Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
26.01.2004 - 23.02.2004
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP guideline study.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2004
Report date:
2004

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
[(2S,3R,5S)-3-[(4-methylbenzoyl)oxy]-5-(5-methyl-2,4-dioxo-3,4-dihydropyrimidin-1(2H)-yl)tetrahydrofuran-2-yl]methyl 4-methylbenzoate
EC Number:
608-497-1
Cas Number:
3056-13-1
Molecular formula:
C26 H26 N2 O7
IUPAC Name:
[(2S,3R,5S)-3-[(4-methylbenzoyl)oxy]-5-(5-methyl-2,4-dioxo-3,4-dihydropyrimidin-1(2H)-yl)tetrahydrofuran-2-yl]methyl 4-methylbenzoate

Method

Target gene:
his
Species / strain
Species / strain / cell type:
other: S. typhimurium TA97a, TA98, TA100, TA102 and TA1535
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
S9-mix
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
7.4, 22, 67, 200 and 600 μg/plate
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle/solvent used: dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO)
Controls
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
other: -S9: 4-Nitro-o-phenylene-diamine (TA97a), t-Butyl-hydroperoxide (TA102), 2-Nitrofluorene (TA98), Sodium azide (TA100, TA1535); +S9: 2-Aminoanthracene (TA98, TA100, TA1535), 1,8-Dihydroxy-anthraquinone (TA102), 7,12-Dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (TA97a)
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation)

DURATION
- Exposure duration: 48 h

NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: three replications each in two independent experiments

DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: growth of bacterial background lawn
Evaluation criteria:
A reproducible increase in the number of revertants to more than 2,5-fold (TA98, TA 1535) and 1,67-fold (TA97a, TA100, TA102), respectively, of the amount of spontaneous revertants in at least one of the concentrations.

Results and discussion

Test results
Species / strain:
other: S. typhimurium TA97a, TA98, TA100, TA102 and TA1535
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
In a preliminary test, toxicity was tested in TA100. No toxicity was observed up to 556 µg/plate. At higher concentrations, the evaluation of the plates was not possible because of the precipitation of the test substance.
Remarks on result:
other: all strains/cell types tested
Remarks:
Migrated from field 'Test system'.

Any other information on results incl. tables

In none of the concentrations tested and with none of the strains used an increase of the mutation frequency to more than the threshold values (250% of the controls for strains TA98 and TA1535, 167% of the controls for strains TA97A, TA100 and TA102) was obtained. Metabolic activation did not change these results.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative