Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 292-054-9 | CAS number: 90530-16-8
Toxicological Summary
Administrative data
Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 1.76 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 75
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 132.2 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- It is assumed that the oral absorption rate is 50% of that of the inhalation absorption. ABSoral/rat=oral absorption rate in rats, ABSinh./human=inhalation absorption rate in humans. NOAEC: Workers Inhalatory NOAECcorr=NOAELoral*(1/0.38 m3/kg/d)*(ABSoral-rat/ABSinhhuman)*(6.7 m3 (8h)/10 m3 (8h)) = 150mg/kg/d*(1/0.38 m3/kg/d)*(0.5*1)*0.67=132.2mg/m3
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 6
- Justification:
- subacute to chronic
- Justification:
- not used for inhalation
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- workers
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown (no further information necessary)
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown (no further information necessary)
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown (no further information necessary)
DNEL related information
Workers - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 5 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 300
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 1 500 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
Workers corrected Dermal NOAEC= oral NOAEL*(ABS oral/ABS dermal) It is assumed that the oral absorption rate is 10% of that of the dermal absorption. ABS oral /ABS dermal = 10 Workers Corrected DERMAL NOAEC= 150 mg/kg bw/day * 10 = 1500 mg/kg bw/day See it OECD document: ENV /JM/MONO(2011)36 GUIDANCE NOTES ON DERMAL ABSORPTION Series on Testing Assessment No 156 18 -Aug-2011Workers Corrected Dermal NOAEC= 150 mg/kg bw/day *10 = 1500 mg/kg bw/ day
See it SeSee it OECD document: ENV/JM/MONO(2011)36 GUIDANCE NOTES ON DERMAL ABSORPTION Series on Testing and Assessment No. 156 18-Aug-2011
Workers Corrected Dermal NOAEC= 150 mg/kg bw/day * 10 = 1500 mg/kg bw/day
See it OECD document:
ENV/JM/MONO(2011)36 GUIDANCE NOTES ON DERMAL ABSORPTION Series on Testing and Assessment No. 156 18-Aug-2011
Workers Corrected Dermal NOAEC = oral NOAEL * (ABS oral/ ABS dermal)
It is assumed that the oral absorption rate is10% of thatof the dermal absorption. ABS oral/ ABS dermal =10
Workers Corrected Dermal NOAEC = oral NOAEL * (ABS oral/ ABS dermal)
It is assumed that the oral absorption rate is10% of thatof the dermal absorption. ABS oral/ ABS dermal =10
Workers Corrected Dermal NOAEC = oral NOAEL * (ABS oral/ ABS dermal)
It is assumed that the oral absorption rate is10% of thatof the dermal absorption. ABS oral/ ABS dermal =10
Workers Corrected Dermal NOAEC = oral NOAEL * (ABS oral/ ABS dermal)
It is assumed that the oral absorption rate is10% of thatof the dermal absorption. ABS oral/ ABS dermal =10
Workers Corrected Dermal NOAEC = 150 mg/kg bw/day*10=1500mg/kg bw /day
See it OECD document: ENV/JM/MONO(2011)36 GUIDANCE NOTES ON DERMAL ABSORPTION Series on Testing and Assessment No. 156 18-Aug-2011
IIIt is assumed that the oral absorption rate is10% of thatof the dermal absorption. ABS oral/ ABS dermal =10
10% dermal absorption was assumed
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 6
- Justification:
- subacute to chronic
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- rat
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- It is assumed that the oral absorption rate is 10% of that of the dermal absorption. ABS oral / dermal =10
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- worker
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown (no further information necessary)
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown (no further information necessary)
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown (no further information necessary)
Workers - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- high hazard (no threshold derived)
Additional information - workers
General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.43 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 150
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 65.2 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- It is assumed that the oral absorption rate is 50% of that of the inhalation absorption. AB ABSoral/rat=oral absorption rate in rats, ABSinh./human=inhalation absorption rate in humans NOAEC: General population inhalatroy NOAECcorr=NOAELoral*(1/1.15 m3/kg/d)*(ABSoral-rat/ABSinh-human) = 150 mg/kg/d*(1/1.15 m3/kg/d)*(0.5*1)=65.2 mg/m3
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 6
- Justification:
- subacute to chronic
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- general population
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown (no further information necessary)
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown (no further information necessary)
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown (no further information necessary)
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 2.5 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 600
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 1 500 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
General population Corrected Dermal NOAEC = oral NOAEL * (ABS oral/ ABS dermal) It is assumed that the oral absorption rate is 100% of that of the dermal absorption. ABS oral/ ABS dermal = 1 General population Corrected Dermal NOAEC = 150 mg/kg bw/day *10= 1500mg/kg bw /day
Workers corrected Dermal NOAEC= oral NOAEL*(ABS oral/ABS dermal) It is assumed that the oral absorption rate is 10% of that of the dermal absorption. ABS oral /ABS dermal = 10 Workers Corrected DERMAL NOAEC= 150 mg/kg bw/day * 10 = 1500 mg/kg bw/day See it OECD document: ENV /JM/MONO(2011)36 GUIDANCE NOTES ON DERMAL ABSORPTION Series on Testing Assessment No 156 18 -Aug-2011
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 6
- Justification:
- subacute to chronic
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- rat
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- general population
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown (no further information necessary)
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown (no further information necessary)
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown (no further information necessary)
General Population - Hazard via oral route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.25 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 600
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 150 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- oral to oral no need extrapolation
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 6
- Justification:
- subacute to chronic
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- rat
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown (no further information necessary)
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- high hazard (no threshold derived)
Additional information - General Population
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
