Registration Dossier
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 203-313-2 | CAS number: 105-60-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Carcinogenicity
Administrative data
Description of key information
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
Caprolactam (CAP) was tested for its carcinogenic potential in 2 species (rats and mice; NTP, 1982).
50 male and 50 female Fischer-344 rats per dose group were fed diets containing 187.5 mg/kg bw and 375 mg/kg bw CAP for 103 weeks. A dietary control group was also included.
Similarly B6C3F1 mice were fed with 2143 mg/kg bw and 1071 mg/kg bw CAP for 103 weeks. Survival in both species was similar to that of controls. The various types of neoplasms occurring in dosed groups and control group in both species were comparable and did not appear to be related to CAP administration.
Summarized, no carcinogenic potential was detected by feeding maximal dose levels of 187.5 mg/kg bw to rats or 2143 mg/kg bw to mice. Besides a decrease in body weight gain no further signs of systemic toxicity were observed.
Inconsistent results were reported in various cell transformation assays.
In one cell transformation assay CAP failed to transform Hamster Embryo cells at dose levels up to 10000 µg/ml (ACC, 1979).
In an interlaboratory comparison treatment of Syrian hamster embryo (SHE) cells with CAP dose levels up to 1000 µg/ml resulted in consistently higher transformation rates compared to non-treated control cells (Jones et al., 1988).
However, in a second interlaboratory comparison, results were negative with SHE cells at doses of 1-1000 µg/ml (LeBoeuf et al., 1989). In both interlaboratory validations significant cyotoxicity was observed with and above 1000 µg/ml. An apparent variance between both was the use of a slightly lower pH value by LeBoeuf et al., resulting in higher transformation efficiencies. Furthermore in this assay known carcinogens were consistently positive and non-carcinogens consistently negative, assigning a certain level of reliability to the test design chosen.
In a weight of evidence approach no indications for a carcinogenic potential can be deduced from these cell transformation assays and based on the 2-years carcinocenicity bioassays, CAP does not require any classification according to EU and GHS standards.
Justification for classification or non-classification
No indication for a carcinogenic potential was identified in carcinogenicity studies in rodents.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

Route: .live1