Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 442-390-9 | CAS number: 40573-09-9
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
An acute oral toxicity study has been conducted on MV31. The result of the study was:
Acute oral toxicity is greater than 2000 mg/kg when tested according to OECD 423.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
The acute oral toxicity of the test article was determined in Sprague Dawley rats. The study was conducted in compliance with OECD GLP (1999). The test method was based on OECD Guideline 423 (1996) and EC Method B.1 (1996). Rats (3/sex) were administered a single dose of 2000 mg/kg body weight of undiluted test article by oral gavage. Body weights (Days 1, 8, and 15) and clinical signs (twice daily) were recorded. No moratlity occurred during the study, and body weight gain was not impaired. On study Day 1, stilted gait was observed in 1 animal and a squatting posture in 2 animals. No other clinical signs were observed in any other animals at any time points. Based on the results of the study, the oral LD50 of the test article is > 2000 mg/kg body weight.
Justification for classification or non-classification
MV31 does not meet the DSD or CLP criteria for classification by the oral route.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
