Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 219-863-1 | CAS number: 2554-06-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- from 2000-02-15 to 2000-02-18
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Guideline study. The study was conducted according to the equivalent OECD guideline. It was conducted according to GLP however no analytical monitoring was carried out.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- ISO 10253 (Water quality - Marine Algal Growth Inhibition Test with Skeletonema costatum and Phaeodactylum tricornutum)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Analytical monitoring:
- no
- Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION
- Method: Single WAFs were prepared by adding 0, 30.6, 96.6, 302.4, 929.1 and 3030.3 mg of test substance to seawater and stirring for 20 h in the dark. After a phase separation period of approx. 4 hours, the clear middle layer of each extract was siphoned off.
- Controls: seawater only, negative control. A background series containing test substance without algae was also used to measure background particle density.
- Evidence of undissolved material (e.g. precipitate, surface film, etc): the test media appeared clear throughout the study and at all treatment levels - Test organisms (species):
- Skeletonema costatum
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Source (laboratory, culture collection): IRCHA, BP 1, F-91350 Vert-le-Petit, France
- Age of inoculum (at test initiation): 3 to 4 days old
- Method of cultivation: not reported
ACCLIMATION
- Acclimation period: not reported
- Culturing media and conditions (same as test or not): same culturing medium
- Any deformed or abnormal cells observed: not reported - Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- saltwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 72 h
- Hardness:
- not reported
- Test temperature:
- 20+/-2°C
- pH:
- range:8.0-9.0
The increase of pH is caused by the algae growth in the test vessels (this is confirmed by measurement of pH in the test background particle test system with no cells). In common with other species of marine algae, Skeletonema costatum gains CO2 from HCO3-, leading to a release of hydroxide ions, that raise the alkalinity of the medium.
The shift in pH of >1 unit is indicative of good algal growth and is not considered to invalidate the test result. - Dissolved oxygen:
- n/a
- Salinity:
- 30‰
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Nominal loading rate: 0, 10, 31.5, 98.6, 316 and 988 mg/l
- Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: conical flasks
- Type (delete if not applicable): closed, with silicone sponge caps
- Material, size, headspace, fill volume:
- Aeration: no
- Initial cells density: 0.35 x 10^3 particles/ml
- Control end cells density:
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 3
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 6
GROWTH MEDIUM
- Standard medium used: yes
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: natural sea water with a salinity of 30‰ sterilized by micropore filtration. Nutrients were added to the medium via concentrated stock solutions.
- Culture medium different from test medium: no
- Intervals of water quality measurement: pH was measured at the start and after 70.5 hours
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Sterile test conditions: yes
- Adjustment of pH: no
- Photoperiod: Continuous
- Light intensity and quality: 60-120 umol/s/m
- Salinity (for marine algae): 30‰
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED
- Determination of cell concentrations: electronic particle counter, Coulter Multisizer model IIe, measured at 0, 25, 48 and 70.5 h. The morphology of the algae was examined visually with the aid of a microscope at the start and end of the test.
TEST CONCENTRATIONS
- Spacing factor for test concentrations: 3 - Reference substance (positive control):
- yes
- Remarks:
- potasssium dichromate and/or 3.5-dichlorophenol
- Duration:
- 70.5 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOELR
- Effect conc.:
- >= 988 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Remarks:
- WAFs
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Duration:
- 70.5 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EL50
- Effect conc.:
- > 988 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Remarks:
- (WAFs)
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Results with reference substance (positive control):
- - Results with reference substance valid? yes
- EC50: not reported
- Other: the test system used is checked with the references substances on a regular basis. The results of these reference tests are in agreement with the mean EC50 values found in international ring tests. - Reported statistics and error estimates:
- The data were analysed using the methods of Kooijman et al.
None of the growth parameters were inhibited by more than 50% over the course of the test. It was therefore not possible to determine EL50 values.
Growth was not adversely affected in any of the treatments. The NOEL was therefore equivalent to the highest treatment level. - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- A 70.5-hour EL50 of >988 mg/l and NOELR of ≥988 mg/l have been determined for the effects of the test substance on growth (expressed as area under the growth curve (A)) of the marine algal species Skeletonema costatum. These values are above the limit of water solubility (LoS) of the substance.
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Study period:
- 2000-10-16 to 2000-10-20
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 201 (Alga, Growth Inhibition Test)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OTS 797.1050 (Algal Toxicity, Tiers I and II)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- - Concentrations: One replicate was reserved for analytical sampling at 0-, 24- and 96-hour.
- Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION
- Method: A 0.20 mg a.i./mL stock solution was prepared by placing 0.0201 g (0.0200 g as active ingredient) of D5 in a 100?mL volumetric flask and diluting to volume with acetone (CAS No. 67-64-1). To minimize the potential for volatilization of the test substance, each 20 µg a.i./L nominal test solution was prepared by directly adding 0.027 mL of the 0.20 mg a.i./mL primary stock solution to the sterile AAP medium (containing an additional 500 mg/L of sodium bicarbonate) in each 265-mL replicate flask.
Growth/test medium: The culture medium used was Algal Assay Procedure (AAP) medium prepared with sterile, deionized water. AAP medium used to prepare the exposure solutions was formulated in the same manner as the culture medium except that an additional 500 mg/L of sodium bicarbonate was added to the medium to provide sufficient dissolved bicarbonate for cell growth in a closed system. - Test organisms (species):
- Raphidocelis subcapitata (previous names: Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, Selenastrum capricornutum)
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Strain: Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, formerly Selenastrum capricornutum, strain 1648, Class Chlorophyceae.
- Source (laboratory, culture collection): The alga was obtained from the University of Texas, Austin, Texas, and was maintained in stock culture at Springborn Smithers.
ACCLIMATION
- Culturing conditions: The stock cultures were maintained within the following conditions: a shaking rate of 100 ± 10 rpm, a temperature of 24 ± 1 °C and continuous illumination at the surface of the medium with an intensity of approximately 300 to 500 foot candles (3200 to 5400 lux). Lighting was supplied by Duro-Test® Vita-Lite® fluorescent bulbs. Culture flasks were agitated continuously on an orbital shaker. - Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- yes
- Total exposure duration:
- 96 h
- Hardness:
- no data
- Test temperature:
- 24 °C
- pH:
- pH measured in the dilution water and solvent control vessels was 7.5 at test initiation and 9.4 at test termination.
pH measured in the 20 µg a.i./L treatment level was 7.5 at test initiation and 9.4 at test termination. - Dissolved oxygen:
- no data
- Salinity:
- not applicable
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Nominal concentrations in µg/L: 20
Initial measured concentrations in µg/L: 12
Unit [results expressed in what unit]: µg a.i./L
The results are reported and interpreted with reference to initial measured concentration - Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: The test was conducted in sterile 265-mL Erlenmeyer flasks containing 265 mL of test solution. All test vessels were fitted with a Teflon®-lined screw cap.
- Test Design: Each flask was filled to approximately 90% of the final volume; a 1.3-mL inoculum of Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata cells, at a density of approximately 211 x 10E4 cells/mL, was aseptically introduced into each flask. This inoculum provided the required initial (0 hour) cell density of approximately 1.0 x 10E4 cells/mL. Each flask was then filled entirely (approximately 265 mL) with the appropriate test or control solution, yielding zero headspace. Each flask was immediately capped with a Teflon®-lined screw cap. Seventeen replicate test vessels were established for the treatment level, the dilution water control and the solvent control (three replicates for cell counts at each interval; 24-, 48-, 72- and 96-hour; one replicate for analytical sampling at 0-, 24- and 96-hour; one replicate for water quality at 0- and 96-hour).
- Water chemistry in test: TOC concentration of the AAP sample collected in October 2000 was 0.59 mg/L. The dilution water and solvent control vessels both had a specific conductivity range of 80 to 90 mmhos/cm at test initiation and at test termination. The 20 µg a.i./L treatment level had a specific conductivity of 80 µmhos/cm at test initiation and 90 µmhos at test termination.
- Light levels and quality during exposure: 380 - 500 foot candles (4100 - 5400 lux). The photosynthetically-active radiation (PAR) of the test area measured at test initiation ranged from 56 to 73 µE/m2/s. - Reference substance (positive control):
- not specified
- Duration:
- 96 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- >= 12 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (initial)
- Conc. based on:
- act. ingr.
- Basis for effect:
- other: cell density and growth rate
- Duration:
- 96 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- > 12 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (initial)
- Conc. based on:
- act. ingr.
- Basis for effect:
- other: cell density and growth rate
- Duration:
- 96 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- > 12 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (initial)
- Conc. based on:
- act. ingr.
- Basis for effect:
- other: cell density and growth rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: not calculable
- Details on results:
- - Exponential growth in the control (for algal test): yes
- Reported statistics and error estimates:
- Statistical methods: A t-Test was used to compare the cell density and growth rate of the control to that of the solvent control. A t-Test was also used to compare the cell density and growth rate of the treatment level to the pooled control.
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- A 96-hour ErC50 of >12 µg a.i./L has been determined for the effects of the test substance on growth rate of Selenastrum capricornutum. A NOEC of ≥12 µg a.i./L has been determined in the same test.
Additional testing was not conducted to further define the EC values since the nominal concentration tested was
slightly above the water solubility limit of the test substance. - Endpoint:
- toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Study period:
- 2006-12-11 to 2006-12-15
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- Although test substance concentrations in the solvent stock solutions were measured prior to the start of the study, concentrations in the test vessels were not measured. Methods to maintain test concentrations (e.g. flow-through) in algae studies are unavailable, hence this study is representative of the potential effect on algae initially exposed to the test substance but subsequently and progressively exposed to its hydrolysis products.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 201 (Alga, Growth Inhibition Test)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- At test initiation, a single sample was removed from each treatment level stock solution prepared (i.e. 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, 8.0 and 16 mg/mL. The samples were analysed for the test substance.
- Vehicle:
- yes
- Details on test solutions:
- PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION
- Method: A 16 mg/mL stock solution was prepared prior to test initiation by placing 0.4001 g of the test substance in a 25-mL volumetric flask and bringing it to volume with acetone. Test solutions were prepared from dilutions of the 16 mg/mL stock solution using AAP medium.
- Controls: Algal growth medium and algal growth medium plus acetone (0.1 mL/L) - Test organisms (species):
- Raphidocelis subcapitata (previous names: Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, Selenastrum capricornutum)
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
Test organism: Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata
Source: Springborn Smithers culture
Age of inoculum: 3 days since previous transfer - Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 72 h
- Hardness:
- Not reported
- Test temperature:
- 24ºC
- pH:
- pH at test initiation: 7.0 to 7.2
pH at test termination: 9.2 to 9.3 (the increase in pH during exposure is common in static algal cultures and is due to photosynthesis by the algae) - Dissolved oxygen:
- Not reported
- Salinity:
- Not applicable
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Nominal test concentrations: 0 (Control), 0 (Solvent control), 0.10, 0.20, 0.40, 0.80 and 1.6 mg/L. The concentration of 1.6 mg/L, the highest concentration tested, is considered representative of the functional limit of solubility. All test solutions were observed to be clear and colorless with no visible undissolved test substance.
- Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test conditions: Closed system. Due to the volatile nature of the test substance volatile organic analysis (VOA) vials with Teflon ®-lined screw caps were used rather than traditional caps which allow air exchange. This procedure was used to minimize the loss of test substance.
- Twelve replicates per treatment level and the control and 24 replicates for the solvent control were prepared. The additional two replicates per treatment level and controls were used for analytical and water quality measurements.
- Initial cell density: 1.5x10E4 cells/mL.
- Water quality parameters (pH and conductivity) were measured at test initiation and at the termination of the 96-hour exposure period.
- Dilution water: Algal Assay Procedure (AAP) medium
- Continuous illumination at 420 to 540 footcandles (4500 to 5800 lux), shaking rate of 100 rpm.
- Effect criteria: 0- to 96-hour cell density and 0- to 72-hour average growth rate (μ) and biomass expressed as yield relative to the performance of the solvent control data.
- 0 to 96-hour cell density and 0 to 72-hour average growth rate (μ ave) and biomass expressed as yield were determined relative to the performance of the solvent control. Yield was calculated as biomass (cell density) at each interval of the test minus the initial biomass at the start of the test. - Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- >= 1.6 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: It is likely that the test organisms were predominantly exposed to the hydrolysis products of the test substance.
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- >= 1.6 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: It is likely that the test organisms were predominantly exposed to the hydrolysis products of the test substance.
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- > 1.6 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: It is likely that the test organisms were predominantly exposed to the hydrolysis products of the test substance.
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- > 1.6 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- other: Biomass expressed as yield
- Remarks on result:
- other: It is likely that the test organisms were predominantly exposed to the hydrolysis products of the test substance.
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- >= 1.6 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- other: Biomass expressed as yield
- Remarks on result:
- other: It is likely that the test organisms were predominantly exposed to the hydrolysis products of the test substance.
- Details on results:
- - Exponential growth in the control (for algal test): yes
- Reported statistics and error estimates:
- No treatment resulted in >50% inhibition of growth rate or biomass. It was therefore not possible to determine definitive EC50 values for these end points.
No observed effect concentrations (NOECs) for growth rate and biomass (yield) were determined using Bonferroni's t-Test. The calculations were performed using TOXSTAT® version 3.5 software. - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- A 72-hour EC50 value of >1.6 mg/L and NOEC of ≥1.6 mg/L have been determined for the effects of the test substance on growth rate of Pseudokirchnerella subcapitata. A concentration of 1.6 mg/L corresponds to the approximate water solubility of the substance. It is likely that the test organisms were predominantly exposed to the hydrolysis products of the substance.
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Study period:
- 14 Feb - 17 Feb 2006
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: The study is considered to be reliability 2 (reliable with restrictions) because some observations associated with validity criteria in the equivalent OECD test guideline are not reported. Read-across of the study is considered to be reliability 2.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Circular on Test Methods of New Chemical Substances (Japan), Alga growth inhibition test
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Remarks:
- according to the Japanese GLP Standard
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Details on properties of test surrogate or analogue material
PHYSICO-CHEMICAL PROPERTIES
- Melting point: < 0°C
- Boiling point: 123°C
- Vapour pressure: < 2.7 kPa at 25 °C
- Water solubility (under test conditions): low
- Stability in water: Test item is hydrolyzed (half-life: within 30 min) - Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- - Sampling method: sampled directly by each vessel and pre-treatment was not performed
- Sample storage conditions before analysis: no strage before analysis
- Methanol was measured, since the test item was quickly hydrolyzed - Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION (especially for difficult test substances)
- Method: test item was measured and diluted in dilution water by stirring for 120 min - Test organisms (species):
- Raphidocelis subcapitata (previous names: Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, Selenastrum capricornutum)
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: Alga
- Strain: ATCC22662
- Source (laboratory, culture collection): American Type Culture Collection
- Age of inoculum (at test initiation): after 4-day preculture
- Method of cultivation: on a shaker
ACCLIMATION
- Acclimation period: 4 days (2006-02-10 ~ 2006-02-14)
- Culturing media and conditions (same as test or not): same as test - Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- yes
- Total exposure duration:
- 72 h
- Test temperature:
- 23.0 - 23.1 °C (23 ± 2 °C), measured at the study initiation, 24, 48 and 72 hours after exposure
- pH:
- 8.0 - 9.9, measured at the initiation and at the end of the study.
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Nominal concentration: 100 mg/L
Measured concentration: 89 mg/L (time-weighted mean; the concentration was determined based on the measured concentration of the hydrolysis product, methanol) - Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: 500 mL Elenmyer-flask
- Type (delete if not applicable): closed
- Material, headspace, fill volume: glass, 490 mL, 100 mL
- Initial cells density: 5000 cells/mL
- Control end cells density: 855900 ± 20700 cells/mL
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 6
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 6
GROWTH MEDIUM
- Standard medium used: yes
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Culture medium different from test medium: same medium
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Sterile test conditions: yes
- Adjustment of pH: no adjustment
- Photoperiod: continuously
- Light intensity and quality: 65 µE/m2/s
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable) :
- Determination of cell concentrations: counting chamber; electronic particle counter;
TEST CONCENTRATIONS
- Range finding study: performed twice.
- Test concentrations: 1) 1, 10 and 100 mg/L, 2) 100 mg/L
- Results used to determine the conditions for the definitive study:
1) Inhibition rate was 16% (close system), -42% (open system) in 1 mg/L, 12% (close system), -44% (open system) in 10 mg/L, and 1% (close system), -36% (open system) in 100 mg/L, respectively.
2) Inhibition rate was -14% (close system) and 6% (open system). Measured concentration was 108 mg/L at the study initiation and 87 mg/L in a close system at the end of the study. - Reference substance (positive control):
- yes
- Remarks:
- Potassium dichromate (analytical grade)
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- > 89 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (TWA)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: the concentration was determined based on the measured concentration of the hydrolysis product, methanol
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- >= 89 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (TWA)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: the concentration was determined based on the measured concentration of the hydrolysis product, methanol
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- > 89 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (TWA)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- biomass
- Remarks on result:
- other: the concentration was determined based on the measured concentration of the hydrolysis product, methanol
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- >= 89 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (TWA)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- biomass
- Remarks on result:
- other: the concentration was determined based on the measured concentration of the hydrolysis product, methanol
- Details on results:
- - Exponential growth in the control (for algal test): yes
- Observation of abnormalities (for algal test): no abnormality was observed - Results with reference substance (positive control):
- - Results with reference substance valid? Yes
- EC50: 0.428 ± 0.0683 mg/L - Reported statistics and error estimates:
- Student's t-test, subsequent to F test for homogeneity of variances.
- Conclusions:
- The NOEC of 2768-02-7 to algae was reported to be ≥89 mg/l for both biomass and growth rate. Due to the rapid rate of hydrolysis, the concentration was determined based on the measured concentration of the hydrolysis product, methanol.
Referenceopen allclose all
Table 1. Mean particle counts (x103particles/ml) corrected for background
|
Loading rate (mg/l) |
||||||
Time (h) |
0 |
0 |
10 |
31.5 |
98.6 |
316 |
988 |
0 |
0.4 |
0.3 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
25 |
1.9 |
1.7 |
1.6 |
1.6 |
1.8 |
1.8 |
1.8 |
48 |
34.9 |
30.1 |
33.4 |
33.4 |
35.0 |
36.6 |
37.4 |
70.5 |
166.9 |
166.0 |
131.3 |
122.2 |
138.7 |
132.4 |
129.9 |
Table 2. Individual growth parameters calculated from the results of the test
Loading rate (mg/l) |
Calculated inoculum (x106/μm3/ml) |
Calculated growth rate (h-1) |
Calculated yield (x106/μm3/ml) |
0 |
0.03 |
0.1384 |
130 |
10 |
0.03 |
0.1441 |
107 |
31.5 |
0.02 |
0.1555 |
101 |
98.6 |
0.02 |
0.1526 |
110 |
316 |
0.02 |
0.1564 |
108 |
988 |
0.02 |
0.1524 |
108 |
Table 3. Area under the growth curve (A) and % inhibition of growth (IA)
|
Loading rate (mg/l) |
||||||
Parameter |
0 |
0 |
10 |
31.5 |
98.6 |
316 |
988 |
A |
2694 |
2573 |
2263 |
2151 |
2377 |
2345 |
2334 |
IA |
0 |
0 |
14 |
18 |
10 |
11 |
11 |
Table 1 Results of analysis of test media
Nominal test substance concentration (μg/L) | Measured concentration at start of test (μg/L) | Percent of nominal | Measured concentration after 24 hours (μg/L) | Percent of nominal | Measured concentration after 96 hours (μg/L) | Percent of nominal |
0 (Control) | <0.50 | - | <0.10 | - | <0.50 | - |
0 (Solvent control) | <0.50 | - | <0.10 | - | <0.50 | - |
20 | 12* | 62 | 9.2* | 47 | 2.1* | 11 |
*Mean of three replicates
Table 2. Test results
Initial mean measured concentration (μg/L) | Mean initial cell density (cells/mL) | Mean cell density after 24 hours (cells/mL) | Mean cell density after 48 hours (cells/mL) | Mean cell density after 72 hours (cells/mL) | Mean cell density after 96 hours (cells/mL) | Percent inhibition | Growth rate 0 -72 h (/day) | Percent inhibition |
0 (Control) | 10000 | 89000 | 620000 | 1090000 | 2700000 | - | 1.61 (0.009) | - |
0 (Solvent control) | 10000 | 100000 | 580000 | 1120000 | 2690000 | - | 1.62 (0.008) | - |
Pooled control | - | - | - | - | 2700000 | - | 1.61 (0.009) | - |
12 | 10000 | 69000 | 530000 | 1110000 | 2690000 | 0.19 | 1.61 (0.009) | 0.00 |
Cell densities are means of three replicates
Standard deviations are shown in brackets
Table 1. Test results
Nominal concentration (mg/L) | Initial cell concentration (cells/mL) | Cell concentration after 24 hours (cells/mL) | Cell concentration after 48 hours (cells/mL) | Cell concentration after 72 hours (cells/mL) | Inhibion of growth rate after 72 hours (%) | Inhibion of biomass (yield) after 72 hours (%) |
0 (Control) | 15000 | 51700 | 194200 | 399200 | - | - |
0 (Solvent control) | 15000 | 56700 | 172900 | 406700 | - | - |
0.10 | 15000 | 62500 | 181700 | 368300 | 3 | 10 |
0.20 | 15000 | 51700 | 177500 | 348300 | 5 | 15 |
0.40 | 15000 | 55000 | 192500 | 394200 | 1 | 3 |
0.80 | 15000 | 54200 | 192500 | 323300 | 7 | 21 |
1.6 | 15000 | 54200 | 176700 | 375800 | 3 | 8 |
The following acceptance criteria are required by OECD
Guideline 201: the cell growth in the solvent control must increase
from the initial density (1.5 x 10E4 cells/mL) by more than
16 times after 72 hours of growth. Additionally, the mean
coefficient of variation (CV) for section-by-section
specific growth rates (day 0 to 1, 1 to 2, and 2 to 3) in
the solvent control replicates should not exceed 35%. The
CV for the average growth rate of the solvent control for
the entire test period (0- to 72-hour growth rate) should
not exceed 7%. During this study, the 72-hour cell density
in the solvent control was 39.92 x 10E4 cells/mL, which
meets the criterion of 24 x 10E4 cells/mL at 72 hours. The
mean daily CV for growth rates observed in the test
was 28% and the CV for 0- to 72-hour growth rate was 2.6%. These values
are within the acceptability criteria.
Table 1. Calculated concentration of the test substance using methanol concentration
Nominal concentration (mg/L) |
Mean measured concentration, mg/L (Percent of nominal) |
Mean measured concentration (*), mg/L |
|
|||
0 hour |
24 hours |
48 hours |
72 hours |
|
||
Control |
< 0.03 |
< 0.03 |
< 0.03 |
< 0.03 |
|
|
100 |
105 (105 |
100 (100 |
75.3 (75) |
80.2 (80) |
89 (89) |
*: Time-weighted mean measured concentration
Table 2. Growth inhibition (%)
Nominal conc. (mg/L) [Mean measured conc. *] |
Inhibition rate (%) Growth rate |
Inhibition rate (%) Biomass |
Control |
- |
- |
100 [89] |
0.3 |
0.5 |
*: Time-weighted mean measured concentration
Description of key information
Toxicity to algae: 70.5 hour EC50 >988 mg/l and NOELR: ≥988 mg/l (nominal) (highest concentration tested) (guideline ISO 10253 (Water quality - Marine Algal Growth Inhibition Test with Skeletonema costatum and Phaeodactylum tricornutum)).
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
A 70.5 hour EL50 of >988 mg/l and NOELR of ≥988 mg/l (nominal) (highest concentration tested) have been determined for the effects of the registration substance on growth rate of the marine algal species Skeletonema costatum, conducted in accordance with test guideline ISO 10253 and in compliance with GLP (TNO, 2000). These values are above the water solubility limit of the substance (0.0073 – 0.0088 mg/l at 23°C) and indicate that toxic effects on algae are unlikely to occur at this concentration. For monoconstituent substances it would not normally be appropriate to test at concentrations above the solubility limit.
This is the only reliable study available for this substance and it has been chosen as key.
The data above are supported by read-across evidence relevant to the impurities. The registration substance has an average purity of >70% Vi4-D4, with <20% 2,4,6,8,10-pentamethyl-2,4,6,8,10-pentavinylcyclopentasiloxane Vi5-D5 (CAS 17704-22-2; Impurity 1) and <10% 2,4,6-trimethyl-2,4,6-trivinylcyclotrisiloxane Vi3-D3 (CAS 3901-77-7; Impurity 2) present as impurities. After due consideration of the properties, the presence of these impurities is not expected to affect the overall hazard profile of the substance.
Read-across studies are in place as supporting studies, to consider the properties of the impurities. Data for Vi5-D5 are read-across from decamethylcyclopentasiloxane D5 (CAS 541-02-6), data for Vi3-D3 are read-across from hexamethyltrisiloxane D3 (CAS 541-05-9). These siloxanes have similar properties with regard to aquatic ecotoxicity. Further information is given in a supporting report (PFA, 2017) attached in Section 13 of the IUCLID dossier.
A reliable algal effects study is available for the siloxane D5 (CAS 541-02-6) and is read-across to Impurity 1 (Vi5-D5) (Springborn Laboratories, 2001). This study (96 hour static test with Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata (formerly Selenastrum capricornutum) gave a result 96 hour EC50 >12 µg/l and 96 hour NOEC ≥12 µg/l. Effects were not seen within the limit of solubility in test media.
A reliable algal effects study is available for the siloxane D3 (CAS 541-05-9) and is read-across to Impurity 2 (Vi3-D3) (Springborn Smithers, 2007). This study (72 hour, static test with Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata) gave a result 72 hour EC50 >1.6 mg/l and 72 hour NOEC ≥1.6 mg/l. Effects were not seen within the limit of solubility in test media.
A 72 hour EC50 value of >89 mg/l (measured (TWA)) has been determined for the effects of read-across substance trimethox(vinyl)silane (CAS 2768-02-7) on growth rate of Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata (MOE, 2006). The data indicate that the vinyl side chain is unlikely to contribute significant excess ecotoxicity to the substance.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
