Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: - | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Eye irritation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2017-12-19 to 2018-01-18
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 018
- Report date:
- 2018
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: OECD Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals No. 492: Reconstructed human Cornea-like Epithelium (RhCE) test method for identifying chemicals not requiring classification and labelling for eye irritation ornea-like Epithelium (RhCE) test method)
- Version / remarks:
- 28 July 2015
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: EURL ECVAM DB-ALM Method Summary No. 164: EpiOcular™ Eye Irritation Test - Summary
- Version / remarks:
- 22 July 2015
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: EpiOcular™ Eye Irritation Test (OCL-200-EIT) For the prediction of acute ocular irritation of chemicals For use with MatTek Corporation’s Reconstructed Human EpiOcular™ Model irritation of chemicals
- Version / remarks:
- 29 June 2015
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- (Bayerisches Landesamt für Gesundheit und Lebensmittelsicherheit, Germany)
Test material
Reference
- Name:
- Unnamed
- Type:
- Constituent
Test animals / tissue source
- Species:
- other: Reconstructed human cornea-like epithelium (RhCE) EpiOcular
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- The test was carried out with the EpiOcular™ reconstructed human cornea-line epithelium (RhCE) model (MatTek). The model consists of normal, human-derived epidermal keratinocytes which have been cultured to form a stratified, highly differentiated squamous epithelium morphologically similar to that found in a human cornea. The EpiOcular™ RhCE tissue construct consists of at least 3 viable layers of cells and a non-keratinised surface, showing a cornea-like structure analogous to that found in vivo.
Test system
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent positive control
- yes, concurrent negative control
- Amount / concentration applied:
- 1. Negative Control 50 μL Aqua dest.
2. Positive Control 50 μL methyl acetate
3. Test Item 50 μL (undiluted) - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 30 +/- 2 min.
- Duration of post- treatment incubation (in vitro):
- - post soak incubation: 12 +/- 2 min.
- post treatment incubation: 120 +/- 15min
- MTT incubation: 3h - Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- The test was performed on a total of 2 tissues per dose group.
- Details on study design:
- The test was performed on EpiOcular, a reconstituted three-dimensional human corneal epithelium model. Hereby, the test item was applied topically. Cytotoxicity is expressed as the reduction of mitochondrial dehydrogenase activity measured by formazan production from MTT after a 30 min exposure period and 120 min post-treatment period and compared to those of the concurrent negative controls.
Results and discussion
In vitro
Results
- Irritation parameter:
- other: Mean relative tissue viability [%]
- Run / experiment:
- Mean tissues 1 and 2
- Value:
- 97.9
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks:
- 100
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks:
- 20.5
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
- TEST ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA
Value Cut off pass/fail
Mean Absolute OD570 nm NK 1.814 0.8 < NK < 2.5 pass
Mean Relative Viability PC [%] 20.5 < 50% pass
Max. Difference of % Viability [%] 1.4 < 20% pass
Any other information on results incl. tables
The mixture of 50 µl test item per 1 mL MTT medium showed reduction of MTT as compared to the solvent. The mixture turned blue/purple. Since the mean relative tissue viability of the test item treated tissues (TM) was above the 60% threshold value killed tissue controls were performed for quantitative correction of results
NSMTT [%] = [(ODKT- ODKU)/ODNK] * 100 = 0.99%
Difference of NSMTT of the two duplicate tissues must be < 20%, otherwise not accepted.
NSMTT1 [%] = [meanODKT1 - ODKU)/ODNK] * 100 = -0.34%
NSMTT2 [%] = [meanODKT2 - ODKU)/ODNK] * 100 = 2.32%
NSMTT1 - NSMTT2 =± 2.66%
NSMTT was ≤ 60% (0.99%) relative to the negative control of living epidermis and could therefore be used for determination of the killed control corrected viability (KCCV) according to the following formula:
KCCV [%] = viabilityTM- NSMTT = 97.0%
The mixture of 50 µL test item per 1 mL A. dest showed colouring as compared to the solvent. Since the mean relative tissue viability of the test item treated tissues (TM) was above the 60% threshold value coloured tissue controls were performed for quantitative correction of results.
NSCliving [%] = [ODTVT/ODNK]*100 = 0.47%
Difference of NSCliving of the two duplicate tissues must be < 20%, otherwise not accepted.
NSC1 [%] = [ODTVT1/ODNK] * 100 = 0.39%
NSC2 [%] = [ODTVT2/ODNK] * 100 = 0.54%
NSC1 – NSC2 = ±0.15%
NSClivingwas ≤ 60% (0.47%) relative to the negative control of living epidermis and could therefore be used for determination of theNSC-corrected mean relative tissue viability (NSCCV) according to the following formula:
NSCCV [%] = viabilityTM[%] – NSCliving[%] = 96.4%
Since the test item showed non-specific MTT-reduction and non-specific colouring of living tissues, a third control for non-specific colour in killed tissues (NSCkilled) was performed to avoid a possible double-correction for colour interference.
The non-specificcolour of additional killed tissues (NSCkilled) was calculated according to the following formula:
NSCkilled [%] = [ODTKT/ODNK]*100 = 1.45%
The true tissue viability was then calculated as the percent tissue viability obtained with living tissues minus NSMTT minus NSClivingplus NSCkilled.
True Tissue Viability = [%] mean tissue viability – NSMTT –NSCliving+ NSCkilled= 97.9%
Result of the Test Item Sa 190
Name |
Negative Control |
Positive Control |
Test item |
|||
Tissue |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
OD570values |
1.798 |
1.775 |
0.400 |
0.405 |
1.763 |
1.755 |
1.847 |
1.837 |
0.401 |
0.424 |
1.817 |
1.777 |
|
OD570values |
1.754 |
1.731 |
0.356 |
0.361 |
1.719 |
1.711 |
1.803 |
1.794 |
0.357 |
0.380 |
1.774 |
1.733 |
|
mean of the duplicates |
1.778 |
1.762 |
0.356 |
0.371 |
1.746 |
1.722 |
mean OD |
1.770* |
0.364 |
1.734 |
|||
TODTT- NSMTT |
- |
- |
1.717 |
|||
TODTTNSMTT und NSCliving |
- |
- |
1.707 |
|||
mean sd OD |
0.011 |
0.010 |
0.017 |
|||
tissue viability [%] |
100.5 |
99.5 |
20.1 |
20.9 |
98.6 |
97.3 |
relative tissue viability difference [%]*** |
0.9 |
0.8 |
1.4 |
|||
mean tissue viability [%] |
100.0 |
20.5** |
98.0 |
|||
mean tissue viability [%] |
- |
- |
97.0 |
|||
mean tissue viability [%] |
- |
- |
96.4 |
|||
True Tissue Viability |
- |
- |
97.9 |
* Corrected mean OD570 of the negative control corresponds to 100% absolute tissue viability
** Mean relative tissue viability of the positive control is < 50%
*** Relative tissue viability difference of replicate tissues is < 20%
Result of the NSMTT Control
NSMTT |
KU |
KT |
Negative Control |
||||
Tissue |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
|
absolute OD570 -values |
0.074 |
0.075 |
0.067 |
0.115 |
1.798 |
1.775 |
|
0.075 |
0.076 |
0.071 |
0.117 |
1.847 |
1.837 |
||
OD570(Blank Corrected) |
0.030 |
0.031 |
0.023 |
0.071 |
1.754 |
1.731 |
|
0.031 |
0.032 |
0.027 |
0.073 |
1.803 |
1.794 |
||
mean OD570 |
0.031 |
0.031 |
0.025 |
0.072 |
1.778 |
1.762 |
|
total mean OD570 |
0.031 |
0.049 |
1.770 |
||||
SD OD570(of the replicate tissues) |
0.000 |
0.033 |
0.011 |
||||
NSMTT [%] |
0.99 |
- |
|||||
Relative Tissue Viability [%] |
- |
100.5 |
99.5 |
||||
Mean Relative Tissue Viability [%] |
- |
100.0 |
|||||
SD Tissue Viability [%] |
- |
0.6 |
|||||
CV [% Viabilities] |
- |
0.6 |
Result of the NSCliving Control
NSCliving |
TVT |
Negative Control |
|||
Tissue |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
|
absolute OD570 -values |
0.050 |
0.053 |
2.098 |
2.048 |
|
0.051 |
0.055 |
2.111 |
2.021 |
||
absolute OD570 - |
0.007 |
0.010 |
2.055 |
2.005 |
|
0.008 |
0.012 |
2.068 |
1.978 |
||
mean OD570 |
0.008 |
0.011 |
2.062 |
1.991 |
|
total mean OD570 |
0.010 |
2.027 |
|||
SD OD570 |
0.002 |
0.050 |
|||
NSCliving[%] |
0.47 |
- |
|||
Relative Tissue Viability [%] |
- |
101.7 |
98.3 |
||
Mean Relative Tissue Viability [%] |
- |
100.0 |
|||
SD Tissue Viability [%]*** |
- |
2.5 |
|||
CV [% Viabilities] |
- |
2.5 |
Result of the NSCkilled Control
NSCkilled |
TKT |
Negative Control |
|||
Tissue |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
|
Absolute OD570 -values |
0.065 |
0.078 |
2.098 |
2.048 |
|
0.064 |
0.082 |
2.111 |
2.021 |
||
Absolute OD570 - |
0.022 |
0.035 |
2.055 |
2.005 |
|
0.021 |
0.039 |
2.068 |
1.978 |
||
Mean OD570 |
0.022 |
0.037 |
2.062 |
1.991 |
|
Total Mean OD570 |
0.029 |
2.027 |
|||
SD OD570 |
0.011 |
0.050 |
|||
NSCkilled[%] |
1.45 |
- |
|||
Relative Tissue Viability [%] |
- |
101.7 |
98.3 |
||
Mean Relative Tissue Viability [%] |
- |
100.0 |
|||
SD Tissue Viability [%] |
- |
2.5 |
|||
CV [% Viabilities] |
- |
2.5 |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- In this study under the given conditions the test item showed no irritant effects. The test item is classified as “non-irritant“ in accordance with UN GHS “No Category”
- Executive summary:
In the present study the eye irritating potential of Sa 190 was analysed. Since irritant substances are cytotoxic to the corneal epithelium after a short time exposure the cytotoxic effects of the test item on EpiOcular™, a reconstituted three-dimensional human corneal epithelium model, were determined. Hereby, the test item was applied topically. Cytotoxicity is expressed as the reduction of mitochondrial dehydrogenase activity measured by formazan production from MTT after a 30 min exposure period and 120 min post-treatment period and compared to those of the concurrent negative controls.
The test item showed no irritant effects. The mean relative tissue viability (% negative control) was > 60% (97.9%; NSMTT-,NSCliving and NSCkilled-corrected).
The controls confirmed the validity of the study. The mean absolute OD570of the two negative control tissues was > 0.8 and < 2.5 (1.814). The mean relative tissue viability (% negative control) of the positive control was < 50% (20.5%). The maximum inter tissue difference of replicate tissues of all dose groups was < 20% (1.4%).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.