Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 946-101-1 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Based on the results of the in vitro tests, the test substance is considered to be not irritating to skin and eyes.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
In vitro skin irritation study:
An in vitro study was conducted to determine the skin irritation potential of the test substance according to OECD Guideline 439 and EU Method B.46 (Reconstructed Human Epidermis Test Method), in compliance with GLP. Human three dimensional epidermal models (triplicates) were exposed to 25µL test substance for 15 min. After a 42 hour post-incubation period, a determination of the cytotoxic (irritancy) effect was performed. Cytotoxicity was expressed as the reduction of mitochondrial dehydrogenase activity measured by formazan production from MTT at the end of the treatment. Skin irritation was expressed as the remaining cell viability after exposure to the test substance. The positive control (25 µL 0.5% SDS) had a mean cell viability of 5.3% after 15 ± 0.5 minutes exposure. The absolute mean OD570 (optical density at 570 nm) of the negative control (25 µL PBS) tissues was within the laboratory historical control data range. The relative mean tissue viability obtained after 15 ± 0.5 minutes treatment with the test substance compared to the negative control tissues was 99%. The standard deviation value of the percentage viability of three tissues treated identically was less than 16%, indicating that the test system functioned properly. Th experiment was considered valid. Since the mean relative tissue viability for the test substance was above 50% after 15 ± 0.5 minutes treatment, the test substance was considered to be non-irritant to human skin under the study conditions (Eurlings, 2016).
In vitro eye irritation studies:
1. An in vitro study was conducted to determine the eye irritation potential of the test substance according to OECD guideline 437 (bovine corneal opacity and permeability (BCOP) test), in compliance with GLP. Bovine corneas were exposed to the test substance for a period of 10 minutes (followed by a post-incubation of 2h with fresh medium). Opacity and permeability were measured and an in vitro irritancy score was then established. Physiological saline and ethanol were used as negative and positive controls, respectively. The corneas treated with the test substance showed opacity values ranging from 0.0 to 4.5 and permeability values ranging from 0.036 to 0.172. The corneas were slightly translucent after the treatment. No pH effect of the test substance was observed on the rinsing medium. The in vitro irritancy scores ranged from 0.6 to 5.2 after 10 minutes of treatment. The negative and positive control values were within the expected range; hence the experiment was considered valid. Under the study conditions, the test substance induced ocular irritation through both endpoints, resulting in a mean in vitro irritancy score of 3.3 after 10 minutes of treatment. Since the test substance induced an IVIS > 3 ≤ 55, no prediction on the classification can be made (Eurlings, 2016).
Another in vitro study was conducted to determine the eye irritation potential of the test substance according to OECD Guideline 492 (EpiOcular™ Cornea Epithelial Model), in compliance with GLP. The EpiOcular tissue construct is a nonkeratinized epithelium prepared from normal human keratinocytes. It models the cornea epithelium with progressively stratified, but not cornified cells. The test consisted of an application of the test substance (50 µL) to the surface of the cornea epithelial construct for 30 minutes. After exposure, the cornea epithelial construct was thoroughly rinsed to remove the test substance and transferred to fresh medium for an immersion incubation. After transfer to fresh medium for a 2 hours incubation period, determination of the cytotoxic (irritancy) effect was performed. Cytotoxicity is expressed as the reduction of mitochondrial dehydrogenase activity measured by formazan production from 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) at the end of the treatment (mean absorption measurement - optical density reading at 570 nm). Eye hazard potential is expressed as the remaining cell viability after exposure to the test substance. The relative mean tissue viability obtained after 30 ± 2 minutes treatment with the test substance compared to the negative control tissues was 85%. Since the mean relative tissue viability for the test substance was above 60%, the test substance was considered to be non-irritant. The positive control had a mean cell viability of 27% after 30 ± 2 minutes exposure. The absolute mean OD570 (optical density at 570 nm) of the negative control tissues was 1.5, which is within the acceptability range from > 0.8 to < 2.5. The standard deviation value of the percentage viability of two tissues treated identically was less than 11%, indicating that the test system functioned properly. It was concluded that this test was valid. Under the study conditions, the test substance was considered to be non irritant to human eye (Verbaan, 2017).
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the results of the in vitro skin and eye irritation tests, the test substance does not meet the criteria for classification for this endpoint according to CLP (Regulation 1272/2008/EC) criteria.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
Deze website maakt gebruik van cookies om het surfen zo aangenaam mogelijk te maken.