Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 202-860-4 | CAS number: 100-52-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / micronucleus study
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 25 October 2018 - 17 December 2018
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 019
- Report date:
- 2019
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 487 (In vitro Mammalian Cell Micronucleus Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian cell micronucleus test
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Benzaldehyde
- EC Number:
- 202-860-4
- EC Name:
- Benzaldehyde
- Cas Number:
- 100-52-7
- Molecular formula:
- C7H6O
- IUPAC Name:
- benzaldehyde
- Test material form:
- liquid
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Source and lot/batch No.of test material: Emerald Kalama Chemical BV (The Netherlands); Lot No. 1803-1
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 2020-01-15
- Purity test date: 2018-09-18
STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: stored at 15-25°C, protected from light under nitrogen
- Stability under test conditions: no analyses of the stability of the test article in administered formulations or dilutions was undertaken as fresh preparations of test article were employed
- Solubility and stability of the test substance in the solvent/vehicle: Preliminary solubility data indicated that Kalama® Benzaldehyde FCC grade was soluble in anhydrous analytical grade dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) at a concentration of at least 119.5 mg/mL.
TREATMENT OF TEST MATERIAL PRIOR TO TESTING
Test article stock solutions were prepared by formulating Kalama® Benzaldehyde FCC grade under subdued lighting in DMSO, with the aid of vortex mixing, to give
the maximum required concentration. Subsequent dilutions were made using DMSO. The test article solutions were protected from light and used within approximately 4 hours of initial formulation.
FORM AS APPLIED IN THE TEST (if different from that of starting material) : colourless liquid
Method
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- lymphocytes: human peripheral blood lymphocytes
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- CELLS USED
- Source of cells: Blood from two healthy, non-smoking Female volunteers from a panel of donors at Covance was used for each experiment.
- Suitability of cells: The use of human peripheral blood lymphocytes is recommended because the cells are only used in short-term culture and maintain a stable karyotype (Evans & O’Riordan, 1975).
- Cell cycle length, doubling time or proliferation index: Cell cycle length: 13 ± 2 hour
- Sex, age and number of blood donors if applicable: Blood from two healthy, non-smoking Female volunteers (Range-Finder: 34, 30 years; Micronucleus Experiment: 23, 34 Years)
- Whether whole blood or separated lymphocytes were used if applicable: human lymphocyte cultures prepared from the pooled blood of two female donors
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Mammalian liver post-mitochondrial fraction (S9) prepared from male Sprague Dawley rats induced with Aroclor 1254.
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Cytotoxicity Range-Finder Experiment:
3+21 Hour Treatment (-S9): 3.853, 6.422, 10.70, 17.84, 29.73, 49.55, 82.58, 137.6, 229.4, 382.3, 637.2, 1062 µg/mL
3+21 Hour Treatment (+S9): 3.853, 6.422, 10.70, 17.84, 29.73, 49.55, 82.58, 137.6, 229.4, 382.3, 637.2, 1062 µg/mL
24+24 Hour Treatments (-S9): 3.853, 6.422, 10.70, 17.84, 29.73, 49.55, 82.58, 137.6, 229.4, 382.3, 637.2, 1062 µg/mL
A maximum concentration of 1062 µg/mL was selected for the cytotoxicity Range-Finder Experiment in order that treatments were performed up to a maximum concentration equivalent to 10 mM (a suitable maximum concentration for in vitro genetic toxicology assays of this type), based on the test article molecular weight of 106.121. No marked changes in osmolality or pH were observed at the highest concentration tested in the Range-Finder (1062 µg/mL), compared to the concurrent vehicle controls. The results of the cytotoxicity Range-Finder Experiment were used to select suitable maximum concentrations for the Micronucleus Experiment.
Micronucleus Experiment:
3+21 Hour Treatments (-S9): 100, 200, 400, 500, 600, 650, 700, 750, 800, 850, 950, 1062 µg/mL
3+21 Hour Treatments (+S9): 100, 200, 400, 500, 600, 650, 700, 750, 800, 850, 950, 1062 µg/mL
24+24 Hour Treatments (-S9): 50, 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, 350, 400, 450, 600 µg/mL - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: Preliminary solubility data indicated that Kalama® Benzaldehyde FCC grade was soluble in anhydrous analytical grade dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) at a concentration of at least 119.5 mg/mL.
Controls
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- mitomycin C
- other: Vinblastine (VIN): Treatment Regime: -S9: 24+24 (concentration: 0.04 µg/mL)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Preincubation period: approximately 48 hours
- Exposure duration: 3 (±S9) or 24 hours (-S9)
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): -S9 (3 hour treatment): 72 hours; -S9 (24 hour treatment): 96 hours; + S9 (3 hour treatment): 72 hours
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): Cytochalasin B (Cyto-B (formulated in DMSO) added to post wash-off culture medium to give a final concentration of 6 µg/mL per culture.
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): Acridine Orange in phosphate buffered saline (PBS), pH 6.8
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2
METHODS OF SLIDE PREPARATION AND STAINING TECHNIQUE USED: Lymphocytes were kept in fixative at 2-8°C prior to slide preparation for a minimum of 3 hours to ensure that cells were adequately fixed. Cells were centrifuged (approximately 1250 g, two to three minutes) and resuspended in a minimal amount of fresh fixative (if required) to give a milky suspension. Several drops of cell suspension were gently spread onto multiple clean, dry microscope slides. Slides were air-dried and stored protected from light at room temperature prior to staining. Slides were stained by immersion in 12.5 µg/mL Acridine Orange in phosphate buffered saline (PBS), pH 6.8 for approximately 10 minutes and washed with PBS (with agitation) for a few seconds. The quality of the staining was checked. Slides were air-dried and stored protected from light at room temperature. Immediately prior to analysis 1-2 drops of PBS were added to the slides before mounting with glass coverslips.
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: A minimum ofone thousand binucleate cells from each culture (2000 per concentration) were analysed for micronuclei. For the 24 hour treatment in the absence of S9, an additional 1000 binucleate cells from each culture (therefore 4000 per concentration) were analysed from the test article concentrations selected for analysis.
CRITERIA FOR MICRONUCLEUS IDENTIFICATION: A micronucleus was only recorded if it met the following criteria:
1. The micronucleus had the same staining characteristics and a similar morphology to the main nuclei, and
2. Any micronucleus present was separate in the cytoplasm or only just touching a main nucleus, and
3. Micronuclei were smooth edged and smaller than approximately one third the diameter of the main nuclei.
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: mitotic index; cloning efficiency; relative total growth; other: Relative index (RI)
- Any supplementary information relevant to cytotoxicity: Slides from the cytotoxicity Range-Finder Experiment were examined, uncoded, for proportions of mono-, bi- and multinucleate cells, to a minimum of 200 cells per concentration. From these data the replication index (RI) was determined. RI, which indicates the relative number of nuclei compared to vehicle controls was determined using the formula as follows:
RI = (number binucleate cells + 2 (number multinucleate cells) / total number of cells in treated cultures)
Relative RI (expressed in terms of percentage) for each treated culture was calculated as follows:
Relative RI (%) = (RI of treated cultures / RI of vehicle controls) x 100
Cytotoxicity (%) is expressed as (100 – Relative RI)
A selection of random fields was observed from enough treatments to determine whether chemically induced cell cycle delay or cytotoxicity had occurred. - Rationale for test conditions:
- Please see 'Any other information on materials and methods incl. tables' for information on Rationale for Test Conditions.
- Evaluation criteria:
- For valid data, the test article was considered to induce clastogenic and/or aneugenic events if:
1. A statistically significant increase in the frequency of MNBN cells at one or more concentrations was observed
2. An incidence of MNBN cells at such a concentration that exceeded the normal range in both replicates was observed
3. A concentration-related increase in the proportion of MNBN cells was observed (positive trend test).
The test article was considered positive in this assay if all of the above criteria were met.
The test article was considered negative in this assay if none of the above criteria were met.
Results which only partially satisfied the above criteria were dealt with on a case-by case basis. Evidence of a concentration-related effect was considered useful but not essential in the evaluation of a positive result (Scott et al., 1990). Biological relevance was taken into account, for example consistency of response within and between concentrations (Thybaud et al., 2007). - Statistics:
- After completion of scoring and decoding of slides, the numbers of binucleate cells with micronuclei (MNBN cells) in each culture were obtained.
The proportions of MNBN cells in each replicate were used to establish acceptable heterogeneity between replicates by means of a binomial dispersion test (Richardson et al., 1989).
The proportions of MNBN cells for each treatment condition were compared with the proportion in vehicle controls by using Fisher's exact test (Richardson et al., 1989). A Cochran-Armitage trend test was applied to each treatment condition. Probability values of p ≤0.05 were accepted as significant.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- lymphocytes: human peripheral blood lymphocytes
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- No marked changes in osmolality or pH were observed at the highest concentration tested in the Range-Finder (1062 µg/mL), compared to the concurrent vehicle controls (individual data not reported).
The proportion of micronucleated binucleate (MNBN) cells in negative (vehicle) control cultures fell within (or very close to) the 95th percentile of the current observed historical vehicle control (normal) ranges. All positive control compounds induced statistically significant increases in the proportion of cells with micronuclei.
All acceptance criteria were considered met and the study was accepted as valid.
Validity of Study
1. The binomial dispersion test demonstrated acceptable heterogeneity (in terms of MNBN cell frequency) between replicate cultures for the 3+21 hour and 24+24 hour treatments in the absence of S9. Statistically significant heterogeneity (p≤0.01) was observed for the 3+21 hour treatment in the presence of S9, primarily due to large differences in MNBN cell frequencies between replicates for the vehicle control and the lowest test article concentration analysed (400 µg/mL). However, none of the MNBN cell frequency values exceeded the normal range under this treatment condition, therefore the observed heterogeneity did not affect the interpretation of the data
2. The frequency of MNBN cells in vehicle controls fell within the normal ranges with the exception of two of the four vehicle control cultures analysed for the 24+24 hour treatment in the absence of S9, one of which fell within the observed range. However, the mean vehicle control MNBN cell frequency was within the normal range and the data were considered acceptable.
3. The positive control chemicals induced statistically significant increases in the proportion of MNBN cells. Both replicate cultures at the positive control concentration analysed under each treatment condition demonstrated MNBN cell frequencies that clearly exceeded the normal range.
4. A minimum of 50% of cells had gone through at least one cell division (as measured by binucleate + multinucleate cell counts) in vehicle control cultures at the time of harvest.
5. The maximum concentration analysed under each treatment condition met the criteria specified.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 4. Range-Finder: -S9: Results of the 3+21 Hour Treatments |
|||||||
Treatment (µg/mL) |
Replicate |
Mono |
Bi |
Multi |
Total |
RI |
Cytotoxicity Based on RI (%) |
Vehicle |
A |
64 |
125 |
11 |
200 |
0.74 |
|
B |
52 |
133 |
15 |
200 |
0.82 |
|
|
Total |
116 |
258 |
26 |
400 |
0.78 |
- |
|
3.853 |
A |
NSc |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
6.422 |
A |
NSc |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
10.70 |
A |
NSc |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
17.84 |
A |
NSc |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
29.73 |
A |
42 |
148 |
10 |
200 |
0.84 |
0 |
49.55 |
A |
58 |
139 |
3 |
200 |
0.73 |
6 |
82.58 |
A |
49 |
140 |
11 |
200 |
0.81 |
0 |
137.6 |
A |
54 |
135 |
11 |
200 |
0.79 |
0 |
229.4 |
A |
52 |
138 |
10 |
200 |
0.79 |
0 |
382.3 |
A |
75 |
123 |
2 |
200 |
0.64 |
18 |
637.2 |
A |
96 |
104 |
0 |
200 |
0.52 |
33P |
1062 |
A |
183 |
17 |
0 |
200 |
0.09 |
89P |
P = Precipitation observed at treatment
NSc = Not scored
Mono = Mononucleate
Bi = Binucleate
Multi = Multinucleate
RI = Replication index
Table 5. Range-Finder: +S9: Results of the 3+21 Hour Treatments |
|||||||
Treatment (µg/mL) |
Replicate |
Mono |
Bi |
Multi |
Total |
RI |
Cytotoxicity Based on RI (%) |
Vehicle |
A |
50 |
139 |
11 |
200 |
0.81 |
|
B |
56 |
127 |
17 |
200 |
0.81 |
|
|
Total |
106 |
266 |
28 |
400 |
0.81 |
- |
|
3.853 |
A |
NSc |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
6.422 |
A |
NSc |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
10.70 |
A |
NSc |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
17.84 |
A |
64 |
122 |
14 |
200 |
0.75 |
7 |
29.73 |
A |
55 |
133 |
12 |
200 |
0.79 |
2 |
49.55 |
A |
58 |
137 |
5 |
200 |
0.74 |
9 |
82.58 |
A |
45 |
138 |
17 |
200 |
0.86 |
0 |
137.6 |
A |
59 |
132 |
9 |
200 |
0.75 |
7 |
229.4 |
A |
57 |
138 |
5 |
200 |
0.74 |
8 |
382.3 |
A |
78 |
118 |
4 |
200 |
0.63 |
22 |
637.2 |
A |
96 |
102 |
2 |
200 |
0.53 |
34P |
1062 |
A |
177 |
23 |
0 |
200 |
0.12 |
86P |
P = Precipitation observed at treatment
NSc = Not scored
Mono = Mononucleate
Bi = Binucleate
Multi = Multinucleate
RI = Replication index
Table 6. Range-Finder: +S9: Results of the 24+24 Hour Treatments |
|||||||
Treatment (µg/mL) |
Replicate |
Mono |
Bi |
Multi |
Total |
RI |
Cytotoxicity Based on RI (%) |
Vehicle |
A |
28 |
146 |
26 |
200 |
0.99 |
|
B |
39 |
142 |
19 |
200 |
0.90 |
|
|
Total |
67 |
288 |
45 |
400 |
0.95 |
- |
|
3.853 |
A |
NSc |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
6.422 |
A |
NSc |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
10.70 |
A |
NSc |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
17.84 |
A |
31 |
148 |
21 |
200 |
0.95 |
0 |
29.73 |
A |
24 |
152 |
24 |
200 |
1.00 |
0 |
49.55 |
A |
23 |
155 |
22 |
200 |
1.00 |
0 |
82.58 |
A |
48 |
144 |
8 |
200 |
0.80 |
15 |
137.6 |
A |
80 |
118 |
2 |
200 |
0.61 |
35 |
229.4 |
A |
124 |
74 |
2 |
200 |
0.39 |
59 |
382.3 |
A |
119 |
74 |
7 |
200 |
0.55 |
53 |
637.2 |
A |
194 |
6 |
0 |
200 |
0.03 |
97P |
1062 |
A |
199 |
1 |
0 |
200 |
0.01 |
99P |
P = Precipitation observed at treatment
NSc = Not scored
Mono = Mononucleate
Bi = Binucleate
Multi = Multinucleate
RI = Replication index
Table 7. Micronucleus Experiment: -S9: Results of the 3+21 Hour Treatments |
|||||||
Treatment (µg/mL) |
Replicate |
Mono |
Bi |
Multi |
Total |
RI |
Cytotoxicity Based on RI (%) |
Vehicle |
A |
112 |
360 |
28 |
500 |
0.83 |
|
B |
127 |
347 |
26 |
500 |
0.80 |
|
|
C |
85 |
380 |
35 |
500 |
0.90 |
|
|
D |
88 |
378 |
34 |
500 |
0.89 |
|
|
Total |
412 |
1465 |
123 |
2000 |
0.86 |
- |
|
100.0 |
A |
134 |
344 |
22 |
500 |
0.78 |
|
B |
114 |
365 |
21 |
500 |
0.81 |
|
|
Total |
248 |
709 |
43 |
1000 |
0.80 |
7 |
|
200.0 |
A |
143 |
328 |
29 |
500 |
0.77 |
|
B |
160 |
315 |
25 |
500 |
0.73 |
|
|
Total |
303 |
643 |
54 |
1000 |
0.75 |
12 |
|
400.0 |
A |
140 |
348 |
12 |
500 |
0.74 |
|
B |
152 |
337 |
11 |
500 |
0.72 |
|
|
Total |
292 |
685 |
23 |
1000 |
0.73 |
15 # |
|
500.0 |
A |
183 |
311 |
6 |
500 |
0.65 |
|
B |
170 |
325 |
5 |
500 |
0.67 |
|
|
Total |
353 |
636 |
11 |
1000 |
0.66 |
23 |
|
600.0 |
A |
213 |
286 |
1 |
500 |
0.58 |
|
B |
244 |
255 |
1 |
500 |
0.51 |
|
|
Total |
457 |
541 |
2 |
1000 |
0.55 |
36 # |
|
650.0 |
A |
246 |
249 |
5 |
500 |
0.52 |
|
B |
237 |
261 |
2 |
500 |
0.53 |
|
|
Total |
483 |
510 |
7 |
1000 |
0.52 |
39 |
|
700.0 |
A |
225 |
271 |
4 |
500 |
0.56 |
|
B |
279 |
219 |
2 |
500 |
0.45 |
|
|
Total |
504 |
490 |
6 |
1000 |
0.50 |
41 |
|
750.0 |
A |
265 |
234 |
1 |
500 |
0.47 |
|
B |
285 |
213 |
2 |
500 |
0.43 |
|
|
Total |
550 |
447 |
3 |
1000 |
0.45 |
47 |
|
800.0 |
A |
305 |
193 |
2 |
500 |
0.39 |
|
B |
294 |
206 |
0 |
500 |
0.41 |
|
|
Total |
599 |
399 |
2 |
1000 |
0.40 |
53 # |
|
850.0 |
A |
308 |
191 |
1 |
500 |
0.39 |
|
B |
303 |
194 |
3 |
500 |
0.40 |
|
|
Total |
611 |
385 |
4 |
1000 |
0.39 |
54 |
|
950.0 |
A |
348 |
151 |
1 |
500 |
0.31 |
|
B |
381 |
117 |
2 |
500 |
0.24 |
|
|
Total |
729 |
268 |
3 |
1000 |
0.27 |
68 P |
|
1062 |
A |
473 |
27 |
0 |
500 |
0.05 |
|
B |
456 |
44 |
0 |
500 |
0.09 |
|
|
Total |
929 |
71 |
0 |
1000 |
0.07 |
92 P |
|
MMC, 0.30 |
A |
250 |
249 |
1 |
500 |
0.50 |
|
B |
244 |
255 |
1 |
500 |
0.51 |
|
|
Total |
494 |
504 |
2 |
1000 |
0.51 |
41 # |
P = Precipitation observed at treatment
Mono = Mononucleate
Bi = Binucleate
Multi = Multinucleate
RI = Replication index
# Highlighted concentrations selected for analysis
Table 8. Micronucleus Experiment: +S9: Results of the 3+21 Hour Treatments |
|||||||
Treatment (µg/mL) |
Replicate |
Mono |
Bi |
Multi |
Total |
RI |
Cytotoxicity Based on RI (%) |
Vehicle |
A |
132 |
341 |
27 |
500 |
0.79 |
|
B |
117 |
342 |
41 |
500 |
0.85 |
|
|
C |
115 |
369 |
16 |
500 |
0.80 |
|
|
D |
110 |
366 |
24 |
500 |
0.83 |
|
|
Total |
474 |
1418 |
108 |
2000 |
0.82 |
- |
|
100.0 |
A |
144 |
343 |
13 |
500 |
0.74 |
|
B |
106 |
366 |
28 |
500 |
0.84 |
|
|
Total |
250 |
709 |
41 |
1000 |
0.79 |
3 |
|
200.0 |
A |
124 |
364 |
12 |
500 |
0.78 |
|
B |
103 |
379 |
18 |
500 |
0.83 |
|
|
Total |
227 |
743 |
30 |
1000 |
0.80 |
2 |
|
400.0 |
A |
148 |
343 |
9 |
500 |
0.72 |
|
B |
130 |
363 |
7 |
500 |
0.75 |
|
|
Total |
278 |
706 |
16 |
1000 |
0.74 |
10 # |
|
500.0 |
A |
204 |
292 |
4 |
500 |
0.60 |
|
B |
187 |
310 |
3 |
500 |
0.63 |
|
|
Total |
391 |
602 |
7 |
1000 |
0.62 |
25 |
|
600.0 |
A |
250 |
247 |
3 |
500 |
0.51 |
|
B |
239 |
259 |
2 |
500 |
0.53 |
|
|
Total |
489 |
506 |
5 |
1000 |
0.52 |
37 # |
|
650.0 |
A |
258 |
237 |
5 |
500 |
0.49 |
|
B |
255 |
244 |
1 |
500 |
0.49 |
|
|
Total |
513 |
481 |
6 |
1000 |
0.49 |
40 |
|
700.0 |
A |
230 |
269 |
1 |
500 |
0.54 |
|
B |
274 |
226 |
0 |
500 |
0.45 |
|
|
Total |
504 |
495 |
1 |
1000 |
0.50 |
39 |
|
750.0 |
A |
270 |
227 |
3 |
500 |
0.47 |
|
B |
270 |
230 |
0 |
500 |
0.46 |
|
|
Total |
540 |
457 |
3 |
1000 |
0.46 |
43 |
|
800.0 |
A |
321 |
177 |
2 |
500 |
0.36 |
|
B |
303 |
197 |
0 |
500 |
0.39 |
|
|
Total |
624 |
374 |
2 |
1000 |
0.38 |
54 # |
|
850.0 |
A |
353 |
145 |
2 |
500 |
0.30 |
|
B |
317 |
181 |
2 |
500 |
0.37 |
|
|
Total |
670 |
326 |
4 |
1000 |
0.33 |
59 |
|
950.0 |
A |
370 |
128 |
2 |
500 |
0.26 |
|
B |
366 |
134 |
0 |
500 |
0.27 |
|
|
Total |
736 |
262 |
2 |
1000 |
0.27 |
67 P |
|
1062 |
A |
415 |
84 |
1 |
500 |
0.17 |
|
B |
403 |
96 |
1 |
500 |
0.20 |
|
|
Total |
818 |
180 |
2 |
1000 |
0.18 |
77 P |
|
CPA, 3.00 |
A |
181 |
312 |
7 |
500 |
0.65 |
|
B |
151 |
342 |
7 |
500 |
0.71 |
|
|
Total |
332 |
654 |
14 |
1000 |
0.68 |
17 |
|
CPA, 5.00 |
A |
218 |
280 |
2 |
500 |
0.57 |
|
B |
235 |
264 |
1 |
500 |
0.53 |
|
|
Total |
453 |
544 |
3 |
1000 |
0.55 |
|
|
CPA, 7.00 |
A |
244 |
255 |
1 |
500 |
0.51 |
|
B |
243 |
257 |
0 |
500 |
0.51 |
|
|
Total |
487 |
512 |
1 |
1000 |
0.51 |
37 # |
P = Precipitation observed at treatment
Mono = Mononucleate
Bi = Binucleate
Multi = Multinucleate
RI = Replication index
# Highlighted concentrations selected for analysis
Table 9. Micronucleus Experiment: -S9: Results of the 24+24 Hour Treatments |
|||||||
Treatment (µg/mL) |
Replicate |
Mono |
Bi |
Multi |
Total |
RI |
Cytotoxicity Based on RI (%) |
Vehicle |
A |
33 |
347 |
120 |
500 |
1.17 |
|
B |
41 |
326 |
133 |
500 |
1.18 |
|
|
C |
38 |
328 |
134 |
500 |
1.19 |
|
|
D |
32 |
366 |
102 |
500 |
1.14 |
|
|
Total |
144 |
1367 |
489 |
2000 |
1.17 |
|
|
50.0 |
A |
46 |
353 |
101 |
500 |
1.11 |
|
B |
53 |
342 |
105 |
500 |
1.10 |
|
|
Total |
99 |
695 |
206 |
1000 |
1.11 |
6 # |
|
100.0 |
A |
113 |
363 |
24 |
500 |
0.82 |
|
B |
124 |
346 |
30 |
500 |
0.81 |
|
|
Total |
237 |
709 |
54 |
1000 |
0.82 |
30 # |
|
150.0 |
A |
151 |
331 |
18 |
500 |
0.73 |
|
B |
174 |
320 |
6 |
500 |
0.66 |
|
|
Total |
325 |
651 |
24 |
1000 |
0.70 |
40 |
|
200.0 |
A |
264 |
230 |
6 |
500 |
0.48 |
|
B |
222 |
269 |
9 |
500 |
0.57 |
|
|
Total |
486 |
499 |
15 |
1000 |
0.53 |
55 # |
|
250.0 |
A |
337 |
158 |
5 |
500 |
0.34 |
|
B |
266 |
222 |
12 |
500 |
0.49 |
|
|
Total |
603 |
380 |
17 |
1000 |
0.41 |
65 |
|
300.0 |
A |
285 |
188 |
27 |
500 |
0.65 |
|
B |
312 |
175 |
13 |
500 |
0.40 |
|
|
Total |
697 |
363 |
40 |
1000 |
0.44 |
62 |
|
350.0 |
A |
212 |
250 |
38 |
500 |
0.65 |
|
B |
262 |
202 |
36 |
500 |
0.55 |
|
|
Total |
474 |
452 |
74 |
1000 |
0.60 |
49 |
|
400.0 |
A |
275 |
211 |
14 |
500 |
0.48 |
|
B |
291 |
199 |
10 |
500 |
0.44 |
|
|
Total |
566 |
410 |
24 |
1000 |
0.46 |
61 |
|
450.0 |
A |
348 |
147 |
5 |
500 |
0.31 |
|
B |
363 |
134 |
3 |
500 |
0.28 |
|
|
Total |
711 |
281 |
8 |
1000 |
0.30 |
75 |
|
600.0 |
A |
478 |
21 |
1 |
500 |
0.05 |
|
B |
478 |
22 |
0 |
500 |
0.04 |
|
|
Total |
956 |
43 |
1 |
1000 |
0.05 |
96 |
|
VIN, 0.04 |
A |
195 |
225 |
80 |
500 |
0.77 |
|
B |
227 |
199 |
74 |
500 |
0.69 |
|
|
Total |
422 |
424 |
154 |
1000 |
0.73 |
38 # |
Mono = Mononucleate
Bi = Binucleate
Multi = Multinucleate
RI = Replication index
# Highlighted concentrations selected for analysis
Table 10. Summary of Results of the Micronucleus Test |
|||||
Treatment |
Concentration (µg/mL) |
Cytotoxicity (%)$ |
Mean MNBN Cell Frequency (%) |
Historical Control Range (%)# |
Statistical Significance |
3+21 hour -S9 |
Vehiclea |
- |
0.60 |
0.00 to 1.01 |
- |
400.0 |
15 |
0.60 |
NS |
||
600.0 |
36 |
0.45 |
NS |
||
800.0 |
53 |
0.50 |
NS |
||
*MMC, 0.30 |
41 |
7.00 |
p≤0.001 |
||
|
|||||
3+21 hour +S9 |
Vehiclea |
- |
0.50 |
0.10 to 1.20 |
- |
400.0 |
10 |
0.35 |
NS |
||
600.0 |
37 |
0.90 |
NS |
||
800.0 |
54 |
0.80 |
NS |
||
*CPA, 7.00 |
37 |
3.10 |
p≤0.001 |
||
|
|||||
24+24 hour -S9 |
Vehiclea |
- |
0.75 |
0.10 to 0.80 |
- |
50.0 |
6 |
0.60 |
NS |
||
100.0 |
30 |
0.40 |
NS |
||
200.0 |
55 |
0.88 |
NS |
||
*VIN 0.04 |
38 |
2.95 |
p≤0.001 |
a Vehicle control was DMSO
* Positive control
# 95thpercentile of the observed range
$ Based on replication index
NS Not significant
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- The test material (Kalama® Benzaldehyde FCC grade) did not induce biologically relevant increases in the frequency of micronuclei when tested up to toxic concentrations for 3+21 hours in the absence and presence of a rat liver metabolic activation system (S9) and for 24+24 hours in the absence of S9 under the experimental conditions described.
- Executive summary:
In a key OECD Guideline 487 study, the test material (Kalama® Benzaldehyde FCC grade) was tested in an in vitro micronucleus assay using duplicate human lymphocyte cultures prepared from the pooled blood of two female donors in a single experiment. Treatments covering a broad range of concentrations, separated by narrow intervals, were performed both in the absence and presence of metabolic activation (S9) from Aroclor 1254-induced rats.
The test material was formulated in anhydrous analytical grade dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO). The highest concentrations analysed in the Micronucleus Experiment were limited by cytotoxicity under each treatment condition and were determined following a preliminary cytotoxicity Range-Finder Experiment. Treatments were conducted 48 hours following mitogen stimulation by phytohaemagglutinin (PHA). The test material concentrations for micronucleus analysis were selected by evaluating the effect of Kalama® Benzaldehyde FCC grade on the replication index (RI). Micronuclei were analysed at three concentrations.
Appropriate negative (vehicle) control cultures were included in the test system under each treatment condition. The proportion of micronucleated binucleate (MNBN) cells in these cultures fell within (or very close to) the 95thpercentile of the current observed historical vehicle control (normal) ranges. Mitomycin C (MMC) and Vinblastine (VIN) were employed as clastogenic and aneugenic positive control chemicals respectively in the absence of rat liver S9. Cyclophosphamide (CPA) was employed as a clastogenic positive control chemical in the presence of rat liver S9. Cells receiving these were sampled in the Micronucleus Experiment at 24 hours (CPA, MMC) or 48 hours (VIN) after the start of treatment. All positive control compounds induced statistically significant increases in the proportion of cells with micronuclei.
All acceptance criteria were considered met and the study was accepted as valid.
Treatment of cells with the test material for 3+21 hours in the absence and presence of S9and for 24+24 hours in the absence of S9 resulted in frequencies of MNBN cells that were generally similar to and not significantly different (at the p≤0.05 level), compared to those observed in the concurrent vehicle controls, at any concentration analysed under each treatment condition. The MNBN cell frequencies fell within the normal ranges at all concentrations analysed with the exception of one culture at the highest concentration analysed following the 24+24 hour treatment in the absence of S9 (1% at 200 µg/mL, which gave 55% mean cytotoxicity). However, there were no statistically significant increases in MNBN cell frequency at any concentration analysed following the 24+24 hour treatment in the absence of S9 and no statistically significant linear trend, therefore this isolated observation was considered not biologically relevant. A statistically significant linear trend (p≤0.05) was observed following the 3+21 hour treatment in the presence of S9 but as there were no statistically significant increases in MNBN cell frequency at any concentration analysed, this observation was also considered not biologically relevant.
It was concluded that the test material (Kalama® Benzaldehyde FCC grade) did not induce biologically relevant increases in the frequency of micronuclei when tested up to toxic concentrations for 3+21 hours in the absence and presence of a rat liver metabolic activation system (S9) and for 24+24 hours in the absence of S9 under the experimental conditions described.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.