Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 205-500-4 | CAS number: 141-78-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Based on a high quality, guideline study in rats, the subchronic inhalation NOAEC for systemic toxicity of ethyl acetate is considered to be 350 ppm (1.28 mg/L), based on sedation during exposure, reduced food consumption and reduced body weight gain. Nasal irritation was observed in this study at all exposure concentrations, therefore, the LOAEC for respiratory irritant effects in rats is considered to be 350 ppm (1.28 mg/L).
A subchronic oral NOAEL of 900 mg/kg bw/day was reported in a 90-day oral study in rats cited in the EPA IRIS database (US EPA, 1988), based on depressed food consumption, suppressed body weight gain and clinical signs observed at 3,600 mg/kg/day.
Repeated dose dermal studies of ethyl acetate have not been reported.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Repeated dose toxicity: via oral route - systemic effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 900 mg/kg bw/day
Additional information
In a recent well conducted study (Christoph, 1998), rats exposed to concentrations of 350, 750, or 1500 ppm (1.28, 2.75, 5.49 mg/L) in air for 94 days showed no significant toxic effects. Diminished response to delivery of an alerting stimuli was noted during exposure at the 750 and 1500 ppm levels. This transient diminished response was confined to the exposure period and was attributed to acute sedative properties of ethyl acetate. Other findings at the 750 and 1500 ppm levels were limited to reduced food consumption and body weight gain, and lower levels of serum triglycerides. No other changes were seen. As this is a modern study conducted to GLP for which the full report and supporting raw data is available, it is regarded as the most robust study for this end point. This study did produce some evidence of nasal mucosa degeneration at 350 ppm. This is a common lesion in rats exposed by inhalation to acetate esters of short-chain alcohols due to the liberation of acetic acid in these cells from the hydrolysis of the ester linkage. Since rats are obligate nose breathers, the delivered dose to this portion of the nose might be higher in rats than in humans and it is not clear what dose could result in lesions in humans. However, it is possible that the air concentration alone could be the most significant contributor to the effect. The NOAEC for systemic toxicity in this study is considered to be 350 ppm or 1.28 mg/L and the LOAEC 750ppm or 2.75 mg/L); the LOAEC for respiratory irritant effects (nasal toxicity) is 350 ppm (1.28 mg/L).
In a separate 100-day study designed to evaluate neurotoxicity by the same laboratory (Christoph, 2003) and conducted at the same exposure levels, decreased food consumption and decreased body weight gain were also noted at 350 ppm.
Other inhalation studies in various laboratory species have failed to show consistent substance-related pathology or toxicity (Blina, 1938; Seth, 1974; Smyth and Smyth, 1928; Sommer, 1957). As many are old and either reported in limited detail, of short duration or carried out using unverified protocols, less weight is put on their findings.
In a 90-day oral study in rats cited in the EPA IRIS database (US EPA, 1988), 900 mg/kg bw/day was established as an oral NOAEL based on depressed food consumption, suppressed body weight gain and clinical signs. Rats in this study received daily gavage doses of 0, 300, 900 or 3600 mg ethyl acetate/kg bw/day.
As mentioned earlier in the metabolism discussion, ethyl acetate is rapidly hydrolyzedin vivoto acetate and ethanol. Since exposure to either ethyl acetate or ethanol results in systemic exposure to ethanol, data from studies that administer ethanol directly are considered useful in identifying hazards associated with ethyl acetate exposure. A 90 day GLP study carried out to assess urethane toxicity used water and 5% ethanol in water as the vehicle. Data from this study showed effects at an approximate dose level of 6000 mg/kg ethanol in female mice. Male rats show minor changes to organ weights and hematology/biochemistry (2800mg/kg), female rats showed minor biochemistry changes and length of oestrus cycle along with liver nodules (2300 mg/kg), male mice showed increased organ weights (some fatty changes to liver) and a decrease in sperm concentration (8000 mg/kg) (NTP, 1996).
Justification for classification or non-classification
The substance neither meets the criteria for classification for repeat dose effects under directive 67/548 nor for specific organ effects following repeated exposures under regulation 1272/2008.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.