- ECHA
- За нас
- Как работим
- Процедури и политики
- Прозрачността
- Дела, по които ECHA е страна
- Candidate list
Дела, по които ECHA е ответник или встъпва в производство
Дела, по които ECHA е ответник или встъпва в производство
Таблицата съдържа всички съдебни дела с постановено решение, по които ECHA е била страна. Заинтересованите страни лесно могат да правят справки в решения, които е възможно да са свързани с тях в обхвата на основните дейности на ECHA (REACH, CLP и др.). По някои дела е възможно да тече процедура по обжалване или препращане. Те също са включени в таблицата. Таблицата не съдържа дела, свързани с персонала и обществените поръчки.
Приключените съдебни дела са класифицирани в осем категории:
- Списък на кандидатите съгласно REACH: дела, свързани с идентифицирането на вещество, пораждащо сериозно безпокойство,
- Регистрация по REACH: случаи, свързани със задължение за съвместно предоставяне на данни;
- Разрешаване съгласно REACH: дела, свързани с включването на вещество в списъка на веществата за разрешаване (Приложение XIV) и със заявленията за разрешаване,
- Оценка съгласно REACH: дела, по които ECHA е поискала информация от регистранта съгласно процедурата за оценяване (членове 40, 41 или 46 от регламента REACH),
- CLH: дела за хармонизиране на класификацията на вещество,
- Биоциди: дела, свързани с биоциди,
- ATD: дела, свързани с искания за достъп до документи,
- Големина на дружеството: дела, свързани с проверката на големината на дружеството и съответните дължими такси.
Case number | Parties | Keywords | Main Legal Provisions | Procedurally linked cases | Date of the ruling |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
T-1/10 R | SNF SAS v ECHA | Proceedings for interim measures – REACH – Identification of acrylamide as a substance of very high concern – Application for suspension of operation of the measure and for interim relief – No urgency | Art. 104(2) of the Rules of Procedure; Art. 34, 57 and 59 of REACH | T-1/10 | 26/03/2010 |
T-343/10 | Etimine and Etiproducts v ECHA | Action for annulment – REACH – Identification of boric acid and disodium tetraborate, anhydrous as substances of very high concern – No direct concern – Inadmissibility | Art. 31, 33 and 59 of REACH | T-346/10 | 21/09/2011 |
T-346/10 | Borax Europe v ECHA | Action for annulment – REACH – Identification of boric acid and disodium tetraborate, anhydrous as substances of very high concern – No direct concern – Inadmissibility | Art. 263 of TFEU; Art. 31, 33, 57 and 59 of REACH | T-343/10 | 21/09/2011 |
T-268/10 | PPG and SNF v ECHA | Actions for annulment - REACH - Identification of acrylamide as a substance of very high concern - Time-limit for bringing an action - Inadmissibility | Art. 263 of TFEU; Art. 102 of the Rules of Procedure; Art. 57 of REACH |
Appeal: C-625/11 P Following case: T-268/10 RENV Appeal on the following case: C-650/15 P |
21/09/2011 |
T-1/10 | PPG and SNF v ECHA | Actions for annulment – REACH – Identification of acrylamide as a substance of very high concern – Measure not actionable – Inadmissibility | Art. 57 and 59 of REACH |
|
21/09/2011 |
T-93/10 | Bilbaína de Alquitranes and Others v ECHA | REACH – Identification of pitch, coal tar, high temperature as a substance of very high concern – Actions for annulment – Actionable measure – Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures – Direct concern – Admissibility – Equal treatment – Proportionality | Art. 263 of TFEU; Art. 57 and 59 of REACH |
Appeal: C-287/13 P Related cases: C-288/13 P C-289/13 P C-290/13 P Appeals on the related cases: T-94/10 T-95/10 T-96/10 |
07/03/2013 |
T-94/10 | Rütgers Germany and Others v ECHA | REACH – Identification of anthracene oil as a substance of very high concern – Actions for annulment – Actionable measure – Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures – Direct concern – Admissibility – Equal treatment – Proportionality | Art. 263 of TFEU; Art. 57 and 59 of REACH |
Appeal: C-288/13 P Related cases: T-93/10 T-95/10 T-96/10 Appeals on the related cases: C-287/13 P C-289/13 P C-290/13 P |
07/03/2013 |
T-95/10 | Cindu Chemicals and Others v ECHA | REACH – Identification of anthracene oil, anthracene low as a substance of very high concern – Actions for annulment – Actionable measure – Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures – Direct concern – Admissibility – Equal treatment – Proportionality | Art. 263 of TFEU; Art. 57 and 59 of REACH |
Appeal: C-289/13 Related cases: T-93/10 T-94/10 T-96/10 Appeals on the related cases: C-287/13 P C-288/13 P C-290/13 P |
07/03/2013 |
T-96/10 | Rütgers Germany and Others v ECHA | REACH – Identification of anthracene oil (anthracene paste) as a substance of very high concern – Actions for annulment – Actionable measure – Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures – Direct concern – Admissibility – Equal treatment – Proportionality | Art. 263 of TFEU; Art. 57 and 59 of REACH |
|
07/03/2013 |
C-626/11 P | PPG and SNF v ECHA | Appeal – European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) – Registration, evaluation and authorisation of chemical substances – Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH Regulation) – Articles 57 and 59 – Substances subject to authorisation – Identification of acrylamide as a substance of very high concern – Inclusion on the candidate list of substances – Publication of the list on the ECHA website – Action for annulment brought prior to that publication – Admissibility | Art. 57 and 59 of REACH |
|
26/09/2013 |
C-625/11 P | PPG and SNF v ECHA | Appeal – European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) – Registration, evaluation and authorisation of chemical substances – Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH Regulation) – Articles 57 and 59 – Substances subject to authorisation – Identification of acrylamide as a substance of very high concern – Inclusion on the candidate list of substances – Publication – Time-limit for instituting proceedings – Article 102(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court – Date from which that time‑limit must be calculated in the case of an action brought against a decision published only on the internet – Legal certainty – Effective judicial protection | Art. 102(1) of the Rules of Procedure; Art. 57 and 59 of REACH |
|
26/09/2013 |
C-287/13 P | Bilbaína de Alquitranes and Others v ECHA | Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH) — Article 59 and Annex XIII — Identification of pitch, coal tar, high temperature as a substance of very high concern, to be made subject to the authorisation procedure — Equal treatment | Art. 181 of the Rules of Procedure; Art. 59 and Annex XIII of REACH |
|
22/05/2014 |
T-1/10 RENV | PPG and SNF v ECHA | Action for annulment — REACH — Identification of acrylamide as a substance of very high concern — Action for annulment — Lack of direct concern — Inadmissibility | Art. 44 of the Rules of Procedure; Art. 263 of TFEU; Art. 59 of REACH |
Prior cases
Proceedings for interim measures: T-1/10 R Subsequent appeal: C-626/11 P |
24/06/2014 |
C-288/13 P | Rütgers Germany and Others v ECHA | Appeals — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH Regulation) — Article 59 and Annex XIII — Identification of anthracene oil as a substance of very high concern, to be made subject to the authorisation procedure — Equal treatment | Art. 181 of the Rules of Procedure; Art. 59 and Annex XIII of REACH |
|
04/09/2014 |
C-289/13 P | Cindu Chemicals and Others v ECHA | Appeals — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH Regulation) — Article 59 and Annex XIII — Identification of anthracene oil, anthracene low as a substance of very high concern, to be made subject to the authorisation procedure — Equal treatment | Art. 181 of the Rules of Procedure; Art. 59 and Annex XIII of REACH |
|
04/09/2014 |
C-290/13 P | Rütgers Germany and Others v ECHA | Appeals — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH Regulation) — Article 59 and Annex XIII — Identification of anthracene oil (anthracene paste) as a substance of very high concern, to be made subject to the authorisation procedure — Equal treatment | Art. 181 of the Rules of Procedure; Art. 59 and Annex XIII of REACH |
|
04/09/2014 |
T-135/13 | Hitachi Chemical Europe and Others v ECHA | REACH — Identification of certain respiratory sensitisers as substances of very high concern — Equivalent level of concern — Action for annulment — Whether directly concerned — Admissibility — Rights of the defence — Proportionality | Art. 14, 44-48, 57 of REACH |
Appeal: C-324/15 P |
30/04/2015 |
T-134/13 | Polynt and Sitre v ECHA | REACH — Identification of certain respiratory sensitisers as substances of very high concern — Equivalent level of concern — Action for annulment — Whether directly concerned — Admissibility — Rights of the defence — Proportionality | Art. 14, 57 and 59 of REACH |
Appeak: C-323/15 P |
30/04/2015 |
T-115/15 R | Deza v ECHA | Interim measures — REACH — Entry of the chemical substance di-(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP) in the candidate list — Application for suspension of operation — No urgency | Art. 104 (2) of the Rules of Procedure |
Initial case:
Appeal:
|
06/05/2015 |
T-268/10 RENV | PPG and SNF v ECHA | REACH — Identification of acrylamide as a substance of very high concern — Intermediates — Action for annulment — Whether directly concerned — Admissibility — Proportionality — Equal treatment | Art. 263 of TFEU; Art. 2(8)(b), 31(1)(a), 31(9)(a), 57 and 59 of REACH |
Previous case: Initial case: T-268/10 Appeal: C-625/11 P Appeal: C-650/15 P |
25/09/2015 |
C-324/15 P | Hitachi Chemical Europe and Polynt v ECHA | Appeal — Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH Regulation) — Article 57(f) — Authorisation — Substances of very high concern — Identification — Equivalent level of concern — Hexahydromethylphthalic anhydride, hexahydro-4-methylphthalic anhydride, hexahydro-1-methylphthalic | Art. 57(f) of REACH |
Initial case: T-135/13 |
15/03/2017 |
C-323/15 P | Polynt v ECHA | Appeal — Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH Regulation) — Article 57(f) — Authorisation — Substances of very high concern — Identification — Equivalent level of concern — Cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylic anhydride, cis-cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylic anhydride and trans-cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylic anhydride | Art. 57(f) of REACH |
initial case: T-134/13 |
15/03/2017 |
T-115/15 | Deza v ECHA | REACH - Establishing a candidate list for eventual inclusion in Annex XIV of regulation (EC) n° 1907/2006 – Supplement to the entry of the chemical substance bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP) in the candidate list – Articles 57 and 59 of regulation n° 1907/2006 | Art. 59 and 57 of REACH; Art. 17 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU |
|
11/05/2017 |
C-650/15 P | PPG and SNF v ECHA | Appeal — Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH) — Article 57 — Substances of very high concern — Identification — Article 2(8)(b) — Exemption — Article 3(15) — Definition of ‘intermediate’ — Acrylamide | Art. 57, 2(8)(b) and 3(15) of REACH |
Previous cases:
Initial case:
Appeal:
Initial Case:
|
25/10/2017 |
C-419/17 P | Deza, a.s. v ECHA | Appeal — Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH Regulation) — Annex XIV — Establishment of a list of substances subject to authorisation — Inclusion in the list of substances identified for eventual inclusion in Annex XIV — Updating of the entry of the substance bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP) in the list — Misinterpretation and misapplication of the REACH Regulation and of the principle of legal certainty — Distortion of the facts and evidence — Scope of the review | Article 57 and 59 REACH |
Prior cases:
|
23/01/2019 |
T‑636/17 | PlasticsEurope v ECHA | REACH — Establishment of a list of substances identified with a view to their eventual inclusion in Annex XIV of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 — Supplement to the entry relating to the substance bisphenol A on that list — Articles 57 and 59 of Regulation No 1907/2006 — Manifest error of assessment — Legal certainty — Legitimate expectations — Proportionality | Articles 57 and 59 of REACH | T-185/17 | 20/09/2019 |
PlasticsEurope v ECHA, French Republic and ClientEarth | REACH — Establishment of a list of substances identified with a view to their eventual inclusion in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 — Inclusion in that list of Bisphenol A as a substance which is toxic for reproduction— Articles 57 and 59 of Regulation No 1907/2006 | Articles 57 and 59 of REACH | T-636-17 | 11/07/2019 | |
T-640/19 | Sasol Germany GmbH and Others v. European Commission (ECHA as intervener) | Action for annulment – REACH – Substances of very high concern – Establishment of a candidate list of substances for eventual inclusion in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 – Decision identifying 4-tert-butylphenol as a substance meeting the criteria for inclusion in the list – Objection of inadmissibility – Act not open to challenge – Act merely implementing the decision – No interest in bringing proceedings – Inadmissibility | Art. 263 of TFEU; Annex XIV of REACH | 14/07/2020 | |
PlasticsEurope v ECHA | REACH – Establishment of a list of substances identified with a view to their eventual inclusion in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 – Supplement to the entry relating to the substance bisphenol A on that list – Articles 57 and 59 of Regulation No 1907/2006 – Manifest error of assessment – Weight of evidence approach – Exploratory studies – Intermediate uses – Proportionality |
Articles 57 and 59 of the REACH Regulation (No 1907/2006) |
16/12/2020 | ||
3M Belgium v ECHA | Action for annulment – REACH – Identification of perfluorobutanesulfonic acid (PFBS) and of its salts as a substance of very high concern – Inclusion in the list of substances identified with a view to their eventual inclusion in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 – Time limit for bringing an action – Article 59(10) of Regulation No 1907/2006 – Article 59 of the Rules of Procedure – Inadmissibility |
REACH Regulation No 1907/2006 |
17/03/2021 | ||
Global Silicones Council and Others v ECHA | REACH – Establishment of a list of substances identified for eventual inclusion in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 – Entry of octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (D4), decamethylcyclopentasiloxane (D5) and dodecamethylcyclohexsiloxane (D6) in that list – Articles 57 and 59 of Regulation No 1907/2006 – Annex XIII to Regulation No 1907/2006 – Weight-of-evidence determination – Manifest error of assessment – Proportionality |
Articles 57 and 59 of the REACH Regulation (No 1907/2006), |
30/06/2021 | ||
Sasol Germany and Others v Commission | REACH – Substances of very high concern – Establishment of a list of identified substances with a view to their eventual inclusion in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 – Decision identifying the substance 4-tert-butylphenol as a substance meeting the criteria for inclusion in the list – Article 57 of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 – Weight of evidence approach – Manifest error of assessment – Proportionality |
Article 57 of the REACH Regulation (No 1907/2006) |
10/11/2021 | ||
PlasticsEurope v ECHA | Appeal – Establishment of a list of substances subject to authorisation – List of substances identified with a view to their eventual inclusion in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 – Updating of the entry of the substance bisphenol A as a substance of very high concern |
Articles 57 and 59 of the REACH Regulation (No 1907/2006) |
21/12/2021 | ||
Chemours Netherlands v ECHA | REACH – Substances of very high concern – Establishment of a candidate list of substances for eventual inclusion in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 – Decision identifying 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoro-2-(heptafluoropropoxy)propionic acid, its salts and its acyl halides as a substance fulfilling the criteria laid down for inclusion in the list – Article 57 of Regulation No 1907/2006 – Manifest error of assessment – Proportionality |
Article 57 of the REACH Regulation (No 1907/2006) |
23/02/2022 | ||
Plastics Europe AISBL v ECHA | Appeal – Establishment of a list of substances subject to authorisation – Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 – Annex XIV – List of substances identified for eventual inclusion in Annex XIV – Updating of the entry of the substance bisphenol A as ‘a substance of very high concern’ |
Articles 2(8)(b), 3(15), 7(2), 17(3), 18(4), 33, 57, 59, Annex XI of the REACH Regulation (No 1907/2006) |
Appeal of Case T-207/18 |
09/03/2023 |