Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 236-675-5
CAS number: 13463-67-7
Several studies are
available and indicate that nano- and microsized TiO2 (including
anatase, rutile and mixed forms) in natural soil and artificial
substrate do not affect survival, reproduction and growth of Eisenia
fetida and Eisenia andrei as well as survival and reproduction of
Enchytraeus crypticus up to at least 1000 mg/kg.
Regarding toxicity to the reproduction of Eisenia fetida and
Eisenia andrei, Schlich et al. (2012) and Wyrwoll et al. (2014) did not
observe effects of nanosized and microsized TiO2 up to 1000 mg/kg dw
In the study by Wyrwoll et al. (2014), dispersions of the
microsized TiO2 material Tiona AT1 (200 nm, anatase), and of the
nano-sized TiO2 materials Hombikat UV 100 (7-10 nm, anatase) and PC 105
(15-25 nm, anatase) in a natural test soil did not affect the survival
of Eisenia fetida in the acute limit toxicity test (OECD 207) and did
not affect growth and reproduction in the earthworm reproduction limit
test (OECD 222) resulting in 28-d NOEC values of ≥ 1000 mg/kg soil dw
(nominal) for survival and reproduction. Schlich et al. (2012) tested
three different nano-sized TiO2 materials, i.e. NM 105 (21 nm,
rutile/anatase), NM 101 (8 nm, anatase) and NM 103 (20 nm, rutile,
coated), in a standard toxicity test according to OECD 222 (2004). The
TiO2 materials did not reduce the number of offspring, and adults of
Eisenia andrei when applied to the test system via powder or dispersion
on feed or soil. Depending on the test setup, the 56-d and 28-d NOEC
values ranged from ≥ 20 (dispersion) to ≥ 1000 mg/kg soil dw (powder;
nominal). On the contrary, significant stimulation of reproduction was
observed for some TiO2 materials (P25, NM 101) with increasing levels.
However, the effect may be due to an improvement of the test soil.
Additionally, information is available on the toxicity of
nanosized TiO2 to Enchytraeid worms from a study by Hund-Rinke et al.
(2016): In a standard toxicity test according to OECD 220 (2004), the
two different nano-sized TiO2 materials NM-104 (26 nm, rutile,
Al-coated) and NM 105 (P25; 21 nm, anatase/rutile) did not affect the
survival and reproduction of Enchytraeus crypticus (28 d EC10 and EC50 >
1000 mg TiO2 NP/kg soil dw (nominal)).
Several supporting studies on the toxicity of nanosized and
microsized TiO2 to earthworm exist:
Micro-TiO2 material Titanium oxide-325 mesh (< 40 µm) did not
affect survival and reproduction of Eisenia andrei and survival,
reproduction and juvenile growth of Eisenia fetida in a sandy-loam soil
resulting in 28-d, 56-d and 126 d NOEC values of ≥ 200 mg/kg dw
(nominal) in a study by McShane et al. (2012). Higher concentrations
were applied to an artificial substrate and the natural soil by
dry-mixing resulting in 28-d and 56-d NOEC values of ≥ 10,000 mg/kg soil
dw (nominal) for all endpoints. The toxicity of nanosized TiO2 material
to the survival and reproduction of Eisenia andrei and Eisenia fetida
was studied in artificial substrate and in a natural soil, the latter
only with E. Andrei, according to OECD 207 and OECD 222, resulting in
28-d and 56-d NOEC values of ≥ 10,000 mg/kg soil dw (nominal) for adult
survival and reproduction. However, tests were performed in the dark to
avoid potential phototoxicity and thus potentially reducing the exposure
of the worms. Under standard-light-darkness cycles, earthworms tend to
remain in the soil under light conditions. Hence, results of these
experiments may not be conservative and are considered supporting data.
Further, McShane et al. (2012) observed in an earthworm avoidance
test with Eisenia fetida that the avoidance behaviour was not affected
by microsized TiO2 at 10,000 mg/kg soil. Results for the three
nano-sized TiO2 materials vary but indicate that earthworms do not avoid
TiO2-NP concentrations up to 100 mg/kg soil but consistently avoid
higher levels of 10,000 mg/kg soil.
Whitfield Aslund et al. (2012) used metabolomics to examine the
response of Eisenia fetida earthworms raised from juveniles for 20−23
weeks in soil spiked with 20 or 200 mg/kg nano- and microsized TiO2.
Data seem to indicate that earthworms exhibited changes in their
metabolic profile relative to the control after exposure to 200 mg/kg of
nano- and microsized TiO2. However, the correlation between the observed
metabolomic response and ecologically relevant endpoints is missing to
Lapied, E. et al. (2011) exposed Lumbricus terrestris for 2-8
weeks to a TiO2 nanocomposite (TiO2 core coated with superposed layers
of Al(OH)3 and PDMS) mixed into food or soil at concentrations up to 100
mg/kg. Apoptosis was measured by immunohistochemistry. Mortality and
apoptotic frequency were not affected in soil-exposed worms. Based on Ti
localization by XRF microscopy, nanoparticles appear to be rather inert
and did not cross the intestinal epithelium/ chloragogenous matrix
barrier to enter the coelomic liquid, or the cuticular barrier to reach
the muscular layers.
The fact that direct exposure to TiO2 NPs did not impair the
immuno-effectiveness of earthworm Eisenia veneta (Rosa) coelomocyte
cells at concentrations well above those predicted for sewage sludge in
the UK (25 mg/L) appears to be further evidence of the low potential of
TiO2 nanoparticles for toxicity to earthworms (Johnson et al. 2011).
In sum and applying a weight of evidence approach, nano- and
microsized TiO2 (rutile, anatase and mixed forms) appear to have a low
potential for short- and long-term toxicity to soil annelids based on
data available for different earthworm species and one enchytraeid
species up to at least 1000 mg/kg dw soil.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
Welcome to the ECHA website. This site is not fully supported in Internet Explorer 7 (and earlier versions). Please upgrade your Internet Explorer to a newer version.
Do not show this message again