Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 205-739-4 | CAS number: 149-44-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
In vitro-test (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test/Ames Test), OECD 471:
Five genetically manipulated strains of Salmonella were exposed to the test item both in the presence and in the absence of a metabolic activation system for 48 hours, using the plate incorporation method.None of the concentrations caused an increase in the number of revertant colonies in the tested strains.The test item neither showed any mutagenic effects nor any cytotoxicity in the Ames Test.
In vitro-test (Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Assay), OECD 476:
The test item was assessed for its potential to induce mutations at mice cell genes. Two experiments at different concentrations with and without metabolic activation showed positive results at the higher concentrations. In conclusion the test item is considered to be clastogenic according to the Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation test.
In vivo test (Mouse micronucleus test), OECD 474:
The genotoxic effect on erythrocytes in bone marrow was examined in the Micronucleus Test in mice.
Male and female animal groups were tested at concentration up to 2000 mg/kg. All animals showed no abnormalities after dosing. The test item induced a statistically significant increase in the mean number of micro-nucleated polychromatic erythrocytes. The observed increase is assessed as biologically relevant and the test item is considered to be clastogenic in the Mouse Micronucleus test.
Overall view
The test item showed a negative and a positive result in in-vitro tests and a positive result in one in-vivo test. Therefore, a classification as mutagenic, category 2 according to CLP regulation 3.5.2.2 is proposed. The criteria for a classification as mutagenic, category 1 B are not given.
Short description of key information:
The substance showed positive results in the Mammalian Cell Gene
Mutation and the Mouse Micronucleus Test, a negative result in the
Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test. The substance is considered to be
classified as mutagenic, category 2 according to CLP regulation.
Endpoint Conclusion: Adverse effect observed (positive)
Justification for classification or non-classification
The test item showed a negative and a positive result in in-vitro tests and a positive result in one in-vivo test. Therefore, a classification as mutagenic, category 2 according to CLP regulation 3.5.2.2 is proposed. Criteria for a classification as mutagenic, category 1 B will not be met.
The administration of the substance in the micronucleus test as an intraperitoneal injection is not an intake that is relevant compared to the most likely human exposure. On the other hand, based on the test results, it cannot be excluded that the substance may induce heritable mutations of germ cells. Therefore it is proposed to classify the substance as mutagenic category 2.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
