Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 231-272-0 | CAS number: 7473-98-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Studies conducted to recognised training guidelines.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From Jun. 12, 1980 to Sep. 9, 1980
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- 2-aminoanthracene was the only compound used to test the efficacy of the S9 fraction
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- Histidine (his- to his+) and tryptophan (tryp- to tryp+) genes in Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli respectively
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1538
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Aroclor 1254-induced rat liver S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Plate incorporation (TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and TA1538) conc. range in tests: 0.4, 4.4, 44.3, 443.3, 4433 and 22167 µg/plate
Pre-incubation (WP2 uvrA) conc. range in tests: 0.3, 3.3, 32.8, 328.44, 3283.7 and 16420 µg/ml - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: Dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO)
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 9-aminoacridine
- 2-nitrofluorene
- N-ethyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine
- methylmethanesulfonate
- other: daunomycin, 4-nitr-1,2-phenylenediamine
- Remarks:
- without S9 mix
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2 -aminoanthracene
- Remarks:
- with S9 mix
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION:
TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and TA1538: in agar (plate incorporation)
WP2 uvrA: preincubation
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 0.5 hours at 37°C
- Exposure duration: 48 hours at 37°C
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 4 plates per compound or concentration
-Independent repeat experiment was conducted. - Statistics:
- Revertant colony numbers were calculated as average and standard deviation. No statistical analysis test was performed.
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- 22167 µg/plate
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1538
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- 22167 µg/plate
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- 22167 µg/plate
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- 22167 µg/plate
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- 22167 µg/plate
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- 22167 µg/plate
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- Toxic effect was observed in all experiments macroscopically or during the routinely conducted microscopical examination of the plates, in some cases already at 4433 µg/plate, in all cases at 22167 µg/plate.
- Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
Under the experimental conditions of this study the test item did not show any mutagenic activity in the concentration range used with and without addition of a postmitochondrial liver homogenate (S-9) as metabolizing system. - Executive summary:
In this guideline (OECD 471) study conducted with GLP certification, the test material (EC xxx-xxx-x) was determined not to be mutagenic. The reverse mutagenicity study was conducted in S. typhimurium (TA98, TA 100, TA 1535, TA 1537, & TA1538) and E. coli (WP2 uvr A) with and without metabolic acitvation. Cytotoxicity was observed at the highest tested concentration (22167 µg/l). The results of the study indicate that the test material does not meet the criteria to be considered mutagenic under the EU Classification, Labelling, and Packaging (CLP) regulation (1272/2008).
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2010
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 mix from phenobarbital i.p. and β-naphthoflavone induced rat liver
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 0 - 1700 μg/mL
- Vehicle / solvent:
- DMSO 1%
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 4h and 24h
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 18h, 24h
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): colcemid
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): GIEMSA
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: in duplicate
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 100 metaphases per culture
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: cloning efficiency
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy: yes
- pH value: yes
- osmolarity: yes
- solubility: yes - Evaluation criteria:
- The test substance is considered as “positive” if the following criteria are met:
• A statistically significant, dose-related and reproducible increase in the number of cells
with structural chromosome aberrations (excl. gaps).
• The number of aberrant cells (excl. gaps) exceeds both the concurrent negative/vehicle
control value and the historical negative control data range.
A test substance generally is considered as “negative” if the following criteria are met:
• The number of cells with structural aberrations (excl. gaps) in the dose groups is not
statistically significant increased above the concurrent negative/vehicle control value and
is within the historical negative control data range. - Statistics:
- The statistical evaluation of the data was carried out using the MUCHAN program system. The proportion of metaphases with structural aberrations was calculated for each group. A comparison of each dose group with the negative control group was carried out using Fisher's exact test for the hypothesis of equal proportions. This test was Bonferroni-Holm corrected versus the dose groups separately for each time and was performed one-sided. If the results of this test are statistically significant compared with the respective vehicle control, labels (* p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.01) are printed in the tables.
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: no
- Effects of osmolality: no
- Precipitation: no
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: no - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative - Executive summary:
In this guideline (OECD 473) study conducted with GLP certification, the test material (EC 231-272-0) was determined not to be genotoxic or cytoxic (up to the limit concentrations). The test was carried out over a range of concentrations (0 to 1700 µg/l) in Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts with and without metabolic activation. The results of the study indicate that the test material does not meet the criteria to be considered mutagenic under the EU Classification, Labelling, and Packaging (CLP) regulation (1272/2008).
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2010
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
- Target gene:
- HPRT
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 mix from phenobarbital and β-naphthoflavone induced rat liver
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 0 - 1700 μg/mL
- Vehicle / solvent:
- DMSO
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- Remarks:
- without S9 mix
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: methylcholanthrene
- Remarks:
- with S9 mix
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Preincubation period: with HAT-medium 24h
- Exposure duration: 4h and 24h
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 24-48h
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent):48 - 72h
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): TG-medium
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: in duplicate
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: all colonies per flask
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: cloning efficiency
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Other: pH, osmolarity, solubility, cell morphology - Evaluation criteria:
- A finding is assessed as positive if the following criteria are met:
• Increase of the corrected mutation frequencies (MFcorr.) both above the concurrent
negative control values and our historical negative control data range (see APPENDIX 5).
• Evidence of reproducibility of any increase in mutant frequencies.
• A statistically significant increase in mutant frequencies and the evidence of a doseresponse
relationship.
Isolated increases of mutant frequencies above our historical negative control range (i.e.
15 mutants per 106 clonable cells) or isolated statistically significant increases without a
dose-response relationship may indicate a biological effect but are not regarded as sufficient
evidence of mutagenicity.
The test substance is considered non-mutagenic according to the following criteria:
• The corrected mutation frequency (MFcorr.) in the dose groups is not statistically significant
increased above the concurrent negative control and is within our historical negative
control data range. - Statistics:
- Due to the clearly negative findings, a statistical evaluation was not carried out.
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- tested in separate test
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: no
- Effects of osmolality: no
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: initial range-finding cytotoxicity test
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: yes
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY: - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative - Executive summary:
(Test details requested)
Referenceopen allclose all
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Additional information
Three in vitro assays were performed to evaluate the genotoxicity of the test substance. At first, the material was tested for its mutagenic potential based on the ability to induce point mutations in selected loci of several bacterial strains, i.e.Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli, in a reverse mutation assay (TA 1535, TA 100, TA 1537, TA 98 and E. coli WP2 uvrA). The test item was applied at concentrations of 0.4 μg - 22167 μg/plate (standard plate test) and 0.3 μg - 16420 μg/plate (pre-incubation test) in presence and absence of a metabolic activation system (S9 mix). A bacteriotoxic effect was observed at the highest concentrations. A relevant increase in the number of his+ or trp+ revertants was not observed in the standard plate test or in the preincubation test either without S9 mix or after the addition of a metabolizing system.
The objective of the second assay was to evaluate the ability of the test substance to induce chromosomal aberrations in cultured Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79) with and without exogenous metabolic activation. The test article was dissolved in DMSO. Three independent experiments were performed: experiment number one was performed without light protection, experiments two and three were performed under light protection. Cells were exposed for 4h with and without metabolic activation up to 1700 ul/ml or for 18 h without S9 up to 1700 μg/mL. No increase in cells with chromosomal aberrations, percent polyploidy or endoreduplication was observed at the concentrations analyzed.
At last, the test material was assessed for its potential to induce gene mutations at the hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase (HPRT) locus in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells in vitro. Two independent experiments were carried out, both with and without the addition of liver S9 mix from induced. Based on the solubility properties of the test substance test doses from 0 - 1700 µg/ml were tested in presence and absence of a metabolic activation system. On the basis from the results of the present study, the test substance did not cause any relevant increase in the mutant frequencies both without S9 mix
The test item did not induce mutations in bacteria or mammalian cells or chromosome aberrations in mammalian cells in vitro. Therefore, the substance is not considered to be genotoxic under the conditions of these tests.
Short description of key information: An Ames tests, an HPRT assay and a chromosome aberration test in CHO cells was performed according or similar to OECD guidelines 471, 473 and 476 to evaluate the genotoxic potential of the test substance. The test item did not induce mutations or chromosome aberrations in vitro. Therefore, the substance is not considered to be mutagenic under the conditions of these tests. Endpoint Conclusion: No adverse effect observed (negative)
Justification for classification or non-classification
Classification, Labeling, and Packaging Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008
The available experimental test data are reliable and suitable for classification purposes under Regulation 1272/2008. As a result the substance is not considered to be classified for genotoxicity under Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.