Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Direct observations: clinical cases, poisoning incidents and other

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
direct observations: clinical cases, poisoning incidents and other
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: reporting suffers from deficiencies

Data source

Referenceopen allclose all

Reference Type:
publication
Title:
The classification of Skin irritants by human patch test
Author:
Basketer DA, Chamberlain M, Griffiths HA, Rowson M, Shittle E, York M
Year:
1997
Bibliographic source:
Food Chem Toxicol 35, 845-852
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Determination of skin irritation potential in the human 4-h patch test
Author:
Basketer DA, York M, McFadden JP, Robinson MK
Year:
2004
Bibliographic source:
Contact Dermatitis 51, 1-4

Materials and methods

Study type:
study with volunteers
Endpoint addressed:
skin irritation / corrosion
Principles of method if other than guideline:
patch test in humans
GLP compliance:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Benzyl alcohol
EC Number:
202-859-9
EC Name:
Benzyl alcohol
Cas Number:
100-51-6
Molecular formula:
C7H8O
IUPAC Name:
phenylmethanol
Details on test material:
no further data

Method

Type of population:
general
Subjects:
volunteers
Ethical approval:
not specified
Route of exposure:
dermal
Reason of exposure:
intentional
Exposure assessment:
measured
Details on exposure:
patch test in human
Examinations:
skin irritancy
Medical treatment:
no data

Results and discussion

Clinical signs:
1/31 weekly positive reaction usually characterized by mild erythema or dryness across most of the treatment site)
compared to 17/32 in the positive control group
Results of examinations:
weekly positive reaction(usually characterized by mild erythema or dryness across most of the treatment site) was observed in 1/31 volunteers compared to 17/32 in the positive control group. Therefore it was concluded that there is no need to classify
Effectivity of medical treatment:
no data
Outcome of incidence:
1/31 (mild erythema) vs 17/32 in the positive control group

Any other information on results incl. tables

weekly positive reaction(usually characterized by mild erythema or dryness across most of the treatment site) was observed in 1/31 volunteers compared to 17/32 in the positive control group Therefore it was concluded that there is no need to classify

Applicant's summary and conclusion