Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 200-756-3
CAS number: 71-55-6
There are two key studies in this section addressing different aspects relating to biological degradation of trichloroethane. The first study conducted by Wood et al 1980 was part of the much larger study initiated by the EPA to ascertain levels of trichloroethane in natural aquifers used for production of drinking water. The results of the study show that the incidence of trichloroethane contamination is restricted to sites where the risk of contamination is high (in this case close to a chemical plant producing chlorinated aliphatic compounds). The paper also contains results of mini mesocosm studies conducted with natural bacterial populations present in muck soils taken from the Florida Everglades. The results of this study show that under anaerobic conditions the DT50 for trichloroethane is 15.6 days.In a second study conducted by Blum and Speece 1980 the toxicity of trichloroethane to aerobic and anaerobic cultures was addressed. The results of this study showed that the IC50 for Nitrosomonas, anaerobic methanogens and aerobic hetyrotrophs were 8.5, 0.52 and 450 mg/L respectively.
The literature does not contain
any studies addressing the simple biodegradation as per OECD guidelines.
The two studies included in this section consist of a Tier III mini
microcosm study and a Tier II study conducted on natural populations
present in waste water treatment plants. Both studies were conducted in
sealed vessels thereby eliminating losses through volatilisation. In the
case of the first study (Woods et al 1980) following a literature review
the authors conclude that degradation was most likely to occur under
anaerobic conditions. To test this hypothesis an anaerobic muck soil was
obtained from the Florida Everglades. Tests showed that naturally
occurring bacterial populations were capable of utilising 1,1,1-trichloroethane
resulting in a DT50 value of 15.6 days which justified the author's
conclusion that trichloroethane was inherently biodegradable. However,
it should be pointed out that the primary degradation products was 1,1
-dichloroethane which is comparatively persistent under anaerobic
conditions and could therefore persist in the environment. Results from
aerobic studies show that 1,1 -dichloroethane is readily degraded by
aerobic bacteria. It can therefore be concluded that in order to remove
trichloroethane from contaminated waste a period of anaerobic
fermentation is necessarily followed by aerobic fermentation to complete
breakdown of the parent material.
Blum and Speece 1980 did not
address biodegradation directly but instead looked at the inherent
toxicity of trichloroethane to species expected to be present in
commercial sewage treatment plants. In this study the toxicity of 1,1,1-trichloroethane
to a range of bacteria (methanogens, Nirosomonas and aerobic hetrotrophs)
was studied. The results of the study showed that the most sensitive
bacteria to 1,1,1-trichloroethane under the conditions of the study were
methanogens (IC50: 0.52mg/L) followed by Nirosomonas (IC50: 8.5mg/L).
Aerobic hetrotrophs were extremely tolerant (IC50: 450mg/L) to
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
Ce site web utilise des cookies afin de vous garantir la meilleure expérience possible sur nos sites web.
Welcome to the ECHA website. This site is not fully supported in Internet Explorer 7 (and earlier versions). Please upgrade your Internet Explorer to a newer version.
Do not show this message again