Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 284-366-9 | CAS number: 84852-53-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Toxicity to soil macroorganisms except arthropods
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to soil macroorganisms except arthropods: long-term
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- May 6 2003 to July 1, 2003
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Study performed according to international guidelines and GLPs using commercial product as test article and published in the literature.
Data source
Referenceopen allclose all
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 003
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Terrestrial toxicity evaluation of decabromodiphenyl ethane on organisms from three trophic levels
- Author:
- Hardy et al.
- Year:
- 2 011
- Bibliographic source:
- Ecotoxicol Envirohn Saf 74(4):703-10.
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Results of terrestrial and aquatic studies on the brominated flame retardant, decabromodipehnyl ethane, a.k.a. Ethane 1,2 bis(pentabromophenyl)
- Author:
- Hardy et al.
- Year:
- 2 009
- Bibliographic source:
- SETAC Annual Meeting, Nov 2009, New Orleans, LA
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Environmental Risk Evaluation Report: 1,1'-(Ethane-1,2-diyl)bis[pentabromobenzene] (CAS no. 84852-53-9)
- Author:
- Dungey SM, Akintoye L
- Year:
- 2 007
- Bibliographic source:
- http://publications.environment-agency.gov.uk/epages/eapublications.storefront/48771dd8022bcfe8273fc0a8029606a9/Search/Run
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 850.6200 (Earthworm Subchronic Toxicity Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 207 (Earthworm, Acute Toxicity Tests)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 222 (Earthworm Reproduction Test (Eisenia fetida/Eisenia andrei))
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 1,1'-(ethane-1,2-diyl)bis[pentabromobenzene]
- EC Number:
- 284-366-9
- EC Name:
- 1,1'-(ethane-1,2-diyl)bis[pentabromobenzene]
- Cas Number:
- 84852-53-9
- Molecular formula:
- C14H4Br10
- IUPAC Name:
- 1,2,3,4,5-pentabromo-6-[2-(2,3,4,5,6-pentabromophenyl)ethyl]benzene
- Test material form:
- solid: particulate/powder
- Remarks:
- migrated information: powder
- Details on test material:
- 98.34 % Decabromodiphenyl ethane
1.66 % Nonabromodiphenyl ethane
Constituent 1
Sampling and analysis
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- Soil samples were collected on days 0, 28 and 56 for analytical confirmation of DBDPEthane test concentrations. The day 28 and 56 samples were composite samples of each treatment level. Homogeneity was determined for the low and high dose replicates (top, middle, bottom of container) just prior to test initiation.
Test substrate
- Vehicle:
- no
- Details on preparation and application of test substrate:
- Soils were mixed in a rotary mixer for at least 24 hours after addition of the test article, hydrated to 60% of their water holding capacity (WHC) with deionized water, and re-mixed to a uniform consistency. Approximately 615 g of soil (i.e., 500 g dry soil) was added to each replicate.
Test organisms
- Test organisms (species):
- Eisenia fetida
- Animal group:
- annelids
- Details on test organisms:
- Eisenia fetida (Vicker’s Farms, Orlando, FL) were from a synchronous population and no greater than four weeks apart in age.
Study design
- Study type:
- laboratory study
- Substrate type:
- artificial soil
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 56 d
- Remarks:
- 28 d for survival; 56 d for reproduction
- Post exposure observation period:
- no
Test conditions
- Test temperature:
- 18.8 to 20.3 degrees C
- pH:
- Day 0: 6.6 to 6.7; Day 56: 6.0 to 6.6
- Moisture:
- Day O: 21.9 to 22.7%; Day 28: 33.0 to 34.6%; Day 56: 33.5 to 37.5%
- Details on test conditions:
- Photoperiod: 16 hr light: 8hr dark
Light Intensity: 463 to 492 lux - Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Nominal: 0, 313, 625, 1250, 2500, 5000 mg/kg dry soil
Measured:- Reference substance (positive control):
- no
Results and discussion
Effect concentrationsopen allclose all
- Key result
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 3 720 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (arithm. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Remarks:
- 28 d
- Key result
- Duration:
- 56 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 1 970 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (arithm. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Details on results:
- DBDPEthane was not detected in the control soils from the earthworm study (
On day 0 and at test termination, the pH of soils ranged from 6.6 to 6.7 and 6.0 to 6.6, respectively. At initiation, soil moisture ranged from 21.9 to 22.7% of the dry weight; the percent moisture at 60% of the soil’s water holding capacity was 23%. After 28 days, soil moisture ranged from 33.0 to 34.6%. At test termination, moisture ranged from 33.5 to 37.5% of the dry weight. Temperatures recorded with the electronic data logger ranged from 18.8 to 20.3°C throughout the test. The 56-d average temperature of the water bath was 19.8 ± 0.1°C. The light intensity ranged from 463 to 692 lux.
Exposure to soils containing DBDPEthane for 28 d had no adverse effect on mortality (e.g. <10% effect), burrowing or avoidance behaviors. The EC10 and EC50 for survival were estimated greater than the highest concentration tested. No abnormal burrowing or avoidance behaviors were observed during the first 60 minutes of testing. After 28 d of exposure, the percent mortality in the adult earthworms was 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, and 0 in the control, 231, 440, 761, 1,910 and 3,720 mg/kg dry soil groups, respectively (Table 1). One out of 10 worms in one of the four replicates at 440 mg/kg soil was not found, and considered dead. All live earthworms were normal in appearance and behavior. The control worms gained an average of 1.92 g/replicate or 42% in replicate mass during the initial 28 d. The mean replicate weight gain in the treatment groups ranged from 1.77 to 2.27 g or 39 to 48% in replicate mass over the initial 28 d. No concentration dependent response in weight gain was observed.
Reproductive output in the controls ranged from 31 to 76 juvenile worms/replicate with an average of 44 juveniles/replicate, which was within acceptable limits. The percent coefficient of variation (%CV) for the control data was 37% with the reproductive data from the E replicate a statistical outlier. When these data were removed, the calculated %CV was 26%. However, the inclusion or exclusion of these data did not alter the NOEC. Therefore, the data reported and the statistical parameters are inclusive of this control replicate. The average reproduction for the treatment groups were 62, 45, 62, 48 and 18 juveniles/replicate for the 231, 440, 761, 1,910 and 3,720 mg/kg groups, respectively. Reproduction at the highest dose level was statistically lower from the control group (p<0.05).
Exposure to DBDEthane did not adversely affect (i.e., >10% effect) earthworm survival, and the 28-d survival NOEC was 3,720 mg/kg dry soil (measured) or 5,000 mg/kg dry soil (nominal), the highest dose tested, with the EC10 and EC50 > 3,720 mg/kg dry soil. The 56-d reproduction NOEC and LOEC were 1,970 and 3,720 mg kg dry soil, respectively. The estimated 28-d reproduction EC10 was 1,860 mg/kg dry soil. The estimated 28-reproduction EC50 was 3,180 mg/kg dry soil, the highest dose tested. - Reported statistics and error estimates:
- Earthworm data was analyzed using SAS for Windows, Relase 6.12 and ToxCalcTM version 5.0 (p<0.05). The NOEC for earthworm survival data was determined using Fisher’s exact test. A Hochberg adjustment was used to control the experiment-wise error rate for the Fisher’s test. The reproduction NOEC value was estimated using a one-way analysis of variance and a one-tailed Dunnet’s test. A Shapiro-Wilk’s and Levene’s tests were performed to determine data normality and homogeneity of the treatment variances. The reproduction data exhibited normality and homogeneity of variance, and a parametric analysis was performed on the untransformed data. DBDPEthane exposure did not adversely effect (i.e., >10% effect) survival, and the EC10 and EC50 for survival were estimated greater than the highest concentration tested. The reproduction data did not display a strong concentration response curve, and non-linear interpolation was utilized to estimate the EC10 and EC50 concentrations for reproduction. The alpha level, p<=0.05, was used for all tests.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1. Measured Soil Concentrations of Saytex 8010 During an Exposure of the Earthworm (Eisenia fetida).
Nominal Concentration (mg/kg dry soil) |
Measured Concentration as mg/kg dry soil (% of Nominal) |
Mean Measured Concentration As mg/kg dry soil (% of Nominal) |
||
Day 0 |
Day 28 |
Day 56 |
||
0 313 625 1250 2500 5000 |
<MQLa 289 (92) 546 (87) 1020 (82) 2210 (88) 4280 (86) |
<MQLa 227 (73) 448 (72) 516c(41) 1760 (70) 3330 (67) |
<MQLb 178 (57) 326 (52) 746 (60) 1750 (70) 3560 (71) |
<MQL 231 (74) 440 (70) 761 (61) 1910 (76) 3720 (74) |
QC Fortifications Low – 299 mg/kg High – 5410 mg/kg High 5430 – mg/kg High – 5940 mg/kg |
282 (94) 4740 (88) --d --d
|
235 (79) --d 4620 (85) --d |
217 (73) --d --d 5420 (91) |
|
Table 2. Measured Soil Concentrations of Saytex 8010 within the Homogeneity Samples.
Nominal Concentration (mg/kg dry soil) |
Measured Concentration as mg/kg dry soil (% of Nominal) |
Mean Measured Concentration As mg/kg dry soil (% of Nominal) |
||
Top |
Middle |
Bottom |
||
313 5000 |
281 (90) 4220 (84) |
293 (94) 4030 (81) |
297 (95) 4300 (86) |
290 (8.33); CV = 3% 4180 (139); CV = 3% |
QC Fortifications Low – 299 mg/kg High – 5220 mg/kg |
279 (93) 4210 (81) |
|
|
|
Table 3. Mortality and Behavioral Observations During the Adult Earthworm Exposure to Saytex 8010.
Mean Measured Concentration (mg/kg dry soil) |
Repetition |
Day 28 Mortalitya (% Mortality) |
Day 28 Observations |
Treatment % Mortality |
O |
A B C D E F G H |
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 |
10N 10N 10N 10N 10N 10N 10N 10N |
0 |
231 |
A B C D |
0 0 0 0 |
10N 10N 11N 10N |
0 |
440 |
A B C D |
0 0 0 1(10) |
10N 10N 10N 9N, 1NF |
2 |
761 |
A B C D |
0 0 0 0 |
10N 10N 10N 10N |
0 |
1910 |
A B C D |
0 0 0 0 |
10N 10N 10N 10N |
0 |
3720 |
A B C D |
0 0 0 0 |
10N 10N 10N 10N |
0 |
Table 4. Worm Weights Measured During the Adult Earthworm Exposure to Saytex 8010.
Mean Measured Concentration (mg/kg dry soil) |
Repetition |
Initial Replicate Weight (g) |
Final Replicate Weight (g)a |
Weight Change per Replicate (g) |
Mean Weight Change per Treatment (g) |
% Weight Change per Treatment |
O |
A B C D E F G H |
4114 4571 4567 4852 5253 4410 4629 3735 |
5585 6650 6598 6891 7311 6642 5554 6242 |
1.471 2.079 2.031 2.039 2.058 2.232 0.925 2.507 |
1918 |
42 |
231 |
A B C D |
4999 4080 5093 4783 |
7286 5702 6001 7184 |
2.287 1.622 0.908 2.401 |
1805 |
38 |
440 |
A B C D |
5041 4164 5199 4521 |
7389 6340 6303 6899 |
2.348 2.176 1.104 2.378 |
2002 |
42 |
761 |
A B C D |
4827 5127 4876 4072 |
7647 6898 7032 6426 |
2.820 1.771 2.156 2.354 |
2275 |
48 |
1910 |
A B C D |
4866 4336 4445 4749 |
7574 6303 5183 6418 |
2.708 1.967 0.738 1.669 |
1771 |
39 |
3720 |
A B C D |
4278 4292 4130 4027 |
6170 6564 7123 4666 |
1.892 2.272 2.993 0.639 |
1949 |
47 |
Table 5. Reproduction During the Earthworm Exposure to Saytex 8010.
Mean Measured Concentration (mg/kg dry soil) |
Repetition |
Number of Surviving Adult Worms |
Number of Juvenile Worms |
Average Reproductiona |
O |
A B C D E F G H |
10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 |
46 32 31 36 76 31 59 39 |
44 (CV = 37%) |
231 |
A B C D |
10 10 10 10 |
33 56 68 92 |
62 |
440 |
A B C D |
10 10 10 10 |
63 42 15b 29 |
45 |
761 |
A B C D |
10 10 10 10 |
58 90 49 49 |
62 |
1910 |
A B C D |
10 10 10 10 |
55 63 39 33 |
48 |
3720 |
A B C D |
10 10 10 10 |
21 27 9 13 |
18* |
aThe mean number of juveniles produced is calculated as the summation of the number of juveniles per container divided by the number of replicate containers. These values were rounded to two significant figure.
bThis sample was spilled during the juvenile enumeration and was not used in the calculation of the mean.
*Statistically significant (p<0.05) reduction in treatment reproductive output as compared to the control value.
Table 6. Effect Concentrations (EC10, EC50). No-Observed-Effect (NOEC), and Lowest-Observed-Effect (LOEC) Concentrations During the Earthworm Exposure to Saytex 8010.
Biological Parameter |
Statistical Endpoints |
|||
LC10 or EC10 (95% CIa) |
LC50 or EC50 (95% CIa) |
NOEC |
LOEC |
|
28-day Survival (mg/kg dry soil) Reproduction (mg/kg dry soil) |
>3720 (N/Cb)
1860 (0 – 2390) |
>3720 (N/C)
3180 (N/C) |
3720
1910 |
>3720
3720 |
aCI = Confidence Interval
bN/C = Could not be calculated
Table 7. Soil pH and Moisture Measurements Taken During the Earthworm Exposure to Saytex 8010.
Mean Measured Soil Concentration (mg/kg dry soil) |
Day 0a pH |
Day 56b pH |
Day 0 % Moisturec |
Day 28 % Moisturec |
Day 56 % Moisturec |
0 231 440 761 1910 3720 |
6.7 6.7 6.7 6.6 6.7 6.6 |
6.6 6.1 6.0 6.0 6.2 6.3 |
22.1 21.9 22.3 22.2 22.7 22.4 |
33.3 33.0 33.4 34.6 33.5 33.5 |
37.5 34.2 34.8 34.4 33.8 33.5 |
apH recorded from parent soil sample
bpH recorded from replicate A soil sample
cSoil moisture of the parent soil at initiation and from a composite sample on days 28 and 56. The soil moisture was measured as a percentage of the dry soil weight. At 60% of the maximum water holding capacity the percent moisture was 23%.
Table 8. Light Measurements Taken During the Earthworm Exposure to Saytex 8010.
Study Day |
Experimental Position |
Treatment Replicate |
Light Intensity (lux) |
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 |
1 7 12 18 19 24 22 25 27 |
Level 4D Level 1A Control F Control D Level 5C Level 1D Control C Level 2D Level 3B |
692 563 628 463 558 527 472 506 470 |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- Exposure to DBDEthane did not adversely affect (i.e., >10% effect) earthworm survival, and the 28-d survival NOEC was 3,720 mg/kg dry soil (measured) or 5,000 mg/kg dry soil (nominal), the highest dose tested, with the EC10 and EC50 > 3,720 mg/kg dry soil. The 56-d reproduction NOEC and LOEC were 1,970 and 3,720 mg kg dry soil, respectively. The estimated 28-d reproduction EC10 was 1,860 mg/kg dry soil. The estimated 28-reproduction EC50 was 3,180 mg/kg dry soil, the highest dose tested.
- Executive summary:
Exposure to DBDEthane did not adversely affect (i.e., >10% effect) earthworm survival, and the 28-d survival NOEC was 3,720 mg/kg dry soil (measured) or 5,000 mg/kg dry soil (nominal), the highest dose tested, with the EC10 and EC50 > 3,720 mg/kg dry soil. The 56-d reproduction NOEC and LOEC were 1,970 and 3,720 mg kg dry soil, respectively. The estimated 28-d reproduction EC10 was 1,860 mg/kg dry soil. The estimated 28-reproduction EC50 was 3,180 mg/kg dry soil, the highest dose tested.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
