Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Dermal absorption

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

dermal absorption
Type of information:
Adequacy of study:
key study
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: QSAR, published in peer reviewed literature, adequate for assessment.
Justification for type of information:
QSAR prediction: migrated from IUCLID 5.6

Data source

Reference Type:
A simple dermal absorption model: Derivation and application
ten Berge, W.
Bibliographic source:
Chemosphere 75, 1440-1445

Materials and methods

Principles of method if other than guideline:
Dermal absorption was predicted using a QSAR.
GLP compliance:

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
EC Number:
EC Name:
Cas Number:
Molecular formula:

Results and discussion

Percutaneous absorption
ca. 0.4 %
Remarks on result:
other: permeability coefficient (Kp) = 0.0071 cm/hour

Any other information on results incl. tables

The model predicted a permeability coefficient of 0.0071 cm/hour.

Derivation of the initial dermal absorption


As is deduced in EHC 235 (2006), the following equation is true:

 Kp= Km * D/h                                                                         [1]                             

(Kp is the permeability coefficient; Km is the pseudo-homogeneous partition, or distribution coefficient between the stratum corneum and the vehicle; D is the effective diffusion coefficient; h is the membrane thickness)


To derive the Kp for the neat substance, the aqueous Kp has to be divided by the stratum corneum/water partition coefficient (Km). The Km(stratum corneum/water) for TAME was calculated to be 3.34 by using the QSAR described by ten Berge (2009).

Since the aqueous Kp was 0.0071 cm/hour, the Kp for neat liquid is: 0.0071 / 3.34 = 0.0021 cm/hour.


To derive the initial absorption of neat TAME, the Kp for neat liquid has to be multiplied by the density. The density of TAME is 770 mg/cm3.

Therefore the initial absorption of neat TAME is 0.0021 cm/hour x 770 mg/cm3= 1.6 mg/cm2/hour


The above mentioned explanation can alternatively be expressed as follows:

Initial absorption (mg/cm2/hr) = rholiquid* (D/h)                                       [2]

(rholiquid is the density of the liquid (mg/m3); D is the diffusion coefficient of the liquid in the stratum corneum (cm2/hr); h is the thickness of the stratum corneum)


D/h = Kp/Km                                                                                          [3]

(Kp is the permeability coefficient; Km is the stratum corneum/water partition coefficient)


Substitution of equation 3 in 2 gives:

Initial absorption (mg/cm2/hr) = rholiquid* Kp/Km                                                                  [4]


The density of TAME is 770 mg/cm3; the Kp and Km were determined to be 0.0071 cm/hour and 3.34, respectively.

As such, the initial absorption (mg/cm2/hr) = 770 * 0.0071/3.34 = 1.6 mg/cm2/hour


In conclusion, the initial absorption of neat TAME is 1.6 mg/cm2/hour.

Correction for evaporation

Since TAME is very volatile, a strong competition between evaporation and skin absorption will occur in case the skin is exposed to neat TAME.

Based on the REACH Guidance appendix R14.1, it was calculated that the evaporation rate of TAME is 470 mg/cm2/hour.

Therefore, of each dose of TAME exposed to the skin, 0.34% (1.6/470) is available for skin absorption because of the majority of the TAME evaporates before absorption can occur.

As such, the percentage of dermal absorption of TAME is assumed considered to be 0.34%. For the calculation of the dermal DNEL, a percentage of dermal absorption of 0.4% is used (which is worse-case).



EHC 235 Environmental Health Criteria 235: Dermal Absorption, World Health Organization 2006.


ten Berge W, 2009. A simple dermal absorption model: derivation and application. Chemosphere 75(11), 1440-5.


Applicant's summary and conclusion