Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: - | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
The test substance is not mutagenic.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 12 Mar 2018 to 02 Apr 2018
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted on 21 July 1997
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Physical appearance (with color): Colourless to yellow liquid
Storage Conditions: Ambient (21 to 29°C)
Date of Expiry: 20-12-2020 - Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Sodium phenobarbitone and β-naphthoflavone induced rat liver S9 homogenate
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Pre-test: 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 μL/plate.
Mutation assay: 0.05, 0.16, 0.5, 1.6 and 5 μL/plate (Based on the results of the initial cytotoxicity test) - Vehicle / solvent:
- DMSO
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 9-aminoacridine
- 2-nitrofluorene
- sodium azide
- mitomycin C
- other: 2-Aminoanthracene
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation) and preincubation
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 30 minutes (preincubation)
- Exposure duration: 66 hours and 45 minutes (plate incorporation); 65 hours (preincubation)
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: reduction of the bacterial background lawn - Evaluation criteria:
- EVALUATION AND INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS
The conditions necessary for determining a positive result are: there should be a dose related increase over the range tested and/or a reproducible increase in the mean revertants per plate of at least one tester strain over a minimum of two increasing doses of the test item, either in the presence or absence of the metabolic activation system. The test will be judged positive if the increase in mean revertants at the peak of the dose response is equal to or greater than 2 times the mean vehicle control value in Salmonella typhimurium strains TA98, TA100 and TA102 or equal to or greater than 3 times the mean vehicle control value in tester strains TA1535 and TA1537. An equivocal response is a biologically relevant increase in a revertant count that partially meets the criteria for evaluation as positive. This could be a dose responsive increase that does not achieve the respective threshold cited above or a non dose responsive increase that is equal to or greater than the respective threshold cited. A response is evaluated as negative, as it is neither positive nor equivocal.
CRITERIA FOR ACCEPTABILITY OF THE TEST
The mutation test is considered acceptable as it meets the following criteria: All tester strains confirmed to their genetic characteristics. The positive controls showed increase in revertant colony numbers of at least twice or thrice the concurrent vehicle control levels with the appropriate bacterial strain. - Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- True negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- True negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- True negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- True negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- True negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- - Solubility Test: The test item was miscible in dimethyl sulphoxide at a concentration of 50 μL/mL.
- Precipitation Test: The test item showed minimal precipitation at 5 μL/plate, slight precipitation at 0.8, 0.9, 1, 2, 3 and 4 μL/plate and no precipitation at 0.7 and 0.6 μL/plate.
- Initial Cytotoxicity Test: Based on the results of the solubility and precipitation tests, the concentrations of 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 μL/plate were selected for the initial cytotoxicity test. No cytotoxicity was observed up to 5 μL/plate. On the basis of cytotoxicity test, 5 μL/plate was considered as the highest test concentration for the mutation assay.
- Plate Incorporation Method: Trial I: All the tester strains treated with the test item, at the concentrations tested of 0.05, 0.16, 0.5, 1.6 and 5 µL/plate showed very close resemblance to the vehicle control when tested with and without metabolic activation. There was no appreciable increase in the number of revertant colonies and no change in bacterial background lawn when compared to that of the vehicle control, among the tester strains. The mean number of revertant colonies/plate and bacterial background lawn in the treatment groups for the tested strains were comparable to that of the vehicle control. The specific positive controls tested simultaneously produced approximately 2.3 to 14.7-fold increase in the mean number of revertants as compared to the vehicle control.
- Preincubation Method: Trial II: All the tester strains treated with the test item, at the concentrations tested of 0.05, 0.16, 0.5, 1.6 and 5 µL/plate showed very close resemblance to the vehicle control when tested with and without metabolic activation. There was no appreciable increase in the number of revertant colonies and no change in bacterial background lawn when compared to that of the vehicle control, among the tester strains. The mean number of revertant colonies/plate and bacterial background lawn in the treatment groups for the tested strains were comparable to that of the vehicle control. The specific positive controls tested simultaneously produced approximately a 2.3 to 13.9-fold increase in the mean number of revertants as compared to the vehicle control.
- Viable Count: Each tester strain was serially diluted to 1E-7 and plated on nutrient agar. Post-incubation of the plate incorporation and for pre-incubation method, the numbers of colonies were counted manually and results were expressed as Colony Forming Units (CFU). Each tester strains resulted in an acceptable range of 1 to 2E9 CFU/mL.
- Quality Control Plates: Control plates with S9 mix, phosphate buffer saline, soft agar, 5 µL/plate of test item, dimethyl sulphoxide and minimal glucose agar plates incubated at 37±1°C for 66 hrs and 45 mins for the plate incorporation method and pre-incubation method were checked for contamination. No microbial contamination was observed.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
The mutagenicity of the test item was evaluated in the Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test according to OECD Guideline 471 and following GLP. On the basis of solubility and precipitation tests, the initial cytotoxicity test was performed at 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 μL/plate. The initial cytotoxicity test was performed with Salmonella typhimurium TA100 both in the presence and absence of a metabolic activation system (sodium phenobarbitone and β-naphthoflavone induced rat liver S9 homogenate). Treatment of tester strain TA100, with the test item in the presence and absence of a metabolic activation system did not result in cytotoxicity. Two independent trials were conducted by the plate incorporation method and pre-incubation method, respectively, in the presence and absence of a metabolic activation system. On the basis of the cytotoxicity results, 5 μL/plate was considered as the highest test concentration for the mutation assay. In the mutation assay, the test item was tested at concentrations of 0.05, 0.16, 0.5, 1.6 and 5 μL/plate. Vehicle control (dimethyl sulphoxide) and appropriate positive controls (2-nitrofluorene, sodium azide and 9 -aminoacridine, and mitomycin C for trials “without metabolic activation” and 2 -aminoanthracene for trials “with metabolic activation”) were tested simultaneously. The tester strains used in the mutation assay were Salmonella typhimurium TA98, TA100, TA 102, TA1535, and TA1537. Based on the experimental results obtained, the mean numbers of revertant colonies at the tested concentrations were comparable to those of the vehicle control, in both trials, in the presence and absence of metabolic activation. There was no appreciable increase in the number of revertant colonies at any of the tested concentrations in both trials. The number of revertant colonies in the positive controls resulted in a 2.3 to 14.7 fold increase compared to the vehicle control under identical conditions. Based on the results obtained from the study, is concluded that the test item, is “non-mutagenic” in the Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test up to the highest tested concentration of 5 μL/plate under the test conditions.
Justification for classification or non-classification
The test substance does not have to be classified for mutagenicity according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.