Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: - | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Guideline study and GLP
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 009
- Report date:
- 2009
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 201 (Alga, Growth Inhibition Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method C.3 (Algal Inhibition test)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- , see "prinicples of method if other than guideline"
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- ln OECD Guideline 201 and EU Method C.3, different compositions of stock solution ll are
stated. The study was conducted in accordance with OECD Guideline 201, therefore, the
composition of stock solution ll must be stated as deviation from EU Method C.3. - GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
Test material
Reference
- Name:
- Unnamed
- Type:
- Constituent
Sampling and analysis
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
Test solutions
- Vehicle:
- yes
Test organisms
- Test organisms (species):
- Desmodesmus subspicatus (previous name: Scenedesmus subspicatus)
Study design
- Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- yes
- Total exposure duration:
- 72 h
Results and discussion
Effect concentrationsopen allclose all
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 7 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: limit of water solubility
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- > 7 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: limit of water solubility
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- > 7 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: limit of water solubility
Any other information on results incl. tables
Two experiments were performed. Because of the algae celts in the samples after 72 hours, sample preparation via solid phase extraction wasn't possible (cartridges became clogged during extraction). Therefore the first experiment was aborted. In the second experiment, the samples after 72 hours were centrifuged. The results of the first study aren't reported- The main study was performed as a limit test using one concentration in the range of water solubility. The water solubility was determined as approximately 7 µg/L. At the start and at the end of the test, the content of the test item in the test solutions was determined using GC. In both experiments the measured values at the start of the test were in the range of water solubility. As the test item wasn't stable in under test conditions, the measured concentrations test item after 72 hours were lower than LOQ. The treatment was used to incubate the unicellular freshwater green algae Desmodesmus subspicatus for a period of 72 hours. The cell concentration of each replicate was determined by measuring the absorption of the cuvettes at 440 nm every 24 hours with a spectral photometer. With these measured values, the number of cells was calculated (linear correlation between cell concentration and absorption given). Then the growth rate, the area under the growth cunte (AUC) and the Yield were determined. The determination of the results was based on the limit of water solubility. The EC50s of potassium dichromate was tested in a current reference test. The values were within the normal range of the laboratory.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- All validity criteria were met.
The EC50s of potassium dichromate were determined in a current reference test. For the
estimation of the EC50s of the positive control, the fits showed sufficient statistical correspondence
of the data with the dose-response-equation. The values were within the normal
range of the laboratory as well as in correspondence with the values from the international
ring test which are stated in EU Method C.3.
The study was performed as a limit test in the range of water solubility. The water solubility
was determined as approximately 7 µg/L. To produce a test solulion in the range of water
solubility a stock solution containing 87.5 mg/L test item in methanol was used for the
preparation of the test solution (0.1 ml/L). The first study was aborted because of too much
algae cells the samples after 72 hours couldn't be measured (cartridges became clogged
during extraction). Therefore the samples in the second experiment were centrifuged before
sample preparation with solid phase extraction.
At the beginning of the test, the measured concentrations were in the range of water solubility
in both experiments. At the end of the test, no test item could be detected. The samples
after 72 hours were shipped on Friday 23.10.2009 and arrived at the test site not until
Tuesday 27.10.2009. As validation of the analytical method showed that the test item
wasn't stable under test conditions, but stable in solvent, this can be stated as uncritical.
Therefore the limit of water solubility was used for the determination of the results.
The result of the test can be considered valid.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.