Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Physical & Chemical properties

Water solubility

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
water solubility
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
15-29 May 2012
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 105 (Water Solubility)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method A.6 (Water Solubility)
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of method:
column elution method
Water solubility:
0.16 mg/L
Temp.:
20 °C
pH:
6.9

Preliminary test:

Even in a total volume of 1000 mL added to ca. 10 mg of the test item, still undissolved particles could be observed after 96 h. This result indicated that the water solubility of the test item was probably below 10 mg/L. Therefore the column elution method was chosen for the study.

Preparation of the column and sample preparations for runs 1, 2, 3:

The following amounts of the test item were weighed into a round bottom flask: RUN 1 = 42.0 mg / RUN 2 = 53.8 mg / RUN 3 = 51.3 mg. Approximately 2.5 g of glass beads (2 mm in diameter) were added and then the test item was dissolved in some drops of acetonitrile. Then the solvent was removed using a nitrogen stream while the flask was shaken carefully. The dry coated glass beads were placed into the distilled water containing column of the test apparatus (column temperature: 20°C, bidistilled water at room temperature: measured pH = 6.9). After a minimum swelling time of approximately 2 h, the pump was started. The fractions were collected using test tubes.

To ensure the stability of the fractions during the sampling period all test tubes provided for the HPLC measurement were prepared with 50 µL of a 0.1 M H3PO4 solution prior to the start. The test tubes for pH measurement were left blank.

The volume of the collected aqueous fractions was estimated and the pH at room temperature was measured in each fifth test tube. 10 mL of each fraction were added with 2 mL of acetonitrile to a total volume of 12 mL (5 mL per fraction + 1 mL acetonitrile for RUN 3) and then analysed by HPLC. The concentration of the test item in the individual fractions was determined by HPLC.

Individual conditions and results:

Run (flow rate)

Rotation period of the fraction collector

Flow rate, measured

Average fraction volume (calc.)

Duration of sampling

Average solubility (mg/L) (RSD)

Remarks

Run 1 (25 mL/h)

35 min per fraction

25.3 mL/h

14.8 mL

Approx. 14.6 h

0.154 (5.8%)

Fractions 6 to 9 and 11 to 14 of 25 in total. The solubility varied

between 0.140 and 0.164 mg/L.

Run 2 (12.5 mL/h)

66 min per fraction

12.7 mL/h

14.0 mL

Approx. 22 h

0.167 (2.4%)

Fractions 6 to 9 and 11 of 20 in total. The solubility varied between

0.163 and 0.174 mg/L.

Run 3 (6.25 mL/h)

99 min per fraction

6.24 mL/h

10.3 mL

Approx. 33 h

0.148 (2.7%)

Fractions 7 to 9, 11 to 14 and 16 to 17 of 20 in total. The solubility

varied between 0.142 and 0.154 mg/L.

Kryostat error began with fraction 12 of Run 2. Therefore temperature control was not ensured for samples beginning with fraction 12. Room temperature for those fractions was approximately 26 °C. In consequence Run 3 was performed with a flow rate of 6.25 mL/h.


Coating check

At the end of each column elution experiment it was confirmed that there was still enough test item on the elution columns. Therefore the residual test item was eluted completely from the column into a 100 mL volumetric flask using acetonitrile. An aliquot (1.0 mL) of this solution was filled up with the HPLC eluent to a volume of 50 mL for Run 1 (100 mL for Run 2 and Run 3) and analyzed by HPLC. The results below show that there was a sufficient amount of test item on the column in order to ensure the saturation of the eluted aqueous phase.


Sample

Amount used for coating (mg)

Concentrate of eluate solution (mg/L)

Amount of residual test item found (mg)

Mean amount needed for the saturation of one fraction (µg)

Theoretical number of fractions to be saturated by residual amount

Run 1

42.0

133.2

13.3

2.28

5833

Run 2

53.8

329.9

33.0

2.12

15566

Run 3

51.3

262.5

26.3

0.92

28587






Endpoint:
water solubility
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Study period:
23 Dec 1992 - 22 Apr 1993
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 105 (Water Solubility)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
no preliminary testing
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of method:
column elution method
Water solubility:
0.17 mg/L
Temp.:
20 °C
pH:
5
Remarks on result:
other: temperature reported as ambient (20-25 °C)
Water solubility:
0.08 mg/L
Temp.:
20 °C
pH:
7
Remarks on result:
other: temperature reported as ambient (20-25 °C)
Water solubility:
0.15 mg/L
Temp.:
20 °C
pH:
9
Remarks on result:
other: temperature reported as ambient (20-25 °C)

Description of key information

0.16 mg/L at 20 °C, pH 6.9 (EU A.6, OECD 105, column elution method)

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Water solubility:
0.16 mg/L
at the temperature of:
20 °C

Additional information

In an earlier experiment, conducted according to OECD 105 (column elution method), the following results were obtained at 20 °C: 0.17 mg/L (pH 5), 0.08 mg/L (pH 7), 0.15 mg/L (pH 9). They are supporting.