Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 232-140-5 | CAS number: 7789-00-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Epidemiological data
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- epidemiological data
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across based on grouping of substances (category approach)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: The EU RAR summarises a number of epidemiological studies of workers occupationally exposed to Cr (VI) compounds. The studies are of varying designs and reliability and have also been previously reviewed by the UK HSE (1989) and the UK IOH (1997).
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- other: EU RAR
- Title:
- European Union Risk Assessment Report: chromium trioxide, sodium chromate, sodium dichromate, ammonium dichromate, potassium dichromate
- Author:
- European Chemicals Bureau
- Year:
- 2 005
- Bibliographic source:
- 3rd Priority List; Volume 53
Materials and methods
- Study type:
- other: The EU RAR reviews a number of studies of various designs
- Endpoint addressed:
- carcinogenicity
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- no guideline available
- Deviations:
- not applicable
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Epidemiological studies investigating cancer incidence in workers occupationally exposed to various forms of chromium
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Remarks:
- Not applicable
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Chromium (VI)
- IUPAC Name:
- Chromium (VI)
- Details on test material:
- Studies relate to occupational exposure to various chromium compounds.
Constituent 1
Method
- Details on study design:
- Various studies are summarised.
- Exposure assessment:
- not specified
Results and discussion
- Results:
- See remarks on results below.
- Confounding factors:
- See discussion.
- Strengths and weaknesses:
- See discussion.
Any other information on results incl. tables
The EU RAR discusses the findings of the epidemiological studies of cancer incidence reviewed previously by the UK Health & Safety Executive (HSE, 1989) and the UK Institute of Health (IOH, 1997). These studies investigated cancer risks among workers exposed to various forms of Cr (III) and Cr (VI). Unfortunately, detailed analysis of smoking habits is almost invariably absent. In chromate production, workers are exposed to Cr (III) during the production of Cr (VI) in water-soluble form e.g. sodium chromate. Although studies of chromate production have clearly established that there is an increase in lung cancer mortality, it is not clear precisely which Cr (VI) compound(s) produced the effect. An excess risk of lung cancer mortality has also been reported for workers in the chromate pigment production industry. However, this industry involves exposure to sparingly soluble or poorly soluble zinc or lead chromates as well as the more water-soluble Cr (VI) compounds covered by the various reviews. Chromium plating workers are exposed to aqueous chromium (VI) trioxide. One study provides clear evidence of an association between chromium plating work and increased lung cancer risk. It is not possible to relate in any reliable manner, the excess lung cancer mortality seen to particular levels of Cr (VI) in the atmosphere. Overall, it was concluded by the HSE and IOH reviews that chromium (VI) trioxide in solution ('chromic acid') is a human carcinogen. However only limited information is available for the other Cr (VI) compounds in this group.
A number of additional studies were included in the EU RAR. Two more recently published studies have significant methodological weaknesses but were included in the RAR because they extended earlier studies which are found in the IOH and HSE reviews:
An epidemiology study of mortality among chromate production workers showed a statistically significant increase in proportional mortality for death from all cancers (PCMR 1.37, 95% CI 1.23-1.51), digestive tract cancer (PCMR 1.33, CI 1.08-1.61), stomach cancer (PCMR 2.05, CI 1.38-2.92), nasal cancer (PCMR 5.18, CI 2.18- 11.30) and lung cancer (PCMR 1.51, CI 1.29-1.75) in white men. For black men, a statistically significant increase in proportional mortality for death from all cancer, lung cancer, bladder cancer and diseases of the digestive system was found among a total of 394 deaths. In black men, the proportion of deaths from lung cancer was slightly increased (PCMR 1.34 CI 1.00-1.75) while the proportion of bladder cancer deaths was statistically significantly higher; PCMR 3.30 (CI 1.42-6.51). Proportional mortality for lung cancer increased with increasing time employed and with latency since first employed.
An additional follow-up study looked at a cohort of 332 males working in a chromate plant between 1931-1937 and were followed through to 1993. Of 283 deaths identified, lung cancer deaths accounted for about 23% (66 deaths). Cumulative exposures to Cr (III) or Cr (VI) were calculated; age-adjusted mortality rates for lung cancer increased with increasing cumulative exposure. The authors claim that there is an association between Cr(III) and increased lung cancer mortality but the EU RAR considers this association to be 'probably spurious', and likely to be the indirect consequence of a correlation between Cr(III) and Cr(VI) exposures.
A follow-on study, concentrating on lung cancer deaths was conducted, extending the period of follow-up on chromium platers in the Midlands, UK, to 1995 (Sorahan et al., 1998). A reliable, statistically significant excess mortality from cancer of the lung was found in the earlier study. There was a positive association between increased incidence of lung cancer and duration of chrome bath work in male workers. In the 1998 study, For those workers with no exposure to chrome bath work, no excess in lung cancer mortality was found, whereas a higher SMR was calculated from the statistics for men exposed to chrome bath work. A statistically significant increased lung cancer SMR was calculated for all male chrome workers 10-19 years after first working with Cr(VI) but other periods of follow-up did not show a statistically significant excess. A significant positive statistical trend was observed for lung cancer mortality in men and cumulative duration of chrome bath work. In the case of men employed for 5 years or more in chrome bath work, the SMR for lung cancer mortality was 375 (10 observed, 2.7 expected, 95% CI 180-689). A raised SMR was also found for women workers with any chrome bath work (observed 15, expected 8.6, SMR 175, 95% CI 98-289). This study confirms the earlier findings that exposure to Cr (VI) in chrome plating work causes a significant increase in the risk of death from lung cancer. It remains impossible to establish a clear dose-response relationship for this excess risk of lung cancer.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- The studies reviewed in the EU RAR (including those previously summarised in the UK HSE and IOH reviews) demonstrate an association between occupational exposure to chromic acid mist (aqueous chromium (VI) trioxide) and lung cancer. While the acidic and corrosive nature of this compound may play a significant role in the development of lung cancer, it is considered likley that the toxic moeity is the Cr (VI) ion. Therefore concerns are raised regarding the human carcinogenicity of the other Cr (VI) compounds in this group.
- Executive summary:
The EUR RAR summarises the results of a number of epidemiological studies investigating the association between occupational exposure to Cr (VI) compounds and cancer mortality. Studies of chrome plating workers (specifically exposed to chromic acid mists) in the US and UK show a clear association between exposure and increased mortality form lung cancer. Studies of occupational exposure to other Cr (VI) compounds have not shown a similar association. The EU RAR notes that the acidic and corrosive nature of chromium trioxide may be a significant contributory factor in the carcinogenesis of chromic acid (aqueous chromium (VI) trioxide), but that the Cr (VI) ion is likely to be the toxic moiety. It is considered that there is concern for the human carciogenicity of the other water-soluble Cr (VI) compounds in this group.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
Siekdami užtikrinti, kad būtų patogu naudotis mūsų svetaine, jos tinklapiuose naudojame slapukus.