Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 485-320-2 | CAS number: 221667-31-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- disregarded due to major methodological deficiencies
- Study period:
- 09 Nov - 07 Dec 2006
- Reliability:
- 3 (not reliable)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- significant methodological deficiencies
- Remarks:
- Invalide study, validity criteria are not reached, the average offspring per female in the controls was only 0.77 per day indicating severe underperformance (performance criterion: >= 3/day). In the Joint review this study was considered invalid by PMRA and the EU RMS agreed in his evaluation for Europe.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 850.1350 (Mysid Chronic Toxicity Test)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- , validity criteria are not reached, the average offspring per female in the controls was only 0.77 per day indicating severe underperformance (performance criterion: >= 3/day).
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: FIFRA Guideline Number 72-4
- Deviations:
- yes
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- - Samples were taken from a point midway between the surface, bottom and sides of each vessel using a pipet.
- Exposure concentrations were analytically confirmed on days 0, 1, 7, 13, 21, 22 and 28 and were used to define measured exposure concentrations for this study. Samples of the aged (approx. 48 h old) and newly prepared diluter stock solutions (approx. 24 h old) were also analyzed at each sampling interval. - Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION (especially for difficult test substances)
- Method: A stock solution of the test substance was prepared daily during the study by adding the test substance directly to artificial seawater. The resulting stock solution was mixed overnight and was observed to be clear and colourless with no visible signs of undissolved test substance following preparation. - Test organisms (species):
- Americamysis bahia (previous name: Mysidopsis bahia)
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: Mysid shrimp
- Source: Laboratory cultures at Springborn Smithers (SSL Lot No. 06A107); original source: Aquatic BioSystems Inc., Fort Collins Co, USA
- Age at study initiation (mean and range, SD): ≤ 24 h
- Feeding during test: yes
- Food type: live brine shrimp (Artemia salina) nauplii, twice daily
- Amount/frequency: During the period prior to pairing, at least one of these feedings was with brine shrimp nauplii enriched with Selco, a substance high in saturated fatty acids. Following the pairing phase, the mysids were fed brine shrimp nauplii enriched with Selco every other day.
CULTURE CONDITIONS
- Mysids were cultured in one of several 76-L glass aquaria with a closed-loop recirculating filtration system providing artificial filtered seawater to the aquaria. The seawater in the aquaria was characterized as having a salinity of 22 to 24‰ and a pH range of 8.1 to 8.3 during the 14-day period prior to test initiation. Dissolved oxygen percent saturation ranged from 98 to 102%, and specific conductance ranged from 32,000 to 35,000 µmhos/cm. The area in which the mysids were cultured received a regulated photoperiod of 16 hours of light and 8 hours of darkness.
- Type and amount of food: live brine shrimp (Artemia salina) nauplii; the first feeding was brine shrimp and the second feeding was brine shrimp enriched with Selco, a substance high in saturated fatty acids.
- Feeding frequency: ad libitum, twice daily - Test type:
- flow-through
- Water media type:
- saltwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 28 d
- Hardness:
- 152 - 182 mg/L as CaCO3 (values for newly prepared batches of artificial seawater)
- Test temperature:
- 24 - 27 °C
- pH:
- 8.1 - 8.3
- Dissolved oxygen:
- 5.1 - 7.3 mg/L
- Salinity:
- 19 - 21 ‰
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Nominal: 0.19, 0.38, 0.75, 1.5, 3.0 mg a.i./L
Mean measured: 0.17, 0.31, 0.54, 1.1, 1.7 mg a.i./L - Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: aquaria
- Material, size, headspace, fill volume: size: 39 x 20 x 25 cm
- Renewal rate of test solution (frequency/flow rate): During each cycle of the diluter system, approximately 500 mL of exposure solution was delivered to each replicate test vessel. During the study, the diluter provided the exposure solutions to each test vessel at a rate of approximately 7.5 aquarium volume additions per day to provide a 90% test solution replacement rate of approximately 7.0 hours. The function of the diluter system (e.g., dilution water flow rates, stock solution consumption) was monitored daily and a visual check was performed twice each day. In this study, the flow-splitting accuracy was within 5% of the targeted delivery.
- No. of organisms per vessel: 30
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 2
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 2
- Biomass loading rate: 0.0027 g/L
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: Artificial seawater was prepared by the addition of a commercially prepared salt formula (i.e., hw-MARINEMIX) to laboratory well water. Newly prepared batches of artificial seawater had a total alkalinity range of 152 to 182 mg/L as CaCO3, a specific conductance range of 20,000 to 27,000 µmhos/cm and a pH range of 8.0 to 8.2. The freshwater was mixed with the appropriate amount of salt in a 1700-L container to a salinity of 17 to 22‰. The artificial seawater was mixed and aerated vigorously for approximately 24 h, then allowed to aerate for an additional 24 h prior to use. The volume of dilution water which was prepared depended on the requirements of the diluter system.
- Total organic carbon: 0.37 mg/L for Nov 2006
- Toxic Metals: below levels of concern
- Pesticides: below levels of concern
- Culture medium different from test medium: no
- Intervals of water quality measurement: Temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH and salinity were measured on each batch of artificial seawater prior to use and daily in each test vessel.
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Photoperiod: 16 h light/8 h dark
- Light intensity: 49 - 85 footcandles (530 - 920 lux) provided by Sylvania Oktron fluorescent bulbs
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable): After males and females had been paired (day 13), the number of dead males and females, the number of offspring produced by each individual female, and any abnormal appearance or behaviour was recorded daily. After test end, body length and dry weight was determined.
RANGE-FINDING STUDY
- 2 studies were performed:
- Test concentrations: (1) nominal 1.6, 3.1, 6.3, 13 and 25 mg a.i./L; (2) 6.3, 13, 25, 50 and 100 mg a.i./L
- Results used to determine the conditions for the definitive study: Since a NOEC level was not established, nominal concentrations were revised to 0.19, 0.38, 0.75, 1.5 and 3.0 mg a.i./L. - Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 0.17 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (arithm. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- act. ingr.
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 0.31 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (arithm. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- act. ingr.
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- other: MATC
- Effect conc.:
- 0.23 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (arithm. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- act. ingr.
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Details on results:
- - No. of offspring produced per day per female: validity criteria are not reached, the average offspring per female in the controls was only 0.77 per day indicating severe underperformance (performance criterion: >= 3/day).
- In general, the stability of stock solutions was questionable for a period of greater than 48 h, since degradation of the samples was observed. All stock solutions used during this study were < 48 h old. - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- no
- Remarks:
- validity criteria are not reached, the average offspring per female in the controls was only 0.77 per day indicating severe underperformance (performance criterion: >= 3/day).
- Endpoint:
- long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 11 Mar - 01 Apr 2005
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 211 (Daphnia magna Reproduction Test)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 850.1300 (Daphnid Chronic Toxicity Test)
- Version / remarks:
- , draft
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: FIFRA 72-4 (b)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- - Sampling method: A sample from batch preparations for new solution analysis and a composite from all replicates at each test level for old solution analysis.
- Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION
- Method of mixing: Electric Mixer (for 100 mg a.i./L solution) and manual stirring with spatula (for all other levels including the controls).
- Duration of Mixing: Overnight (for 100 mg a.i./L solution based on solubility experiments) and approximately 1 minute (for all other levels including the controls)
- Controls: Yes
- Test concentration separation factor: 2 - Test organisms (species):
- Daphnia magna
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: Water flea
- Source: In-house culture originally obtained from Aquatic Biosystems, Fort Collins, CO on August 6, 2003
- Organism Age at Initiation: First instar < 24 hours old neonates
- Feeding during test: yes
- Food type: Green algae (Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata) and Tetrafin®
- Amount and Frequency: algae once daily at a rate of = 2 x 10s algal cells/L of test solution and a slurry of Tetrafin® on Monday, Wednesday and Friday at a rate of = 0.02 mg per mL of test solution. - Test type:
- semi-static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 21 d
- Hardness:
- 154 - 186 mg/L as CaCO3
- Test temperature:
- 19.5 - 21.0 °C
- pH:
- 8.0 - 8.7
- Dissolved oxygen:
- 7.6 - 11.8 mg/L (84 to 130 % saturation)
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Nominal concentrations: Control, 3.13, 6.25, 12.5, 25.0, 50.0 and 100 mg a.i./L
Measured concentrations: Control (< 0.61), 3.13 (3.63), 6.25 (7.21), 12.5 (14.1), 25.0 (27.7), 50.0 (57.2) and 100 (111 .6) mg a.i./L (ppm) - Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: 1 liter beakers containing approximately 900 ml test solution (multiple organism beakers); 250 ml beakers containing approximately 200 ml test solution (single organisms beakers)
- Material, size, headspace, fill volume: 1 liter beakers containing approximately 900 ml test solution (multiple organism beakers) and 250 ml beakers containing approximately 200 ml test solution (single organisms beakers); all glass
- Renewal rate of test solution: on day 3, 10 and 17
- No. of organisms per vessel: 5 organisms (for sublethal and survival effects assessment) and 1 organism (for sublethal, survival, reproduction and growth effects).
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 3 replicates (for sublethal and survival effects assessment) and 10 replicates (for sublethal, survival, reproduction and growth effects assessment).
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 3 and 10
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: according to guideline
- Intervals of water quality measurement: At experimental start, weekly thereafter including experimental finish.
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Adjustment of pH: No
- Photoperiod: 16 hours light, 8 hours dark
- Light intensity: 45 to 62 footcandles (480 to 670 lux)
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED: Observations for sublethal effects and survival made daily, reproductive output (neonates counts) occurred at the time of first brood release and on Monday, Wednesday and Friday there after (to include the day of termination), growth determinations made at the end of the exposure. - Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 57.2 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (arithm. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- act. ingr.
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 111.6 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (arithm. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- act. ingr.
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Remarks:
- See Table 2 in "Anyother information onresults incl. tables".
Referenceopen allclose all
Table: First generation (F0) survival, F0 reproduction, F0 average body length and F0 average dry body weight at the termination of the 28 day life-cycle test exposing mysids to AE 0001789 technical. (a) Significantly reduced compared to the control, based on Williams' Test.
Mean measured concentration (mg a.i./L) |
Test Day 28 Survival (%, male-female combined) |
Reproductive Success (Offspring/Female/Reproductive Day) |
Average Total Body Length (mm) |
Dry Body Weight (mg) |
||
Males |
Females |
Males |
Females |
|||
Control |
87 |
0.77 |
7.2 |
7.4 |
0.81 |
1.12 |
0.17 |
92 |
0.64 |
7.3 |
7.5 |
0.81 |
1.12 |
0.31 |
93 |
0.51 (a) |
7.4 |
7.5 |
0.88 |
1.08 |
0.54 |
96 |
0.57 (a) |
7.3 |
7.4 |
0.82 |
1.18 |
1.1 |
84 |
0.27 (a) |
7.2 |
7.3 (a) |
0.86 |
1.06 |
1.7 |
94 |
0.26 (a) |
7.1 |
7.3 (a) |
0.86 |
0.96 (a) |
Behavioral and Morphological Observations:
Test Concentration Used for Analysis: Mean Measured Concentrations
Observations Made: No effects noted for any surviving organisms
Immobilization:
Percent Immobilized: 0%to 16%
Passed Criteria for Normality and Homogeneity of Variance: No
Statistical Analysis: Non-parametric
Treatment Groups Significantly Different (P = 0.5) Controls: None
No Observed Effect Concentration (NOEC): 111.6 mg a.i./L
Lowest Observed Effect Concentration (LOEC): >111.6mga.i./L
Control Health: Control organisms exceeded the criteria of <20% immobility (OECD 1998)
Time to First Brood:
Mean Time to First Brood Range: 7.0 to 7.6 days (excluding the 1 1 1.6 mg a.i./L level in which brood development did not occur)
Passed Criteria for Normality and Homogeneity of Variance: No
Statistical Analysis: Non-parametric
Treatment Groups Significantly Different(P =0.5) Controls: 111.6 mg a.i./L
No Observed Effect Concentration (NOEC): 57.2 mg a.i./L
Lowest Observed Effect Concentration (LOEC): 111.6 mg a.i./L
Neonates per Adult Reproduction Day:
Mean number of Young/Adult Reproductive day range: 21.5 to 23.7 (excluding the 1 1 1.6 mg a.i./L level in which brood development did not occur)
Passed Criteria for Normality and Homogeneity of Variance: No
Statistical Analysis: Non-parametric
Treatment Groups Significantly Different(P =0.5) Controls: 111.6 mg a.i./L
No Observed Effect Concentration (NOEC): 57.2 mg a.i./L
Lowest Observed Effect Concentration (LOEC): 111.6mg a.i./L
Reproductive Criteria: Mean number of live offspring produced per parent control animal surviving at the end of the test exceeded the established criteria of = 60 (USEPA 1996)
Growth:
Day of Evaluation: Adult Length and Dry Weight at Termination
Length
Mean Range: 4.19 to 5. 21 mm
Passed Criteria for Normality and Homogeneity of Variance: Yes
Statistical Analysis: Parametric
Treatment Groups Significantly Different(P =0.5) Controls: 111.6 mg a.i./L
No Observed Effect Concentration (NOEC): 57.2 mg a.i./L
Lowest Observed Effect Concentration (LOEC) 111.6mg a.i./L
Day of Evaluation: Adult Length and Dry Weight at Termination
Dry Weight
Mean Range: 1.074 to 1.692mg
Passed Criteria for Normality and Homogeneity of Variance: Yes
Statistical Analysis: Parametric
Treatment Groups Significantly Different(P =0.5) Controls: 6.25a, 111.6 mg a.i./L (" not considered biologically significant since the three higher test concentrations were not statistically significantly different from the control group)
No Observed Effect Concentration (NOEC): 57.2 mg a.i./L
Lowest Observed Effect Concentration (LOEC) 111.6mg a.i./L
Observations:
No other sublethal effects were noted for surviving organisms.
Conclusions: The 21-day exposure to AE 0001789 resulted in a NOEC of 57.2 mg a.i. /L and a LOEC of 111.6 mg a.i./L based on reproduction and growth.
Table 1: Measured Test Concentrations of AE 0001789 During the 21-day Exposure of the Daphnia magna
Nominal Concentration (mg a.i./L) |
Measured concentrations (mg a.i./L) |
|||||||
Day 0 |
Day 3 |
Day 10 |
Day 17 |
Day 21 |
Mean |
Standard Deviation |
Percent of Nominal |
|
Control (new) |
<0.61 |
<0.61 |
0.61 |
<0.61 |
0.61 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Control (old) |
--- |
<0.61 |
0.61 |
0.61 |
--- |
|||
3.13 (new) |
3.57 |
3.49 |
3.69 |
3.90 |
3.68 |
3.63 |
0.14 |
116 |
3. 13 (old) |
--- |
3.49 |
3.57 |
3.69 |
--- |
|||
6.25 (new) |
7.05 |
7.14 |
7.36 |
7.74 |
7.30 |
7.21 |
0.26 |
115 |
6.25 (old) |
--- |
6.97 |
6.92 |
7.22 |
--- |
|||
12.5 (new) |
14.0 |
14.1 |
14.7 |
14.7 |
13.9 |
14.1 |
0.38 |
113 |
12.5 (old) |
--- |
13.7 |
14.0 |
13.8 |
--- |
|||
25.0 (new) |
27.2 |
27.9 |
28.4 |
28.7 |
27.2 |
27.7 |
0.62 |
111 |
25.0 (old) |
--- |
27.5 |
27.1 |
27.3 |
--- |
|||
50.0(new) |
53.9 |
56.8 |
58.8 |
58.2 |
57.5 |
57.2 |
1.53 |
114 |
50.0 (old) |
--- |
57.9 |
58.1 |
56.6 |
--- |
|||
100 (new) |
107.4 |
108.9 |
117.1 |
116.2 |
113.7 |
111.6 |
4.55 |
112 |
100 (old) |
--- |
103.8 |
113.4 |
112.0 |
--- |
Table 2: Validity criteria for OECD 211
Criterion from the guideline |
Outcome |
Validity criterion fulfilled |
The mortality of the parent animals in the control (femaleDaphnia) does not exceed 20% at the end of the test. |
The mortality of the parent animals in the control did not exceed 20% at the end of the test. |
yes |
The mean number of living offspring produced per parent animalsurvivingat the end of the test is ≥ 60 in the control. |
Mean number of live offspring produced per parent control animal surviving at the end of the test exceeded the established criteria of = 60. |
yes |
Note: The same validity criterion (20%) can be used for accidental and inadvertent parental mortality for the controls as well as for each of the test concentrations.
Description of key information
NOEC (21 d): 57.2 mg a.i./L (arith. mean measured, reproduction, Daphnia magna, OECD 211)
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Fresh water invertebrates
Fresh water invertebrates
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect concentration:
- 57.2 mg/L
Additional information
The long-term effects of the test substance to freshwater invertebrates were evaluated in a 21d GLP-study on Daphnia magna according to the OECD guideline 211 (M-255076-01-1). The test design was semi-static with a weekly test substance renewal. Daphnia magna were exposed to nominal concentrations of 3.13, 6.25, 12.5, 25.0, 50.0 and 100 mg a.i./L (measured concentrations: 3.63,7.21 , 14.1, 27.7, 57.2 and 111.6 mg a.i./L) alongside a negative control. A NOEC (21d) of 57.2 mg a.i./L (mean measured) and a LOEC (21d) of 111.6 mg a.i./L (mean measured) for the parameters reproduction and growth were determined.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.