Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 688-332-8 | CAS number: 199119-58-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 18 April 1997 to 19 August 1997
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: The study was performed to GLP and in line with standardised guidelines OECD 414 and EPA OPP 83-3 with no deviations thought to impact on the reliability of the presented results.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 999
- Report date:
- 1999
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 414 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPP 83-3 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.31 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: JMAFF 59 NohSan No. 4200
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OTS 798.4900 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- sodium 4,6-dimethoxy-N-({[3-(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)pyridin-2-yl]sulfonyl}carbamoyl)pyrimidin-2-aminide
- EC Number:
- 688-332-8
- Cas Number:
- 199119-58-9
- Molecular formula:
- C14H13F3N5O6SNa
- IUPAC Name:
- sodium 4,6-dimethoxy-N-({[3-(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)pyridin-2-yl]sulfonyl}carbamoyl)pyrimidin-2-aminide
- Test material form:
- solid: particulate/powder
- Details on test material:
- - Physical state: solid (powder)
- Storage condition of test material: room temperature
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- other: Tif:RAI f
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Age at mating: minimum 8 weeks
- Housing: individually
- Diet: pelleted, certified standard feed ad libitum
- Water: tap water ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 7 days, between delivery and the first treatment on day 6 post coitum
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 ± 3 °C
- Humidity (%): 50 ± 20 %
- Air changes (per hr): about 16 air changes/hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hours dark / 12 hours light
IN-LIFE DATES: From 18 April 1997 to 19 August 1997
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- other: 0.5% (w/w) sodium carboxymethylcellulose
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS: Test material - vehicle mixtures were prepared daily with a high speed homogeniser. Homogeneity of the mixtures during administration was obtained with a magnetic stirrer.
VEHICLE
- Concentration in vehicle: 0, 3.0, 30.0 and 100 mg/mL
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): 10 mL/kg bw - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- Duplicate samples of dosing solutions were taken once before and once after dosing on 30 April and 12 May 1997. The samples from before dosing were taken from the top, middle and bottom of the container; the samples after dosing were taken from the middle of the container. Test material concentrations were determined by HPLC.
- Details on mating procedure:
- - M/F ratio per cage: 1/3
- Length of cohabitation: overnight in mating cages
- Proof of pregnancy: vaginal plug / sperm in vaginal smear referred to as day 0 of pregnancy - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Animals received single daily doses from day 6 to day 15 post coitum
- Frequency of treatment:
- Daily from day 6 to day 15 post coitum
- Duration of test:
- Dams were sacrificed on day 21 post coitum
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 24 females per dose group
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: The dose levels were selected on the basis of results generated from a range finding study in which the test material was shown to elicit a slight effect on maternal parameters at 1000 mg/kg. No indication of teratogenesis was observed during the range finding study.
Examinations
- Maternal examinations:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: twice daily (> 6 hours apart)
- Cage side observations checked included mortality
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: daily
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: daily
FOOD CONSUMPTION : Yes (calculated as food consumption (g) per period/days per period)
- Time schedule: days 6, 11, 16 and 21
POST-MORTEM EXAMINATIONS: Yes
- Sacrifice on gestation day 21
- Organs examined: macroscopic pathological examination of the main organs of the thoracic and abdominal cavities, in particular the genitals. - Ovaries and uterine content:
- The ovaries and uterine content was examined after termination: Yes
Examinations included:
- Gravid uterus weight: Yes
- Number of corpora lutea: Yes
- Number of implantations: Yes
- Number of early resorptions: Yes
- Number of late resorptions: Yes
- Number of live and dead fetuses: Yes - Fetal examinations:
- All foetuses were weighed and sexed before sacrifice. Necropsy examinations included:
- External examinations: Yes: all per litter. Special attention was paid to the body surface, head, trunk and extremities
- Soft tissue examinations: Yes: half per litter. Examination included morphology and position of the following organs and organ systems: skin, central nervous system, eyes, body cavities, respiratory system, digestive system, endocrine system, circulatory system, excretory system, genital system
- Skeletal examinations: Yes: half per litter. Investigation included: facial bones, cranial bones, sternum, shoulder girdle, forelimbs, pelvic girdle, hindlimbs, ribs and spinal column
- Head examinations: Yes: all per litter. Examination included: cranioschisis, encephalocele and cleft palate - Statistics:
- Statistical analysis of continuous data was performed using the Analysis of Variance Procedure followed by Dunnett's t-Test in case of a significant result. Categorical data were analysed using Chi-Square test followed by Fischer's Exact test in case of a significant result. Non-parametric data were analysed using Kruskal-Wallis non parametric analysis of variance test followed by Dunn test.
- Historical control data:
- Historical control data was available for comparison of the findings.
Results and discussion
Results: maternal animals
Maternal developmental toxicity
- Details on maternal toxic effects:
- Maternal toxic effects:yes
Details on maternal toxic effects:
There were no premature mortalities during the study and no statistically significant differences in mean body weights across the groups.
Mean maternal body weight gains from day 16 to termination were approximately 10% and 7% less than that of the controls in the high and mid-dose groups, respectively although the difference were not statistically significant. Food consumption over the treatment period was reduced by approximately 11% and 6% in the high and mid-dose groups respectively, and the differences from control were deemed to be statistically significant.
Net weight change (carcass weight minus day 6 weight) was reduced by 21% in the high dose group and by 17% in the mid-dose group. Although not statistically significant, these differences correlate with the reduction in food consumption observed in both groups, and are therefore regarded as an indication of maternal toxicity.
In the low dose group, the slightly reduced net weight change was due to a higher than usual gravid uterus weight, and not considered treatment related.
Incidental clinical findings included chromodacryorrhea in one mid-dose animals, crust/scurf and/or wound in two mid-dose animals and hair loss in one high dose animal. Occasional vaginal bloody discharges were also observed in three low dose animals and in one high dose animal. These findings were not considered to be treatment related.
19, 22, 20 and 23 positively mated females were pregnant in the control, 30, 300 and 1000 mg/kg groups, respectively. All of them were sacrificed at termination on day 21 of pregnancy and were found to have viable fetuses. A non-dose response increase in the number of corpora lutea in the low and mid-dose groups resulted from the unusually low number observed in control animal ovaries compared to historical data, and therefore was not considered to be of any significance.
Preimplantation losses, the number of implantation sites, and early and late post implantation losses were regarded as similar in all groups. There were no dead or aborted foetuses. Maternal necropsy confirmed the clinical observations of skin lesions in two animals of the mid-dose group and hair loss in one animal of the high dose group. These findings were considered incidental. There were no other findings at gross necropsy.
Effect levels (maternal animals)
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 30 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: maternal toxicity
Results (fetuses)
- Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
- Embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:yes. Remark: reduction in food consumption and net weight change
Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
Foetal weights were lower both in the high and mid-dose groups compared to controls but statistical significance was achieved in the high dose group only. Although the means were within the historical range, this body weight reduction was regarded as treatment-related and as an indication of delayed foetal development.
There were a number of visceral - thymus, liver and kidney findings, the incidences of which were similar in all dose groups. A collection of blood stained fluid was observed in the abdomen of two foetuses, one from each of the mid and high dose groups. This finding was considered to be incidental. A generalised oedema was observed in two foetuses from the low dose group. In the absence of any similar abnormalities in the mid and high dose groups, this was not attributed to treatment. No other findings were reported at foetal external examination. No skeletal malformations were found. Increased incidences of a few skeletal variations were observed in mid and high dose group foetuses, principally delayed ossifications of a few skeletal elements. The affected skeletal districts – sternum, thoracic vertebrae, metatarsus, fingers and toes became ossified late in the pregnancy and their incomplete ossification at day 21 was seen, together with the reduction in foetus weight, as an indication of developmental retardation in these two dose groups.
Effect levels (fetuses)
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 30 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: fetotoxicity
Fetal abnormalities
- Abnormalities:
- not specified
Overall developmental toxicity
- Developmental effects observed:
- not specified
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1: Mean Maternal Feed Consumption (g)
Time period |
Treatment group (mg/kg) |
|||
0 |
30 |
300 |
1000 |
|
Days 0-6 |
22.8 |
22.6 |
22.6 |
22.6 |
Days 6-11 |
24.5 |
23.9 |
22.8* |
21.5** |
Days 11-16 |
25.7 |
25.4 |
24.2* |
23.3** |
Days 16-21 |
25.9 |
25.1 |
24.6 |
24.7 |
Days 6-16 |
25.1 |
24.6 |
23.5* |
22.4** |
* p ≤ 0.05
** p ≤ 0.01
Table 2: Mean Uterine and Carcass Weights (g)
Treatment group (mg/kg) |
||||
0 |
30 |
300 |
1000 |
|
Gravid uterus |
97.5 |
104.9 |
89.6 |
96.1 |
Carcass |
263.5 |
257.1 |
255.7 |
255.7 |
Net weight change from day 6 |
37.0 |
32.2 |
30.8 |
29.4 |
Table 3: Mean Foetal Body Weights (g)
Treatment group (mg/kg) |
||||
0 |
30 |
300 |
1000 |
|
Foetal body weight (g) |
5.6 |
5.4 |
5.3 |
5.3* |
* p≤ 0.05
Table 4: Summary of all Foetal Skeletal Observations
Treatment group (mg/kg) |
||||
0 |
30 |
300 |
1000 |
|
Litters evaluated |
19 |
22 |
20 |
23 |
Foetuses evaluated |
127 |
162 |
140 |
160 |
Live |
127 |
162 |
140 |
160 |
Dead |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Total malformations |
||||
Foetal incidences |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Litter incidences |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Affected foetuses/litter |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Total anomalies |
||||
Foetal incidences |
11 |
14 |
9 |
31* |
Litter incidences |
7 |
11 |
6 |
16 |
Affected foetuses/litter |
8.41 |
8.47 |
6.149 |
20.78 |
Total variations |
||||
Foetal incidences |
126 |
162 |
140 |
160 |
Litter incidences |
19 |
22 |
20 |
23 |
Affected foetuses/litter |
99.25 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
* p≤ 0.05
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions of the study, administration of the test material at doses above 30 mg/kg bw/day elicited maternal toxicity, characterised by reduced maternal net weight loss. The litters of these animals showed reduced foetal weight and an increased incidence of skeletal abnormalities. In the remaining litters, the incidence of foetal effects did not greatly differ from normal values. There was no adverse effect of treatment, maternal or foetal, at 30 mg/kg/day in this study. The NOAEL for both maternal and embryo/foetotoxicity in this study was therefore considered to be 30 mg/kg bw/day.
The study is considered to be reliable, relevant and adequate for risk assessment and classification and labelling purposes. - Executive summary:
In a GLP compliant study conducted in line with standardised guidelines OECD 414 and EPA OPP 83-3, the effect of the test material on developmental toxicity was determined in the rat. Rats were administered the test material daily, by oral (gavage), at 0, 30, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw from day 6 to day 15 post coitum. The animals were checked daily for clinical signs and mortality and body weight and food consumption were measured daily. Maternal animals were sacrificed on day 21 post coitum and subjected to gross necropsy. The uteri were dissected and contents examined. Foetuses were weighed, sexed and inspected for external, visceral and skeletal abnormalities. During the study there were no premature mortalities.
In the high dose group, maternal toxicity was evidenced by an 11% decrease in food consumption over the period of dosing and a 21% decrease of carcass weight minus day 6 weight. Slight but statistically significant reduction in foetal weight and increased incidences of a few skeletal variations were considered to be the consequence of a delay in foetal development and therefore secondary to maternal toxicity.
In the mid-dose group a significant 6 % reduction in food consumption over the period of treatment was also observed and the carcass weight minus day 6 weight was reduced by 17 %. Lower foetal weights and increased incidences of incomplete ossification of posterior digit phalanges were also recorded.
In the low dose group no treatment-related findings were observed.
Under the conditions of the study the test material was not embryotoxic, foetotoxic, or teratogenic in rats. A slight reduction in foetal weight and increased incidences of a few skeletal variations were considered related to delayed development and secondary to maternal toxicity at 300 and 1000 mg/kg and based on these observations, the maternal and foetal NOAELs were defined as 30 mg/kg.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.