Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Environmental fate & pathways

Adsorption / desorption

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
adsorption / desorption: screening
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
test procedure in accordance with national standard methods with acceptable restrictions

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1984
Report date:
1984

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: EPA 540/9-82-021
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
no
Type of method:
HPLC estimation method
Media:
soil

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
ethyl 2-({[(4-chloro-6-methoxypyrimidin-2-yl)carbamoyl]amino}sulfonyl)benzoate
EC Number:
618-690-2
Cas Number:
90982-32-4
Molecular formula:
C15H15ClN4O6S
IUPAC Name:
ethyl 2-({[(4-chloro-6-methoxypyrimidin-2-yl)carbamoyl]amino}sulfonyl)benzoate
Test material form:
solid
Remarks:
White
Details on test material:
95 to >99% purity
Radiolabelling:
yes

Study design

Test temperature:
25°C

HPLC method

Details on study design: HPLC method:
The mobility of the test substance was studied on each soil type by soil thin-layer chromatography. Each soil sample was hammer-milled to a 1-5 μm particle size and coated as a 400 μm layer onto 20 cm x 20 cm glass plates. One microliter aliquots of the sample and reference standard solutions (1 mg compound/mL acetone) were spotted three cm from the bottom of each plate. The lower 0.5 cm of each plate was submerged in water and the water was allowed to ascend to a height of 10 cm. The plates were air dried for 24 hours and exposed to X-ray film (Kodak SB-5) for two weeks.

Batch equilibrium or other method

Analytical monitoring:
no
Matrix propertiesopen allclose all
Matrix no.:
#1
Matrix type:
sandy loam
% Clay:
18
% Silt:
21
% Sand:
61
% Org. carbon:
2.1
pH:
6.5
CEC:
6.6 meq/100 g soil d.w.
Matrix no.:
#2
Matrix type:
silt loam
% Clay:
17
% Silt:
81
% Sand:
2
% Org. carbon:
4.3
pH:
5.4
CEC:
21.1 meq/100 g soil d.w.
Matrix no.:
#3
Matrix type:
silt loam
% Clay:
5
% Silt:
83
% Sand:
12
% Org. carbon:
7.5
pH:
5.2
CEC:
15.5 meq/100 g soil d.w.
Matrix no.:
#4
Matrix type:
sandy loam
% Clay:
7
% Silt:
33
% Sand:
60
% Org. carbon:
1.1
pH:
6.6
CEC:
5.3 meq/100 g soil d.w.

Results and discussion

Adsorption coefficientopen allclose all
Key result
Sample No.:
#1
Type:
other: Ka
Value:
0.43 other: µg/g
pH:
6.5
Temp.:
25 °C
Matrix:
Cecil sandy loam
% Org. carbon:
2.1
Key result
Sample No.:
#2
Type:
other: Ka
Value:
3.2 other: µg/g
pH:
5.4
Temp.:
25 °C
Matrix:
Flanagan silt loam
% Org. carbon:
4.3
Key result
Sample No.:
#3
Type:
other: Ka
Value:
7.4 other: µg/g
pH:
5.2
Temp.:
25 °C
Matrix:
Keyport silt loam
% Org. carbon:
7.5
Key result
Sample No.:
#4
Type:
other: Ka
Value:
0.19 other: µg/g
pH:
6.6
Temp.:
25 °C
Matrix:
Woodstown sandy loam
% Org. carbon:
1.1
Key result
Sample No.:
#1
Type:
Kd
Value:
0.96 other: µg/g
pH:
6.5
Temp.:
25 °C
Matrix:
Cecil sandy loam
% Org. carbon:
2.1
Key result
Sample No.:
#2
Type:
Kd
Value:
3.7 other: µg/g
pH:
5.4
Temp.:
25 °C
Matrix:
Flanagan silt loam
% Org. carbon:
4.3
Key result
Sample No.:
#4
Type:
Kd
Value:
0.24 other: µg/g
pH:
6.6
Temp.:
25 °C
Matrix:
Woodstown sandy loam
% Org. carbon:
1.1

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Validity criteria fulfilled:
yes
Conclusions:
The test substance was very weakly adsorbed (Ka = 0.2-0.4) on the two sandy loam soils (Cecil sandy loam and Woodstown sandy loam) and only weakly adsorbed (Ka = 3-7) on the two silt loam soils (Flanagan silt loam and Keyport silt loam).
Executive summary:

Adsorption, desorption, and soil thin-layer chromatography studies were conducted on Cecil sandy loam, Flanagan silt loam, Keyport silt loam, and Woodstown sandy loam soils. The mobility of the test substance varied from low mobility (EPA Class 2) to mobile (EPA Class 4) based on the results of the soil thin-layer chromatography study. The Rf values were similar to those of terbacil but appeared to be more highly dependent on the percent organic matter content of the soil.

The test substance was very weakly adsorbed (Ka = 0.2-0.4) on the two sandy loam soils (Cecil sandy loam and Woodstown sandy loam) and only weakly adsorbed (Ka = 3-7) on the two silt loam soils (Flanagan silt loam and Keyport silt loam).

 

Adsorbed radioactivity was readily desorbed for the sandy loam soils (Cecil sandy loam and Woodstown sandy loam) but more tightly retained on the silt loams. This ease of desorption appears to be inversely proportional to the percent organic matter content of the soils (Flanagan silt loam and Keyport silt loam).

Categories Display