Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 236-675-5
CAS number: 13463-67-7
Dispersions of microsized TiO2 are not toxic to aquatic algae and
cyanobacteria up to ≥ 100 mg/L (NOEC) and 5,600 mg TiO2/L (NOEC) in
fresh- and saltwater, respectively. Considering the low solubility of
microsized TiO2, it is further concluded that microsized TiO2 is not
toxic to freshwater algae up to its solubility limit. A low toxic
potential of algal toxicity is observed for dispersed nanosized TiO2
with EC10 and EC50 values being > 2 mg/L and > 50 mg/L, respectively.
Dissolved/dispersed pigment grade TiO2 material, prepared by
stirring for 48 h and filtering the dispersion through a 0.1 µm filter,
did not significantly affect the growth rate of Pseudokirchneriella
subcapitata in a test according to OECD 201 (72 h NOEC ≥ 100 mg/L,
nominal). Measured TiO2 concentrations of the test media (10-100 mg
TiO2/L, nominal) at test start were below the LOQ (1.44 µg TiO2/L) or
ranged from 1.52-1.60 µg TiO2/L and did not increase with the TiO2
loading rate (Schlich et al. 2015). Thus, microsized TiO2 is not toxic
to algae up to its solubility limit.
Microsized TiO2 was also not toxic to marine algae. Hudson et al.
(2007) exposed Skeletonema costatum to the supernatant of TiO2
dispersions, prepared by stirring for 20 h and siphoning of the middle
phase after a sedimentation period of 1 h, in a test according to ISO
10253. A 72 h NOEC value of 5600 mg TiO2/L (nominal) was derived. It is
further concluded that microsized TiO2 is not toxic to marine algae up
to its solubility limit.
In the study by Hudson et al. (2007), TiO2 particles at these
unrealistically high concentrations may have adsorbed nutrients that are
necessary for algae growth including phosphate and thereby caused algae
growth limitation in the closed, artificial test system. Hence, effect
values as derived by Nicolas et al (2015) may be due to an experimental
artefact and considered overly conservative.
The algae studies were performed at concentrations several
magnitudes above the solubility limit of microsized TiO2.
Transformation/dissolution data of different microsized TiO2 materials
indicate a low solubility in environmental media as dissolved Ti
concentrations after 28 d were below the respective LOD/LOQ (<
0.11 / < 0.34 µg Ti/L). In sum, it is concluded that
microsized TiO2 is not toxic to algae up to the solubility limit in
fresh- and saltwater.
Nicolas et al (2015) tested dispersions of the two titanium
dioxide nanoparticles, i.e. NM 101 (< 10 nm) and NM 104 (20 nm), in
Erlenmeyer flasks in an algae toxicity test according to OECD 201
(2011). The determined EC10 for inhibition of growth rate amount to 2.1
and 4.7 mg/L for NM 101 and NM 104, respectively, whereas the EC50 were
> 50 mg/L indicating a low potential for toxicity to algae.
Additionally, in a guideline algae toxicity test according to OECD
201 (2011) but without detailed documentation by Hund-Rinke et al.
(2016), dispersions of the TiO2 nanoparticles NM-104 (26 nm, rutile,
Al-coated) were tested in Erlenmeyer flasks. Determined EC10 and EC50
values for growth rate were reported as a range of 5-35 mg TiO2 NP/L (72
h EC10) and 415-1028 mg TiO2 NP/L (72 h EC50), indicating a low
potential for algal toxicity.
Nano-TiO2 particles may adsorb nutrients necessary for algae
growth such as phosphate. In several studies sorption of phosphate to
nano-TiO2 was observed (e.g. Luo et al. 2015 and Moharami et al. 2014).
Hence, nutrients of the test medium such as phosphate may adsorb to
nanosized TiO2, resulting in lower bioavailable concentrations and
thereby cause algae growth limitation in a closed, artificial test
system without the buffering capacity of natural water systems. Due to a
bigger and open nutrient pool in natural open environments, it is not
expected that nutrient adsorption to nanosized TiO2 at concentrations
applied by Nicolas et al (2015) and Hund-Rinke et al. (2016) would cause
algal growth limitations. Hence, effect values as derived by Nicolas et
al (2015) and Hund-Rinke et al. (2016) may be due to an experimental
artefact and considered overly conservative.
One study on the long-term toxicity of nanosized TiO2 to
freshwater polycultures further indicates that nano-TiO2 is not toxic to
biofilms at 1 mg/L. In this study by Kulacki et al. (2012), algae
biofilms consisting of monocultures of either Synedra ulna, Scenedesmus
quadricauda, or Stigeoclonium tenue as well as biofilms consisting of
polycultures of these three species were exposed to dispersions of the
nanosized TiO2 material P25 (27 ± 4 nm) in a recirculating system for 32
days without any significant effects on biomass resulting in 32-d NOEC
values of ≥ 1 mg n-TiO2/L (nominal). Dispersed TiO2 concentrations in
the water phase of the 0.1 and 1 mg/L treatments decreased to background
levels (0.015 mg/L) or to 0.026 mg/L at the end of the test,
Miller et al. (2010) also found that nanosized TiO2 was not toxic
to marine phytoplanktonic algae up to 1 mg/L. Dispersions of a nanosized
TiO2 material (15-20 nm) did not significantly reduce the growth rate of
four marine phytoplanktonic species, including diatoms, chlorophytes and
prymnesiophytes, in a non-standardized toxicity test. Reported 72 h
NOEC-values were ≥ 1 mg n-TiO2/L (nominal).
In a supporting study by Morelli et al. (2018), dispersions of
n-TiO2 (Aeroxide P25, primary particle size: 24 ± 7 nm) up to the
highest test concentration of 10 mg/L did not significantly affect the
growth rate of the marine green alga Dunaliella tertiolecta and thus an
unbounded 72-h NOEC of ≥ 10 mg n-TiO2/L (nominal) was derived.
Significant aggregation and quick sedimentation in the saline test
medium was observed, resulting in a decrease of suspended n-TiO2
In sum, two GLP-conform guideline tests of the toxicity of
microsized TiO2 to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria resulted in an
unbounded NOEC value of ≥ 100 mg/L TiO2/L for Pseudokirchnerella
subcapitata in freshwater and a NOEC of 5,600 mg TiO2/L for Skeletonema
costatum, in saltwater. Nicolas et al (2015) observed some toxicity of
two n-TiO2 materials, however, the respective EC10s are well above
long-term classification criteria. Studies with n-TiO2 and freshwater
polycultures (Kulacki et al. 2012) or saltwater phytoplankton species
(Miller et al. 2010) point to a low potential for toxicity to algae. In
sum, it can be concluded that microsized TiO2 is not toxic to aquatic
algae and cyanobacteria up to ≥ 100 mg/L (NOEC) and up to 5,600 mg
TiO2/L (NOEC) in fresh- and saltwater, respectively. Also, a low
potential for algal toxicity is observed for nanosized TiO2 with EC10
and EC50 values being > 2 mg/L and > 50 mg/L, respectively.
Luo et al. 2015. The Effect of Phosphate and Sulfate on Arsenate
Desorption From Nano-TiO2. J. Res. Sci. Tecnol. 12, Suppl. 1, S17-S-23
Moharami et al. 2014. Effect of TiO2, Al2O3, and Fe3O4
Nanoparticles on Phosphorus Removal from Aqueous Solution. Environ.
Prog. Sustain. Energy 33, 1209-1219
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
За да гарантираме, че се възползвате максимално от функциите на нашия уебсайт, сме въвели „бисквитки“.
Welcome to the ECHA website. This site is not fully supported in Internet Explorer 7 (and earlier versions). Please upgrade your Internet Explorer to a newer version.
Do not show this message again