2-Isopropyl-5-methylphenol (Thymol) (CAS no. 89-83-8).3H-Thymol was synthesized by PerkinElmer Life Sciences and Analytical Sciences (Boston, MA).The specific activities of thymol was 27.7 mCi/mmol,respectively. Analytical standards of thymol was purchased from Lancaster Synthesis, Inc. (Pelham, NH).Initial test substance conc. used in the study was 10 mg/g. Sandy loam soil collected at the Iowa State University Agronomy and Agricultural Engineering Research Farm near Ames, Iowa (field 55) was used as a test inoculum for the study. The soil was classified as a sandy loam, a Nicollet–Webster complex with 1.6% organic matter, 60% sand, 22% silt and 18% clay, and pH 7.0.Soil (50 g) was kept in a 250mL French square bottle, and soil moisture content was adjusted to 75% of−33 J/ kg moisture. The temperature was maintained at 25±2◦C. Soil samples were treated with 3H-thymol in 300μL of acetone carrier at 10μg/g. Thymol had a total radioactivity of 1.8μCi applied in this study. There were four replications for each group. Bottles were sealed with perforated caps to maintain an aerobic condition. Polyurethane foam was suspended above the treated soils inside each bottle to capture volatile compounds. Polyurethane foam was changed biweekly. Anhydrous calcium sulfate (Drierite; 1.5g) was used to trap 3H2O in the air in the container. Drierite was changed when it turned pink. Soil sampleswere taken at pretreatment and 1, 3, 7, 14 and 30 days post-treatment. These soil sampleswere then stored in the−20◦C freezer prior to analysis. Quantitative analysis of thymol was performed using a Hewlett-Packard (Palo Alto, CA) series 1100 HPLC system with a quaternary pump, an autosampler, a thermostatted column compartment and a Spectroflow 757 absorbance detector (ABI Analytical, Kratos Division, Ramsey, NJ). Data were collected and analyzed using HP Chemstation system software (REV. A.04.01). An Alltech Adsorbosphere(Deerfield, IL) C18 column (4.6×250mm, 5μm particle size) was used. Detection was conducted at 270nm with a flowrate of 1.0mL min−1 at room temperature. The mobile phase was methanol+distilled water (70+30 by volume).Soil samples (50 g) were extracted with methanol + distilled water (95 + 5 by volume) 3 times, and the resulting extracts were pooled. Filtered samples were directly injected for HPLC analysis. HPLC fractions were collected for liquid scintillation counting (LSC). Drierite and polyurethane foam were extracted with methanol 4 times, and the resulting extracts were subjected to LSC to measure trapped radioactivity. Non-extractable radioactive residues in soil were measured by soil combustion using a Packard sample oxidizer.14 Briefly, a 0.5 g soil sample was incorporated into a cellulose pellet, and they were combusted for capture of 3H2O, and three replications were performed for each treatment. The dissipation half-lives(DT50)were calculated using a first-order dissipation model. A Student’s t-test was used to compare dissipation rates of thymol in light and in dark from the water dissipation studies. The criterion for statistical significance was set at the P<0.05 level. Test chemical thymol was quantified by a HPLC method coupled with LSC. The retention times for thymol was 12.5 on the HPLC chromatogram. Recoveries of 3H-thymol was more than 90% from soil, as determined by spike-recovery experiments at the initial time point. In soil, the cumulative volatilization of test chemical in 1 month reached 26%. The lower volatilization from soil compared with that from water is probably due to adsorption to soil colloids. The evolved 3H2O remained consistently less than 1% throughout the study period, indicating that little mineralization occurred. The average radioactivity as bound residues remained below 3% in 1month.The percentage degradation of test chemical 2-Isopropyl-5-methylphenol in soil was determined to be 50% in 5.35 days (128.4 hrs).
Another biodegradation study in soil was carried out for determining the half-life of the test chemical 2-Isopropyl-5-methylphenol (CAS no. 89-83-8) (European Food Safety Authority, 2012).The half-life period of 2 -Isopropyl-5 -methylphenol in soil was determined to be 30 days.
In a supporting study from authoritative database (2017), biodegradation study in soil was carried out for determining the half-life of the test chemical 2-Isopropyl-5-methylphenol (CAS no. 89-83-8).The half-life period of 2 -Isopropyl-5 -methylphenol in soil was determined to be 5 days at 20°C.
For the target chemical2-Isopropyl-5-methylphenol(CAS no. 89-83-8) from modelling database (2018), the half-life period of 2-Isopropyl-5-methylphenol in soil was estimated using Level III Fugacity Model. If released into the environment, 74.2% of the chemical will partition into soil according to the Mackay fugacity model level III. The half-life period of 2-Isopropyl-5-methylphenol in soil is estimated to be 30 days (720 hrs).
On the basis of above results for target chemical 2-Isopropyl-5-methylphenol (from peer reviewed journal, authoritative and modelling databases), it can be concluded that the test substance 2-Isopropyl-5-methylphenol is not persistent in the soil environment and therefore the exposure risk to soil dwelling animals is moderate to low.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
