Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 603-837-5 | CAS number: 134605-64-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 30 August 1995 to 19 February 1996
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: The study was performed to GLP and in line with the standardised guidelines OECD 414, EC OJ No L133/24, Japanese MAFF 59 and US EPA OPP 83 -3, with no deviations thought to impact the reliability of the presented results.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 996
- Report date:
- 1996
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 414 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPP 83-3 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OTS 798.4900 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Japanese MAFF 59 NohSan No. 4200, "Teratogenicity Study" January 1985
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: European Communities Commission Directive 87/302/EEC, "Teratogenicity Study - Rodent and Non-Rodent", OJ No L133/24, May 30, 1988
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Limit test:
- yes
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 1-(allyloxy)-2-methyl-1-oxopropan-2-yl 2-chloro-5-[3-methyl-2,6-dioxo-4-(trifluoromethyl)-3,6-dihydropyrimidin-1(2H)-yl]benzoate
- EC Number:
- 603-837-5
- Cas Number:
- 134605-64-4
- Molecular formula:
- C20H18ClF3N2O6
- IUPAC Name:
- 1-(allyloxy)-2-methyl-1-oxopropan-2-yl 2-chloro-5-[3-methyl-2,6-dioxo-4-(trifluoromethyl)-3,6-dihydropyrimidin-1(2H)-yl]benzoate
- Test material form:
- solid: particulate/powder
- Remarks:
- migrated information: powder
- Details on test material:
- - Physical state: Solid, tan coloured powder
- Storage condition of test material: Room temperature
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- other: Russian Chbb:HM
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Age at study initiation: 3 months (minimum)
- Fasting period before study: Not reported
- Housing: housed individually in battery cages with steel slatted floors.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Pelleted, certified standard feed, ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Tap water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 7 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 19 ± 2 °C
- Humidity (%): 50 ± 20 %
- Air changes (per hr): about 16 air changes per hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hours light / 12 hours dark
IN-LIFE DATES: From: 11/09/95 To: 29/02/96
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- other: 0.5% carboxymethylcellulose and 0.1 % aqueous polysorbate 80
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS: Test substance-vehicle mixtures were prepared daily with a high-speed homogeniser. Homogeneity of the mixtures during administration was maintained with a magnetic stirrer.
VEHICLE
- Concentration in vehicle: 0, 2.5, 25 and 250 mg/mL mixture
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): 4 mL/kg of actual bodyweight
- Purity: 0.5% (w/w) aqueous solution of sodium carboxymethylcellulose and 0.1% (w/w) aqueous polysorbate 80 - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- In order to permit determination of content, homogeneity and stability of the test substance under the actual conditions of administration during the study, samples of test substance-vehicle mixtures were taken on the date(s) designated below, once before and once after dosing. The samples from before dosing were taken from the top, middle and bottom of the container; the samples from after dosing were taken from the middle of the container.
Samples were taken in duplicate. Together with 10 mL of vehicle and approximately 2.0 g of test substance they were frozen until analysis.
- dates of sampling: 21 and 27 September 1995
Samples were analysed by HPLC with the following conditions:
- Column: 5 µm; 125 mm x 4.6 mm (o.d.)
- Temperature: room temperature
- Eluent: Acetonitrile/0.02 M H3PO4 (60+40 v/v)
- Flow: 1.0 mL/min
- Wavelength: 274 nm
- Injection volume: 10 μL - Details on mating procedure:
- - Impregnation procedure: Females were artificially inseminated with diluted semen from bucks of the same strain. The day of insemination was designated as day 0 of pregnancy.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- From day 7 to day 19 of gestation.
- Frequency of treatment:
- Daily
- Duration of test:
- 29 days
Doses / concentrations
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
0, 10, 100 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day
Basis:
nominal conc.
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 20 females
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: The dose levels were selected based on the results of a previous rangefinding study in pregnant rabbits (study no. 951036). In the preliminary study, test substance was non-toxic to dams, embryos and foetuses at doses up to 1000 mg/kg, and there was no indication of teratogenesis.
- Rationale for animal assignment (if not random): Inseminated females were allocated to experimental and control groups using a method of randomisation by weight stratification.
Examinations
- Maternal examinations:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: twice daily (> 6 hours apart)
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: daily
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: daily
FOOD CONSUMPTION: Yes (on days 4, 7, 12, 16, 20, 24 and 29)
- Food consumption for each animal determined according to the following formula: feed comsumption (g) per period / days per period
WATER CONSUMPTION: No data
POST-MORTEM EXAMINATIONS: Yes
- Sacrifice on gestation day 29
- Organs examined: Macroscopic pathological examination of the main organs of the thoracic and abdominal cavities, in particular the genitals. - Ovaries and uterine content:
- The ovaries and uterine content was examined after termination: Yes
Examinations included:
- Gravid uterus weight: Yes
- Number of corpora lutea: Yes
- Number of implantations: Yes
- Number of early resorptions: Yes
- Number of late resorptions: Yes - Fetal examinations:
- - External examinations: Yes: all of litter
- Visceral examinations: Yes: half per litter
- Skeletal examinations: Yes: half per litter
- Head examinations: Yes: half per litter - Statistics:
- Statistical analysis of continuous data (e.g. body weight, feed consumption) was performed using the Analysis of Variance Procedure (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett's t-Test in case of a significant result in the ANOVA. Categorical data (e.g. malformation counts) were analysed using Chi-Square test followed by Fisher's Exact test in case of a significant result in the Chi-Square test.
Non-parametric data (e.g. mean percent affected fetuses/litter) were analysed using the Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric analysis of variance test followed by Mann-Whitney U-test. - Historical control data:
- Available and documented within the study report.
Results and discussion
Results: maternal animals
Maternal developmental toxicity
- Details on maternal toxic effects:
- Maternal toxic effects:yes
Details on maternal toxic effects:
- Maternal Toxicity
None of the maternal animals died during the study and only occasional incidental clinical signs occurred during the study.
At 1000 mg/kg, there was a slight reduction in food consumption during the dosing period (days 7 to 20) and an increase in food consumption at the end of gestation when the animals were no longer dosed (days 20 to 29). In this group a significant difference in weight change was seen only for days 12 to 16 of gestation and overall on days 7 to 19. Overall weight change for days 7 to 29 was comparable among all groups.
Gravid uterus weights, carcass weights, and net weight change from day 7 were similar in all four groups. There were no maternal necropsy findings.
- Reproduction and Cesarean Section Data
Preimplantation losses, numbers of implantation sites and live litter size were similar in all groups.
At 1000 mg/kg, there was an increase in the incidence of post implantation loss, almost exclusively in the form of early resorptions. Three females in this group showed total early embryonic resorption; for the remaining 16 pregnant females, this parameter was increased when compared to controls and historical control data.
Effect levels (maternal animals)
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEL
- Effect level:
- 100 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: maternal toxicity
Results (fetuses)
- Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
- Embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:no effects
Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
At 1000 mg/kg, foetal weights (both male and female) were slightly reduced compared to controls.
The incidence and type of external, visceral and skeletal findings were not affected by treatment.
Effect levels (fetuses)
open allclose all
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEL
- Effect level:
- 100 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: embryotoxicity
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEL
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: teratogenicity
Fetal abnormalities
- Abnormalities:
- not specified
Overall developmental toxicity
- Developmental effects observed:
- not specified
Any other information on results incl. tables
Analytical results:
The chemical analysis determined the concentration, homogeneity and stability of the test material in 0.1% (w/w) aqueous polysorbate 80 with 0.5% (w/w) CMC by HPLC-analysis. The overall mean concentration of the homogeneity samples were found to be 92.7%, 92.6%, and 99.0% of the nominal concentrations for dose group 2 (2.5 mg/mL), for dose group 3 (25 mg/mL), and for dose group 4 (250 mg/mL), respectively. The homogeneity varied in the range from -2% to +2% of the mean concentrations. The test material was found to be stable in 0.1% (w/w) aqueous polysorbate 80 with 0.5% (w/w) CMC under actual conditions of administration over the period of dosing.
Table 1: Mean Maternal Bodyweight (g)
Day |
Mean Maternal Bodyweight (g) |
|||
Group 1 (0 mg/kg bw/day) |
Group 2 (10 mg/kg bw/day) |
Group 3 (100 mg/kg bw/day) |
Group 4 (1000 mg/kg bw/day) |
|
0 |
2882 |
2874 |
2878 |
2892 |
1 |
2896 |
2890 |
2875 |
2903 |
2 |
2888 |
2886 |
2878 |
2902 |
3 |
2876 |
2887 |
2870 |
2887 |
4 |
2878 |
2869 |
2864 |
2882 |
5 |
2865 |
2865 |
2860 |
2870 |
6 |
2858 |
2857 |
2854 |
2865 |
7 |
2860 |
2855 |
2854 |
2860 |
8 |
2851 |
2856 |
2845 |
2863 |
9 |
2843 |
2851 |
2850 |
2849 |
10 |
2851 |
2854 |
2842 |
2842 |
11 |
2846 |
2844 |
2841 |
2840 |
12 |
2837 |
2853 |
2844 |
2828 |
13 |
2836 |
2864 |
2847 |
2819 |
14 |
2842 |
2866 |
2849 |
2829 |
15 |
2856 |
2873 |
2861 |
2821 |
16 |
2860 |
2884 |
2870 |
2818 |
17 |
2866 |
2888 |
2868 |
2803 |
18 |
2857 |
2887 |
2869 |
2790 |
19 |
2853 |
2879 |
2863 |
2782 |
20 |
2842 |
2869 |
2847 |
2763 |
21 |
2836 |
2866 |
2848 |
2755 |
22 |
2833 |
2861 |
2840 |
2763 |
23 |
2839 |
2864 |
2843 |
2781 |
24 |
2851 |
2879 |
2851 |
2805 |
25 |
2870 |
2882 |
2868 |
2828 |
26 |
2884 |
2898 |
2876 |
2843 |
27 |
2902 |
2906 |
2889 |
2871 |
28 |
2917 |
2924 |
2901 |
2902 |
29 |
2932 |
2943 |
2907 |
2921 |
Table 2: Mean Maternal Bodyweight Gain (g)
Days |
Mean Maternal Bodyweight Change (g) |
|||
Group 1 (0 mg/kg bw/day) |
Group 2 (10 mg/kg bw/day) |
Group 3 (100 mg/kg bw/day) |
Group 4 (1000 mg/kg bw/day) |
|
0-4 |
-4 |
-5 |
-14 |
-10 |
4-7 |
-19 |
-13 |
-10 |
-23 |
7-12 |
-23 |
-2 |
-9 |
-31 |
12-16 |
24 |
31 |
26 |
-11* |
16-20 |
-18 |
-14 |
-23 |
-54 |
20-24 |
9 |
9 |
4 |
42 |
24-29 |
81 |
64 |
56 |
116 |
7-19 |
-7 |
23 |
9 |
-78* |
7-29 |
72 |
88 |
53 |
61 |
* p ≤ 0.05
Table 3: Mean Food Consumption
Days |
Mean Food Consumption g/animal/day |
|||
Group 1 (0 mg/kg bw/day) |
Group 2 (10 mg/kg bw/day) |
Group 3 (100 mg/kg bw/day) |
Group 4 (1000 mg/kg bw/day) |
|
0-4 |
91.9 |
95.4 |
87.4 |
91.8 |
4-7 |
82.2 |
89.3 |
87.2 |
87.5 |
7-12 |
83.9 |
86.4 |
86.9 |
71.7 |
12-16 |
64.6 |
73.2 |
69.6 |
49.2 |
16-20 |
63.9 |
71.8 |
70.3 |
42.1 |
20-24 |
69.6 |
76.5 |
71.2 |
81.5 |
24-29 |
80.1 |
75.0 |
79.7 |
105.6* |
* p≤ 0.05
Table 4: Summary of Caesarean Section Data for Pregnant Dams
Observation |
Group 1 (0 mg/kg bw/day) |
Group 2 (10 mg/kg bw/day) |
Group 3 (100 mg/kg bw/day) |
Group 4 (1000 mg/kg bw/day) |
|
Number of pregnant animals used for calculation |
19 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
|
Corpora lutea |
Total |
121 |
120 |
122 |
132 |
Mean |
6.4 |
7.1 |
6.8 |
6.9 |
|
Implantation Sites |
Total |
97 |
93 |
89 |
112 |
Mean |
5.1 |
5.5 |
4.9 |
5.9 |
|
Preimplantation loss % per animal |
Total |
24 |
27 |
33 |
20 |
Mean % |
21.3 |
23.1 |
27.5 |
17.2 |
|
Foetuses (per animal) |
Total |
83 |
71 |
77 |
81 |
Mean |
4.4 |
4.2 |
4.3 |
4.3 |
|
% Alive |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
|
% Dead |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Live foetuses (per animal) |
Total |
83 |
71 |
77 |
81 |
Mean |
4.4 |
4.2 |
4.3 |
4.3 |
|
Malformed live foetuses (per animal) |
Total |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
Mean |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.1 |
|
Dead foetuses |
Total |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Early resorptions (per animal) |
Total |
14 |
21 |
12 |
29 |
Mean |
0.7 |
1.2 |
0.7 |
1.5 |
|
% of implantations per animal |
16.5 |
21.3 |
12.7 |
31.9 |
|
Late resorptions (per animal) |
Total |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
Mean |
0 |
0.1 |
0 |
0.1 |
|
% of implantations per animal |
0 |
1.5 |
0 |
1.4 |
|
Abortion Sites |
Total |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Postimplantation loss (per animal) |
Total |
14 |
22 |
12 |
31 |
Mean |
0.7 |
1.3 |
0.7 |
1.6 |
|
% of implantations per animal |
16.5 |
22.8 |
12.7 |
33.3 |
|
Affected implants (per animal) |
Total |
14 |
22 |
12 |
32 |
Mean |
0.7 |
1.3 |
0.7 |
1.7 |
|
% of implantations per animal |
16.5 |
22.8 |
12.7 |
34.0 |
|
Number of litters used for calculations |
18 |
15 |
18 |
16 |
|
Viable male foetuses |
Number |
39 |
34 |
40 |
36 |
% |
47.0 |
47.9 |
51.9 |
44.4 |
|
Viable female foetuses |
Number |
44 |
37 |
37 |
45 |
% |
53.0 |
52.1 |
48.1 |
55.6 |
|
Foetal bodyweight (g) |
Mean |
41.4 |
41.0 |
41.9 |
40.0 |
Male foetal bodyweight (g) |
Mean |
41.3 |
41.5 |
42.4 |
39.8 |
Female foetal bodyweight (g) |
Mean |
41.5 |
39.6 |
41.4 |
40.2 |
Table 5: Summary of Caesarean Section Data Day 29 Post-Coitum
Observation |
Group 1 (0 mg/kg bw/day) |
Group 2 (10 mg/kg bw/day) |
Group 3 (100 mg/kg bw/day) |
Group 4 (1000 mg/kg bw/day) |
||
Number of pregnant animals used for calculation |
18 |
15 |
18 |
16 |
||
Corpora lutea |
Total |
116 |
106 |
122 |
119 |
|
Mean |
6.4 |
7.1 |
6.8 |
7.4 |
||
Implantation Sites |
Total |
93 |
80 |
89 |
103 |
|
Mean |
5.2 |
5.3 |
4.9 |
6.4 |
||
Preimplantation loss % per animal |
Total |
23 |
26 |
33 |
16 |
|
Mean % |
21.4 |
25.2 |
27.5 |
13.7 |
||
Foetuses (per animal) |
Total |
83 |
71 |
77 |
81 |
|
Mean |
4.6 |
4.7 |
4.3 |
5.1 |
||
% Alive |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
||
% Dead |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Live foetuses (per animal) |
Total |
83 |
71 |
77 |
81 |
|
Mean |
4.6 |
4.7 |
4.3 |
5.1 |
||
Malformed live foetuses (per animal) |
Total |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Mean |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.1 |
||
Dead foetuses |
Total |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Early resorptions (per animal) |
Total |
10 |
8 |
12 |
20 |
|
Mean |
0.6 |
0.5 |
0.7 |
1.3 |
||
% of implantations per animal |
11.9 |
10.8 |
12.7 |
19.2 |
||
Late resorptions (per animal) |
Total |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
|
Mean |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
||
% of implantations per animal |
0.0 |
1.7 |
0.0 |
1.7 |
||
Abortion Sites |
Total |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Postimplantation loss (per animal) |
Mean |
10 |
9 |
12 |
22 |
|
Total |
0.6 |
0.6 |
0.7 |
1.4 |
||
% of implantations per animal |
11.9 |
12.5 |
12.7 |
20.8 |
||
Affected implants (per animal) |
Total |
10 |
9 |
12 |
23 |
|
Mean |
0.6 |
0.6 |
0.7 |
1.4 |
||
% of implantations per animal |
11.9 |
12.5 |
12.7 |
21.6 |
||
Number of litters used for calculations |
18 |
15 |
18 |
16 |
||
Viable male foetuses |
Number |
39 |
34 |
40 |
36 |
|
% |
47.0 |
47.9 |
51.9 |
44.4 |
||
Viable female foetuses |
Number |
44 |
37 |
37 |
45 |
|
% |
53.0 |
52.1 |
48.1 |
55.6 |
||
Foetal bodyweight (g) |
Mean |
41.4 |
41.0 |
41.9 |
40.0 |
|
Male foetal bodyweight (g) |
Mean |
41.3 |
41.5 |
42.4 |
39.8 |
|
Female foetal bodyweight (g) |
Mean |
41.5 |
39.6 |
41.4 |
40.2 |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions of the study, maternal toxicity (reduced food consumption and body weight gain) and embryo and fetal toxicity (increased incidence of early resorption and decreased fetal weights) were seen in the 1000 mg/kg group. The No Observed Effect Level (NOEL) of the test material in this study was therefore considered to be 100 mg/kg for dams and fetuses. There was no indication of teratogenic potential.
- Executive summary:
The study was performed to meet the requirements of OECD 414, EC OJ No L133/24, Japanese MAFF 59 and US EPA OPP 83 -3 under GLP conditions. The study was performed to evaluate the potential of the test substance to cause embryotoxic, foetotoxic, and teratogenic effects in rabbits. The test substance was evaluated over a range of concentrations - 0, 10, 100 and 1000 mg/kg. Females were inseminated with semen from males of the same stock. Inseminated females were treated daily with the test material from day 7 to day 19 of gestation. On day 29 dams were sacrificed and foetuses extracted and examined for skeletal and visceral effects.
None of the maternal animals died during the study and only occasional incidental clinical signs occurred during the study.
At 1000 mg/kg, there was a slight reduction in food consumption during the dosing period (days 7 to 20) and an increase in food consumption at the end of gestation when the animals were no longer dosed (days 20 to 29). In this group a significant difference in weight change was seen only for days 12 to 16 of gestation and overall on days 7 to 19. Overall weight change for days 7 to 29 was comparable among all groups.
Gravid uterus weights, carcass weights, and net weight change from day 7 were similar in all four groups. There were no maternal necropsy findings.
Preimplantation losses, numbers of implantation sites and live litter size were similar in all groups.
At 1000 mg/kg, there was an increase in the incidence of post implantation loss, almost exclusively in the form of early resorptions. Three females in this group showed total early embryonic resorption; for the remaining 16 pregnant females, this parameter was increased when compared to controls and historical control data.
At 1000 mg/kg, foetal weights (both male and female) were slightly reduced compared to controls. However, the incidence and type of external, visceral and skeletal findings were not affected by treatment.
Under the conditions of the study, maternal toxicity (reduced food consumption and body weight gain) and embryo and foetal toxicity (increased incidence of early resorption and decreased foetal weights) were seen in the 1000 mg/kg group. The No Observed Effect Level (NOEL) of the test material in this study was therefore considered to be 100 mg/kg for dams and foetuses. There was no indication of teratogenic potential.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.