Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 284-366-9 | CAS number: 84852-53-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Effects on fertility
Description of key information
No effects on productive organs was observed in a 90 -day repeated dose study up to the limit dose of 1000 mg/kg bw per day in a guideline study in rats.
Effect on fertility: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- subchronic
- Species:
- rat
Additional information
No evidence of maternal toxicity, developmental toxicity, or teratogenicity was observed in rats or rabbits administered the substance orally over gestation days 6 -15 or 6 to 18, respectively, at dosage levels up to 1250 mg/kg/d. No evidence of an effect on the male or female reproductive organs was observed in rats administered the substance for 28 or 90 days at doses up to 1250 mg/kg/d or 1000 mg/kg/d, resepctively. Based on the available data there is at present no concern for toxicity to reproduction.
However, based on the data requirements of Annex X of REACH and extended
one generation is foreseen as a standard information requirment at this
tonage level and a testing proposal is being provided in this dossier.
We do propose to perform a toxicokinetic study after repeated exposure
before a definitive decison on an EOGRT.
Short description of key information:
Guideline- and GLP-compliant prenatal developmental studies in two
species and subchronic studies including investiation of the
reproductive tract. Results published in the peer-reviewed literature.
Effects on developmental toxicity
Description of key information
Guideline- and GLP-compliant prenatal developmental studies in two species and subchronic studies including
investiation of the reproductive tract. Results published in the
peer-reviewed literature.
Effect on developmental toxicity: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 1 250 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- subacute
- Species:
- rat
Additional information
No evidence of maternal toxicity, developmental toxicity, or teratogenicity was observed in rats or rabbits administered the substance orally over gestation days 6 -15 or 6 to 18, respectively, at dosage levels up to 1250 mg/kg/d. No evidence of an effect on the male or female reproductive organs was observed in rats administered the substance for 28 or 90 days at doses up to 1250 mg/kg/d or 1000 mg/kg/d, resepctively. This information provides sufficient information to conclude a lack of effect on reproduction.
Toxicity to reproduction: other studies
Description of key information
In a developmental neurotoxicity study in rats the test substance, decabromodiphenyl ethane (EBP), was administered at doses of 0, 100, 320, and 1000 mg/kg/day in corn oil once daily by oral gavage to four groups of 25 time-mated female Crl:CD (SD) rats (F0 dams) on gestation day 6 through lactation day 21. The dose volume was 5 mL/kg.
Clinical observations, body weights, and food consumption were recorded at appropriate intervals. In addition, detailed clinical observations (DCO) were conducted outside of the home cage on all dams in each group on gestation days 10 and 15 and on lactation days 10 and 20. All females were allowed to deliver and rear their offspring (F1 generation) to lactation day 21, at which time the dams were euthanized and necropsied.
Clinical observations, body weights, and sex were recorded for the F1 pups at appropriate intervals. Surface righting response was evaluated for all available F1 pups beginning on postnatal day (PND) 2. On PND 4, litters were culled to eight pups/litter (four pups/sex/litter, when possible). Following culling, a subset (Subset A) consisting of one pup/sex/litter/group was assigned to detailed clinical observations (PND 4, 11, 21, 35, 45, and 60), auditory startle response (PND 24 and 63), motor activity (PND 13, 17, 21, and 61), and learning and memory using Passive Avoidance (PND 64 [acquisition] and PND 71 [memory]). One pup/litter/group (10 pups/sex/group) from Subset A was selected for brain weights, neuropathological and morphometric evaluations on PND 72. A second subset (Subset B) consisting of one pup/sex/litter/group was selected for learning and memory using Passive Avoidance on (PND 23 [acquisition] and PND 30 [memory]). A third subset (Subset C) consisting of one pup/sex/litter was selected for brain weight evaluations on PND 22; of these, one pup/litter (10 pups/sex) from all groups was selected for neuropathological and morphometric evaluations on PND 22.
Developmental landmarks (balanopreputial separation or vaginal patency) were evaluated for all F1 animals in Subset A. All F1 animals not selected for behavioral evaluations (Subset D) were euthanized and necropsied on PND 30.
F0 maternal survival was unaffected by treatment with the test substance. No remarkable clinical findings were noted for the F0 females at the daily examinations and no test substance-related changes in detailed clinical observations were noted at any dose level. Mean body weights, body weight gains, and food consumption in the 100, 320, and 1000 mg/kg/day groups were unaffected by test substance throughout gestation and lactation. There were no effects of the test substance on reproductive performance.
There were no effects of the test substance on litter or offspring developmental parameters. There were no effects of test substance on mean male and female pup body weight gains. There were no test substance-related effects on postweaning body weight or the onset of sexual maturation as measured by the age of attainment of vaginal opening or preputial separation.
For F1 males and females, there were no test substance-related effects on DCO, motor activity, auditory startle, learning and memory at any dose level at any age.
There were test substance-related morphometric changes in brains of male rats on PND 22 and PND 72 at 100, 320, and 1000 mg/kg/day. There were lower group mean morphometric brain measurements in the cortex (Level 1), hippocampus (Level 3), and cerebellum (Level 5) on PND 22 and PND 72. The morphometric changes were not associated with statistically significant changes in brain weight or gross brain measurements, although there was a slight decrement of group mean brain weight in the 1000 mg/kg/day group males at PND 22. There were no microscopic changes in brain, spinal cord, nerve roots, or ganglia. There were no test substance-related changes in female rats for the macroscopic examinations and measurements, or neuropathology at any dose level at any age.
In conclusion, there were no test substance-related effects observed in this study consistent with systemic toxicity. There was no evidence of maternal toxicity at any dose level. Therefore, the no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) for systemic toxicity of EBP was 1000 mg/kg/day (the highest dose level tested). Test substance-related findings in the offspring were limited to morphometric changes in brains of male rats on PND 22 and PND 72 at 100, 320, and 1000 mg/kg/day. Peer review of two independent pathologists suggested that these are considered ambigous findings and an artefact of the section and measureing method cannot be excluded. Thus, the NOAEL for developmental neurotoxicity cannot be determined with sufficent certainty for males. However in the light of the limited bioavailability of the substance the reported effects are not considered as strong evidence of adversity.
Nevertheless a testing proposal is submitted to investigate the toxicokinetics in pregnant rats after repeated oral exposure.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Non-classification: Based on the lack of effects observed in two prenatal developmental studies and two subchronic studies at doses >=1000 mg/kg/d.
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.