Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 601-818-6 | CAS number: 122009-11-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Skin sensitisation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP complaint guideline study, available as unpublished report, no restrictions, fully adequate for assessment
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 989
- Report date:
- 1989
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of study:
- guinea pig maximisation test
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 4-(diethoxyphosphinyl)-2-methyl-2-butenoic acid ethyl ester
- EC Number:
- 601-818-6
- Cas Number:
- 122009-11-4
- Molecular formula:
- C11 H21 O5 P
- IUPAC Name:
- 4-(diethoxyphosphinyl)-2-methyl-2-butenoic acid ethyl ester
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): C-5-Ester-phosphonat tech.
- Substance No.: 88/876
- Physical state: liquid, yellowish
- Stability under test conditions: not limited
- Storage condition of test material: room temperature
Constituent 1
In vivo test system
Test animals
- Species:
- guinea pig
- Strain:
- Dunkin-Hartley
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Lippische Versuchstierzucht, Hagemann GmbH & Co. KG, Extertal, Germany.
- Age at study initiation: young adult animals
- Weight at study initiation: in the range between 233 and 262 g at the beginning of the study
- Housing: 5 animals per cage (Makrolon, type IV), Granulate Type 3/4 (staubfrei) bedding, SSNIFF
- Diet: Kliba 341.4 mm (Kaninchen-Meerscheinchen-Haltungsdiät); ad libitum. Supllied by Firma Klingentalmühle AG, CH-4303 Kaiseraugst Switzerland
- Water: tap water; ad libitum. The drinking water was supplemented with ascorbic acid, 0.2 g/L, twice per week
- Acclimation period: at least 8 days before the beginning of the study
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20-24
- Humidity (%): 30-70
- Air: fully air-conditioned rooms
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Inductionopen allclose all
- Route:
- intradermal and epicutaneous
- Vehicle:
- olive oil
- Remarks:
- DAB 8
- Concentration / amount:
- - Intradermal induction: 5% in olive oil DAB 8 resp. in Freund's adjuvant/aqua dest. (1:1) resp. olive oil DAB 8
- Epicutaneous induction: 100% (unchanged)
- Challenge: 100% (unchanged)
Challengeopen allclose all
- Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Vehicle:
- olive oil
- Remarks:
- DAB 8
- Concentration / amount:
- - Intradermal induction: 5% in olive oil DAB 8 resp. in Freund's adjuvant/aqua dest. (1:1) resp. olive oil DAB 8
- Epicutaneous induction: 100% (unchanged)
- Challenge: 100% (unchanged)
- No. of animals per dose:
- - Control group: 10
- Test group: 20 - Details on study design:
- RANGE FINDING TESTS:
In a preliminary test, the highest non-irritating concentration of the test item was determined. The undiluted, liquid test substance was applied 2 times for 24 hours within a period of 96 hours to the flanks of 4 animals under occlusive conditions. Application sites were read at ca. 24 and 48 hours after beginning of application. The undiluted test substance was not irritating.
MAIN STUDY
A. INTRADERMAL INDUCTION EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 1 (on day 0)
- Test groups: A total of six intradermal injections in groups of two per animal was made. These injections were: A) front row: 2 injections each 0.1 mL Freund's adjuvant without test substance emulsified with water in ratio 1:1, B) middle row: 2 injections of each 0.1 mL test substance formulation, and C) back row: 2 injections of each 0.1 mL Freund's adjuvant/water 1:1 with test substance
- Control group: same as test groups, without test substance
- Site: animal shoulders
- Evaluation: 24 h after injections
B. EPICUTANEOUS INDUCTION EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 1
- Exposure period: about one week after intradermal induction (day 7)
- Test groups: 2 x 4 cm filter paper strips were applied to the skin of the shoulder under an occlusive dressing. In the case of liquids the filter paper strip was soaked in the unchanged test substance; thus, the animals were exposed to about 0.3 g of the test substance
- Control group: not treated, since the test substance was applied unchanged and thus no solvent was used
- Site: shoulder, same area as in the case of the previous intradermal application
- Frequency of applications: once
- Duration: 48 hours
- Evaluation: 48 h after the beginning of application
C. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 1
- Day(s) of challenge: first challenge 14 days after epicutaneous application, second challenge one week later
- Exposure period: 24 hours
- Test/control groups: 1st challenge: treatment of the test group and of control group 1 with the test substance (control group 2 remained untreated); 2nd challenge: treatment of the test group and of control groups 1 and 2 with the test substance. 2 x 2 cm filter paper strips were applied to the skin of the flank under an occlusive dressing. The test filter paper strip was soaked in the test substance; thus the animals were exposed to about 0 .15 g of the test substance .
- Site: intact clipped flank
- Evaluation: about 24, 48 and 72 h after the beginning of application - Challenge controls:
- 1st challenge: treatment of the control group 1 with the test substance (control group 2 remained untreated);
2nd challenge: treatment of the test group and of control groups 1 and 2 with the test substance - Positive control substance(s):
- no
Results and discussion
In vivo (non-LLNA)
Resultsopen allclose all
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- other: negative control group 1
- Dose level:
- 100% (unchanged)
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: other: negative control group 1. Dose level: 100% (unchanged). No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
- Reading:
- rechallenge
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- other: negative control group 1
- Dose level:
- 100% (unchanged)
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: rechallenge. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: other: negative control group 1. Dose level: 100% (unchanged). No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
- Reading:
- rechallenge
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- other: negative control group 2
- Dose level:
- 100% (unchanged)
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: rechallenge. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: other: negative control group 2. Dose level: 100% (unchanged). No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 100% (unchanged)
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 100% (unchanged). No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
- Reading:
- rechallenge
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 100% (unchanged)
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: rechallenge. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 100% (unchanged). No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
Any other information on results incl. tables
INDUCTION:
After intradermal induction, distinct erythema and edema were observed at the injection sites of the control animals and the test animals at which only Freund's Adjuvant/water (1:1) was applied. Injection of test substance preparation in olive oil DAB 8 and in Freund's Adjuvant/water (1:1) caused necrotic skin changes in addition to distinct edema. The control animals injected with olive oil DAB 8 (vehicle) exhibited distinct erythema. After the epicutaneous induction, necrotic skin changes (caused by the intradermal induction) and distinct edema could be observed in the test animals.
CHALLENGE AND RECHALLENGE: The epicutaneous challenges with the unchanged test substance did not cause any skin reactions either in the control animals or in the test animals.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- not sensitising
- Remarks:
- Migrated information
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions of the test, the substance is not considered to be skin sensitizer.
- Executive summary:
The substance was tested for its sensitizing effect on the skin of the Pirtbright-Hartley guinea pig, in a GLP complaint OECD 406 guideline study, based on the method of Magnusson and Klingman. 20 animals for the test group received six intradermal injections of 5% on day 0 and one epicutaneous application of the unchanged test substance on day 7. Two control groups (10 animals each) were treated similar but only with the vehicle. On day 21 all animals from the test group and animals from control group 1 were challenged epicutanously with the unchanged test substance. On day 28 day all animals (test group, control group 1 and control group 2) were challenged with the unchanged test substance. No skin effects were observed in either the test group or one of the control groups. It was therefore concluded that the substance is not a skin sensitizer.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.