Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 688-332-8 | CAS number: 199119-58-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to terrestrial plants
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
Description of key information
NOEC 0.0237 g/ha, EC50 0.0907 g/ha, EC25 0.0237 g/ha, EPA OPPTS 850.4225 and 850.4250, Schwab 2000.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
Schwab (2000) is a tier 2 toxicity study performed on ten different crop species; Daucus carota, Cucumis sativus, Lactuca sativa, Raphanus sativus, Glycine max, Lycipersicon esculentum, Zea mays, Lolium perenne, Avena sativa and Allium cepa. Plants were all exposed to the test material in a single application made over a dosing range of 52, 26, 13, 6.5, 3.25, 1.63, 0.815 and 0.408 g/ha. Plants were observed for two to three weeks and assessed for visible injury, percent emergence and growth in the emergence test and visible injury and growth in the vegetative vigour test.
Under the conditions of the test effects on growth were observed in all species with the exception of the tomato in the vegetative vigour test. The species identified as being most sensitive according to the different effect parameters are the radish, lettuce and ryegrass. Overall the most sensitive endpoint appears to be visible injury where the radish was shown to be the most sensitive species according to phytotoxic ratings.
All species rated for visible injury in the emergence test exhibited a significant difference from the controls. The lettuce and radish were considered to be the most sensitive having NOEC values of 0.815 and 0.640 g/ha, respectively. EC₅₀ values for the two species were determined to be 4.66 and 8.87 g/ha. The main effects noted were stunting and chlorosis.
The radish was also considered the most sensitive in the vigour test based on phytotoxic ratings with corresponding NOEC and EC₅₀ values of 0.0237 and 0.0907 g/ha.
Out of the 10 different plant species tested for percentage emergence five showed significant (p=0.05) difference from the control, where ryegrass was considered to be the most sensitive. The NOEC was determined to be 6.5 g a.i./ha and the EC₅₀ of 15.2 g/ha.
All species showed a significant (p=0.05) difference, in comparison to the control, for both shoot length and shoot weight in the emergence test. Lettuce was the most sensitive plant following a pre-emergence application of the test material. The NOEC and EC₅₀ values were determined to be 0.815 and 5.41 g/ha, respectively, for shoot length. The NOEC and EC₅₀ for shoot weight were determined to be 0.815 and 3.32 g g/ha.
Comparison of plant shoot length and dry weigh to controls showed that again the radish was the most sensitive species in the vegetative vigour test. All species showed significant difference (p=0.05), with the exception of the Tomato, lettuce did not show significance for shoot length alone. The radish shoot length NOEC and EC₅₀ were determined to be 0.0710 and 2.74 g/ha, respectively. The radish dry weight NOEC and EC₅₀ were determined to be 0.0237 and 0.139 g/ha, respectively.
The study was performed according to GLP, in line with standardised guidelines, with a high standard of reporting and has thus been assigned a reliability score of 1 in line with the principles for assessing data quality set out by Klimisch (1997). The study is considered to be reliable, relevant and adequate for risk assessment purposes.
The available data are considered to be complete and the following conclusions for toxicity have been taken forward for risk assessment based on the worst case scenario using the most sensitive data; NOEC 0.0237 g /ha and EC₅₀0.0907 g/ha (all concentrations are representative of the active ingredient and corrected for sample purity).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.