Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 242-362-4 | CAS number: 18479-58-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study with acceptable restrictions
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 009
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: US FDA; This study was designed to evaluate ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline stages C and D of the reproductive process
- Deviations:
- not specified
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Reaction mass of 2,6-dimethyloct-7-en-2-ol and 2,6-dimethyloct-7-en-2-yl formate
- EC Number:
- 915-335-6
- Molecular formula:
- C11H20O2 C10H20O
- IUPAC Name:
- Reaction mass of 2,6-dimethyloct-7-en-2-ol and 2,6-dimethyloct-7-en-2-yl formate
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Remarks:
- Cr1:CD(SD)
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Age at arrival: 62 days (approximate)
- Weight at study initiation: 218 to 244 g
- Fasting period before study: None
- Housing: Individually in stainless steel, wire-bottomed cages (except during cohabitation)
- Diet: Ad libitum. Certified Rodent Diet #5002 (PMI Nutrition International, St. Louis, MO)
- Water: Ad libitum. Local water processed by reverse osmosis. Chlorine added as bacteriostat
- Acclimation period: Yes, but duration not stated
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 17.8-26.1 (targeted)
- Humidity (%): 30 to 70 (targeted)
- Air changes (per hr): 10 (minimum)
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- corn oil
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
Suspensions of the test article were prepared weekly at the testing facility. Prepared formulations were stored at room temperature, protected from light.
VEHICLE
- Concentration in vehicle: The dosage preparations are shown in Table 1.
- Amount of vehicle: Constant dosage volume of 10 mL/kg - Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- Samples were analyzed according to the method described in Charles River Laboratories Preclinical Services. Results of concentration and homogeneity analyses were within +/- 15% of calculated concentrations and = 5% relative standard deviations.
- Details on mating procedure:
- After a suitable acclimation, 130 virgin female rats were placed into cohabitation with 130 breeder male rats, one male rat per female rat. The cohabitation period was a maximum of five days. Gestation day 0 was considered the first day when spermatozoa were detected in a vaginal smear or a copulatory plug was observed. Pregnant rats were assigned to individual housing.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Rats were treated on gestation days 7 through 17. Dosages were adjusted daily based on the individual body weights recorded prior to dosage administration.
- Frequency of treatment:
- Once daily
- Duration of test:
- Until gestation day 21
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Dose / conc.:
- 500 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Dose / conc.:
- 250 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Dose / conc.:
- 0 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Remarks:
- Vehicle
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 25 female/dose group
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: Dosages were based on the results of a range-finding study with the same test article at a dosage level of 1000 mg/kg/day. This was selected as the highest dose in the current study.
- Rationale for route of administration: Oral (gavage) was selected for use as comparison with the dietary route; the exact dosage can be accurately determined.
Examinations
- Maternal examinations:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: Twice daily (rats were observed for viability at least twice daily each day of the study and weekly for clinical observations and general appearance during the acclimation period and on DG 0)
- Cage side observations included: Clinical observations, abortions, premature deliveries and deaths before and approximately 3 hours after dosing, and once daily during the post-dosage period.
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: No data
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: Weekly during the acclimation period, on DG 0 and daily during the dosage and post-dosage periods
FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE: Yes
- Food consumption for each animal determined and mean daily diet consumption calculated as g food/kg body weight/day: Yes
- Compound intake calculated as time-weighted averages from the consumption and body weight gain data: No data
WATER CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE: No data
POST-MORTEM EXAMINATIONS: Yes
- Sacrifice on gestation day 21
- Organs examined: Thoracic, abdominal and pelvic viscera. Gross lessions were retained in neutral-buffered 10% formalin for possible future evaluation. Unless specifically cited, all other tissues were discarded. - Ovaries and uterine content:
- The ovaries and uterine content was examined after termination: Yes
Examinations included:
- Gravid uterus weight: No data
- Number of corpora lutea: Yes
- Number of implantations: Yes
- Number of early resorptions: Yes
- Number of late resorptions: Yes
- Other: Placentae were examined for size, color and shape. Number and distribution of live and dead fetuses were recorded. - Blood sampling:
- - Plasma: No
- Serum: No - Fetal examinations:
- - External examinations: Yes (all per litter)
- Soft tissue examinations: Yes (half per litter)
- Skeletal examinations: Yes (half per litter)
- Head examinations: No data
- Anogenital distance of all live rodent pups: Not specified - Statistics:
- Clinical observations and other proportional data were analyzed using the Variance Test for Homogeneity of the Binomial Distribution. Continuous data (e.g., body weights, body weight changes, feed consumption values, and litter averages for percent male fetuses, percent resorbed conceptuses, fetal body weights and fetal anomaly data) were analyzed using Bartlett’s Test of Homogeneity of Variances and the Analysis of Variance, when appropriate [i.e., Bartlett’s Test was not significant (p>0.001)]. If the Analysis of Variance was significant (p≤0.05), Dunnett’s Test was used to identify the statistical significance of the individual groups. If the Analysis of Variance was not appropriate [i.e., Bartlett’s Test was significant (p≤0.001)], the Kruskal-Wallis Test was used, when less than or equal to 75% ties were present. In cases where the Kruskal-Wallis Test was statistically significant (p≤0.05), Dunn’s Method of Multiple Comparisons was used to identify the statistical significance of the individual groups. If there were greater than 75% ties, Fisher’s Exact Test was used to analyze the data. Count data obtained at Caesarean-sectioning of the dams were evaluated using the procedures described above for the Kruskal-Wallis Test.
- Historical control data:
- Historical control data was available from this laboratory for the period from January 2005 to January 2007.
Results and discussion
Results: maternal animals
General toxicity (maternal animals)
- Clinical signs:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Minor incidences of sparse hair coat or localized alopecia, excess salivation, urine-stained abdominal fur, ungroomed coat, rales, ptosis, chromodacryorrhea (colored tears), and soft or liquid feces. These observations were all considered unrelated to the treatment because the incidences were observed in vehicle control rats, were not dosage dependent, or were transient and did not persist.
- Mortality:
- no mortality observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- 1000 mg/kg bw/day: Body weight gains for the entire dosage period were reduced by 5% when compared with controls, an observation that was not statistically significant but was considered evidence of a threshold for maternal toxicity.
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- 1000 mg/kg bw/day: Absolute (g/d) and relative (g/kg/d) feed consumption values were significantly reduced for the entire dosage period.
- Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- not examined
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not examined
- Endocrine findings:
- not examined
- Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not examined
- Immunological findings:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not examined
- Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No gross lesions were noted at necropsy.
- Neuropathological findings:
- not examined
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Other effects:
- no effects observed
Maternal developmental toxicity
- Number of abortions:
- not examined
- Pre- and post-implantation loss:
- no effects observed
- Total litter losses by resorption:
- no effects observed
- Early or late resorptions:
- no effects observed
- Dead fetuses:
- no effects observed
- Changes in pregnancy duration:
- not examined
- Changes in number of pregnant:
- no effects observed
- Other effects:
- not examined
Effect levels (maternal animals)
open allclose all
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- body weight and weight gain
- food consumption and compound intake
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEL
- Effect level:
- 500 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- body weight and weight gain
- food consumption and compound intake
Maternal abnormalities
- Key result
- Abnormalities:
- no effects observed
Results (fetuses)
- Fetal body weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- 1000 mg/kg bw/day: Body weights for combined male and female fetuses were reduced approximately 3%. The reduction in female fetuses was statistically significant (P ≤ .05).
- Reduction in number of live offspring:
- no effects observed
- Changes in sex ratio:
- no effects observed
- Changes in litter size and weights:
- no effects observed
- Anogenital distance of all rodent fetuses:
- not examined
- Changes in postnatal survival:
- not specified
- External malformations:
- no effects observed
- Skeletal malformations:
- no effects observed
- Visceral malformations:
- not examined
- Other effects:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Significant increases in fetal variations attributable to the test article were observed only at the 1000 mg/kg bw/day dosage level. These changes consisted of reversible minor variations, including a threshold but statistically significant increase in supernumerary ribs, along with associated significant increases and decreases in the respective numbers of thoracic and lumbar vertebrae, and a small but statistically significant retardation in ossification of the metatarsal bones in the hindpaws, evident as a reduction in the mean number of ossified metatarsal bones.
Effect levels (fetuses)
open allclose all
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEL
- Effect level:
- 500 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- fetal/pup body weight changes
- skeletal malformations
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Remarks on result:
- not determinable due to absence of adverse toxic effects
Fetal abnormalities
- Key result
- Abnormalities:
- not specified
Overall developmental toxicity
- Key result
- Developmental effects observed:
- not specified
Any other information on results incl. tables
- Dosage occurred on days 7 through 17 of gestation.
- Excludes values that could not be calculated or appeared incorrectly recorded, as well as those associated with spillage.
- Studies (N = 44) conducted at the Testing Facility between January 2005 and January 2007 in rats of the same strain.
- Means and Standard Deviations
- Mean and range of means per study
- Bold = effect of test article because values were significant and/or exceeded historical ranges. DGs = Days of Gestation
Table 2: MATERNAL BODY WEIGHT GAINS - SUMMARY
DOSE GROUP |
| I | II | III | IV |
DOSAGE (mg/kg bwt/day) |
| 0 (control) | 250 | 500 | 1000 |
RATS TESTED | N | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 |
PREGNANT | N | 22 | 24 | 24 | 25 |
MATERNAL BODY |
|
|
|
|
|
WEIGHT CHANGE (G) |
|
|
|
|
|
DAYS 0 - 7 | MEAN±S.D. | +42.5 ± 7.2 | +42.0 ± 8.2 | +40.7 ± 10.6 | +39.8 ± 7.5 |
DAYS 7 - 8 | MEAN±S.D. | -2.6 ± 4.6 | -0.4 ± 5.2 | -1.2 ± 5.5 | -4.1 ± 6.8 |
DAYS 8 - 9 | MEAN±S.D. | +1.4 ± 4.3 | +2.0 ± 5.6 | +1.5 ± 4.0 | -1.1 ± 6.2 |
DAYS 9 - 10 | MEAN±S.D. | +3.2 ± 4.6 | +4.0 ± 4.8 | +6.1 ± 4.2 | +5.4 ± 5.7 |
DAYS 7 - 10 | MEAN±S.D. | +2.0 ± 6.5 | +5.5 ± 7.0 | +6.4 ± 8.6 | +0.1 ± 9.4 |
DAYS 10 - 12 | MEAN±S.D. | +12.0 ± 5.3 | +14.8 ± 5.4 | +12.9 ± 5.2 | +11.8 ± 9.6 |
DAYS 12 - 15 | MEAN±S.D. | +17.7 ± 8.5 | +17.1 ± 9.5 | +19.8 ± 5.8 | +18.4 ± 7.3 |
DAYS 15 - 18 | MEAN±S.D. | +41.2 ± 9.6 | +39.4 ± 8.8 | +41.2 ± 7.3 | +39.0 ± 7.7 |
DAYS 7 - 18 | MEAN±S.D. | +73.0 ± 17.0 | +76.8 ± 15.2 | +80.2 ± 14.5 | +69.3 ± 15.1 |
DAYS 18 - 21 | MEAN±S.D. | +59.4 ± 11.4 | +54.2 ± 8.7 | +61.0 ± 10.8 | +58.1 ± 12.8 |
DAYS 7 - 21 | MEAN±S.D. | +132.4 ± 22.6 | +130.9 ± 16.7 | +141.2 ± 20.5 | +127.4 ± 20.5 |
DAYS 0 - 21 | MEAN±S.D. | +174.9 ± 25.6 | +173.0 ± 21.0 | +181.9 ± 27.2 | +167.2 ± 23.6 |
Table 3: MATERNAL RELATIVE FEED CONSUMPTION VALUES (G/KG/DAY) - SUMMARY
DOSAGE GROUP | I | II | III | IV |
|
DOSAGE (MG/KG/DAY)a |
| 0 (VEHICLE) | 250 | 500 | 1000 |
RATS TESTED | N | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 |
PREGNANT | N | 22 | 24 | 24 | 25 |
MATERNAL FEED |
|
|
|
|
|
CONSUMPTION (G/KG/DAY) |
|
|
|
| |
DAYS 0 - 7 | MEAN±S.D. | 96.2 ± 6.8 | 94.2 ± 6.9 | 93.5 ± 10.6 | 92.5 ± 6.5 |
|
|
| [ 23]b | [ 23]b |
|
DAYS 7 - 10 | MEAN±S.D. | 58.6 ± 10.2 | 60.8 ± 9.7 | 60.4 ± 12.7 | 46.2 ± 11.3** |
|
|
|
| [ 23]b |
|
DAYS 10 - 12 | MEAN±S.D. | 61.4 ± 9.6 | 65.4 ± 8.8 | 60.0 ± 7.9 | 54.2 ± 15.5* |
DAYS 12 - 15 | MEAN±S.D. | 59.8 ± 7.2 | 63.5 ± 9.7 | 59.6 ± 7.1 | 54.9 ± 9.3 |
|
|
| [ 22]b | [ 23]b |
|
DAYS 15 - 18 | MEAN±S.D. | 63.8 ± 14.0 | 68.7 ± 7.6 | 64.2 ± 10.0 | 60.8 ± 8.9 |
|
| [ 21]b |
|
|
|
DAYS 7 - 18 | MEAN±S.D. | 61.0 ± 5.6 | 64.5 ± 6.0 | 61.4 ± 7.3 | 54.1 ± 6.1** |
|
| [ 21]b |
|
|
|
DAYS 18 - 21 | MEAN±S.D. | 73.1 ± 8.1 | 71.8 ± 8.7 | 74.6 ± 7.1 | 76.2 ± 8.1 |
DAYS 7 - 21 | MEAN±S.D. | 63.7 ± 4.8 | 66.4 ± 5.4 | 64.7 ± 6.0 | 59.6 ± 5.3* |
DAYS 0 - 21 | MEAN±S.D. | 69.5 ± 4.0 | 70.5 ± 4.6 | 69.0 ± 5.3 | 66.0 ± 3.8* |
[ ] = NUMBER OF VALUES AVERAGED
* Significantly different from the vehicle control group value (p≤0.05). ** Significantly different from the vehicle control group value (p≤0.01).
Table 4: Dosage-Dependent Statistically Significant Fetal Observations (Average Ossification Sites per Fetus per Litter)
Observation | Dosage Group (DGs 7 through 17) |
|
| ||
mg/kg/day | 0 (Vehicle) | 250 | 500 | 1000 | Historical Controla |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Litters | 22 | 24 | 24 | 25 | 982 |
Fetuses | 155 | 164 | 183 | 184 | 7305 |
Rats tested, n | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 |
|
Rats pregnant, n (%) | 22 (88) | 24 (96) | 24 (96) | 25 (100) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corpora lutea, mean ± SD | 14.6 ± 2.4 | 14.9 ± 2.8 | 16.3 ± 2.4 | 15.8 ± 2.3 |
|
Implantations, mean ± SD | 14.0 ± 2.1 | 13.8 ± 2.8 | 15.2 ± 1.7 | 14.8 ± 1.8 |
|
Resorptions, mean ± SD | 0.6 ± 0.7 | 0.8 ± 0.9 | 0.6 ± 0.6 | 0.5 ± 1.2 |
|
Litter size, mean ± SD | 13.4 ± 2.2 | 13.0 ± 2.4 | 14.6 ± 2.0 | 14.3 ± 2.4 |
|
Fetal body weight/litter, mean ± SD | 5.50 ± 0.28 | 5.54 ± 0.30 | 5.55 ± 0.31 | 5.33 ± 0.33 |
|
Male fetuses | 5.63 ± 0.28 | 5.73 ± 0.31 | 5.68 ± 0.28 | 5.45 ± 0.36 |
|
Female fetuses | 5.38 ± 0.29 | 5.37 ± 0.28 | 5.42 ± 0.35 | 5.18 ± 0.32* |
|
Live fetuses/group | 295 | 311 | 350 | 358 |
|
Dead fetuses/group | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ribs (pairs)b,c | 13.06 ± 0.11 | 13.06 ± 0.10 | 13.09 ± 0.13 | 13.19 ± 0.23d | 13.06 (13.02-13.12) |
Thoracic Vertebraeb,c | 13.08 ± 0.15 | 13.08 ± 0.16 | 13.12 ± 0.17 | 13.24 ± 0.28*,d | 13.08 (13.02-13.16) |
Lumbar Vertebraeb,c | 5.92 ± 0.15 | 5.91 ± 0.16 | 5.87 ± 0.17 | 5.75 ± 0.27**,d | 5.92 (5.83-5.97) |
Metatarsalsb,c | 4.95 ± 0.12 | 4.87 ± 0.21 | 4.91 ± 0.12 | 4.78 ± 0.27**,d | 4.83 (4.68-4.95) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* = Significantly different from the vehicle control group value (p≤0.05). ** = Significantly different from the vehicle control group value (p≤0.01).
Testing facility historical control data for mean fetal body weight ranges (82 studies): combined male/female, 4.94 to 5.93 g; male fetuses, 5.10 to 5.98 g; female fetuses, 4.80 to 5.78 g.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- On the basis of these data, the maternal no-observable-adverse-effect-level (NOAEL) was 1000 mg/kg bw/day. At this dose level, maternal body weight gains were reduced (not significantly) and feed consumption was significantly reduced. The 500 mg/kg bwt/day dose level was assigned as the NOEL for maternal effects.
The developmental NOAEL was also 1000 mg/kg bw/day. This was based on minimal reductions in female fetal weights and small increases in reversible variations in skeletal ossification. The 500 mg/kg bw/day dose level was assigned as the NOEL for developmental effects. - Executive summary:
The test item was administered in corn oil by gavage to groups of pregnant Sprague-Dawley rats at dosages of 0, 250, 500 or 1000 mg/kg bw/day on gestational days 7 to 17. Viability, clinical signs, body weights and feed consumption were observed or measured for all animals. Animals were sacrificed on gestational day 21 and Caesarean sectioning performed. Fetuses were weighed and examined for sex, gross changes, and soft tissue or skeletal alterations. No clinical signs attributable to the test item administration were observed. At the 1000 mg/kg bw/day dose level, mean maternal body weight gains were reduced 5% versus controls. Absolute and relative feed consumption were also reduced at this dose level. The minimal maternal effects noted were associated with minimal (approx. 3%) reductions in fetal body weights, reversible variations in ossification and increases in supernumerary thoracic ribs with associated increases or decreases in thoracic and lumbar vertebrae, respectively. Findings of delayed skeletal ossification are generally considered readily reversible (Carney and Kimmel, 2007 "Interpretation of skeletal variations for human risk assessment: Delayed ossification and wavy ribs", Birth Defects Research 80:473 -496). The minimal developmental delays (reduced pup weights, delayed ossificaiton, changes in metatarsals) are all expected to be readily reversible based on studies that have investigated the progression and outcome of similar effects. On the basis of these data, the maternal no-observable-adverse-effect-level (NOAEL) was 1000 mg/kg bw/day. At this dose level, maternal body weight gains were reduced (not significantly) and feed consumption was significantly reduced. The 500 mg/kg bwt/day dose level was assigned as the NOEL for maternal effects.The developmental NOAEL was also 1000 mg/kg bw/day. This was based on minimal reductions in female fetal weights and small increases in reversible variations in skeletal ossification. The 500 mg/kg bw/day dose level was assigned as the NOEL for developmental effects.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.