Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 205-739-4 | CAS number: 149-44-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Skin sensitisation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- January 2008 to March 2008
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP-guideline study: the test was conducted according the O.E.CD. guideline no. 406 dated July 17, 1992 and the method B.6 oI the E.E.C no 96/54 dated July 3, 1996.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 008
- Report date:
- 2008
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.6 (Skin Sensitisation)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of study:
- guinea pig maximisation test
- Justification for non-LLNA method:
- Valid study from the year 2008 was available.
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Sodium hydroxymethanesulphinate
- EC Number:
- 205-739-4
- EC Name:
- Sodium hydroxymethanesulphinate
- Cas Number:
- 149-44-0
- Molecular formula:
- CH4O3S.Na
- IUPAC Name:
- sodium hydroxymethanesulphinate
Constituent 1
In vivo test system
Test animals
- Species:
- guinea pig
- Strain:
- Dunkin-Hartley
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River (F-69592 L' Arbresle)
- Age at study initiation: 4 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: between 228 and 275 g
- Housing: The animals were housed either in groups of 2 or 3 in polycarbonate containers, the flooring of which was covered with dust-free cuttings and the top fitted a stainless steel lid with a feeding device and drinking device of 500 ml.
- Diet: C17.50 guinea pig breeder (Special Diets Services)
- Water: tap water from public distribution system
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 19-22 °C
- Humidity (%): between 36% and 58%
- Air changes (per hr): no data
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Inductionopen allclose all
- Route:
- intradermal and epicutaneous
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Concentration / amount:
- see "details on study design"
Challengeopen allclose all
- Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Concentration / amount:
- see "details on study design"
- No. of animals per dose:
- MAIN STUDY: Group 1 (negative control): 5 female
Group 2 (treated): 10 female - Details on study design:
- RANGE FINDING TESTS:
Preliminary studies:
1. Determination by intradermal injection of the Maximal Non Necrotizing Concentration (CMNN):
This test was conducted for the purpose of determing a MNNC of the test item.
Two animals received on both sides of the spine, a volume of 0.1 mL of the test item, at 6 concentrations: diluted at 50%,25%, 12.5%, 6.25%,3 .125% and 1.56% in isotonic sodium chloride. A macroscopic evaluation of the cutaneous reactions was conducted 24 hours later and 48 hours later
if necessary.
2. Determination by topical application of the Pre-Maximal Non Irritant Concentration (Pre-MNIC):
This test, which allowed to evaluate the irritant potential of the test item, defined whether an application of sodium lauryl sulfate would be needed during topical induction phase.
The test item was applied on the dorso-Iumbar zone of two guinea pigs shom be forehand, with occlusive dressing for 24 hours, at 4 different concentrations: diluted at 80%, 40%, 20% and 10% in distilled water. A macroscopic evaluation of the cutaneous reactions was conducted 24 hours after removal of the dressing.
3. Determination by topical application ofthe Maximal Non Irritant Concentration (MNIC):
This test was carried out for the purpose of determining the MNIC of the test item without risk of an irritant effect during the challenge phase.
Three guinea pigs were treated according to the same treatment as animals from GROUP I (negative control) for the induction phase (i.e. isotonic sodium chloride and distilled water). During the challenge phase, the animals were treated with the test item placed onto the selected treatment sites and covered with an occJusive dressing for aperiod of 24 hours at 4 different concentrations: diluted at 80%, 40%, 20% and 10% in distilled water.
A macroscopic evaluation of the cutaneous reactions was conducted 24 hours after removal of the occlusive dressing.
MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
INTRADERMAL INDUCTION:
- No. of exposures: Group 1 (negative control): 5 female x 3 pairs of ID = 15 exposures
Group 1 (treated):10 female x 3 pairs of ID = 30 exposures
- Test groups:
GROUP 2 (Treated):
• 2 ID: Freund's Complete Adjuvant diluted by 50 % in isotonic sodium chloride,
• 2 ID: test item at 3.125%,
• 2 ID a test mixture in equal volumes v/v: - Freund's Complete Adjuvant at 50% and the test item at 6.25%.
- Control group:
GROUP 1 (Negative control):
• 2 ID: Freund's Complete Adjuvant diluted at 50 % in isotonic sodium chloride.
• 2 ID: isotonic sodium chloride
• 2 ID: a mixture with equal volumes v/v: Freund's Complete Adjuvant at 50% and isotonic sodium chloride
- Site: on the scapular zone in such a way as an injection on each pair is placed to either side of the spine
- Frequency of applications: three pairs of intradermal injections (ID)
- Concentrations: 0.1 mL
TOPICAL INDUCTION:
Day 6: The scapular zone of all the animals in each group, shom be forehand, was brushed wilh a solution of
sodium lauryl sulfate at 10% in thick vaseline, in order to create a local irritation.
Day 7: A topical application under occlusive dressing for 48 hours was perfonned on the injection sites of each animal.
GROUP 1 (Negative control): 0.5 mL of distilled water
GROUP 2 (treated): 0.5 mL of the test item at 80%
After the removal ofthe pateh, the treated areas were rinsed with distiJled water.
Rest phase: 10 days
B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 6
- Day(s) of challenge: Day 20
- Exposure period: 24 hours
- Test groups: GROUP 1 (Negative control) and GROUP 2 (treated)
- Site: on the previously shorn dorso-Iumbar zone, an application on either side of the spine
- Concentrations: - 1 sampIe cup containing the test item at 80% (MNIC) and at 40% (112 MNIC). - Challenge controls:
- No use of a challenge (i.e. naive) control group.
- Positive control substance(s):
- yes
- Remarks:
- alpha-Hexylcinnamaldehyde
Results and discussion
- Positive control results:
- a-Hexyceinnamaldehyde (CAS# 101-86-0) is used in the laboratory in order to check the sensibility of the method since this substance is known to have mild to moderate skin sensitisation properties
In vivo (non-LLNA)
Resultsopen allclose all
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 80 %
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 5
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 80 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 5.0.
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 80%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 5
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 80%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 5.0.
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 40%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 5
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 40%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 5.0.
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 40%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 5
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 40%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 5.0.
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 80%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 80%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 80%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 80%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 40%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 40%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 40%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 40%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Sensitising potential assessment:
No macroscopic cutaneous reactions attributable to allergy were recorded during the examination following the removal of the occusive dressing (challenge phase) from the animals of the treated group with the test item. No cutaneous intolerance reaction was recorded in animals from the negative control group.
Weight evolution:
Not any abnormality was recorded in the body weight gain of both groups.
Mortality:
No mortality was registered during the main test.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- not sensitising
- Remarks:
- Migrated information
- Conclusions:
- In view of the results under the experimental conditions, the test item needs not to be classified.
- Executive summary:
No macroscopic cutaneous reactions attributable to allergy were recorded after induction of Guinea Pigs with the test item.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
På den här webbplatsen används kakor. Syftet är att optimera din upplevelse av den.