Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 272-695-0 | CAS number: 68909-18-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 4 FEB 2010 to 28 JUN 2010
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 010
- Report date:
- 2010
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Pyridinium, 1-(phenylmethyl)-, ethyl methyl derivs., chlorides
- EC Number:
- 272-695-0
- EC Name:
- Pyridinium, 1-(phenylmethyl)-, ethyl methyl derivs., chlorides
- Cas Number:
- 68909-18-2
- Molecular formula:
- C12H7ClNR1R2R3R4R5, where R1-5 are alkyl groups
- IUPAC Name:
- Pyridinium, 1-(phenylmethyl)-, ethyl methyl derivs.,chlorides
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): MK92K
- Physical state: brown liquid
- Analytical purity: 75% active ingredient
- Composition of test material, percentage of components: 75% active ingredient, 3.8% propan-2-ol and 21.2% water
- Lot/batch No.: PK231-141/1
- Retest date of the lot/batch: 29 March 2011
- Storage condition of test material: 15 to 25°C in the dark
Constituent 1
Method
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- other: S. typhimurium strains: TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and TA102
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Not applicable.
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- other: With the exception of strain TA102, these strains require biotin as well as histidine for growth. In strain TA102 the critical mutation in the histidine gene is located on a multicopy plasmid pAQ1.
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Mammalian liver post-mitochondrial fraction (S-9)
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Range-finder experiment (with and without): 1.6, 8, 40, 200, 1000 and 5000 µg/plate.
Mutation Experiment 1 (with and without): 0.064, 0.32, 1.6, 8, 40, 200 and 1000 µg/plate.
Mutation Experiment 2 (with and without): 15.63, 31.25, 62.5, 125, 250, 500 and 1000 µg/plate*.
Mutation experiment 2 (additional treatments of strain TA102, without): 1.95, 3.91, 7.81, 15.6, 31.3, 62.5 and 125 µg/plate.
* (1000 µg/plate concentration tested in strains TA98, TA1535 and TA102 in the absence of S-9 only and all strains in the presence of S-9). - Vehicle / solvent:
- Anhydrous analytical grade dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO)
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-nitrofluorene (2NF), Sodium azide (NaN3), 9-aminoacridine (AAC), Mitomycin C (MMC), Benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P) and 2-aminoanthracene (AAN).
- Remarks:
- Final plate concentrations (µg/plate): 2NF = 5.0; NaN3 = 2.0; AAC = 50.0; MMC = 0.2; B[a]P = 10.0; AAN = 5.0 or 20.0.
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- Toxicity Range-Finder Experiment
The substance was tested for toxicity (and mutation) in strain TA100. Triplicate plates without and with S-9 mix were used. Negative (vehicle) and positive controls were included in quintuplicate and triplicate respectively, without and with S-9 mix. These platings were achieved by the following sequence of additions to 2.5 mL molten agar at 46 ± 1°C:
• 0.1 mL bacterial culture
• 0.1 mL test article solution or control
• 0.5 mL 10% S-9 mix or buffer solution
followed by rapid mixing and pouring on to Vogel-Bonner E agar plates. When set, the plates were inverted and incubated at 37 ± 1°C in the dark for 3 days. Following incubation, these plates were examined for evidence of toxicity to the background lawn, and where possible revertant colonies were counted.
Mutation Experiments
The substance was tested for mutation (and toxicity) in five strains of Salmonella typhimurium (TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and TA102), in two separate experiments, at the concentrations detailed previously, using triplicate plates without and with S-9. Negative (vehicle) controls were included in quintuplicate, and positive controls were included in triplicate in both assays without and with S-9. Platings were achieved as described above.
Treatments in the presence of S-9 in Experiment 2 included a pre-incubation step. Quantities of test article or control solution (reduced to 0.05 mL), bacteria and S-9 mix detailed above, were mixed together and incubated for 1 hour at 37 ± 1°C, before the addition of 2.5 mL molten agar at 46 ± 1°C. Plating of these treatments then proceeded as for the normal plate-incorporation procedure. In this way, it was hoped to increase the range of mutagenic chemicals that could be detected in the assay.
Volume additions for the Experiment 2 pre-incubation treatments were reduced to 0.05 mL due to the vehicle (DMSO) employed in this study. This, and some other organic vehicles, are known to be near to toxic levels when added at volumes of 0.1 mL in this assay system when employing the pre-incubation methodology. By reducing the addition volume to 0.05 mL per plate, it was hoped to minimise or eliminate any toxic effects of the vehicle that may have otherwise occurred.
Following Experiment 2 treatments of TA102 in the absence of S-9, there were insufficient non-toxic concentrations to allow a thorough assessment of mutagenicity. Therefore, additional plate-incorporation treatments were performed at lower test concentrations and these results are presented as Experiment 2 additional data.
Colony counting
Colonies were counted electronically using a Sorcerer Colony Counter (Perceptive Instruments) or manually where confounding factors such as bubbles or splits in the agar affected the accuracy of the automated counter. The background lawn was inspected for signs of toxicity. - Evaluation criteria:
- For valid data, the test article was considered to be mutagenic if:
1. Dunnett's test gave a significant response (p ≤ 0.01) which was concentration related
2. the positive trend/effects described above were reproducible.
The test article was considered as positive in this assay if all of the above criteria were met.
The test article was considered as negative in this assay if none of the above criteria were met.
Results which only partially satisfied the above criteria were dealt with on a case by case basis. Biological relevance was taken into account, for example consistency of response within and between concentrations and (where applicable) between experiments. - Statistics:
- Individual plate counts from all experiments were recorded separately and the mean and standard deviation of the plate counts for each treatment were determined. Control counts were compared with the accepted normal ranges for our laboratory for numbers of spontaneous revertants on vehicle control plates and numbers of induced revertants on positive control plates. Data were considered acceptable if the mean vehicle control counts fell within the historical 99% confidence intervals for group means and/or each vehicle control plate count fell within the historical 99% reference ranges, and the positive control plate counts were comparable with the historical 99% reference ranges. The ranges that are quoted are based on a large volume of historical control data accumulated from experiments where the correct strain and assay functioning are considered to have been confirmed. Data for our laboratory are consistent with ranges of spontaneous revertants per plate considered acceptable elsewhere.
For evaluation of test article and positive control data there are many statistical methods in use, and several are acceptable. Dunnett's test was used to compare the counts at each concentration with the control. The presence or otherwise of a concentration response was checked by non-statistical analysis, up to limiting levels (for example toxicity, precipitation or 5000 µg/plate).
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- other: S. typhimurium strains: TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and TA102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- Evidence of toxicity was observed at 200 and/or 1000 µg/plate and above in the absence or presence of S-9, respectively.
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1: Summary of mean revertant colonies (-S-9) – Experiment 1
Substance |
Dose level µg/plate |
TA98 |
TA100 |
TA1535 |
TA1537 |
TA102 |
Mean ± SD |
Mean ± SD |
Mean ± SD |
Mean ± SD |
Mean ± SD |
||
DMSO |
26 ± 3 |
113 ± 11 |
18 ± 5 |
13 ± 2 |
330 ± 19 |
|
Test matertal |
0.064 |
30 ± 6 |
109 ± 6 |
15 ± 7 |
15 ± 2 |
342 ± 25 |
0.32 |
22 ± 4 |
115 ± 9 |
21 ± 4 |
8 ± 4 |
308 ± 13 |
|
1.6 |
30 ± 3 |
108 ± 10 |
16 ± 2 |
11 ± 5 |
287 ± 19 |
|
8 |
33 ± 5 |
122 ± 23 |
17 ± 3 |
10 ± 4 |
348 ± 47 |
|
40 |
25 ± 0 |
104 ± 13 |
15 ± 9 |
12 ± 3 |
358 ± 34 |
|
200 |
22 ± 6 |
40 ± 19 |
15 ± 5 |
12 ± 6 |
90 ± 11 |
|
1000 |
T |
T |
T |
T |
T |
|
Positive Controls |
Compound |
2NF |
NaN3 |
NaN3 |
AAC |
MMC |
Dose level |
5 |
2 |
2 |
50 |
0.2 |
|
Mean ± SD |
848 ± 91 |
720 ± 69 |
615 ± 105 |
107 ± 6 |
896 ± 6 |
SD Standard Deviation
T Toxic, no revertant colonies
Table 2: Summary of mean revertant colonies (+S-9) – Experiment 1
Substance |
Dose level µg/plate |
TA98 |
TA100 |
TA1535 |
TA1537 |
TA102 |
Mean ± SD |
Mean ± SD |
Mean ± SD |
Mean ± SD |
Mean ± SD |
||
DMSO |
34 ± 5 |
99 ± 8 |
16 ± 6 |
14 ± 5 |
261 ± 12 |
|
Test material |
0.064 |
36 ± 4 |
113 ± 20 |
18 ± 4 |
17 ± 5 |
275 ± 23 |
0.32 |
34 ± 9 |
108 ± 10 |
13 ± 2 |
22 ± 6 |
277 ± 13 |
|
1.6 |
37 ± 9 |
118 ± 13 |
17 ± 3 |
25 ± 1 |
247 ± 20 |
|
8 |
39 ± 2 |
124 ± 12 |
19 ± 4 |
22 ± 3 |
263 ± 39 |
|
40 |
36 ± 7 |
103 ± 3 |
13 ± 3 |
16 ± 2 |
276 ± 30 |
|
200 |
44 ± 14 |
108 ± 10 |
11 ± 3 |
19 ± 1 |
212 ± 32 |
|
1000 |
38 ± 6 |
25 ± 9.2 |
9 ± 6 |
5 ± 5 |
T |
|
Positive Controls |
Compound |
B[a]P |
AAN |
AAN |
AAN |
AAN |
Dose level |
10 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
20 |
|
Mean ± SD |
364 ± 15 |
1138 ± 93 |
217 ± 14 |
120 ± 51 |
1875 ± 108 |
SD Standard Deviation
T Toxic, no revertant colonies
Table 3: Summary of mean revertant colonies (-S-9) – Experiment 2
Substance |
Dose level µg/plate |
TA98 |
TA100 |
TA1535 |
TA1537 |
TA102 |
Mean ± SD |
Mean ± SD |
Mean ± SD |
Mean ± SD |
Mean ± SD |
||
DMSO |
17 ± 5 |
96 ± 12 |
13 ± 2 |
11 ± 4 |
245 ± 30 |
|
Test material |
15.63 |
22 ± 4 |
109 ± 2 |
14 ± 2 |
10 ± 1 |
258 ± 32 |
31.25 |
20 ± 2 |
106 ± 7 |
15 ± 6 |
11 ± 8 |
286 ± 10 |
|
62.5 |
25 ± 6 |
100 ± 6 |
9 ± 3 |
10 ± 1 |
222 ± 17 |
|
125 |
19 ± 7 |
43 ± 11 |
16 ± 5 |
10 ± 3 |
T |
|
250 |
8 ± 2 |
T |
8 ± 2 |
T |
T |
|
500 |
T |
T |
T |
T |
T |
|
1000 |
T |
NT |
T |
NT |
T |
|
Positive Controls |
Compound |
2NF |
NaN3 |
NaN3 |
AAC |
MMC |
Dose level |
5 |
2 |
2 |
50 |
0.2 |
|
Mean ± SD |
675 ± 39 |
637 ± 22 |
482 ± 33 |
90 ± 14 |
920 ± 98 |
SD Standard Deviation
T Toxic, no revertant colonies
NT Not Tested
Table 4: Summary of mean revertant colonies (+S-9) – Experiment 2
Substance |
Dose level µg/plate |
TA98 |
TA100 |
TA1535 |
TA1537 |
TA102 |
Mean ± SD |
Mean ± SD |
Mean ± SD |
Mean ± SD |
Mean ± SD |
||
DMSO |
33 ± 8 |
77 ± 10 |
15 ± 4 |
17 ± 7 |
236 ± 14 |
|
Test material |
15.63 |
35 ± 5 |
82 ± 16 |
13 ± 8 |
19 ± 4 |
230 ± 14 |
31.25 |
35 ± 5 |
94 ± 12 |
16 ± 1 |
22 ± 2 |
220 ± 5 |
|
62.5 |
31 ± 9 |
84 ± 4 |
11 ± 4 |
15 ± 4 |
229 ± 9 |
|
125 |
30 ± 8 |
88 ± 16 |
18 ± 4 |
17 ± 2 |
220 ± 22 |
|
250 |
40 ± 8 |
87 ± 8 |
11 ± 5 |
20 ± 6 |
205 ± 7 |
|
500 |
38 ± 6 |
67 ± 9 |
11 ± 4 |
14 ± 2 |
T |
|
1000 |
17 ± 3 |
T |
T |
T |
T |
|
Positive Controls |
Compound |
B[a]P |
AAN |
AAN |
AAN |
AAN |
Dose level |
10 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
20 |
|
Mean ± SD |
333 ± 34 |
626 ± 43 |
202 ± 6 |
105 ± 19 |
1748 ± 57 |
SD Standard Deviation
T Toxic, no revertant colonies
Table 5: Summary of mean revertant colonies (-S-9) – Experiment 2 additional treatments
Substance |
Dose level µg/plate |
TA102 |
Mean ± SD |
||
DMSO |
100 µL |
265 ± 14 |
Test material |
1.95 |
257 ± 30 |
3.91 |
280 ± 5 |
|
7.81 |
297 ± 14 |
|
15.63 |
293 ± 3 |
|
31.25 |
282 ± 20 |
|
62.5 |
205 ± 11 |
|
125 |
T |
|
Positive Controls |
Compound |
MMC |
Dose level |
0.2 |
|
Mean ± SD |
889 ± 10 |
SD Standard Deviation
T Toxic, no revertant colonies
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- It was concluded that the substance did not induce mutation in five histidine requiring strains (TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and TA102) of Salmonella typhimurium when tested under the conditions of this study. These conditions included treatments at concentrations up to at least 125 µg/plate (toxic concentration), in the absence and in the presence of a rat liver metabolic activation system (S-9).
- Executive summary:
Ther substance was assayed for mutation in five histidine‑requiring strains (TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and TA102) of Salmonella typhimurium, both in the absence and in the presence of metabolic activation by an Aroclor 1254‑induced rat liver post-mitochondrial fraction (S‑9), in two separate experiments.
All treatments in this study were performed using formulations prepared in anhydrous analytical grade dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO), and all concentrations tested were corrected for 75% active ingredient.
An initial toxicity Range‑Finder Experiment was carried out in the absence and in the presence of S-9 in strain TA100 only, using final concentrations at 1.6, 8, 40, 200, 1000 and 5000 mg/plate, plus negative (vehicle) and positive controls. Following these treatments, evidence of toxicity was observed at 200 or 1000 mg/plate and above in the absence or presence of S-9, respectively. These data were considered to be acceptable for toxicity assessment only as insufficient non toxic concentrations were available to allow a thorough assessment of mutagenic activity.
Experiment 1 treatments of all tester strains were performed in the absence and in the presence of S‑9. The maximum concentration was reduced to 1000mg/plate based on toxicity observed in the Range Finder Experiment and a concentration range of 0.064 ‑ 1000 mg/plate was employed. Following these treatments, evidence of toxicity was observed at 200 and/or 1000 mg/plate in all strains in the absence and presence of S-9.
Experiment 2 treatments of all the tester strains were performed in the absence and in the presence of S-9. For strains TA98, TA1535 and TA102 in the absence and presence of S-9, and strains TA100 and TA1537 in the presence of S-9 only, the maximum test concentration was 1000 mg/plate, for strains TA100 and TA1537 in the absence of S-9, the maximum test concentration was reduced to 500 mg/plate based on strain specific toxicity observed in previous experiments. Narrowed concentration intervals were employed covering the ranges 15.63 – 1000 mg/plate (TA98, TA1535 and TA102 in the absence and presence of S-9, and strains TA100 and TA1537 in the presence of S-9 only) or 15.63 – 500 mg/plate (TA100 and TA1537 in the absence of S-9), in order to examine more closely those concentrations of MK92K approaching the maximum test concentration and considered therefore most likely to provide evidence of any mutagenic activity. In addition, all treatments in the presence of S-9 were further modified by the inclusion of a pre-incubation step. In this way, it was hoped to increase the range of mutagenic chemicals that could be detected using this assay system. Following these treatments, evidence of toxicity was observed up to the highest five concentrations across all strains in the absence and presence of S-9.
Experiment 2 additional treatments of TA102 were performed in the absence of S-9 using a plate-incorporation methodology as insufficient concentrations were available to allow a thorough assessment of mutagenic activity. A narrowed concentration range was employed (1.95 ‑ 125 mg/plate). Following these treatments, evidence of toxicity was observed at 62.5 mg/plate and above.
The test article was completely soluble in the aqueous assay system at all concentrations treated, in each of the experiments performed.
Negative (vehicle) and positive control treatments were included for all strains in both experiments. The mean numbers of revertant colonies on negative control plates all fell within acceptable ranges, and were significantly elevated by positive control treatments.
Following treatments of all the test strains in the absence and presence of S‑9, no increases in revertant numbers were observed that were concentration related, reproducible and statistically significant when the data were analysed at the 1% level using Dunnett’s test. This study was considered therefore to have provided no evidence of any MK92K mutagenic activity in this assay system.
It was concluded that the substance did not induce mutation in five histidine‑requiring strains (TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and TA102) of Salmonella typhimurium when tested under the conditions of this study. These conditions included treatments at concentrations up to at least 125 mg/plate (toxic concentration), in the absence and in the presence of a rat liver metabolic activation system (S‑9).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.