Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 211-694-1 | CAS number: 687-47-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Carcinogenicity
Administrative data
Description of key information
There are no reliable studies available for the assessment of the carcinogenicity endpoint with the target substance, ethyl (S)-lactate. Therefore, available data from an oral carcinogenicity study conducted with a suitable read-across partner, calcium lactate was used to assess the carcinogenicity of the target substance. In addition, the conclusion of the OECD SIDS report, 2004 on the carcinogenic potential of ethanol is provided, stating that occupational exposure to ethanol and the use of ethanol in consumer products does not pose a carcinogenic hazard.
Based on the available data, no classification for carcinogenicity is warranted for the target substance ethyl (S)-lactate.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Carcinogenicity: via oral route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- carcinogenicity: oral
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Justification for type of information:
- For justification of read-across please refer to the read-across report attached to IUCLID section 13.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Species:
- rabbit
- Clinical signs:
- not specified
- Mortality:
- not specified
- Body weight and weight changes:
- not specified
- Food efficiency:
- not specified
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not specified
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not specified
- Haematological findings:
- not specified
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not specified
- Urinalysis findings:
- not specified
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not specified
- Immunological findings:
- not specified
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not specified
- Gross pathological findings:
- not specified
- Neuropathological findings:
- not specified
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- not specified
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Other effects:
- not specified
- Details on results:
- No tumors were reported after 5 or 16 months, respectively details not provided.
- Conclusions:
- Based on the results, lactic acid is considered as not carcinogenic.
- Endpoint:
- carcinogenicity: oral
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Justification for type of information:
- For justification of read-across please refer to the read-across report attached to IUCLID section 13.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
- not examined
- Mortality:
- mortality observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence):
- In females, the mortality rate in the 5% group was slightly higher than those in the other two groups.
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Compared with the controls, a 13% decrease in body-weight gain was observed in male and female rats of the high-dose group. The toxicological relevance was not further discussed.
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- not examined
- Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Throughout the administration period, daily water consumption was almost constant in all groups of both sexes.
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No specific dose-related changes were observed in any of the haematological parameters.
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- no effects observed
- Endocrine findings:
- not examined
- Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not specified
- Immunological findings:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Females in the 5% group exhibited slightly but significantly higher kidney weights compared with controls. Histologically, however, there was no difference in the severity of chronic nephropathy between different groups.
A significant dose-dependent increase was observed in the relative brain weights of both male and female rats although no histological change was detected which may result from the decrease in body weight gains. - Gross pathological findings:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- A number of non-neoplastic lesions (e.g. myocardial fibrosis, bile-duct proliferation, hepatic microgranulomas and chronic nephropathy) were observed in all groups, with no difference in their incidences and/or degrees.
- Neuropathological findings:
- not examined
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- A slight increase in calcium deposition in the papilla compared to controls was observed in females of the 5% dose group. This type of lesion was histologically different from nephrocalcinosis and might depend on the increase in urinary calcium levels.
It is known that these lesions occur spontaneously in old F344 rats (Goodman et al., (1979): "Neoplastic and nonneoplastic lesions in aging F344 rats.", Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 48, 237-248.). The data show that no clear toxic lesions specifically caused by long-term administration of calcium lactate, except for the slight calcium deposition in the renal papilla, were detected in any organ. The type of lesion observed in the kidney of female rats in the 5% group was histologically different from the so-called nephrocalcinosis, which is characterized by an intraluminal deposition of calcium observed mainly in the cortico-medullary region. The pathogenesis of this lesion is unclear and might depend on the increase in the urinary calcium level; this parameter was not determined in this study. - Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Tumours were found in many organs and/or tissues in all groups including the controls. In males from all groups, tumours of the testis were the most frequent, followed by those of the adrenal gland, thyroid gland, pituitary gland, haematopoietic organs, mammary gland, lung and pancreas. In females, the commonest tumours were those of the uterus, pituitary gland, haematopoietic organs, mammary gland, thyroid gland, adrenal gland and pancreas. Tumours were also detected in other organs/tissues from rats of all groups, but at lower incidences. Histologically, all the tumours observed in this experiment were similar to those known to occur spontaneously in F344 rats, as reported in previous studies (Goodman et al.,1979; Maekawa et al.,1983; Maita et al.,1987; Solleveld et al.,1984). None of the experimental groups showed a significant increase in the incidence of any specific tumours compared with the corresponding control value (chi-square and/or Fisher's test), and also no positive trend was noted in the occurrence of any tumour (trend analysis test; Pete et al., 1980). It was therefore concluded that calcium lactate had no carcinogenic activity in F344 rats when it was given continuously in the drinking-water for 2 years.
- Other effects:
- not specified
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEC
- Effect level:
- 50 000 ppm (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: no calcium lactate-related carcinogenic activity observed
- Key result
- Critical effects observed:
- no
- Conclusions:
- It was concluded that calcium lactate had neither toxic nor carcinogenic activity in F344 rats when it was given continuously in the drinking water for 2 years.
- Executive summary:
In a carcinogenicity study Calcium lactate (> 97 % purity) was administered ad libitum to 50 F344 rats per sex per dose in drinking-water at levels of 0, 2.5 or 5 % for two years. Calcium lactate is the calcium salt of lactic acid, which is a major and essential species in mammalian primary metabolism and a ubiquitous ingredient in all kinds of food.
No clear toxic lesion was specifically caused by long-term administration of Calcium lactate. No significant dose-related increase in the incidences of tumours in any organ or tissue was found. The results indicate that calcium lactate had neither toxic nor carcinogenic activity in F344 rats.
This information is used in a read-across approach in the assessment of the target substance. For justification of read-across please refer to the read-across report attached to IUCLID section 13.
- Endpoint:
- carcinogenicity: oral
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Justification for type of information:
- For details and justification of read-across please refer to the read-across report attached to IUCLID section 13.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Conclusions:
- Based on the available information it was concluded in the OECD SIDS report on ethanol, that with some confidence occupational exposure to ethanol and the use of ethanol in consumer products does not pose a carcinogenic hazard.
- Executive summary:
In the literature many laboratory carcinogenicity studies in animals exist using ethanol as the test substance. However, these are almost universally carried out to improve the understanding of the risks associated with the consumption of alcoholic beverages. Characteristically, these are carried out by the oral route and at high doses, well in excess of 1000 mg//kg bw/day, which means they are inadequately designed and provide too little data to characterise the carcinogenic potential of ethanol at doses relevant to occupational exposure and use of consumer products containing the substance.
In a carcinogenicity study conducted by the National Toxicology program conducted according to GLP, mice were exposed to ethanol in drinking water at the relatively high doses of 2.5 and 5.0% for 2 years, which resulted in average daily consumptions of ca. 100 and 180 mg ethanol for males and 80 and 155 mg ethanol for females. It showed only equivocal evidence of carcinogenic activity of in males based on increased incidences of hepatocellular neoplasms. However, there was no evidence of carcinogenic activity of ethanol in female mice exposed to either concentration (NTP, 2004). There remains no robust evidence of carcinogenicity in laboratory animals at doses other than those associated with consumption of alcoholic beverages. This is consistent with the findings of IARC who concluded that there is inadequate evidence for the carcinogenicity of ethanol in experimental animals (IARC, 1988).
Regarding studies in human the OECD SIDS report stated:” that although no epidemiological studies are available for ethanol per se, there are a large number of studies (retrospective cohort, prospective cohort and case-control studies) on the effects of alcoholic beverages, which contain ethanol and water as the two main components. These epidemiological studies clearly indicate that drinking alcoholic beverages is causally related to cancers of the oral cavity, pharynx (excluding the nasopharynx), larynx and oesophagus. The effect appears to be independent of beverage type. The aetiology is likely to proceed via a mechanism whereby frequent exposure to high local concentrations of liquid ethanol and its metabolites leads to persistent irritation, and eventually hyperplasia and finally tumor formation. (Greim H., 1999). For the oral cavity, pharynx, larynx and oesophagus, alcoholic beverage consumption in excess of 10-40 g ethanol per day is necessary before there is a convincing increase in the relative risk of cancer (Greim H., 1999; UK Dept of Health, 1995). Such a mechanism would not therefore be relevant to occupational exposure. Drinking alcoholic beverages is also likely to be causally linked to liver cancer. The liver is the primary site of metabolism and sees high concentrations of ethanol and its metabolites. Tumor formation is normally associated with cirrhosis, which is in turn normally seen only following chronic alcohol abuse in excess of 80 g ethanol per day (Greim H., 1999; UK Dept of Health, 1995). Such a scenario is not relevant to occupational exposure to ethanol. Drinking alcoholic beverages is also possibly causally linked to cancer of the breast and large bowel. Should the causal link with breast cancer be proven, the mechanism is believed to be via disturbance of the hormonal system. There is little or no indication of a causal relation with cancer of the stomach, pancreas, lung, urinary bladder, kidney, ovary, prostate, lymphatic or haematopoietic system. There is no convincing evidence that the carcinogenic effects of alcoholic beverages in humans occurs as a result of the mutagenic effect of ethanol, acetaldehyde or other beverage constituents (UK Dept of Health, 1995). The International Agency for Research on Cancer has classified alcoholic beverages (but not ethanol) as Group 1 - carcinogenic to humans (IARC, 1988). The International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI, 1999) has published an extensive review of the health issues relating to alcohol consumption. They concluded that ethanol is not a carcinogen by standard laboratory tests. Such tests are the normal measure for the assessment of industrial chemicals and any chemical that would be expected to present a carcinogenic hazard to workers or consumers during normal handling and use would be expected to show a positive result in one or more of such tests.”
The results of the genotoxicity in vitro test battery (OECD 471, OECD 473 and OECD 490) showed, that ethyl (S)-lactate do no induce genetic toxicity and these results can be seen as indicative for non-carcinogenic potential.
Ethyl (S)-lactate is rapidly hydrolysed into lactic acid and ethanol in vivo and thus it is justified that the assessment of the carcinogenicity can be based on information for lactic acid and ethanol.
Regarding lactic acid it can be stated that lactic acid is a major and essential species in mammalian primary metabolism and a ubiquitous ingredient in all kinds of food and thus carcinogenicity is not a relevant end point for such a substance, since there is no way of lowering exposure below minimum required levels or normal (or even abnormal) internal levels.
That lactic acid do not pose any carcinogenic potential was supported by the results of a long-term toxicity, carcinogenicity study in F344 rats treated with calcium lactate. Calcium lactate is a salt of lactic acid and immediately dissociates in aqueous environments into lactic acid and the Ca2+.
Referenceopen allclose all
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
Carcinogenicity: via inhalation route
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Carcinogenicity: via dermal route
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the available data from the read-across partners, the target substance ethyl (S)-lactate does not warrant classification for carcinogenicity in accordance with CLP Regulation 1272/2008.
Additional information
The results of the genotoxicity in vitro test battery (OECD 471, OECD 473 and OECD 490) showed, that ethyl (S)-lactate do no induce genetic toxicity and these results can be seen as indicative for a non-carcinogenic potential.
Ethyl (S)-lactate is rapidly hydrolysed into lactic acid and ethanol in vivo and thus it is justified that the assessment of the carcinogenicity can be based on information for the source substances lactic acid and ethanol.
Regarding lactic acid it can be stated that lactic acid is a major and essential species in mammalian primary metabolism and a ubiquitous ingredient in all kinds of food and thus carcinogenicity is not a relevant end point for such a substance, since there is no way of lowering exposure below minimum required levels or normal (or even abnormal) internal levels.
That lactic acid do not pose any carcinogenic potential was supported by the results of a long-term toxicity, carcinogenicity study in F344 rats treated with calcium lactate. Calcium lactate is a salt of lactic acid and immediately dissociates in aqueous environments into lactic acid and the Ca2+. Calcium lactate was given ad libitum in the drinking-water at levels of 0, 2.5 or 5% to groups of 50 male and 50 female rats for two years. No clear toxic lesion was specifically caused by long-term administration of calcium lactate. No significant dose-related increase was found in the incidences of tumours in any organ or tissue. The results indicated that calcium lactate had neither toxic nor carcinogenic activity in F344 rats. Regarding ethanol it can be stated that there is no compelling evidence to warrant a classification of ethanol for cancer in the context of the relevant classification and labelling regulations for chemical substances.
Based on the available data from the read-across partners, the target substance ethyl (S)-lactate does not warrant classification for carcinogenicity in accordance with CLP Regulation 1272/2008.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.